Quinn’s campaign manager hire now official
Tuesday, May 11, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I told subscribers about this a week ago. Gov. Pat Quinn finally has a new campaign manager, but he’s from Wisconsin, of all places…
The chief of staff to Wisconsin Lieutenant Gov. Barbara Lawton is leaving to run the election campaign for Democratic Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn.
Ben Nuckels has been Lawton’s chief of staff since February 2007. Lawton announced Nuckels’ move to the Quinn campaign on Tuesday.
Nuckels left Lawton’s office briefly last year to work on her campaign for governor. But when she dropped out of the race, Nuckels rejoined her Capitol staff.
A photo from his Facebook page. Kinda on the young side…
So, Quinn waits over three months to hire a campaign manager, but he’s a young out-of-stater who hasn’t run anything in Illinois. Welcome to the bigtime, Mr. Nuckels. Good luck. You’re gonna need it.
…Adding… With a hat tip to a commenter, check out Gov. Quinn’s heavily ironic quote from yesterday…
“When there’s a job to be done, look to Illinois workers because they are second to none.”
That slogan apparently only applies to the private sector, not to campaigns.
…Adding More… This is essentially something that I pointed out to subscribers last week and brought up in comments today…
The fact is [that] Quinn is Quinns campaign manager. He does not want anyone around him to contradict his thinking. This guy is going to be asked to coordinate Quinn’s direction and he very well may be up to that limited task.
125 Comments
|
A closer look at the budget battle
Tuesday, May 11, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The Decatur Herald & Review editorial page writes about something I told subscribers this week…
The House and Senate adjourned Friday night after it became clear that more negotiations were needed to come up with a plan that could gain approval. According to the Capital Fax newsletter, the delay is necessary so the governor can negotiate with some legislators about including pet projects in the budget.
Whatever the cause, the rank and file was told to go home for a few days, with the promise they would be called back to approve a budget.
Actually, it’s more involved than that, but thanks for the hat tip anyway. The table is being set for a deal on the worst possible budget ever, but it’ll still be more politically palatable than forcing citizens to face up to the harsh realities that deep cuts and revenues are both needed.
* I seriously doubt that this is the case…
Maybe, possibly, potentially (one never really knows when one lives in a state controlled by Sorcerer Madigan and his apprentices, who chant vague incantations in their shrouded backrooms), [House Speaker Michael Madigan is] stalling until Republicans will be forced into the game.
It’s then, after May 31, that passing a budget would require GOP votes too, and another party would be forced to share the voters’ ire when the consequences come to light.
That would, of course, force Republican gubernatorial candidate Bill Brady to step up and declare himself and present his budget solution before voters pull the lever to elect him on some vague and generic feel-good promises.
First, the House Republicans have only one real targeted member, Rep. Reboletti. The rest of the game will be played on almost purely Democratic incumbent turf. That means the Republicans can easily afford to stay in Springfield and keep vulnerable Democrats pinned down behind their desks, instead of out walking precincts. I have yet to ever see the minority party exclusively blamed for an overtime, or for an overtime dragging itself out. So, if this thing goes past June 30th, the Republicans have no real incentive to cut a deal until, well, election day.
And I’m not sure, either, that Brady will ever get smoked out on his full budget plan. Most likely, he’ll just introduce some amendments to eliminate things like the State Board of Education, which is one of his campaign promises, but only accounts for about $27 million in personnel and operating expenditures - and all but $3 million of that is slated for running student assessment programs.
* SJ-R…
It’s a good thing Illinois legislators blew out of town on Friday without passing a state budget because the options they produced were the worst yet in what is now a seven-year fiscal debacle.
We’ve had a nasty structural deficit in this state for years, but the latest problem goes back to the 2001 recession. Nine years, not seven. George Ryan did a yeoman’s job of cutting the budget, but it wasn’t enough and ever since then they’ve been using one-off patchwork solutions to “fix” the problem. As Steve Schnorf has said before, they’ve been spending like they passed a major tax hike without ever actually passing a tax hike. Not to mention the revenue crash.
21 Comments
|
* It’s been reported that Sen. Bill Brady lobbied the House Republicans hard against borrowing to make the state’s scheduled pension payments. Brady has called the governor’s pension borrowing idea “kicking the can down the road,” and “digging the hole deeper” for the state. And we’ve already pointed out that Sen. Brady actually has proposed borrowing to eventually balance the budget, despite his statements to the contrary.
But back in February, Brady outlined - you guessed it - a pension borrowing plan to Crain’s…
[Brady would] fill much of the existing $80-billion hole in the state’s pension plans by borrowing. The borrowing would be repaid by allotting much of the natural growth in state revenues to pension debt service, he says.
Yesterday, Gov. Pat Quinn’s campaign issued this statement about Brady’s denial that he’d ever supported a ten percent across the board budget cut when he clearly had…
“It’s important for voters to ask: Is this someone who doesn’t comprehend his own budget proposal? Or is it that Sen. Brady simply cannot recall his numerous statements about the budget over the past five months?”
Brady’s lack of comprehension appears to apply to almost all of his major budget plans: Borrowing, pension borrowing and across the board cuts. Sheesh.
* Speaking of yesterday’s kerfuffle, my intern Dan Weber broke the story yesterday that Republican gubernatorial candidate Bill Brady was contradicting himself on his previous support for a ten percent across the board state budget cut. Brady claimed during a media availability last week that he never supported an across the board cut and Dan pounced while other reporters let it go. He pressed Brady to admit that he had, in fact, supported an across the board budget cut. Brady challenged Dan to “find it on tape” and Dan did. He also found other quotes of Brady in news articles claiming that the GOP candidate did, indeed, support an across the board cut.
Well, Carol Marin led off her segment last night with Dan’s story, which she unfortunately attributed to me…
At least she got the news source right. The AP then picked it up without any attribution at all…
Bill Brady is taking issue with a politician’s comments on how to solve the state’s budget crisis. Problem is, that politician is himself.
Brady, the Republican candidate for Illinois governor, bristled last week when a reporter asked about his proposal for a 10 percent, across-the-board cut in state spending.
“I’ve never said ‘across the board.’ I’ve never said ‘across the board.’ You find it on tape,” the Bloomington state senator said.
In fact, Brady has called for “across the board” cuts on multiple occasions.
The AP is the media giant most upset with little ol’ bloggers rewriting their stories without attribution, yet here they do exactly the same thing as those hated Huffington Post aggregators, but don’t even provide a link. That’s outright theft in my book.
The Tribune also picked up Dan’s story and attributed it to Chicago Tonight, not Dan…
Republican governor candidate Bill Brady sought today to tamp down a flap over his plans for the state’s deficit-plagued budget after previously calling for 10 percent across-the-board cuts, then denying it.
“It’s how the question is framed. And I will admit it’s a matter of semantics,” Brady, a veteran state senator from Bloomington, said during an interview on WTTW-Ch. 11’s “Chicago Tonight.” “But what I simply say is that I have to reduce spending by 10 percent. No area of state government shall be (protected) from reduced spending. Pretty much it is every area.”
And the Sun-Times, which is usually good about crediting (mainly because they get to plug me as a Sun-Times columnist), said it all came from the governor’s campaign…
Quinn’s campaign wasted little time Monday digging up news clippings and a Jan. 13, 2010 video posted on Youtube.com in which Brady did just that.
Actually, the video they used in their online story was the same one Weber used, and it wasn’t from the governor’s campaign, it was posted months ago by Jeff Berkowitz’s guy.
The big boys really need to grow up and stop pretending that alternative media doesn’t exist and, therefore, is not deserving of any credit. I’ve dealt with this for 20 years, and now Dan is getting a little taste of it. I don’t think he’s enjoying it. Enough, already.
*** UPDATE *** Nice catch by Progress Illinois from Brady’s appearance on Chicago Tonight yesterday…
BRADY: I call for elimination of the State Board of Education: $80 million a year spent. … Now, I’d create a downsized department, so that we provide the necessary –
MARIN: So it wouldn’t be a total $80 million.
BRADY: No, but let’s say half — $40 million.
“Half” is not “eliminate.”
*** UPDATE 2 *** Zorn posts the entire transcript of the Chicago Tonight interview and notes how Brady twice tried to excuse his denials over ever saying he was for an across the board budget cut. Zorn’s conclusion…
Either Brady doesn’t know what “semantics” means or he’s a liar
Ouch.
* Related…
* Edgar isn’t sold on Quinn, Brady plans: Speaking of the Democratic and Republican candidates for the office he once held, former Gov. Jim Edgar said “both are right and both are wrong.” … “We are going to have to raise taxes,” Edgar said Monday night in a question-and-answer session at the McLean County Museum of History. “We have to do the cuts first and then increase taxes.” Edgar said the cuts will need to be “brutal.” “Everyone in this room is going to be mad if they are done right. It’s going to have to affect everyone.”
* Lawmakers’ furloughs not as costly
* Illinois can’t afford holiday on sales taxes
* Where there’s smoke, there’s ire
* Our View: Stop delaying and start leading in Springfield
* Lawmakers shirk their duty on budget
* Our Opinion: Lawmakers hit new low in irresponsibility
* Legislature shows it lacks leadership
* IL lawmakers continue to debate budget
82 Comments
|
Ledes, heds and other stuff
Monday, May 10, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
* I just “love” ledes like this…
E-mails and other records of Dr. Eric Whitaker — one of President Obama’s best friends — have been subpoenaed by a federal grand jury, the Chicago Sun-Times has learned.
Eleven grafs down, we get this crucial bit of information…
Nothing in the subpoenas suggests Whitaker or Golden are targets of the investigation, and a spokesman for the two said they have not been subpoenaed personally or questioned by authorities.
But it’s a juicy lede, so therefore it runs.
* The Tribune editorial board must’ve swallowed hard before they ran their Sunday edit about some of the decent things the General Assembly has accomplished this session. I kid. Maybe they are starting to abandon their breathless rants. Oh. Wait. I forgot to read the lede…
They squandered months when they could have restructured state spending, dropped the ball on ethics reforms, and cruelly stymied a voucher program that would have offered hope to 30,000 kids languishing in Chicago’s worst schools. But lawmakers settled other issues in their ultimately failed rush to end their session three weeks early.
* While keeping my fingers crossed that I’m not accidentally “pulling a Brady,” I do not believe I have ever written this phrase since it is so tired and hackneyed…
This much is certain:
I checked the Google and didn’t see violations on my part, but that doesn’t cover the subscription portion.
* Maybe a little too thorough?…
As confirmed by multiple sources Friday afternoon – including his own office – the Illinois governor will take part Monday morning in a labor rally planned outside the LyondellBasell plant on U.S. 6. He is scheduled to speak at 10 a.m.
* The headline is self-promotional nonsense…
House sends controversial banking bill to Gov. Quinn
It was only “controversial” because the Trib made a mountain out of an ant hill last week. Actually, it wasn’t even that.
* How many people really remember this?…
Last year the state eliminated the food tax break for candy and soft drinks and caught hell for it from those who thought lawmakers were playing nanny.
I doubt anybody is up in arms about this today.
* Ummm…
Those most adamantly opposed to term limits keep building a stronger case for them than any proponent could muster.
I sure hope the League of Women Voters doesn’t take up that constitutional amendment push. It’ll be a sure-fire loser.
* Oy…
In [Metra Director Phil Pagano’s] pocket was found a final mocking gesture flipped at the organization that was about to humiliate him:
It was a Metra manual on how to handle service disruptions in the event of a suicide.
* Roundup…
* McPier and more
* McCormick reform package sent to Gov. Quinn
* McPier Overhaul Awaits Governor’s Signature
* Launch real reform with legal bribery
* Our View: State phone law set for 21st century, so long as consumers protected: Though the bill passed unanimously in the Legislature - mostly in the hope it will provide more jobs and investment - the Citizens Utility Board and the AARP remain opposed, fearing that rural parts of downstate will be left behind in favor of wiring Chicagoland, and that land-line rates will end up spiking. Indeed, the phone companies managed to get dropped a pre-existing mandate that at least 90 percent of downstate have access to broadband, though they pledge to follow through anyway since it’s arguably in their interest to build their customer base.
* DuPage eyes payback for state
* House sends controversial banking bill to Gov. Quinn
* Senate sends nursing home reforms to governor’s desk
* Advocates: Nursing home bill would raise standards
* Questions linger over telecom overhaul
* Illiana Expressway Moving Ahead
* Legislative wrapup
11 Comments
|
Question of the day
Monday, May 10, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
* The setup…
Friday, state Sen. Dan Kotowski, a Democrat from Park Ridge, charged on the Senate floor that [Sen. Dan Duffy, a Republican from Barrington] abused his elected powers in a different way. A letter Duffy mailed to constituents in March seeking campaign donations featured a replica of the Illinois State seal - an image Kotowski said has no business appearing in materials related to campaigns. […]
“I don’t want to give the impression that the state has sanctioned my fundraising activity,” [Kotowski] said.
Duffy said that appearance doesn’t matter, however, as state law allows conditional use of the seal. As long as the materials the seal is reproduced on are not paid for by the state, no laws are being violated, he said. […]
Jo Johnson, an attorney for the Senate Republicans, agreed that Duffy’s use adhered to both the State Designations Act and the State Officials and Employees Ethics Act.
“While there is a perceptional issue, I do not believe that it is an ethics violation to use the state seal in a fundraising letter,” Johnson said.
Duffy regularly uses the State Seal on his campaign literature.
* The Question: Should the use of the State Seal be banned for campaign purposes? Explain.
40 Comments
|
Stupid quote of the month
Monday, May 10, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
* What a stupid comparison to make…
“There’s a lot of stuff in marijuana that’s not good for you,” said Limey Nargelenas, a lobbyist for the Illinois Association of Chiefs of Police.
It’s also unclear whether the relief patients claim to receive from marijuana is good for them in the long term, he said.
“It’s like people taking meth,” he said. “People feel a lot better after ingesting methamphetamine.”
You’d think a guy who once owned a bar/restaurant would want to stay away from that sort of goofy comparison.
This is fear mongering at its worst. Marijuana=Meth. Sheesh. Thank goodness that the Illinois State Police have finally seen the light and are now neutral on Rep. Lou Lang’s bill to legalize medical marijuana. At least some people are thinking clearly.
…Adding… From the story…
The following states have enacted laws that legalized medical marijuana: Alaska, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.
All 14 states require proof of residency for someone to be considered a “qualifying patient” for medical marijuana use. Home cultivation is not allowed in New Jersey, which is finalizing rules and about to launch its program.
48 Comments
|
The mess we’re in
Monday, May 10, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
* Writing a weekly syndicated column with a Friday afternoon deadline is tough during end-of-session week (or, as it turned out to be “pause-of-session” week). But I had a pretty good idea where things were heading for a few days: Right onto the rocks. So, here it is…
One of the things that became crystal clear last week during the Illinois Senate’s debate over a new state budget was that Democratic legislative leaders have completely broken the budget-making process.
It’s no big secret that more and more power has been concentrated into the hands of the leaders, the House speaker and the Senate president. And now they have it all.
Long gone are the days when the appropriations committees had any input. Also vanished is the “budgeteers” system, when appropriations chairmen and experts from each caucus would sit down to hash out the budget’s details. Instead, all of the work now is being done by staff at the leaders’ absolute direction.
As a consequence, senators barely had any idea about what they were voting for last week when they approved a budget along party lines. The committee hearing before the vote provided precious few details and instead revolved around partisan bickering over a Democratic maneuver solely designed to embarrass the Republicans. Republicans repeatedly denounced the budget process as far too rushed and wholly untransparent, and they were right.
This was without a doubt the most top-down, opaque budget ever produced under the Statehouse dome. The Democrats and Republicans couldn’t even agree on whether spending increased or dropped next fiscal year because there was so little time to analyze the data, and the legislation itself is so obtuse that analysis was made extremely difficult, if not impossible.
The granting of the governor huge new budget powers in a different bill was at the root of that analysis problem. He’s supposed to make most of the cuts, and nobody really knows how much he actually will slash.
The legislation included a 5 percent reduction in personnel and operations lines, but Gov. Pat Quinn would be given the power to hold back even more spending and make major changes to state-mandated programs with the stroke of a pen. Nobody knows how far he will go, so it’s impossible to say just what the final spending level will be.
And then the stinking disaster moved to the House, where liberal independents were upset at the way things were going. Many wanted to see a vote on a tax hike; some wanted cuts. Almost nobody wanted to vote for anything.
The liberal independents were grumbling about “sending a message” by withholding their support, but even they would have to admit that nothing much will improve no matter how much more time they’d take and that things will only get worse for their cherished programs if the session went into overtime and the Republicans got a seat at the table.
There’s no way that a tax hike will pass this month. Even the lib indies had to comprehend that cold, hard fact. The House Democratic recalcitrants have proposed almost no cuts themselves and probably wouldn’t support many if they actually were on the table.
Stomping their feet and demanding they be delivered from this nightmare without coming up with a realistic, doable, passable alternative looked more like the actions of spoiled children who’ve been shielded from unpleasant realities all their lives more than like legislators. They let their big daddy (House Speaker Michael Madigan) run things all year without uttering a single word, and now he set the table with one of the most unpalatable spreads ever and they wanted to hold their breath until they turned blue. Nice timing.
Of course, the Republicans are no better. Several whined last week that recommendations from groups like the Illinois Policy Institute weren’t included in the Democratic budget plan. But not one person from that side of the aisle bothered to turn those budget ideas into an actual piece of legislation. The reason is obvious. Not even the Republicans were willing to go on record supporting such radical cuts.
Senate President John Cullerton (D-Chicago) rightly pointed out last week that Republican gubernatorial candidate Sen. Bill Brady, of Bloomington, had introduced an appropriations bill at the beginning of the year. Instead of turning that bill into an alternative GOP budget, Brady gave up his sponsorship. The House Republican caucus proposed a little more than $5 billion in budget cutting “suggestions” earlier this year, but almost all of it was based on a ridiculous and fiscally impossible scheme to use nonexistent dollars from the capital construction plan to fund the budget. And when the House Republican higher-ups realized what they’d done, they backed away from it entirely.
What a mess this state is in.
* And your big budget bust-up roundup…
* Illinois’ lawmakers paralysis on budget driven by dysfunction, election: “It was another gimmicky bill that was hastily put together and designed to get us out of Springfield and give the governor unprecedented powers to spend (money) as he saw fit with little input from Democratic legislators,” complained Rep. Marlow Colvin, D- Chicago, former chairman of the House Black Caucus, echoing the unhappiness of other minority members. Another bloc of Democratic lawmakers, progressives, also complained that Quinn’s emphasis on maintaining adequate funding for education masked the need to improve human services funding, even though ensuring proper dollars for schools arguably plays better to independent and moderate suburban voters.
* State legislators leave Capitol at a standstill: State Rep. Elaine Nekritz, a Northbrook Democrat, said it would have been “premature” to rush a budget through this week when significantly more time remains for action. “We can always develop a better budget if we work a little bit more and get a little more input,” she said.
* Quinn: Ill. lawmakers ‘pretty close’ on budget: Gov. Pat Quinn said Saturday that lawmakers are “pretty close” to passing a new state budget but offered no explanation for his optimism or even why he now backs a budget that rejects his top legislative priority: a tax increase… “We’re pretty close,” Quinn said. “I think it’s healthy to have a robust debate and discussion this month on the budget, and ultimately they’ll be a vote, certainly before the end of the month.”
* Illinois Democrats Predict State Budget by June
* House fails to act on budget: The GOP’s choice for governor, state Sen. Bill Brady (R-Bloomington), said debt-heavy budget plans put before lawmakers Friday were the handiwork of “incompetence on the second floor,” referring to Quinn’s Statehouse office. “I will proudly take credit for stopping the Democrats from digging a deeper hole of debt, placing a burden on our children and grandchildren,” Brady said. “Someone’s got to stand up and be responsible.” Quinn shot back at Brady, accusing him of putting gubernatorial grandstanding ahead of the state’s neediest residents. “He wants to spend money, but he doesn’t want to vote for the funding. He was over here trying to cause chaos,” Quinn said, “and he’s not going to get away with it.”
* The blame game: “A year ago, we said to you, ‘Yes, we will participate in a borrowing plan,’” Cross said. “The problem of today versus a year ago is we said to the governor, ‘Governor, we’re going to give you a chance, we have a new governor, a fresh start, we have some problems.’” But Quinn didn’t live up to House Republicans’ expectations, Cross said. “Our governor needs to lead. Leaders lead. He needs to cut; he needs to control spending; he needs to pay his bills; he needs to provide for job growth and Medicaid reform.”
* Spineless in Springfield: They can’t do right thing
* Profiles in failure
* Our View: Lawmakers fail to set priorities, deal with problems
* Horse track slots plan hits snag
* Bill is still alive to bring slot machines to Fairmount, other Illinois tracks
28 Comments
|
Comments Off
|
|
Support CapitolFax.com Visit our advertisers...
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
|
|
Hosted by MCS
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax
Advertise Here
Mobile Version
Contact Rich Miller
|