Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Oy
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Oy

Thursday, Jul 30, 2009

* The clueless Daily Herald editorial board continues its clueless ways

The [Cook] county board voted to give sheriff’s police the option of writing a $200 ticket for possession of small amounts of marijuana. This departs from state law, which requires suspects to be booked, jailed and slapped with a criminal record.

Um, no. State law allows local governments to hand out the tickets. If memory serves, that goes all the way back to Jim Thompson’s era.

* By the by, Glenview apparently has the ticket option. This is from a recent police blotter

Joseph Gizzi, 18, of 2413 Saranac Lane, Glenview, was charged with possession of between 2.5 and 10 grams of marijuana late Friday after police stopped the vehicle in which he was a passenger on the 1500 block of Milwaukee Avenue. Bond was set at $1,000 pending an Sept. 3 court date.

Jesus Rodriquez, 21, of 103 Main St., Northfield, was issued tickets for possession of marijuana and drug paraphernalia July 17 after police stopped him around 10:30 p.m. at 9th Street and South Branch.

Flavia Stavri, 19, of 7827 Beckwith Road, Morton Grove, was issued a ticket for possession of less than 10 grams of marijuana July 22 after an officer stopped him around 7 p.m. at Rugen Park, 2941 Harrison St.

After officers stopped a vehicle around 11 p.m. July 22 on the 9700 block of Milwaukee Avenue, Tomasz Dmyterko, 19, of 50 Stacy Court, Glenview, was issued tickets for possession of less than 10 grams of marijuana and minor in possession of alcohol and Alan Koszyk, 19, of 8440 W. Ciara St., Niles, was issued a ticket for possession of drug paraphernalia.

James Westhoff, 18, of 630 Locust St., Winnetka, was issued tickets for possession of less than 10 grams of marijuana and possession of a fictitious identification card after officers stopped him Friday evening outside Chestnut Wines, 1762 Waukegan Road.

Last I checked, Glenview was not in chaos.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

20 Comments
  1. - Speaking at Will - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 10:07 am:

    == Last I checked, Glenview was not in chaos. ==

    So a lack of Chaos is the new standard for success? Marijuana is illegal in the state of Illinois, this hodge podge enforcement / ticket writing in some places and jail time in other areas is chaos. Either legalize possession up to a certain amount statewide, or keep it illegal,

    This ticket writing for Marijuana shows that once again government is more concerned with revenue streams than making an attempt to curtail drug use.


  2. - wordslinger - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 10:15 am:

    This isn’t the first time the Herald editorial board has been averse to doing the reading.

    Still, it’s bizarre to write an editorial that presumes the county board is wantonly voting to defy state law. Journalism 101 would require you to check the facts before you write.


  3. - Objective Dem - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 10:23 am:

    If I’m not mistaken, a police record for drug possession also has all sorts of implications for student financial aid, ability to live in public housing, etc. I’m not sure if the ticket will have the same impact. I hope not because it makes the punishment disproportional to the crime.


  4. - The Doc - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 10:28 am:

    Speaking at Will, is it really that black and white in your eyes? I don’t hear much argument for legalizing marijuana. Alternatively, I think most folks realize jail time and/or a permanent criminal record is harshly punitive for a small amount of the stuff.

    What’s the problem with extracting a few bucks from violators? Certainly, a $200 fine is a deterrent, right?


  5. - Rob_N - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 10:29 am:

    Speaking, putting someone in jail costs a lot more than writing a ticket so it’s not just a “revenue stream” it’s a cost efficiency. You may not agree with the decision but the commissioners had to weigh how worthwhile and cost-effective it is to either lock up generally non-violent offenders or write them a ticket.

    Somehow I doubt the commissioners were seeing dollar signs as a result of writing tickets (rather than as a result of not having to expend the finances to house those offenders).

    Operating a jail is an expensive proposition.


  6. - ChiTownguy - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 10:32 am:

    I agree they should have checked the facts before writing this editorial. Silly mistake.

    I am a supporter of tickets versus criminal charges. However, my reading of the editorial didn’t come out so much against the law, as against the way and manner it was enacted - without consulting the sheriff’s office and by giving discretion to the officer writing the ticket.

    Unless I am missing some critical background information, both appear to be valid arguments. W

    Why not consult the sheriff beforehand?

    Why give officer’s discretion? Make it a ticket or don’t. Are there any other laws where a choice between ticket and jail is permitted?

    That should start a lively discussion here!


  7. - Speaking at Will - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 10:57 am:

    @ Rob N & The Doc.

    Your points are well taken on the costs of jailing small time drug offenders. Counties are struggling financially all across the state. I just dont like inconsistant application of the law. If we need to decriminalize marijuana through the reduction of the penalty for possession then great, lets do it. However this town by town free for all creates confusion, especially for those who are already baked by 10am.


  8. - Tunes - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 11:06 am:

    Cannabis should’ve been decriminalized long ago. This a huge step in the right direction. A victim-less crime if I ever heard of one. Now if the Federal government would only get their collective heads out of the sand and tax it- and take the $ out of the hands of the criminals, we’d all be better off for it…and No, I do not use it!


  9. - Velma D. - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 11:47 am:

    Speaking at Will, There has always been officer descretion involved in arrests. Remember station adjustments? Also consider underage drinking. There are state laws on the books on the topic (I’m talking just possession here, not driving). But much of the time municipal tickets are issued instead of an arrest. College towns utilize this a lot. Arrests occur if the problem is more serious or involves repeat offenders. I haven’t seen chaos or mass confusion resulting.

    Do you really think the Cook Co. court system handles minor pot possession consistently? Do you think the criminal courts take minor pot offenses seriously? Really?? Try sitting in a misdemeanor courtroom in the first district versus the second and see the difference. Then try a DuPage Co. Court, or Maybe Will Co., the same state law is interpreted differently all the time.

    I thing the real problem is that certain political toes were stepped on. As to the Herald, well, they need to do a bit of basic resarch before they start writing. Very sad.


  10. - Leroy - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 12:34 pm:

    OK, all you enterprising iPhone developers…come up with an app that displays a pot weed icon on the iPhone if you are in a pot friendly locale, and a mean looking cop if you aren’t.

    Should be easy.


  11. - Just Say No! - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 12:45 pm:

    It seems the only ones who are for de-criminaization are the ones who use marijuana themselves.

    Jail overcrowding and tax revenue are weak, baseless arguments for de-criminalization.

    Is pot addiction the sriving force here?


  12. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 12:52 pm:

    ===It seems the only ones who are for de-criminaization are the ones who use marijuana themselves. ===

    You are seeing only what you want to see.

    ===Is pot addiction the sriving force here? ===

    I don’t know what “sriving” means, but you got any real proof that pot is addictive?


  13. - Inish - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 1:03 pm:

    You don’t have to be pro pot to understand cost effective methodology…And the point of the post was that a major daily newspaper failed to do basic Journalism 101 level investigation.
    Perhaps the DH Ed board are all anti Bob Marley as well???


  14. - Inish - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 1:04 pm:

    That was a joke…who isn’t a Bob Marley fan…lol


  15. - 19th Ward - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 1:31 pm:

    -Just Say No!

    I’m not a pot smoker/drug user, but I’m all for de-criminalization.


  16. - Inish - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 2:01 pm:

    The county board vote is not about decriminalizing but a change of the consequence- ticket not jail


  17. - Ghost - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 3:23 pm:

    === de-criminalization ====

    it is still criminal. I do not understand why so many media outlets (and bloggers) insist on using this term.


  18. - MrJM - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 4:11 pm:

    As one who has never sampled pot, may I suggest the following 3-step plan:

    1. Decriminalize it.
    2. Regulate it.
    3. Tax it.

    – MrJM


  19. - Lynn S - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 11:41 pm:

    Speaking at Will–everytime the government tries to curtail drug use a black market and resultant law-breaking follow. Did you pay attention in your high school history class when they talked about Prohibition and the rise of the Mob in the 1920s?

    Oh, and by the way, marijuana was legal until 1937…


  20. - Lynn S - Thursday, Jul 30, 09 @ 11:52 pm:

    An Iphone app? OMG!!!!!!!! that is hilarious!!

    IF Apple would allow it, I imagine it may very well jump into the list of top 5 app sales within 2-3 days of its release! And the money they could make from it!! This is something you could price at $19.99, and folks would buy it because it would be sooooooooo much cheaper than a ticket!!

    It would be very easy to program this–you would just go off gps coordinates. The question, though, is how long your purchase would be good for (I would suggest at least a year), and are repurchases at original price or a lower rate?

    I’m going to have to call my brothers–they know programmers and could probably find a way to make $$$ on this.

    Rich–please don’t ever delete this post!! I will need it when I claim 10% of their Iphone app income!

    Thanks in advance for the belly laughs and the great idea!

    Lynn S. ;-)


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* State Journal-Register endorses Rauner "with reservations"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Pritzker campaign lawyer hints at defamation suit, claims campaign was never served
* Rauner says he's "trying to eradicate" the Madigan machine "cancer," but the "treatments are tough"
* Question of the day
* *** UPDATED x1 - Speaker Ryan to campaign for Davis *** Trump likely coming to Illinois to boost Bost
* Musical Interlude: Try (just a little bit harder)
* Tell me another fairytale, Grandpa
* Rauner again denies any delays at Quincy veterans' home
* "Speed dating" candidates
* Lawyer won't answer simple questions as some anonymous former Pritzker staffers speak out
* AFL-CIO launches "massive" digital ad buy
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller