Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » The House “Agri-Culture-Wars” Committee strikes again
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
The House “Agri-Culture-Wars” Committee strikes again

Wednesday, Mar 16, 2011

* We’ve talked before about all the non-agriculture bills which have been assigned to the House Agriculture Committee. Yesterday, the committee held a hearing on two bills opposed by pro-choice forces, which sparked a “Women are Not Livestock” protest

The House Agriculture and Conservation Committee, which is dominated by conservative downstate Democrats and Republicans, [yesterday] unanimously approved a measure that would require Illinois abortion clinics to meet tougher regulations to continue providing services.

Under the proposal, clinics that perform more than 50 abortions a year would be required to meet the same regulatory requirements as other medical outpatient surgery clinics.

* Three bills were actually assigned for debate in the committee yesterday. Two passed, but one was held up because a pro-choice Senator had already pre-filed to sponsor the bill, effectively killing it in that chamber...

All three sponsors of the bills denied asking that their bills be sent to the Agriculture Committee and did not know who made the decision to put their bills before the panel, though all complimented House Speaker Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) for giving their bills a chance to be heard.

“I don’t know,” said [GOP Rep. Darlene] Senger, when asked why her abortion-clinic bill was in front of the farming committee. “These committees have been all over the place this time. I got some other bills in some crazy places right now, too.”

But House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie (D-Chicago), who chairs the House Rules Committee that assigns bills to committees, said rank-and-file legislators make the request as to where their bills go in the earliest stages of the legislative process.

* As you an see, the “why” behind the bill assignments is a bit murky. The sponsors aren’t taking responsibility, but Speaker Madigan’s office is pointing the finger of blame at them

When asked if the ideological makeup of the committee was the reason for the bill’s assignment, Senger said, “I couldn’t comment on that.”

But Steve Brown, spokesman for House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago, said the legislation went to the committee at Senger’s request.

And

Senger denies requesting the committee assignment for her bill, or even knowing how it got there. She suggested that other lawmakers or lobbyists may have had some input into the committee assignment.

That could be.

* Back to the protest

“I’m not sure what agriculture has to do with women’s reproductive health care,” said Rep. Elaine Nekritz, D-Northbrook, who wore one of the shirts on the House floor.

Rep. Sara Feigenholtz, D-Chicago, said there were agendas floating to erode the rights of women.

“Even worse, they seem to be going to the most inappropriate committees here in Springfield that deal with livestock,” she said. “Personally, I think it should offend every woman in the state of Illinois that those bills were sent to that committee.”

Asked if she thought they were sent there because of the more conservative makeup of the committee, increasing the proposals’ chances of making it onto the House floor, Feigenholtz said, “You think?”

And

“They’ve spent more time asking questions about road kill and muskrats than they did (debating) this bill,'’ before passing it 13-0, complained Ed Yohnka of the American Civil Liberties Union, which opposes the bill.

* An unusual defense

Peter Breen of the Thomas More Society, who testified for the bill in committee, made one of the few attempts to justify the committee assignment. He maintained the bill is an attempt to regulate potentially unsafe abortion clinics, and said: “They say women are not livestock. We completely agree, which is why they should not be treated like that.'’

* The last word

But even some conservatives, like state Rep. Mike Bost, R-Murphysboro, question the committee’s catch-all jurisdiction over conservative social issues. Bost got a big laugh from the protestors when he presented an unrelated bill with the announcement that “it might actually be an agricultural bill.'’

“I’m always amazed at what goes through the Ag Committee,'’ he said later. “I’m pro-gun, I’m pro-life, but you have to question it.'’

Discuss.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

14 Comments
  1. - reformer - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 9:14 am:

    Osterman’s gun control bills used to go to the most liberal committees. I don’t recall Elaine or Sarah complaining about committee assignments when it favors bills they like.


  2. - Pot calling kettle - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 9:19 am:

    Clearly a strategy that backfires to some extent. Would these bills have collected this much attention & negative publicity if they had gone through an appropriate committee? Probably not. Plus, it puts some conservative Dems in the position of having to make a vote they might not want to cast.


  3. - Carl Nyberg - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 9:24 am:

    Pat Quinn is governor, right?

    What is the purpose of this bill? Does it have any purpose than to push the buttons of people who give money and get active on the abortion issue?

    I’m looking at the world facing some serious problems.

    And what I see in Springfield is a bunch of preening narcissists.

    Terry Link, Mike Boland and Art Turner were too incompetent to get the media to cover the Scott Lee Cohen story–let’s give it to Hynes and Quinn, they’ll know what to do.

    Most of the state legislatures don’t stand up to leadership b/c they are too lazy or inept to raise their own campaign funds.

    But, hey, let’s argue about abortion. Should be good for some direct mail fundraising. And the doofuses in the media know how to write an article about abortion. Writing about unemployment, labor issues, which manufacturing might benefit from Japan’s problems, nuclear safety, etc. would require some research.


  4. - Gilman - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 9:30 am:

    What’s wrong with regulating abortions? God knows we regulate everything else in this state…

    (Don’t forget to put a tax on abortions to pay for this regulation. And think of the jobs it will create!)


  5. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 9:36 am:

    From the outside looking in, the committee assignment process appears to be just another tool to concentrate power in the Speaker’s office and keep committees and their chairs weak while keeping individual members dependent on his good graces.

    Using the abortion example, strong advocates on either side of the question aren’t going to jump for the chance to get on the Ag Committee. Therefore, their influence on whatever abortion legislation the Speaker deems can reach the floor is bupkis.

    It’s good to be the king.


  6. - Bill - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 9:40 am:

    This bill is typical overreach by the right-wingers. Emboldened by the possibility of success on concealed carry and stung by actions of the lame duckers, they move on to their favorite issue of women’s rights ( or the lack of them). They should have realized that this is their third rail and kept away but NOOOOOOO! Talk about awakening the sleeping bear!
    Whoops! Sorry for the animal analogy!


  7. - Dooley Dudright - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 9:42 am:

    In the aftermath of tax hike/civil unions/death penalty abolition, Rich writes: “Downstate Democratic legislators are screaming for the (concealed carry) bill as a way to help them throw some much-needed red meat at their furious constituents.”

    By extension — tossing a couple of bones for gnawing-on by the Ag Committee helps accomplish the same purpose.

    Give vent to the rage. Things eventually will calm down.

    And the bills won’t pass.

    Very shrewd. Very smart.


  8. - David Lawson aka Federal Farmer - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 9:46 am:

    I admit I haven’t read the terms of this bill, but it seems to me that an abortion clinic is performing an outpatient surgery so I don’t understand why they wouldn’t be held to the same standards and requirements of an outpatient surgery clinic.

    I’m pro-choice, but this sounds like an odd thing to get riled up about.


  9. - fed up - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 9:59 am:

    I also am pro choice but do not understand why an abortion clinic isn’t held to the same standards as other out patient clinics. Maybe their is a good reason not to regulate abortion clinics but besides the need for more security I don’t see what makes them different than other medical clinics.


  10. - D.P. Gumby - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 10:27 am:

    Sounds like an effort to gin up anti-abortion supporters by piggy-backing on the abhorrent situation in Philly and seeking to equate all clinics w/ that place. Two likely Illinois alternatives: 1) all Illinois facilities already comply so this is just a “press release” bill or 2) there are requirements for outpatient facilities that are expensive and unnecessary for abortion services that would unduly burden such services, which fits the strategy of the anti-choice forces of creating more and more obstructions to women exercising their choice.


  11. - amalia - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 10:30 am:

    the sponsor may have asked that the bill go to this committee, but Mike Madigan, you allowed women to be treated like livestock. it’s insulting and irresponsible to have an important issue reviewed this way. hey, Lisa, what do you think about that?


  12. - cermak_rd - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 11:44 am:

    Abortion clinics are different from other outpatient surgery centers in one important way and that’s that the surgery they do is very, very specific. So for instance, they would be unlikely to have more than 1 X-ray machine (if that) because it’s not used in this type of medicine. They would not have a full pharmacoupia of drugs on hand because they would be unlikely to use them. I can’t imagine an abortion being provided to a man or a 60 year old woman, so they probably don’t have items on hand that might be used for such patients.


  13. - CSI - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 1:41 pm:

    One thing to remember is that K. Burke and Flowers are on the Ag Comm too and both bills passed out on leave so I find it hard to make the case this was a conservative coo.


  14. - sweaty freddy - Wednesday, Mar 16, 11 @ 1:44 pm:

    Feigenholtz and Nekritz wear shirts and give speeches to protest the assignments of the bills to Agriculture yet they vote for Madigan as Speaker who assigns these bills to this conservative committee for years. They love the public attention and duping the people that care about the issue that they are on their side but they do not have the courage to confront the Speaker about it. Well played by them and everyone is fooled by their act.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Governor's office staff member tested positive, had no close contact with Pritzker
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Republicans want to hear Pritzker's remap thoughts while Democrats push back against GOP plans
* An unintended, but likely forseeable consequence of over-cautious policies
* COVID-19 roundup: Lawsuit filed over LaSalle Veterans’ Home death; IDOC resuming in-person visitation; Hotel revenues plunged 80 percent
* Question of the day
* Legislator pay ruling should not be a surprise
* *** UPDATED x1 *** 2,433 new confirmed and probable cases; 18 additional deaths; 1,998 hospitalized; 418 in the ICU; 4.4 percent average case positivity rate; 4.9 percent average test positivity rate; 132,188 average daily doses
* More like this, please
* *** UPDATED x1 *** State Board of Elections calls special meeting to discuss Sandvoss situation
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraising event list
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Big teachers union wins prompt grumbling
* Center Square network gets grant to offer "an alternate perspective to legacy media’s unfair coverage of individuals who disagree with state shutdowns"
* Moody's: New Chicago firefighter pension law is "credit negative"
* Open thread
* *** UPDATED x1 *** SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller