Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Smith: “I will not cower”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Smith: “I will not cower”

Monday, Apr 30, 2012 - Posted by Rich Miller

* As expected, Rep. Derrick Smith (D-Chicago) pled not guilty today and then read a statement to reporters

Smith, under pressure to resign his position, accused the FBI of engaging in “shenanigans” during the investigation and said agents pressured people to “say bad things about me.”

“I will not cower,” he said as his family stood behind him in the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse lobby after entering his not-guilty plea. “I intend to stand tall.

Smith also suggested he will remain in office while he fights the charges.

“The people in my district elected me on March 20, 2012, even after the government charged me with wrongdoing,” he said. “And that’s because they believed in me.”

Smith has never been elected to his office. He was appointed, then won the Democratic nomination against a white Republican. He’s starting to sound like Rod.

Also, regardless of whether people were pressured to “say bad things” about him or not, the guy is on tape taking $7,000 in cash. I don’t know how you “stand tall” after you do something like that.

       

27 Comments
  1. - Oswego Willy - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 12:38 pm:

    “The people in my district elected me on March 20, 2012,…”

    They nominated you … not elected you …

    I hate when appointed officals get the election “thing” wrong …

    Dear, the Honorable Derrick Smith,

    I understand your plight completely and, I too, would not cower to the US Attorney. They don’t know the “real” you, and when they feel that fury, they will be the ones cowering.

    Your Pal,

    the Honorable Rod Blagojevich
    Governor in Exile


  2. - Responsa - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 12:39 pm:

    ==He’s starting to sound like Rod==

    LOL, Rich. Rod, with his defiant and twisting of the facts approach, is not exactly the role model most pols in trouble with the Feds (and recorded asking for money) would choose.


  3. - I'M ON MY LUNCH BREAK! - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 12:45 pm:

    Whether or not he was entrapped, Smith needs to be removed from office. Entrappment means that law enforcement officials tempted you into doing something you wouldn’t ordinarily have done. That is a perfectly valid defense to the criminal charges, and if the court finds that’s what happened the charges should be thrown out. However, our elected officials must be above that type of temptation. It’s not enough to say “I won’t accept a bribe. . . unless someone offers me a lot of money in which case I might be tempted into taking it.” The very fact that he is capable of being entrapped to accept a bribe demonstrates that he is unfit to hold elective office.


  4. - Wensicia - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 12:58 pm:

    Should we call this new practice of publicly going on offense after federal indictment ‘the Rod Blagojevich defense’, or something to that effect?


  5. - DOWNSTATE DEM - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 1:02 pm:

    Is there no honor among thieves these days?


  6. - titan - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 1:04 pm:

    So…who’s the “Independent” or “New Party” candidate the old party will run against him?


  7. - 47th Ward - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 1:05 pm:

    I posted this a minute ago on the earlier thread:

    SMITH: I can’t guarantee that she gonna get [the grant] (UI).

    CS-1: Oh, she know that. But it’s just. . . she tryin’. She tryin’. And what she tryin’ to do is. . . a pretty good thing to me.

    That’s one exchange that I’d focus on if I was Smith’s lawyer. But I’m not a lawyer. I just think, having read the complaint, that it’s not a slam dunk case. Was it entrapment? My instinct is yes, but that is tough to prove.

    The bottom line is, one could argue that Smith was doing what many legislators have done: a favor for a constituent who might also become a political donor.

    And CS-1 had done political campaign work for Smith but didn’t get paid. Smith owed CS-1 for political work, and ended up paying him $1,000 in cash and $1,000 in a check. I would bet the check was from his political account, meaning Smith was probably guilty of being stupid and trying to hide a campaign contribution. Again, he wouldn’t be the first legislator who tried to hide a campaign donation.

    This is why we have trials: to let juries determine the facts.

    http://dig.abclocal.go.com/wls/documents/derricksmithfinalcomplaint.pdf


  8. - sal-says - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 1:12 pm:

    “I don’t know how you “stand tall” after you do something like that.”

    Hey, this is politics IL style, isn’t it?


  9. - 47th Ward - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 1:15 pm:

    Again, not being a lawyer, but couldn’t Smith’s attorneys subpeona every letter of support written by a state legislator to the Capital Development Board on behalf of applicants to CDB’s day care capital grant program?

    No wonder they want to boot Smith out of the House. His defense could be very embarrassing to other state officials who’ve done similar things but have received checks instead of cash.


  10. - dave - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 1:21 pm:

    His defense could be very embarrassing to other state officials who’ve done similar things but have received checks instead of cash.

    Not really… it isn’t illegal to write a support letter and receive a campaign contribution from someone. It IS illegal to explicitly write a support letter in exchange for money (whether it be cash or a check).


  11. - 47th Ward - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 1:28 pm:

    ===It IS illegal to explicitly write a support letter in exchange for money (whether it be cash or a check).===

    Yes, it is. A quid pro quo is always a no-no. But I’d prefer we let a jury decide what actually happened and how credible CS-1 is before we rush to judgement about Smith.

    And for the record, even if he gets acquitted, I think there is plenty of grounds for the House to expel him if it so chooses.

    I used to take the word of Patrick Fitzgerald as Gospel. I don’t anymore. And the anonymous informant is what really bothers me about this case.


  12. - dave - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 2:04 pm:

    **I’d prefer we let a jury decide what actually happened and how credible CS-1 is before we rush to judgement about Smith.**

    Yea… I definitely agree. My only point is that it shouldn’t and wouldn’t be embarrassing to find other legislators who have written support letters for someone they received a campaign contribution from.


  13. - CircularFiringSquad - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 2:34 pm:

    Hmm…did Capt Fax miss adding this to his invite to the lynching….
    “Last month the government then informed the court of a 2004 drug conviction and a 1978 burglary conviction, both of which resulted in probation, he said. In addition, prosecutors said the informant had about 20 other arrests for charges ranging from burglary to weapons offenses, the lawyer said.

    Henderson said he was highly skeptical that the government could not have known the extent of the criminal history in March, especially since the informant has cooperated with the government in the past.” from the Tribbies


  14. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 2:39 pm:

    CircularFiringSquad, that was Smith’s pal. Nice friends he’s got setting up cash payments.


  15. - Demoralized - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 2:53 pm:

    47th:

    The criminal trial has nothing to do with whether he should continue to serve or even be removed from office. The legality of what he did is irrelevant in my opinion. What he did was clearly unethical and I think the GA would be well within their rights to remove him from office.


  16. - 47th Ward - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 2:56 pm:

    I agree 100% Demoralized. But when the House acts based solely on the accusation of an anonymous informant, they are setting a dangerous precedent.

    I think when it gets time to deal-making or sentencing, then Smith will resign his seat. And I’ve said this all along, even if Smith is acquitted, the House can still expel him. One is a legal process, the other a political process.

    But think of the future witch hunts if the House acts quickly and the legal case unravels.


  17. - Sammy E. - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 3:02 pm:

    Following up on CircularFiringSquad post above:

    The G didn’t fully inform the judge about the informant’s criminal background before the wire was approved…is that grounds for the defense to have the recording tossed out, or is it just a minor slip up by the feds??? Without the overhears, there is no case.

    Still, doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be expelled from the House.


  18. - Demoralized - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 3:30 pm:

    47th:

    I don’t think there are any dangers here. He is on tape for crying out loud. He had the cash also. Like I said, legal or not it’s disgusting and I have no problem if they simply voted right now to remove him.


  19. - CircularFiringSquad - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 3:40 pm:

    Smith’s pal and a paid government snitch with 3 years senority.


  20. - HRT - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 3:45 pm:

    The CDB has been silent on making these grant awards. Any way this factors in to the delay?


  21. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 3:49 pm:

    ===legal or not it’s disgusting ===

    Fully agreed.


  22. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 4:31 pm:

    I fully agree as well, Rich, but if we expelled every legislator who did something that was morally repugnant to the general public, the House and Senate chambers would be echo chambers.

    Without casting aspersions on anyone, how does the alleged case against Smith stack up against the perfectly legal case of a legislator who is the chief sponsor of major legislation on behalf of a major corporation and then turns around, resigns, and gets paid to be their registered lobbyist after the measure becomes law?

    @Demoralized - Yes, he is on tape. Go back and read the indictment, and tell me exactly what he is on tape doing.


  23. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 4:35 pm:

    ===if we expelled every legislator who did something that was morally repugnant to the general public===

    Oh, please. Your endless excuses for this guy have truly become tiresome.

    He’s on tape taking the cash.

    End of story.


  24. - Demoralized - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 4:52 pm:

    YDD:

    I’m not even going to dignify that with a response.


  25. - 47th Ward - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 4:54 pm:

    Demoralized, did you read the criminal complaint? I’ve read it several times and it’s very hard to understand the transcripts. I don’t YDD was being snarky toward you, I think it was a legitimate question.


  26. - StreetervilleSnookie - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 6:28 pm:

    If every Illinoisan can’t stand up, condemn Smith and demand his expulsion then we truly DO have the government we deserve here in IL.


  27. - Demoralized - Monday, Apr 30, 12 @ 6:39 pm:

    47th:

    Yes, I did. And I understood YDD believed it to be a legitimate question. I disagree. I think it’s nonsense.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the holidays
* And the winners are…
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to previous editions
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Report: Far-right Illinois billionaires may have skirted immigration rules
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards (Updated)
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller