SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Friday, Jul 31, 2009

* Ab Mikva is upset with US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald. You’ll all remember Fitzgerald’s press conference after Blagojevich’s arrest…

“The conduct would make Lincoln roll over in his grave,” Fitzgerald said the day of the Dec. 9 arrest. He also said Blagojevich had gone on “a political corruption crime spree.” And Robert D. Grant, head of the FBI’s Chicago office, told the same news conference that if Illinois “is not the most corrupt state in the United States it’s certainly one hell of a competitor.”

Mikva’s response yesterday…

“I certainly don’t like the prosecutor coming out and trying his case [in the media] and possibly tainting the jury pool with a big press conference announcing he has indicted so-and-so, or, in Blagojevich’s case, has arrested so-and-so — he hadn’t even reached an indictment yet,” Mikva saids at the American Bar Association convention.

“The argument is made by some prosecutors that this is a part of a public information factor of a prosecutor’s job, and they have to do it. That’s nonsense.” […]

“I suppose prosecutors have first amendment rights, but … somehow there’s something wrong and inconsistent with a prosecutor who is supposed to try that case in court and is supposed to be the public persona [of justice] announcing to the world that you’ve got this guy dead-to-rights and he should go to jail for a long time,” Mikva said. […]

Pressed on whether prosecutors such as Fitzgerald should make themselves available to answer questions from the press about newly-released indictments, Mikva conceded sometimes that was helpful and necessary with complicated cases, but he said the prosecutors should keep their answers unemotional.

A federal judge agreed

“I think that the indictment should be the news conference,” said Judge Paul L. Friedman of U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia, suggesting that reporters should get their information about the case from the indictment and prosecutors should not add facts not contained in that document.

* The Question: Did Fitzgerald go too far? And should US Attorney’s, the FBI and others in law enforcement avoid press conferences that stray from the cold facts of an arrest or indictment?

Explain both answers, please. Thanks.

- Posted by Rich Miller        


34 Comments
  1. - Obamarama - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 11:31 am:

    Yes Fitz went to far. Unless I missed Lincoln’s involvement in the indictment, that reference had nothing to do with informing the public about the facts at hand. By saying that Blago went on a political corruption crime spree, Fitz was asserting Blago’s guilt–or prosecuting from the podium if you will. If I am a member of the media seeking clarification on a complicated case, sensational rhetoric doesn’t answer my questions but rather taints my objectivity.

    As for avoiding press conferences that stray from the facts, of course they should. But that is in the hands of the person behind the microphone. Leave the subjectivity to the editorial boards, who will ultimately screw up the story, and then we can chastise them on CapFax. Everybody wins.


  2. - George - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 11:32 am:

    In a certain sense, Fitzgerald had to make his press conference meet the expectation of severity of arresting a sitting Governor in the wee hours of the morning, leading him on a path to being removed from office.

    I think the question of “too far” goes to whether or not they had the backup evidence at the time that made it an open-and-shut case, or if the real meat of the prosecution in the upcoming trial will come from evidence gleaned after the arrest (flipping harris, monk, kelly, etc.). The danger is that they don’t end up using any of the stuff that Fitzgerald highlighted in the press conference (maybe because they have better stuff), and that gives Blago an opening to say Fitzgerald tainted the jury pool, leaving him grounds for appeal and extension of the nightmare.

    So, we will have to wait and see if he went too far.

    But I think we would have all been shocked if the Press Conference was cold hard facts without some drama. We expected it to meet the moment, in a way.


  3. - George - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 11:35 am:

    Then again, “that would make Lincoln roll over in his grave” is a bit too far, regardless of everything I said above.

    That had no relevance to the case, and was an emotional appeal to the public.


  4. - Pot calling kettle - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 11:37 am:

    Yes, he went too far. He appeared to be grandstanding. It made him look like he was considering following other well-known prosecutors into elected office.

    There is always a chance that the accused is innocent, our system presumes innocence. People are often overwhelmed by the enormity of the crime and lose sight of the question of guilt. The press conference assumed guilt.

    By having a press conference, the prosecutor (or FBI) runs the risk of that vaulting into hyperbole and damaging the case. A press release listing the facts of the case would probably be the better option in most situations, especially the high profile ones. Once prosecutors and the FBI start fielding questions and answering on the fly, they are likely to say something they shouldn’t.


  5. - wordslinger - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 11:38 am:

    Yes, on both counts.

    Both Fitzgerald and Grant larded their statements with zingers that they hoped would lead the TV news. The facts spoke for themselves. The rest was piling on, lacked decorum and was unprofessional.

    (Don’t you hate giving Blago a break?)

    Once the Justice Department picks a target, they can devote unlimited resources to prosecution. That’s awesome power that should be devoted to trying their case in court, not in public opinion.

    Like Joe Friday, just the facts.


  6. - fed up - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 11:47 am:

    I too agree he went to far. I think Fitzgerald and Grant are frustrated with the size and scope of corruption in Illinois. They know they can only investigate a small percentage of the crimes being committed and may have been hoping to wake up the masses to start holding the states elected officals responsible for the sleazy state of affairs in this state.


  7. - Doug Dobmeyer - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 11:48 am:

    Fitzgerald embelished what was already a sensational case. If he had done any less, people might have thought him somewhat “dead to the world.”

    The issue remains could Blago or any governor arrested in the early morning hours, taken away in handcuffs would not taint the jury pool. Perhaps the mannerisms of the cops contributed more to the tainting then the US Atty.

    Doug Dobmeyer


  8. - downstate dem - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 11:53 am:

    It was such an emotional story, securing cause for the
    arrest of a sitting governor that I think everyone got caught
    up in the show.

    The governors antics almost begged for this type of story
    to come out when he was arrested.

    Was it right to make the allegations? No . . . and not very professional, but if I were in Fitz’s shoes I’m not sure I could have avoided the comments either.


  9. - jake - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 12:11 pm:

    I agree that he went too far, by all normal standards of prosecutorial behavior. The possible justification is that he was attempting to abort a crime in progress; i.e., the selling of the Senate seat. In order to prevent the continuation of a crime in progress, measures are sometimes justified that would otherwise not be.


  10. - lifer - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 12:43 pm:

    I think Fitz didn’t go too far. He tried to stop the selling of a senate seat (even arresting a governor didn’t appear to work in that regard he still appointed the Obama successor).

    FBI and prosecutors should only state the facts but then if they didn’t grand stand a bit would the press follow it?


  11. - Anon - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 12:44 pm:

    Yes and yes. It isnt mr. Fitzgerald’s job to editorialize on his department’s activities. he should report only the facts. I dont think one could argue that his comments didnt taint the opinion of every potential juror. If I were Blagojevich’s legal team, considering the various opinions out there from respected legal minds, I would seek to get the case thrown out.

    From the day he was arrested (being led out of his hime in handcuffs as a sitting governor is also a questionable tactic from a department of justice), he has been tarred and feathered in the court of public opinion. I believe that Mr. Fitzgerald lit that fire, and, as a result, Mr. Blagojevich will never receive a fair trial.


  12. - Will County Woman - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 12:48 pm:

    yes, fitzgerald went too far in his comments. and, when blago’s lawyers rightly asked that fitzgerald be removed the judge should have ganted the motion.

    by not doing so, the blago legal team has a good issue for an appeal—especially now with other federal judges weighing in on this issue.


  13. - Will County Woman - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 12:56 pm:

    and…yes federal prosecutors and law enforcement should stop with the law and order tv show theatrics, that they always claim only happens on tv and that no real self-respecting prosecutor would do. ;-)


  14. - jake - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:01 pm:

    I think there will not be problems with having a trial, since many of the items in the indictment were not dealt with in the news conference in question, which was at the time of the arrest. A very good consequence of the prosecutor’s behavior is that it gave the legislature enough backbone for impeachment and removal from office, which in my opinion was long overdue. It is true that the Mr. Blagojevich has subsequent to the arrest been all but convicted in the court of public opinion, but very little of that has been due to the prosecutor. A lot of it has been due to Mr. Blagojevich’s own behavior and the rest has been due to the irresistible nature of the story for both serious and satirical media.


  15. - Fed up - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:06 pm:

    Or is Mikva deflecting attention away from his unwillingness to press for Madigan to explain himself with regard to U of I clout list favors to constituents. Could any of those ‘favors’ have gone to donors by chance?


  16. - steve schnorf - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:21 pm:

    Of course he went too far: that has been his style pretty consistently the past few years, hasn’t it (Scooter Libby?).

    The idea that he had to because he was trying to stop a crime in progress is ridiculous: the arrest did that.

    T lest it wasn’t the OJ trial, but Mr Fitzgerald is following in the footsteps of the talking heads with 24 hours of air to fill, and that should be beneath him.


  17. - mac - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:34 pm:

    Yes he “misspoke”,as our President would explain it-but the commentary by these judges further these “mispoken” remarks.Would seem more prudent to have these judges air their complaints directly to Fitz or file a formal protest rather than help his remarks remain in the public eye by their publicizing their concerns at this date


  18. - heet101 - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:45 pm:

    Yes to both. Fitzgerald was grandstanding and came across as holier than thou and indignant. It reminded me of when you get pulled over by a cop and he tries to give you a moral lecture rather than just writing you the freakin’ speeding ticket and getting the business done. These prosecuting agents should absolutely avoid all the public pontification. The overall public impression of law enforcement officials would change for the better if there was a little less God-like vitriol and a little more sticking to the cold hard facts.


  19. - chuddery - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:46 pm:

    I don’t have any particular judgment regarding Fitzgerald’s conduct, but I don’t recall anyone here mentioning this when the indictments were handed down.

    It’s possible I missed some hand-wringing over Fitzgerald’s press conference while I was breathing a sigh of relief that Blago was stopped from selling a Senate seat, but 8 months after the fact the criticism seems a little excessive.


  20. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:51 pm:

    ===but I don’t recall anyone here mentioning this when the indictments were handed down.===

    I posted about a couple of things back then, actually.


  21. - sal-says - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:56 pm:

    Not to speak for Fitzgerald, but I suspect his words came from his apparent (and visible) anger at the egregiousness of goofy’s actions; wanting to seel the senate seat. Did he go ‘too far’? Did Blago?

    I suspect that some would argue what the ‘facts’ are in any statement law enforcement makes.

    Mikva? He’s the guy who ‘doesn’t want to micromanage’ the U of IL regarding whether or not the university’s leadership, who were involved in this sordid episode, should resign like he says the trustees should. But it’s apparently OK to criticize Fitz months after the fact? Hello?


  22. - Rich Miller - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:58 pm:

    ===But it’s apparently OK to criticize Fitz months after the fact? Hello? ===

    Let’s stick to the question, please. The subject came up at a panel discussion. It’s not like he just came out and held a press conference or something.

    Back to the question. Final warning.


  23. - Will County Woman - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 1:59 pm:

    @ chuddery
    national news media and pundits did weigh-in on this issue when it occured, and most, if not all, correctly concluded that Fitzgerald (and Grant) got a little too cute and gone too far.

    @ Mac
    the federal judges who have voiced their concern with fitzgerald, as I recall it, did so during a recent speaking enagement, in which they were first asked for their opinions. That they had not voiced any unsolicited opinions prior to the other day suggest that they were content to keep their opinions to themselves. Just because they dare to disagree with the Fabulous Mr. Fitzgerald, doesn’t mean you have knock ‘em by questioning their sincerity, does it?


  24. - slinger - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 2:01 pm:

    Didn’t Mikva get a big board appointment from Blagojevich that paid a decent amount of change? Just asking. I’m sure he shouldn’t have disclosed that to the ABA.


  25. - Jake from Elwood - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 2:02 pm:

    Mikva is wrong, Prof. Friedman is wrong and P.Fitz was wrong.
    Of course prosecutors should be allowed to have news conferences. The defense certainly gets the same right. They need not be limited to a factual recitation. P.Fitz overdid it with his hyperbole, but recognize that this was a unique factual setting.
    In sum, it should be permitted if not welcomed but a little more discretion is in order.


  26. - Ghost - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 2:08 pm:

    === Did Fitzgerald go too far? ===

    No, in fact he seemed to be acting in the same manner as Mikva.

    lets recall that Mikva is in the course of an investigation which has produced no final report wrapping up. I would consider that the equiaalant of the fed indcitment.

    However Mikva, while he is still investigating, stated to the press:
    === the University of Illinois trustees should all should submit their resignations. ===

    Apparently Mikva thinks conduct codes are for everyone else.

    === should US Attorney’s, the FBI and others in law enforcement avoid press conferences that stray from the cold facts of an arrest or indictment? ===

    Yes, but then again so should defense attorneys and defendants. It a defendant or his attorney may talk in a amnner that might taint the jury, why would we cripple the prosecutor? its either ok for all or ok for none.


  27. - Amy - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 2:20 pm:

    Yes the Northern District Attorney went too far with that news conference. it’s odd, but quite often he just does not know when to shut up. look his testimony in the Ambrose matter,
    the fed guy who blabbed to the mob, horrible, and not just for someone who is supposedly so smart. even someone who is
    not a lawyer could read that he said too much. (don’t care that
    the Feds won, Fitz talk in the witness box exposed him.)

    I do agree that he could have conducted that press conference and gone beyond just the simple facts, after all, he was stopping a crime in progress. but it’s how he did it, overacting, grandstanding.

    U.S. Attny Fitzgerald does not seem to be functioning in the same way, he’s not as good as he once was. Is he getting tired of the job? does he need a vacation? is he getting Obama syndrome? (need of a vacation, has to stay on prompter). what
    is changing him, making him not as good at his job?


  28. - Responsa - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 2:29 pm:

    I thought at the time that Fitz was being uncharacteristically dramatic in the news conference. But I think many of us also realized almost immediately that preventing the outright sale of a US Senate seat, (which would have happened had Fitz not turned the spotlight on right then and stopped it) was very important. The feds ultimately having to conduct the prosecution of a sitting governor AND a sitting(appointed) senator would have been really interesting and newsy, but horrible for our state and nation. Fitz is a hero on this one.


  29. - Cook County Moderate - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 2:31 pm:

    Yes he went to far, and it has become the status quo for him. He continually tries cases through the media, namely Chicago media who continues to paint him as a knight on a white horse that has come to save the public from rampant corruption. The true facts are known by him (his crew of attys.)and Blago. It is not his job to hand feed the public and the media what he deems as relevant information. His job is to try a case to a judge and a jury not to the numerous media outlets. They should have no bearing on the outcome. Any other atty. would be sanctioned severely for making these type of comments to the media, play fair and stop the double standards.


  30. - wordslinger - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 3:23 pm:

    –I don’t have any particular judgment regarding Fitzgerald’s conduct, but I don’t recall anyone here mentioning this when the indictments were handed down.–

    The indictments came months later, of course. There was a lot of discussion here in the days following the arrest as to whether Fitz and Grant went too far with their remarks.

    A lot.


  31. - lake county democrat - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 3:30 pm:

    Yes (but understandably and he didn’t go *that* far given the facts of the indictment almost speak hyperbole themselves) and Yes — the media will take care of that, thank you.


  32. - winco - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 3:52 pm:

    Did he go too far? The answer can be found in the the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct. While they are purposefully vague, because they were written by lawyers to apply to lawyers. But it is pretty clear he went too far. Rules 3.6 and 3.8 let prosecutors disclose the facts of an indictment or charge, but not the hyperbolic statements he made, and they are not even allowed to say “I think he’s guilty.”
    http://www.state.il.us/court/SupremeCourt/Rules/Art_VIII/default.asp
    Defense lawyers are similarly restricted, but all lawyers can make public statements if they believe they need to respond to the other side’s public statements or even just the facts out in the media from other sources.


  33. - chuddery - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 4:39 pm:

    Well I’m thoroughly chastened, and will stick to the QOTD rather than question it.


  34. - David - Friday, Jul 31, 09 @ 8:15 pm:

    He went too far. Even though it may prove to be true in the end, even a dope like Rod deserves his day in court before being declared guilty by anyone. There is only one thing we know for sure about Rod - He’s guilty!


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* In which I agree with the governor
* Stuff you may not know about Illinois pensions
* It's just a bill
* Question of the day
* AG Madigan wants expansion of hate crime law
* Déjà vu all over again
* Rauner defends grand bargain parameters
* "We are proud to call him one of our own"
* Springfield holds its collective breath as strike talk mounts, budget impasse continues
* *** LIVE *** House session coverage
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* LaHood, Bustos could reach out more to voters d.....
* Our opinion: Hey, lawmakers! Budget mess not a .....
* Our opinion: Hey, lawmakers! Budget mess not a .....
* Op-ed: Overly generous compensation drives Illi.....
* The Sunday Spin: Politics with Rick Pearson Ful.....
* Democratic State Sen. Daniel Biss Inches Toward.....
* Rauner’s office: Gov spends 55% of Illinois nig.....
* Jim Dey: Thinking ahead, Ammons endorses Prussing..
* Highest pay in nation not good enough for Illin.....


* Parking near Wrigley Field about to get more expensive
* Tight budget might mean no sheriff's patrols on Rock River
* Authorities shooting deaths of 2 was murder-suicide
* Father of dead Navy SEAL refused to meet Trump at ceremony
* 2 young girls found dead after Chicago house fire
* Lawyer for ex-Rep. Jackson seeks shorter supervision period
* Urbana man who killed son pleads guilty to 2nd-degree murder
* School seminar near Chicago sparks civil rights, race debate
* 3rd suspect in shooting death of Chicago toddler denied bail
* Illinois man charged in Iowa killing of girl has trial moved

* Sanctuary issue draws dueling demonstrations to Capitol
* Rauner's office: Gov spends 55% of Illinois nights at Mansion
* Report: State senator's law firm dealings under scrutiny
* Durbin wants open look at Russian involvement in election
* Trump puts moderate GOP governors in awkward spot
* Economic stakes high for Springfield in labor showdown
* AFSCME authorizes strike, but still wants to bargain with Rauner
* AFSCME members authorize leaders to call strike
* Madigan forms Illinois House panel to address school funding
* Ex-U.S. Rep. Jackson gets about $138,400 in annual benefits

* Like our roundup? Share it around.
* For Chicago museums, it pays to be on public land
* Exelon hunts more state nuke subsidies following Illinois win
* Let's pass a law: No Illinois budget, no one gets re-elected
* After Seaway, what a true community bank looks like


* In era of great young shortstops, do Cubs have 2 of game’s best?
* Pregnant nominee Natalie Portman says she’ll skip Oscars
* White Sox tip Rockies 7-3 for first Cactus League victory
* CPS teachers on their own for basic classroom supplies
* Oscar Fashions: Whose wearing what; ribbons make a statement
* ‘The Columnist’ types tale of journalism in a different era
* Man killed in single-vehicle crash on Edens near Glencoe
* Only one Bulls player deserves to wear No. 1 … Jimmy Butler
* Fun and bonding in White Sox clubhouse
* Laura Washington: Trump transgender order ‘about being cruel’


* Police say more than 100 Jewish cemetery headstones damaged in Philadelphia
* Tyler Saladino battling for a job in crowded White Sox infield
* Police: Mardi Gras crash suspect's alcohol level 3 times legal limit
* Sunday's recap: Cubs 1, Indians 1
* Denzel Valentine, Nikola Mirotic making most of latest opportunities
* Man was drunk when his minivan hit, killed pedestrian in Lansing: Prosecutors
* Joe Maddon impressed with Jason Heyward's modified swing
* Did the 2011 White House correspondents' dinner spur Trump to run for president?
* 'Knock them right in the face': Baylor coach's tone-deaf message on sexual assault scandal
* 1 dead in crash on Edens near Tower Road


» Chicagoans Rally To Support Trans Rights After Trump Rescinds Student Protections
» Rauner Has Plan To Keep Government Running In Case Of Strike
» Congressman Rush Declares His Offices As Sanctuaries
» Weekend Funerals For Young Victims Of Chicago Violence
» CPS Relents, Returns $15 Million to Poorest Chicago Schools
» Doctors Discuss Alternatives To Opioids For Pain
» State Week: Will AFSCME Strike?
» Illinois Lawmakers: NEIU Student Workers Can Only Keep Jobs If State Passes Budget
» Civil Rights Investigation Into Cicero Schools Not Its First
» Indivisible Illinois Activists Concerned About Bobby Rush's Absence From Congress


* Sanctuary issue draws dueling demonstrations to Capitol
* Angie Muhs: It's time to name another Reader Advisory Board
* Bernard Schoenburg: Duckworth names 'thoughtful' former boss to downstate post
* Statehouse Insider: It's not the money, it's the appearance
* Our View: It's time for penance at the Capitol
* Rauner's office: Gov spends 55% of Illinois nights at Mansion
* Community Foundation: Sister's legacy lives on through scholarship fund
* Report: State senator's law firm dealings under scrutiny
* Durbin wants open look at Russian involvement in election
* Charles Krauthammer: Trump and the ‘Madman Theory’


* SIUE’s Venessa Brown receives 2017 Insight Into Diversity Giving Back Award
* LIVE! Nebraska
* Pedestrian killed in Oakland
* Alex Heeb can be reached at 618-208-6451 or on Twitter @alexheebs.
* Calhoun commissioners examine burn bans
* Midland looks at adding ag tech classes
* Two dead in murder/suicide in Herrin
* Father of slain Navy SEAL from Peoria refused meeting with Trump
* ENGAGEMENT
* ANNIVERSARY


* IN Current Conditions
* Police say drunk driver caused Mardi Gras crash that hurt 28
* Leonard scores 25, leads Spurs to 119-98 rout of Lakers
* Parking near Wrigley Field about to get more expensive
* Greenwell sparks No. 13 Duke women 95-71 over Tar Heels

* Protesters converge on US Rep. Randy Hultg...
* GOP congressman appears to distance himsel...
* US Representative Randy Hultgren visits ne...
* Hultgren criticizes immigration ban, Roska...
* Hultgren to join veterans' forum at Geneva...
* Hultgren to participate in veterans forum ...
* Protesters Demand Town Hall Meetings From ...
* Majority of IL Congressional Delegation Op...
* Group upset with Trump wants Town Hall mee...
* US Congressman tours new Aurora Specialty ...

* Political math is not economic math - Wash......
* Durbin wants open look at Russian involvem......

* Senator Duckworth discusses infrastructure......

* This morning students at Swarthmore College are sitting-in, demanding that the administration divest in fossil fuel.
* Democratic Party suicide?
* Maryville East Coming Down Quickly
* #LibertysPromise
* The Democratic establishment.
* 81% of AFSCME Illinois state workers vote for strike authorization.
* Reading and slave insurrection.
* You’re not welcome here.
* Mem Fox’s read-aloud commandments.
* A win for Illinois special education students. We’re not done yet. Contact your Illinois legislators now.


* Governor Bruce Rauner Honors Carnegie Hero From Buffalo Grove
* Governor Addresses State Board of Education to Emphasize Importance of Strong Accountability Standards
* Stars and Legends to Perform at 2017 Illinois State Fair - First Round of Grandstand Headliners Announced for Springfield Fair
* Earthquake Education Kiosk Unveiled at University Mall in Carbondale - IEMA, Central U.S. Earthquake Consortium project will help southern Illinois residents reduce damage, injuries from earthquakes
* Governor Takes Bill Action

  
* MWC 2017: Google Assistant Expands Beyond Pixel to New Android Smartphones
* Google Photos is getting an ad spot during the Oscars
* Samsung Galaxy Tab S3 specifications
* Major U.S. carriers confirm LG G6 availability this spring
* The whole world is officially invited to witness the March 29 Galaxy S8 ‘Unpacking’ in NYC
* Watch Samsung’s first teaser for the Galaxy S8 launching in March
* Samsung’s Galaxy S8 debuting in New York City on March 29 at Unpacked event

* Asche gets White Sox started in Quintana's debut
* Collins, Moncada make Sox debuts in Cactus opener
* Fulmer looks to keep learning throughout spring
* Fulmer's strong start highlights Cactus opener
* Fulmer's strong start highlights Cactus opener
* White Sox trio nursing injuries as spring play begins
* Quintana eager to face USA, teammates in Classic


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller