*** UPDATED x1 - Gingrich takes the bait *** Another phony “controversy” has the Interwebtubes in a tizzy
Tuesday, Nov 9, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Check out the right-leaning blogs today and you’ll see a huge number of posts that more than just suggest the Democrats are plotting to deny Republican Mark Kirk his rightful place in the US Senate. A representative sample…
Whew! That’s a lot of yucky bile. And that handful of posts barely skims the surface of the indignant blogtastic outrage. And, by the way, it’s all completely false. * All the hoo-ha is based on a fatally flawed AP brief…
* OK, first of all, way back in July the judge who ordered the special election gave the Illinois State Board of Elections until November 24th to certify the special. This schedule has been in place a very long time, before anyone knew that Kirk would be elected. * Secondly, the Illinois State Board of Elections actually plans to certify the election a day early, according to an official I just spoke with. They’re gonna do it on the 23rd, not the 24th. * Thirdly, the Senate is recessing its lame duck session during the entire week of the 23rd because of Thanksgiving. The Senate won’t restart the session until November 29th. * And fourthly - and most importantly - Secretary of State Jesse White’s office claims the AP misquoted them. What they said was they intend to process the paperwork immediately and will make sure that it gets into the hands of the proper DC authorities in plenty of time for the first day of the restarted lame duck session on the 29th. Between the 23rd and the 29th lies Thanksgiving, remember. Things can happen. That’s why they stressed they want to make extra special sure that Kirk is sworn in on or before the 29th. * So, to sum up, the schedule that was set way back in July is still on track. The State Board of Elections is actually pushing up the ordered date by a full day. The AP screwed up. The SoS will expedite matters. Mark Kirk will be sworn in by the time the Senate reconvenes on Monday, November 29th. Also, I’m not sure where Tom Roeser found that December 3rd date, but he’s way off. *** UPDATE *** And right on schedule, WLS allows Newt Gingrich to push this phony story into the bloodstream…
Sheesh.
|
*** UPDATED x1 Madigan suggests another way *** A look ahead
Tuesday, Nov 9, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller *** UPDATE *** House Speaker Michael Madigan is throwing a bit of cold water on all this “mandate” talk by Gov. Quinn…
But then Madigan went on to lay out how the governor might improve his tax package…
And that means a one percentage point income tax hike won’t be nearly enough. * Unlike others, I believe that Gov. Pat Quinn has at least some right to claim a limited mandate from last Tuesday. How many people ran for governor this year promising to increase income taxes and still won? I think he’s probably the only one. That took guts and he prevailed. But the governor does not have the right to misstate the facts…
The “majority” voted for someone else, governor. Also, Bill Brady, Scott Lee Cohen and Lex Green all flatly opposed a tax hike. Total up their numbers and you get 51 percent. Words matter, governor. * Meanwhile, this free rides for seniors debacle is almost a perfect microcosm for how screwed up our politics have been in this state…
Madigan’s key word there is “eventually.” That could mean next year, it could mean in 20 years. The longer the program remains in place, however, the tougher it’s gonna be to kill or modify. Blagojevich used his amendatory veto powers to add the free rides provision. And even though people in both parties screamed bloody murder, the General Assembly didn’t dare knock down his AV. Seniors vote. And once you give them something, it’s politically dangerous to take it away. The House has tried to come up with a compromise in the past to only give the free rides to the “truly needy,” but it’s been stopped in the Senate and Gov. Pat Quinn has threatened to veto it. If they can reach a compromise in the coming months, then that could be a sign that the majority party is willing to stick their necks out on other items. * Whether they’ll go this far is doubtful…
Madigan was the chief co-sponsor of House Bill 1 last year, which would’ve increased the motor fuel tax by 8 cents per gallon. The money would’ve been used for capital projects, but the House Republicans refused to go along and pushed video gaming instead. Raising the fuel tax partially for mass transit would require one heck of a huge compromise with Downstate legislators, to say the least. * And we still don’t know for sure how the governor’s income tax increase will play out. Back in late July, Gov. Quinn seemed to say that he would veto anything other than his one percentage point tax hike… Quinn was attempting at the time to control the damage done by his budget director, who predicted to Bloomberg that the income tax would be hiked by two points in January, which would be double Quinn’s proposal. * But a one point hike that includes property tax relief doesn’t do a whole lot to balance the state’s budget. And without further cuts, many legislators will be reticent to vote for any tax increase…
Franks will never vote for a tax hike no matter how much the budget is cut. But he may not be too far off with that prediction of his. * There are those who are attempting to look at the local tea leaves to claim that the citizenry is opposed to higher taxes…
16 out of 37 is actually a pretty decent batting average, as far as recession-era tax hike referenda go. Hinsdale passed a sales tax increase, for example, as did Lake Zurich and even Macon County, where Bill Brady cleaned up. Even so, local sales and property tax referenda are different animals. I’m not sure there’s a direct comparison here.
|
Congratulations are in order
Tuesday, Nov 9, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * First up, Scott Reeder, who is a proud papa of a new baby…
* Not trying to mix personal with business, but Illinois Review is due props of a different sort…
|
Question of the day
Tuesday, Nov 9, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * From Stateline.org…
National map of one-party state governments before election day… ![]() After election day… ![]() * The Question: Considering that the Republicans could not take over either legislative chamber, the governor’s mansion or the Supreme Court during the greatest Republican wave since 1994 (and the largest GOP state legislative wave since 1928), and considering that the GOP will be completely shut out of the redistricting process for the first time since our new state Constitution was adopted, are Statehouse Republicans doomed here? If not, why? If so, for how long? Explain. * Bonus Question: Either way, what should legislative Republicans do now?
|
Ignoring the millionaire in the room
Tuesday, Nov 9, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Subscribers already know what I found last week after talking to Bill Brady’s campaign and others about where and why Brady lost to Gov. Pat Quinn. “Social issues” seems to be a big part of everyone’s post-election analysis, although I think I’ve pinpointed that aspect of it far more for subscribers. * For instance, here’s Kent Redfield…
That was part of it. * Sean Trende, a Senior Elections Analyst for RealClearPolitics, published a nifty little map. The counties in blue are those that Mark Kirk outperformed fellow Republican Bill Brady. The counties in red are those where Brady did better than Kirk… ![]() And his resulting take…
The DGA’s ads ran during the summer. They didn’t work. This is what happens when you write your analysis in DC and you only talk to fellow DC denizens who love to take credit for themselves. * Bernie thinks that creationism and Sheila Simon were in the mix…
* Progress Illinois thinks it was the ground game which got black and Latino voters to the polls…
62 percent of the Latino vote is pretty darned horrid. Rod Blagojevich took 83 percent of the Latino vote four years ago. * But Greg Hinz and I are the only two who pointed out the obvious…
It’s more than just random third candidates, however. Keep in mind that Cohen spent a fortune on this race. He wasn’t your usual third party also-ran. The Brady campaign told me a few months ago that they believed Cohen wouldn’t hurt them until he got more than 7 percent of the vote. I told them at the time that I thought they were wrong. They were. Let’s take a look at just two suburban counties. In DuPage County, Mark Kirk won by 57,338 votes and Brady won by 44,812. Third party candidates received 14,491 votes in the US Senate race, but third partiers and Scott Lee Cohen combined to score 20,188 in the governor’s race. Lake County saw the same thing. Kirk won by 36,247 and Brady won by 15,800. Third partiers got 9,451 US Senate votes and 15,148 gubernatorial votes. This actually happened all over suburbia. Lots of voters took a look at Quinn and decided they couldn’t be with him. But then they looked at Brady and, for various reasons (likely the social issues, subscribe for more detailed info on why) decided they couldn’t vote for him, either. So, they went with Cohen, who spent millions on TV, mail and radio. I told you weeks ago that when Cohen’s name was included in the polling, Quinn significantly closed the gap on Brady. For weeks, I refused to even run Rasmussen’s poll numbers until they included Cohen’s name in their surveys for that very reason. The Cohen factor was huge, yet it’s been almost wholly ignored out there. Scott Lee Cohen hated Pat Quinn. He got into the governor’s race thinking he could destroy Quinn. In the greatest of all 2010 ironies, Cohen ended up playing a major role in electing Quinn. I gotta wonder what he does for an encore. Any guesses?
|
Between a Madigan and a tea party
Tuesday, Nov 9, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * I had heard this, but wasn’t able to confirm it last week, but Michael Sneed ran it…
* And my syndicated newspaper column takes a look at a particularly sticky wicket…
* Related…
|
Morning Shorts
Tuesday, Nov 9, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Luis Gutierrez: Sun-Times’s Rezko story ‘false‘ * Rezko gave Gutierrez a deal on town house * FBI interviewed Luis Gutierrez in 2008 about Rezko deal * Key witness in Blago trial charged with shoplifting * Retail good and bad: Vacancy drops, but so do rents * Weis: City crime is down for 22nd straight month * Burge sentencing postponed till Jan. * Daley hopes to find new schools chief quickly * Cook County tax rates generally stable * Cook County property-tax bills expected to be flat in Chicago, slightly up in suburbs * Daley’s last budget poised to sail through City Council * Budget Committee OKs Mayor Daley’s $6.15 billion budget for 2011 * Daley’s $6B City Budget Gets Preliminary OK * Standard & Poor’s lowers Chicago bonds * Audit discovers firefighters falsified mileage claims * Senator Durbin wants investigation into Metra pollution levels * Clearing the air on Metra pollution * Metra commuters may face health risks * City Council Committee Approves Acid Ordinance Supported by Attack Victims * Lee Enterprises reports continued growth in 4Q * Kurtz resigns from MCC board * Will County faces dilemma: Jobs or lower taxes? * Aurora police union hires firm to probe city budgets * Fourth candidate announces for Yorkville mayor * Moline may raise garbage fee, as well as city administrator’s pay * Quincy expects early retirement program to meet its $5.2 million goal * Adams County budget deficit remains just over $1 million * Macon County is poised to approve budget * Enos Park master plan would cost $45 million over 10-20 years * Sales tax boosters to reassess, maybe try again * SJ-R: Don’t give up on sales tax hike for schools * Ordinance will cost landlords $25 per unit in Collinsville * Mayoral hopefuls’ sprint under way * Coalition of black leaders backs Rep. Davis for mayor * Meeks rips black mayoral search process * Sweet: African American Chicago mayoral vote could be splintered * Emanuel Will Announce Run Next Week * Rahm Emanuel talks trash – in good way * Rahm to lay out plans for growing Chicago jobs * McQueary: Emanuel desperately needs a ‘beer summit’ * Mayoral Hopeful Pushes Old Idea: Abolishing City’s ‘Head Tax’ * Emanuel pitches phasing out head tax for businesses * Miguel Del Valle Refutes Report He’s Interested in CPS Job * Brown: Del Valle in mayoral race until very end * Washington: Next mayor needs arts agenda * Tax appeals commissioner won’t run for Chicago mayor * ‘Party’s over,’ Preckwinkle vows * State’s attorney investigating Batavia vote complaint
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Monday’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Saturday, Nov 6, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
Reader comments closed until Tuesday
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Barton and I are going to take a long weekend. Many thanks to Bill Brady for conceding today and letting us all get a much-needed break. I think I could sleep for three days. Before I go, I want to thank this blog’s readers and commenters for an enjoyable, crazy fun election season. But I want to particularly thank my subscribers for their continued support. Times are tough, and some of you can’t afford to renew, but most of you are hanging in there, as you’ve done for many a year. I can’t thank you enough, and I hope to continue improving every day. * Anyway, enough of this “I love you, man!” stuff. I need a nap. These guys are playing their first Chicago gig at the Double Door on Tuesday. Check them out…
|
*** UPDATED x1 *** Quinn victory press conference live-blog and video
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * ABC7 will broadcast it live. I’ll post the embedded video at 3:30, when the festivities are set to begin. * 3:27 pm - The feed is now hot, so here’s the embed. If you have any problems with ABC7’s feed, you can click here to watch WGN. * 3:33 pm - WGN just reported that the presser is running 10-20 minutes late. * While we’re waiting for the governor, House Republican Leader Tom Cross just issued a statement…
* 3:58 pm - Almost a half hour late. Four more years, campers. Oy. *** 3:59 pm *** And we’re starting… “We may have strong differences on policy issues, but we’re all Americans and Illinoisans.” Said being elected was a “tremendous privilege.” “We were often underestimated, but not by me.” Said he believes in grassroots politics. Education, he said, is the “key to opportunity for everyone.” “My job is to put Illinois to work.” Mentioned education again and said he wants to maintain integrity in government. Said those were his three top goals. He used Manny’s as a microcosm of Illinois. Diverse clientele where everybody seems to get along. “I could tell last week that there was a surge everywhere I went.” “The people call the shots, not the experts, not the pollsters and not the insiders.” “It’s never easy to concede. I’ve not won every election and when you don’t win it’s really hard.” Quinn said he will put together a veto session agenda for the “budget situation” and the “jobs situation.” Asks that legislators in both parties in both chambers “not be timid” on reform. Said he thinks AllKids will be in place “as long as I’m around.” “You know, when you’re down 13 points, nobody’s throwing rosebuds at you.” Best line of the day. Said he sees a tax increase as “revenue investments in people.” … “Investing in education pays great dividends.” Said the Hispanic vote was “very, very important… and really made a big difference.” “We have a lot of work to do in Illinois and I’m ready to do it.” * End. …Adding… Bill Brady’s concession letter to supporters is here. *** UPDATE *** Video…
|
A little mid-afternoon diversion - Pat Quinn busts a move
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Simon Edelman was producing videos for Gov. Pat Quinn’s campaign in complete obscurity until the readers of this blog started taking notice in the early summer of 2009. His recent “Glee” video now has over 150,000 views. Our young man has grown up right before our eyes. Simon sent me this e-mail the other day and I got so busy that I forgot to post it…
* Simon’s note inspired me to make another Quinn mashup video. This one’s for Simon, Gov. Quinn and all the people who worked so hard to elect the governor. I figure they’ve earned it. Some of you may disagree with the sentiment expressed, but, hey, it’s over, man. It’s finally over. So get up and dance with Pat… Gimme the bridge now
|
Brady’s concession speech live blog - Raw video
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * You can click here to listen or watch the live video. * 1:29 pm - The video feed is now hot. * 1:30 pm - Two minute warning. Jason Plummer will speak first, followed by Sen. Bill Brady. * 1:32 pm - If you’re having trouble with the ABC7 feed, CBS2 also has a live feed. * 1:33 pm - Plummer vowed to work with the lt. governor and the governor any way he could. He choked up a bit when thanking his staff. * 1:34 pm - Brady is now speaking. “This election, this campaign for us was all about a path to bringing jobs” to the people of Illinois. “We thank the voters of Illinois, the millions of voters who were willing to listen to us.” “I just a few minutes ago got off the phone with Gov. Quinn, and I congratulated him on his victory, as he deserved.” Brady said he also offered to work with Gov. Quinn. Sen. Brady praised his wife Nancy, “who could not do a better job.” “Jason and I have truly been blessed” with their hard-working staff. “But it’s the people of Illinois that we truly are grateful to.” Brady said that after a “bitter election,” it was time to work together to make the state as great as it can be. * 1:40 pm - End of remarks. * 1:41 pm - He’s going to take questions from the media. Said the governor had invited him to Manny’s Deli to talk. Said the big GOP congresional wins show that the people want their leaders to work together in a bipartisan manner. Asked about his campaign strategy, he said he’d leave it to the pundits to decide whether it was the right one or not. He wouldn’t rule any further run out right now. “Life’s too short to rule anything out.” Mrs. Brady said something at the same time, but I didn’t catch it. Did anyone else hear what she said? * 1:44 pm - End of questions. Classy, reserved, firm, yet not defiant. A decent job by a decent man. * 2:12 pm - Sun-Times…
* 2:18 pm - Gov. Quinn is holding a 3:30 presser. I’ll look around for live audio/video. Help me if you can. I still have to finish my syndicated newspaper column. If you missed Brady’s speech, here is the raw video… * At the end, Brady is asked whether he might run again. “Third time’s a charm?” a reporter asked. Brady said that life’s too short to rule anything out. Mrs. Brady, however, shook her head, smiled and said what sounded like “We’re not going to entertain that right now.” I don’t blame her. That was a grueling campaign. Bill’s basically been running for governor for the past six years.
|
A look ahead
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Gov. Pat Quinn loves him some Michael Sneed, and he gave her an exclusive interview for today’s paper…
From yesterday’s Sneed…
It wasn’t just Giannoulias, however. Quinn has been upset for months that legislative Democrats with anything close to a tough race refused to go anywhere near him. Considering how badly Quinn was beaten Downstate, that’s quite understandable. And while he won the Cook County suburbs, he was never anywhere near 50 percent, so he was seen as a needless drag. Legislative leaders prefer to position their candidates in isolation during years like this. But Quinn thought that meant they despised him. It wasn’t personal, it was just business. * For instance, Brady had some coattails in Decatur…
Flider wanted nothing to do with Quinn during the campaign. I can’t hardly blame him. * And check this out…
* Gov. Quinn won on a platform of moderate cuts, “strategic” borrowing and raising taxes. But a key component of that plan stalled again yesterday in the Senate…
* And lawmakers don’t appear to love any of the options…
* And the general feeling under the Statehouse dome yesterday was similar to this longtime subscriber’s, who wrote…
Yes, it is. Without a doubt.
|
Question of the day
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * I seem to be using him a lot today, but Zorn has posted a Pat Quinn quote…
Well, he did run on a tax increase platform during a tea party (TEA=Taxed Enough Already) year and won. That’s certainly something. Yet, he hardly scored a resounding win. * The Question: Does Gov. Quinn have a mandate? If not, explain. If so, to do what?
|
Brady will bow out at 1:30
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * I’ll see what I can do about finding some audio and video. WJBC Radio in Bloomington was a good source the other day. Check back at 1:30. * Pantagraph…
* Tribune…
* AP…
…Adding… ABC7 will carry it live. Thanks to a commenter for finding that one.
|
BRADY TO HOLD PRESSER AT 1:30
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller Posted by Barton Lorimor More gubernatorial drama…
|
Protected: SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today’s edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller
|
Newspaper wants to abolish one person, one vote in Illinois
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * The Southern Illinoisan’s editorial board has lost its collective mind…
Yeah. OK. Let’s abandon “One person, one vote.” Right. That brilliant idea wouldn’t just meet “fierce resistance” from Chicago. Judges would laugh it out of court. Seriously, pot didn’t just secretly become legal in Illinois, did it? Because those editorial board members are obviously smoking some very wacky weed. * Empty acres don’t vote. Counties don’t vote. Townships don’t vote. Regions don’t vote. Citizens vote. Back in the “good old days,” southern Illinois politicians were able to stop redistricting for decades. The Chicago area’s population was exploding, but the people there had little influence in their state legislature. Apparently, the newspaper of record for that region would like to go back to those halcyon times. * Here’s a news flash for the undemocratic southerners: Mark Kirk is not from Chicago, but he won statewide. Judy Baar Topinka does not live in Chicago and neither does Dan Rutherford. Sheila Simon actually lives in Carbondale, where that bizarro newspaper is published. Bill Brady didn’t lose because he wasn’t from Chicago. Bill Brady lost because he failed to run a better campaign than Pat Quinn. Period. Brady was the frontrunner all year. He blew it. Plain and simple. Get over it, man. Back in 1994, Downstater Jim Edgar actually won Cook County. George Ryan was from Kankakee, where I was born. Last time I checked, Kankakee is not a Chicago ward. Obviously, it can be done. Brady just didn’t pull it off. * And it wasn’t just Chicago votes that elected Pat Quinn. Almost half a million Downstaters voted for him. Should they be disenfranchised too? Why should the 2,104 voters in Hardin County have more say in their state government than the 1,373,020 human being voters who happen to live in Cook County? What makes those Hardin voters so all-fired special and superior? The Southern Illinoisan is based in Jackson County. 15,617 people voted for governor in Jackson. But 23,594 people voted in Chicago’s 19th Ward. Yet, for some reason Jackson County votes should count for more than Beverly/Morgan Park’s? * Look, you backed a candidate who didn’t win. But that doesn’t mean it’s time for radical, unconstitutional “solutions.” That’s some very dangerous thinking. Several years ago, I asked the good folks who run the Legislative Research Unit if they had any data on which counties were the biggest state tax eaters and which were the biggest state revenue generators. I was told that the LRU has long refused to do that study because it is just too controversial. The last time they did it, they discovered that Downstate was a net revenue eater, the suburbs were a net revenue contributor and Chicago was revenue neutral. The results caused such an uproar that they won’t even touch the subject now. The fact that Downstaters eat more than their share of state money doesn’t give them the right to have more than one vote per person. * Newspaper editorial boards are supposed to be the guardians of public discourse. They’re supposed to take the time to think things through, calm the darker influences on our souls and advocate for rational, reasonable solutions. None of that was present in the SI’s ridiculous editorial. I really thought the Tribune was horrid, but there’s just no comparison here.
|
A note to commenters
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * Usually, I have to use the front page to warn commenters before an election to calm down. I didn’t have to do that this year. I intervened in the comments section on occasion, but it never got to the point where I felt the need to issue an above the fold banishment warning. Yesterday afternoon, however, while I was working at the Statehouse and unable to keep an eye on the blog, things got way outta hand in comments. * I completely understand how Bill Brady’s supporters feel right now. You thought you had it. You didn’t. And now the other side doesn’t want to even give you time to make sure all the votes are counted. That’s just horribly depressing. I can see why you’re upset, even angry. And I think I understand how the Quinn supporters are feeling. You had Rodney Freaking Dangerfield himself as your candidate, but by gosh he won. And now the guy he beat won’t admit defeat and exit the stage like a proper gentleman. Combine those two and you’ve got quite the combustible mix. * But here’s the thing. I won’t tolerate any more of this. I issued a lifetime banishment last night and I’ll do more today if need be, so start treating each other with respect and take off your tinfoil hats or you’re going to find yourself forever banned from commenting here. And you can bet your house that I’m just itching to zap my first moron today. Don’t tempt me. Try to understand what the other side is going through. It’s not really all that difficult. Both parties won something unexpected Tuesday, both parties also lost. * Please use the comment section on this post to say something nice about the other side today. You’ll be surprised at how much better you’ll feel. Politics is a rough business, and, yes, we do play rough here. But we don’t need to get dirty and be mean to each other. So, electronically shake hands and let’s move along. We’re better than yesterday.
|
Who was the best pollster? Nobody
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller * How did the pollsters do on the Illinois governor’s race? I don’t think it’s ever been this bad. Nobody’s average even came close. From RCP via Zorn. Click the pic for a larger image… ![]() * October polling. Again, click the pic for a better view… ![]() PPP should’ve stopped in mid October when it was ahead. * Rasmussen was also way off nationwide. From FiveThirtyEight, also via Zorn…
* But FiveThirtyEight’s famed computer model didn’t exactly work like a charm, either… ![]() Thoughts?
|
Chicago will count 11,777 absentees Friday
Friday, Nov 5, 2010 - Posted by Rich Miller [Bumped up from Thursday evening for visibility.] * From the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners…
Quinn’s lead stands at 19,413, but apparently, that’ll be rising once Chicago finishes counting. Other counties are still processing as well, but that’s a huge number of city absentees. * From ABC7…
And, keep in mind that most of those provisionals probably won’t even be counted. Cook County Clerk David Orr said yesterday that the county usually approves only about a quarter of the provisional ballots. This is why there’s just no chance for Brady. …Adding… About 37,000 of those 50,000 total uncounted absentees and provisionals are in Chicago and Cook County alone. …Adding More… Quinn won Chicago with 75 percent of the vote. Figuring that the city’s 11,777 absentees will break out about the same (it’ll probably be higher for Quinn, considering pre-election polling, but let’s just figure it that way), that’s 8,832 absentee votes for Quinn. If a quarter of the city’s provisionals are counted, that’s 2,062 more votes for Quinn, for a total of 10,894 votes. Using the same math for suburban Cook, which Quinn won with 53 percent, Quinn would pick up 6,042 votes. City and Cook combined total 14,874 Quinn votes. Using that same figuring, Brady’s total for both Chicago and Cook would be 6,742. Add the difference of those two numbers to Quinn’s current margin over Brady and you get a Quinn lead of 27,545, with just 13,000 votes left to count, assuming they are all countable, and they’re not. This thing is over. The AP is right.
|
« NEWER POSTS | PREVIOUS POSTS » |