Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » A new third rail? Plus, other hot buttons
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
A new third rail? Plus, other hot buttons

Tuesday, Jan 26, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller

* These Tribune poll results are why it was such a big mistake for Republican gubernatorial candidate Jim Ryan to say he’d be open to leasing the tollway system…

Oof.

From the Trib

Politicians who hope to gain traction with voters by urging that the Illinois Tollway be leased to a private company might want to rethink their strategy.

By overwhelming numbers, Republican and Democratic voters alike oppose privatization of the tollway system and believe it would lead to higher tolls, according to a Tribune/WGN-TV poll.

The statewide poll of likely primary voters, conducted Jan. 16 to 20, shows Democrats opposing privatization 72 percent to 14 percent, with 13 percent undecided. Republicans oppose the idea 65 percent to 16 percent, with 19 percent undecided.

Why? Among Democrats, 71 percent say tolls are certain to increase if the tollway is leased to a private company; 68 percent of Republicans feel the same way.

It’s a no-win idea.

This is what JRyan actually said

[Ryan] said, if elected, he’d consider leasing the Illinois tollway system to a private operator. And he said that on the same day that rates were increased on parking meters leased by Chicago to a private operator in one of the most politically unpopular deals in recent city history.

“I want to consider and will consider every innovative approach possible to address our budget problems,” said Jim Ryan, (R) candidate for governor.

The former attorney general–who the Tribune poll suggested is the frontrunner for the Republican nomination for Illinois governor– says leasing the suburban tollway system to a private operator might be the key to bailing out Illinois from its $13 billion budget hole.

“I’m willing to put everything on the table and take a look at it,” said Ryan.

Tollway users, however, have seen what happened when the Skyway was leased: Rates went up. And everybody has seen what happened to the price of Chicago parking meters when they were leased to a private company.

It could bring in big bucks, but it’s a killer issue. The Tribune didn’t post its crosstabs, so we don’t know how this breaks down by region, but I’d bet that the suburbs don’t love it.

* On another hot button topic, the Rockford Register-Star actually editorialized earlier this week in favor of video gaming for its city

The revenue generated by these video games is for a specific purpose. It will go to help pay off the bonds for the state’s long-needed and often neglected capital construction plan. Video gaming makes up 25 percent of the revenue to pay those bonds and we’re worried that if revenues fall short, other taxes may be raised.

Video gambling is already going on illegally. The state is legalizing the activity and taking its share.

We believe there are social costs to gambling but also think that government should only go so far to protect us from ourselves. People who are susceptible to addictive behaviors will find an outlet.

It’s time to take advantage of new legal sources of revenue.

Common sense on an editorial page. Who woulda thunk it?

Whatever the case, the editorial appeared to work. The city council refused to opt out last night.

* Right next door in Machesney Park, the village zoning commission voted for strict restrictions on campaign yard signs

The village’s Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-1 Monday to recommend approval of a law that would limit campaign signs to 6 square feet per side in residential areas and 9 square feet per side in all other areas of the village.

Only one political sign per candidate or issue would be allowed on any lot, with the exception of corner lots, which are allowed two signs. […]

Opposing candidates would be restricted from placing signs within 10 feet of each other, and signs would not be allowed to be displayed more than 60 days before an election.

Violators would have their signs removed and could be fined up to $50 per violation.

[Oops. Misread the darned story. But it’s still a goofy idea.] OK, for starters, that one sign limit is just goofy. What if the husband and wife are on different sides of a campaign? I can tell you from my own experience growing up, that happens a lot.

And candidates can’t place signs within 10 feet of each other? Who’s gonna get the fine? Both? So, what if a candidate complies with this rule and puts up a sign, then another candidate violates the rule and places the sign right next to it? This also happens all the time. Which one gets dinged?

Silliness.

* Related…

* Referendum to seek voter input about wind turbines in McLean, Livingston counties: Ballots in White Oak Township in McLean County will carry three referendum questions concerning the White Oak Energy Center. The advisory propositions seek input on whether a moratorium should be issued through Dec. 31, 2013, on issuing special-use permits for new wind turbines near Carlock. A second question asks voters if a requirement that new township road agreements should be finalized before extensions of special-use permits are granted for wind turbines in the township. The third question asks whether measures should be taken to protect the property values of White Oak Township residents before permits are extended.

       

13 Comments
  1. - corvax - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 10:51 am:

    I’m a little sensitive to this sign issue after a run-in with my local municipality during the 2004 senate primary over my Obma lawn sign.

    How can these towns even begin to think about restrictions on political speech? the only legitimate concerns i can see are public safety if large signs impair drivers (but then the ordinances should be content-neutral, e.g., just as applicable to the local Realtor(c)(who certainly won’t stand for a time limit in this market!) and not targeted at campaign signs) and litter if the wind blows then away (for which there are already ordinances)

    Plus, what’s a “campaign sign”? could I have had an “Impeach war criminal Bush” sign up for only 60 days of an 8-year term? or had to take down a “Dump Blago” (who is less Serbian than i am although I am not Serbian) sign after 2 months?


  2. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 10:51 am:

    The idea of leasing the tollways is radioactive because, for the last 30 years, underdog office-seekers have tried to make noise by pledging to make them freeways.

    Of course, the one thing Downstate Dem and GOPers can agree on is that they don’t want the tollway rolled into IDOT. So it will never happen.


  3. - SweetLou - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 11:00 am:

    That Machesney Park law would have to be unconstitutional. It’s a clear violation of political speech. Just absurd.


  4. - frustrated GOP - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 11:07 am:

    so having wind turbines that generate clean electric and property tax dollars is bad how? give me a break. We don’t need a democratic state run government to keep jobs out of the State, only a bunch of NIMBY’s running around.


  5. - zatoichi - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 11:13 am:

    What do people think a lease arrangement does? Is the leaser coming in to do it for free? Of course rates will go up. The lease is simply a cover for ‘I did not raise taxes’. The profits that state could of had simply go to someone else.

    So when will the lawsuit come in Machesney Park because Smith’s sign is 9 feet from Jones and Jones claims to have had their sign up first? Let’s see 12 signs will need 120 linear feet. Must be some big lots there.


  6. - Louis G. Atsaves - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 11:31 am:

    This sounds similar to the yard sign ordinance in my city (Lake Forest). Only one sign per candidate. Restricted to small yard signs only with a height restriction. Must be a certain number of feet from the center of the road, making most sign postings on some residential side streets legal only if they are almost directly in front of your house. Limited to a certain number of days before the election and must be down almost immediately after the election.

    Message signs can stay up forever. “Support the Troops. End the War.” is a fixture on some Democratic lawns, although after Obama announced we were staying longer in Iraq and would surge in Afghanistan, many of those signs suddenly came down.

    So with my city lot type of front yard, I can put down one sign for each candidate. If 100 candidates are on the ballot, I can annoy our city officials and all the neighbors by putting up 100 signs, one for each of them.

    Usually 4 is the maximum for common sense reasons.


  7. - Kyle Boller's Clipboard - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 1:03 pm:

    People are clearly against selling or leasing the tollway. They’re also against raising taxes and fees and cutting important services. They’re against the state going bankrupt. They’re probably okay with cutting pensions, unless they’re in a union, in which case they’re against it — and if they’re union, they’re more likely to vote, be involved in the political process, etc.

    In other words, if you take each individual strategy that might help solve the state’s budget crisis, people are against all of them. Otherwise we would have done them already and not been in the crisis.

    I’m not actively for selling or leasing the tollway in the abstract, but compared to some of the other options, it may start to look awfully appealing come mid-May.


  8. - in the left lane - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 2:11 pm:

    If we’re trying to raise general revenue by increasing tolls, why do we need to lease the tollways to a middleman? Can’t the state just raise the tolls itself? Why is everyone so eager to give up control of public infrastructure these days?


  9. - b dogg - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 3:08 pm:

    The arguments in the rockford editorial are relevant to the drug war as well. End the drug war!


  10. - Plutocrat03 - Tuesday, Jan 26, 10 @ 3:32 pm:

    The toll roads were intended to collect $$ to pay their own way. Seems fraudulent to change the laws to provide freeways to another group of people.

    If the toll roads are proposed good enough for the residents of northern Illinois, then make the other proposed roads toll roads as well.


  11. - Angry Chicagoan - Wednesday, Jan 27, 10 @ 9:02 am:

    The elephant in the room that everyone is skirting around is that almost all these privatization deals — the parking garages, the parking meters, the Indiana Toll Road — have been huge giveaways to the lessee. The only one where the public sector got anything like fair market value (considering where the tolls are set) is the Chicago Skyway, and that was a fluke; four bids close to the giveaway rate that was also the city’s estimate, and then Cintra-Macquarie coming in at more than double. And even they will make plenty of money on the deal.

    These lease deals are robbing taxpayers, usually for short-term budget balancing. In the case of state-owned assets they additionally rob one part of the state for the benefit of another.

    The best solution, in my view, is for the state to no longer fund superhighways but put what resources it has into repairing the basic road network and making it safe; reconstructing, adding shoulders, adding turn lanes and so on. Divided highways should be tolled — without exception — statewide.


  12. - Angry Chicagoan - Wednesday, Jan 27, 10 @ 9:05 am:

    And to clarify; the superhighway network should still be state owned. With a tolled network, we’d have to decide whether we want something basic, along the lines of the 2.8 cents a mile I-pass/5.6 cents cash, to keep the superhighways maintained; or if we’d want a higher rate to subsidize other state capital projects, such as the two-lane road network, rail, schools and so on.


  13. - remember the facts - Wednesday, Jan 27, 10 @ 9:06 am:

    There was a vote to build the tollway (commonly called the tri state) when the bills were paid for the construction - IT WAS TO BECOME A FREEWAY - this vote was a long time ago - and we still have tollways - why have a referendum that will be ignored


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Showcasing The Retailers Who Make Illinois Work
* Reader comments closed for the holidays
* And the winners are…
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to previous editions
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Report: Far-right Illinois billionaires may have skirted immigration rules
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards (Updated)
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller