Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Tuesday, Jan 17, 2012 - Posted by Rich Miller

* “The McLaughlin Group” is not something I generally watch, but my parents are devotees. The host, John McLaughlin, often asks his guests for predictions, and McLaughlin himself offered up this one this past weekend

“Michelle Obama will run for the United States Senate in 2016 and she will be thereby kind of mimicking, if that’s not the right word [then] duplicating the career of Hillary Clinton,” McLaughlin said.

Video

Notice that everyone laughs at the end.

If she did run, it would be against freshman Republican incumbent Mark Kirk, who won President Obama’s former seat in 2010.

* The Question: Do you think a Michelle Obama Senate bid is a possibility, or is McLaughlin full of hot air?

Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please. Thanks.


And while it’s quite possible that you could answer “Yes” to both parts of the question, try to pick the “most right” response.

       

41 Comments
  1. - keys21 - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 11:47 am:

    I don’t see her running. That being said, if she were to run, she’d definitely have a good shot at winning.


  2. - The Captain - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 11:56 am:

    WRONG!

    I really only know this show from the SNL skits.


  3. - Wensicia - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:00 pm:

    Anything’s possible, but I don’t think she’ll be interested in following the political path of Hillary Clinton. Nothing she’s done so far points to an interest in government or politics; she’s basically your typical first lady.

    McLaughlin is always full of hot air, that part was easy.


  4. - ChicagoR - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:00 pm:

    I’ve never considered the possibility of her running for office. But if she did, I’d love it. She could be such a better representative for Illinois than Kirk.


  5. - amalia - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:03 pm:

    McLaughlin show is endlessly fascinating, especially the end of the year shows where the plaid jacket comes out. may be the only place we’ll continue to hear from Pat Buchannan which is often disturbing, but always interesting.

    But, wrong on this one. don’t see Michelle Obama leaving the work with her own children and she’s no Hillary.


  6. - hammer - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:04 pm:

    Nah, I don’t see (feel?) her having that fire in her belly that Hillary did. As well, wasn’t there rumour of her hating DC?


  7. - Come on man! - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:04 pm:

    It really depends on if BO wins in 2012.


  8. - DuPage Moderate 1 - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:12 pm:

    I think Michelle Obama has never shown the slightest interest in running for elective office, and I think she’s been at most a reluctant (though effective) campaigner for her husband.


  9. - Pundeete - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:12 pm:

    She won’t run. She has not shown any interest in running for public office. I see her moving back to Chicago and immersing herself in civic/business interests in her hometown. BO got his, now it will be time for her.


  10. - girlawyer - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:24 pm:

    But if she wanted to imitate Hillary, shouldn’t she run for a New York seat, or at least somewhere that she has no connection?


  11. - chad - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:30 pm:

    All hot air. The Clintons are addicted to national politics and Washington. The Obamas just are not. By the time Barack is done, they will be relieved to get out and stay out of DC.


  12. - Mr. Grassroots - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:31 pm:

    I answered “It’s a possibility,” only because it didn’t say it’s a remote possibility. She would win if she wanted it, but I don’t think that’s where she wants to go. I don’t doubt she will do something great, but not necessarily (remote possibility) politics. Head of a prominent not-for-profit, a huge author for sure, a speaker, motivator. But I really don’t see politics. Oh, by the way, if she runs she not only wins but wins big.


  13. - Bill - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:39 pm:

    Michelle has too much class for the Senate.


  14. - Boone's is Back - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:40 pm:

    I’m guilty of watching the show too although I roll my eyes at McLaughlin’s senior tin foil hat moments like this Michelle Obama thing.

    I also think it’s funny (and kind of cool) that most of the pundits on the show have remained a constant. Link to the aforementioned hilarious Dana Carvey impersonation….

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/279531/saturday-night-live-mclaughlin-group


  15. - carbaby - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:41 pm:

    I have often found McGlaughlin Group to be very interesting and more intelligent generally speaking than most of the shows of this genre even though I’m very young considering their average demographic. That being said, I have seen little to nothing in Michelle’s actions that are indicative of someone wanting to pursue politics. She has issues that she is passionate about but not in a political/legislative manner. I do concur that I could see her involving herself more with nonprofit work- that appears to be more in line with her advocacy and interests.


  16. - Cincinnatus - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:47 pm:

    If the kids are old enough, and in college, yes. The Obama’s have no bounds on ambition and will stay in public life.


  17. - Dirty Red - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:51 pm:

    = is McLaughlin full of hot air? =

    We’re still talking about John and not Ryan, right? :)


  18. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:52 pm:

    I voted “hot air” simply because there’s no reason to believe that Obama has any interest in the Senate.

    McGlaughlin’s a different sort of cat. He was a Jesuit priest who gave up his collar to be one of the last men standing in the Nixon White House. Since then, he’s made a fortune on PBS. Not a typical career path.


  19. - Plutocrat03 - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:58 pm:

    Four years is a long time to predict with any certainty. The first step is whether they stay in the WH past 2013. If they do, then 2016 is too soon.

    They are both relatively young and I doubt that they will both retire to the rocking chair in 2013 or 2017.


  20. - mokenavince - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:58 pm:

    I don’t think so,McLaughlin was just sayin.


  21. - holewall - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 12:59 pm:

    Michelle’s running is possible, but is it probable? McLaughlin is full of hot air. Therefore, both alternatives can be true at the same time.


  22. - L.S. - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 1:04 pm:

    The term political “junkie” exists for a reason. It’s hard to just give it up. Right now it seems far-fetched. But assume he wins a second term, the realities of leaving power will come into focus by 2015 and the next move will have to be a consideration. It’s a long way away, but if she’s anywhere near as popular as she is now, it would be a tempting opportunity for anyone. And what’s the pressures of a Senate seat in your home town when you’ve already been first lady for 8 years?


  23. - Irish - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 1:13 pm:

    I think she will have had her fill of politics by then. Unlike Hillary who is driven and is probably the reason Bill was successful I think Michelle is completely content to be a mom. I can see her becoming a little more involved in some of the programs she has championed and maybe dabbling in her law profession. But I don’t see her wanting to be in the spotlight that Hillary seems to crave.


  24. - 47th Ward - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 1:14 pm:

    ===The Obama’s have no bounds on ambition.===

    Cinci, you write that as if you know them. I’ve actually met them, and while Barack clearly has political ambition, Michelle does not. For evidence, you could read Jodi Kantor’s book. I know from personal experience that Michelle has always been reluctant about having a political life.

    No way she’ll ever run for office. Having said that, like all former first ladies, she will use her influence to make an impact somewhere after they leave the White House. My guess is she’ll start a nonprofit organization that mentors young people, especially those who are outsiders or have been traditionally excluded from positions of power and influence in society. And I think she’ll be wildly successful at it.


  25. - cermak_rd - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 1:15 pm:

    I’ve never seen her show any interest. In fact, she seems mostly hesitant to campaign for the POTUS, though she does it well.

    I think she’s more interested in her children at the moment and while, yes, they’ll be older then, I still don’t see her doing that.


  26. - Shore - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 1:15 pm:

    As she was reported to say in the book that came out last week, the irish families in chicago control everything so no she won’t be allowed to run and will be passed over for Bill Daley/richard daley’s daughter/some other irish political scion.


  27. - Chester J. Lampwick - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 1:16 pm:

    From reading Jodi Kantor’s book, I think Michelle is eager for her husband’s presidency to be over so she can regain some normalcy in her life. I think running for Senate makes that even less possible than it already is.


  28. - Deep South - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 1:18 pm:

    I was watching the show when McLaughlin made his prediction and burst out laughing. Earlier in the program there was discussion about this new book, “The Obamas” and there was some mention of the fact that Michelle at first didn’t want Barrack to run…that she had no stomach for politics. So why in the world would McLaughlin think that she will run for senate? I’m amazed that some people in Washington just have no clue of things outside the Beltway…


  29. - Jim - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 1:44 pm:

    Don’t think she cares much for politics. She’ll love her life as former First Lady. They’ll be rich beyond her wildest dreams and catered to like royalty. That’s what she wants, will enjoy and will not abandon for the tawdry business of politics.


  30. - Westside - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 1:46 pm:

    McLaughlin is full of gas. I worked my tail off to get the President to the US Senate and then to the WH, and would gladly do it again for Michelle. But It ain’t going to happen. What the beltway gasbags fail to understand is that both Obamas are fully actualized, and crave neither limelight nor power, for their own sake.


  31. - OneMan - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 2:01 pm:

    Me thinks that Mrs. Obama would want to get home and get the girls a more normal life.


  32. - western illinois - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 2:16 pm:

    She could come back home…..and run for gov!
    It gets her out of DC by 2014.
    I see teh real conflict later I bet she wants to come back to Illinois and I am sure he wants to go to Hawaii


  33. - Bill F - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 2:44 pm:

    I love McLaughlin - used to be must-see TV for me. Haven’t watched it in a few years. This is a fun topic to talk about, but I’m not seeing it. She has not been out front on hard policy issues as Hillary was - choosing instead more traditionally First Lady issues like childhood obesity and helping military families.

    Of course, stranger things have happened. But I rate this a “WRONG!”


  34. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 2:50 pm:

    Yes I think her running is a possibility, not probable, but not out of the question especially if her husband gets defeated in 2012.


  35. - southwest - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 3:06 pm:

    She would only carry Chicago and I can’t even imagine her being that politically popular in Chicago.


  36. - Chevy owner/Ford County - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 3:46 pm:

    I would think that Sheila Simon and/or Lisa Madigan (among others) might have something to say about this….


  37. - zatoichi - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 4:15 pm:

    She does not appear to be a political animal enough, but once she has gotten a taste of the big time it could be hard to walk away. BO is young enough to give big dollar speeches for a long time so they will be financially set. Seems like a long shot to me, but Kirk is not exactly setting the world on fire so the opportunity will be there. Whatever Lisa Madigan decides to do will be the issue.


  38. - langhorne - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 4:40 pm:

    i voted it a possibility, but its a long shot, unless it is just a flash in the pan and she fades. i dont see her as a lasting candidate, because i dont see her connecting with any constituency to develop a base. maybe she could run from hawaii easier.


  39. - Cheryl44 - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 6:37 pm:

    Mrs. Obama is not at all interested in politics. She’s also the smartest person in the room if the crowd consists of her husband and the Clintons.


  40. - Boone Logan Square - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 6:49 pm:

    On the final week of October 1992, John McLaughlin predicted that President George H.W. Bush would win re-election. I don’t think that President Bush’s own pollster would have agreed with the prediction on that date.

    Don’t see Mrs. Obama ever wanting to run for elected office, and my guess is the Democratic nominee for Senate in 2016 is not someone who is spending much time in DC these days.


  41. - wishbone - Tuesday, Jan 17, 12 @ 10:01 pm:

    Hot air, but everyone knows that.

    p.s. Rich: I have a suggestion for a Question of the Day. If the revived South Side Irish parade goes past a gay bar does the Klu Klux Klan win?


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Napo's campaign spending questioned
* Illinois react: Trump’s VP pick J.D. Vance
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller