21 Comments - wordslinger - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 10:55 am: Those guys always want more, and will drown you in paper and numbers justifying it until your brain is numb. Not right now, guys. Everyone’s cutting back. Enjoy your current profits. - fedup dem - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 10:56 am: If Rep. Bradley was really sharp he would announce that he plans to have Impeachment resolutions ready to be filed against any ICC member who supports the proposed increase. He should also announce that if the increase is approved, he will file an amendment to zero out of the budget all funding for the ICC (save for the salaries of the Commissioners) for the coming year. The argument for that would be that Illinois residents can get screwed by the utilities just as easily without also having to pay for a body to rubber-stamp increases! - LN - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 11:05 am: @fedup dem: Actually, after the ICC approved Ameren’s rate increase last year Rep. Bradley filed a bill that would make drastic changes to the ICC including publicly electing non-partisan board members. HB 4255. http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocTypeID=HB&DocNum=4255&GAID=10&SessionID=76&LegID=47133 - Team Sleep - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 11:05 am: I recently watched “The Informant!”, and reading this post really got the old hamster wheel turning. Maybe it’s time for CUB to take their concerns to the USDOJ and ask U.S. Attorneys Courtney Cox, Roger Heaton & Patrick Fitzgerald to open an investigation, which would in turn lead to an (albeit small) antitrust case with the end game of breaking up Ameren and ComEd’s grasps on Illinois. Ameren was allowed to essentially swallow up UE, CILCO, IP and CIPS. Their initial motive should have been enough of a red flag. Their current motives should certainly be scrutinized and possibly even bring action against the company. Ameren’s ownership of four other major utilities allows them to set prices and keep the market clamped in their favor. It is amazing nothing bigger has been done to stop them. - Tom Joad - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 11:12 am: Jacobs and Clayborne have been toadies for the utilities and polluters since they came to the Senate. Jacob’s dad, the former Senator, lobbies for ComEd and works out of his son’s office. A conflict of interest if there ever was one, and a mususe of state property. This misuse of the committee should come as no suprise. - Loop Lady - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 11:20 am: Well said Tom…these two jamokes need an eye or four kept on them please… - TaxMeMore - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 11:29 am: Chicago charges up to a 15% tax rate on electricity usage for individuals. I guess Bradley only cares about the poor people downstate, not the poor people in Chicago getting gouged by Chicago’s outrageous electricity tax. I get a kick out of all these progressive/liberal/Democrats pretending to care about the little guys having to pay more for electricity, except when it is their outrageous tax policies that hurt the poor. Call up CUB and ask them for a list of the tax rates paid on utilities in Illinois. They won’t have it, because they don’t care if poor people have to pay unavoidable, high electricity taxes. - VanillaMan - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 12:03 pm: Are public utilities non-profit? Are we expecting these companies to be run for free? When we see tough economic times, are we going to start demanding that these private companies become philanthropic? What gives? Why the anger over providing a public utility and getting a profit? And what does it mean when it is reported as a “record profit”? Once again, the ICC doesn’t allow private utilities to exceed a profit level of 6-7%. That is a low profit line that has been in place historically based on whether we can get full service from these private utility companies. When profits are too low - they can’t do their jobs and provide the utility. When they are too high - then it appears that the utilities are scalping customers via their power monopoly. So, we have a state agency that ensures the balance. Yet, we have politicians who want to make hay out of this. They want to fingerpoint, and claim that any business that is overseen by a governmental agency, should be forced to sacrifice so that the politicians and their failures don’t cost them their political elections. The utilities always ask too much. The ICC always returns to the historic base equation of profit percentages. It is all a big game with rules that have been decided generations ago. No one is getting screwed or the complicated relationships between customer, provider and government will collapse, giving us NO utilities. - Will - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 12:45 pm: Vanilla man, no they aren’t public utilities. They’re private monopolies. If they were publicly owned utilities we’d have better service and lower rates. Illinois would be better off if Ameren were driven out of the state and their executives hauled into court. - Joe - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 12:47 pm: “Communities throughout Southern Illinois are facing the highest unemployment rates in recent history,” the Marion Democrat said. “Those workers who have managed to keep their jobs are facing cutbacks to their hours and benefits. For Ameren to ask these people to fund an increase so that their executives can see another year of growing profits is frankly appalling.” Hmmm! Does Senator Bradley consider himself to be one of those getting less pay and benefits? Typical political hypocrisy. - TaxMeMore - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 1:06 pm: “If they were publicly owned utilities we’d have better service and lower rates.” We’d be more likely to have contaminated Crestwood government water statewide with everyone paying a 15% electricity tax rate with the way politicians run things in Illinois. Anybody charged with a crime yet in Crestwood for that publicly owned utility poisoning its residents, Will? Illinois would be better off if Democrats were driven out of the state and their party leaders hauled into court. - Sick of it! - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 1:42 pm: If Ameren is such a huge profit machine then why is it’s stock price around half of what it was 2 years ago along with. Smaller dividend? - VanillaMan - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 2:03 pm: They’re private monopolies. You really haven’t a clue, do you? You must be basing your views on the Springfield in The Simpsons. Dude - that’s a cartoon. Anyone can own stock in these companies, which means that they are not private. Since 1997, with Electric Deregulation, they are also not a monopoly either. You must not have electricity, or you’d be able to watch television news and discover these things. - CircularFiringSquad - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 2:03 pm: Meanwhile let’s all buy into the StateWideTom.Tribune plan to weaken the caucuses so there will be no one to stand up to these special interests….good timing SWTom BTW anyone standing around BillTheBuilder victory tour to see if he is against the rate hikes….hmmm How about LilLumberJack???? Yea or nay - Sangamon Sage - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 3:12 pm: Technically AMEREN/UE may not be a monopoly but, south of I-80 they have the lion’s share of customers by far. It also is not an open marketplace either. If I choose to live in Taylorville, my electric and gas are furnished by AMEREN/UE - I have no choice in providers. Finally, the ICC has shown time and again that they are political appointees shilling for the utility industry. If the ICC were even handed there would be no need for CUB to protect consumers’ interests. - reality hits home - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 4:19 pm: Bradley should have thought about that when he supported the Ameren bailout 3 years ago. The Republicans railed that there was NO language in the bill to prevent future rate hikes. I believe this is the second rate hike request since then. Of course, I’m sure Bradley will forget to mention this as he wines for the next several weeks. - Retired State Employee - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 6:04 pm: VanillaMan - I would like you to tell me how to take advantage of deregulation. Of course it turns out that didn’t work. Even if I could buy power from some other source, I would still have to pay Ameren for the delivery of that power. And after 13 years, I still can’t buy power from any other source. It might be a public company, it might not be a monopoly, but they have captive customers. Call it what you want. Part of the problem is people like me. I have cut my power usage by 30%. The unintended consequences of energy efficiency is reduced demand and reduced income for the power companies so they have to increase their rates. - wordslinger - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 7:04 pm: –You must not have electricity, or you’d be able to watch television news and discover these things.– VMan, that’s hilarious. I have no doubt that television news (Fox Hillbilly) is your intellectual lifeline. I’m sure they have lots of stories on public utilties. Right up your alley, slick. - Some Guy - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 8:22 pm: I don’t like these utilities tub thumping for more conversion to natural gas. They will want to run their new plants on it. The natural gas has to be piped in from out of state, and is and will be subject to wild market fluctuations by the actions of speculators. Is it better than coal, yes, but not by all that much. All I ever hear from my friends living in Ameren country is tale after sad tale of how this big company bought up the small local utility and basically stripped it for liquid assets, without going out to do the extensive updating and maintenance that had been deferred by the failed utility. When those ice storms and tornadoes hit down south, the Ameren-served areas were down more often and for much longer than other utilities, my friends tell me it is because the old distribution - the poles and wires - were worn out and thus failed more extensively and took longer to repair. - Seyi - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 11:01 pm: A move towards a more customer focused sector is what the utility industry needs. Only when the Comed’s and Ameren’s of this world realize that their role is to provide customers a service will they start buckling up. Retail/the market model, which is being rolled out in the supplier sector, is seriously required in the generation sector. - Tim - Monday, Mar 8, 10 @ 11:13 pm: Business owners should turn to innovative new companies to fight these rate increases. For instance, Power2Switch allows companies to reduce electricty rates by offering alternatives to Ameren and Commonwealth Edison. The service is completely free and offers a number of ICC registered suppliers in Illinois. Check them out at: http://www.power2switch.com Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.