Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** Fun with numbers
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** Fun with numbers

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

* From a press release…

Thousands in Illinois Urge State Reps To Oppose SB 1715 on Statewide Day of Action Against Fracking

MoveOn Members in Illinois Launch Campaigns Urging State Legislators and Governor Pat Quinn to Support A Ban on Fracking

ILLINOIS - On Thursday, May 30th, MoveOn members from Illinois will be mobilizing as part of a statewide day of action against hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as fracking. Activists are urging their state legislators and Gov. Quinn to oppose SB 1715, unless a one-year moratorium and the creation of a task force to study the effects of fracking in the Illinois are added into the bill.

As of this writing, the statewide petition has a mere 1,436 signatures. The other online petitions listed in the full press release have a total of 485 signatures. So, they’ll probably break 2,000 by tomorrow. “Thousands” will be accurate, I suppose, but not truly descriptive.

*** UPDATE *** From…

Hi Rich —

I just saw your piece referring to all the MoveOn members in Illinois who are starting and signing petitions on fracking.

Thanks for covering their activism. Just wanted to clarify one thing — there are currently 46 different petitions on the subject of fracking started by MoveOn members in Illinois, for a total number of 10,955 unique signatures on all of those petitions. As we noted in the advisory, 32 distinct House districts are targeted by these petitions.

You can view them here:

Please let me know if you have questions.


Stefanie Faucher

OK, I stand corrected.

[ *** End Of Update *** ]

* Meanwhile, large-scale fracking has apparently begun in southern Illinois before the regulations have kicked in

(AP) — State records indicate that high-volume oil drilling already has begun in Illinois, where lawmakers and others are scrambling to pass a bill to establish regulations for a practice that has generated intense national debate as energy companies push into new territory.

Carmi-based Campbell Energy LLC submitted a well-completion report last year to the Department of Natural Resources voluntarily disclosing that it used 640,000 gallons of water during hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” of a well in White County. A regulatory bill awaiting a vote by state lawmakers — but not yet written at the time the well was drilled — defines “high-volume” as the use of 300,000 gallons or more of fluid during all stages of fracking. […]

Brad Richards, vice president of the Illinois Oil and Gas Association, said he wasn’t surprised to learn of the Campbell well but stressed that the company did nothing wrong. And although the volume of fluid it used was a lot compared with what has traditionally been used in Illinois — the typical “frack” has been 100,000 gallons or less — it pales in comparison to states like North Dakota and Pennsylvania, where it’s not unusual for drillers to use 2 million to 8 million gallons of fluid in a well, he said.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Steve - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:02 pm:

    Yeah, we are Illinois. We’d rather not have jobs! Yeah. We are the leader in decline. Yeah. Instead of focusing on fracking, how about shutting down things in Illinois that don’t work…. The list is long. Imagine a world without public_____ ( you fill in the blank).

  2. - JoeVerdeal - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:14 pm:

    It was nice to see the picture of the “sit-in” participants in front of Governor Quinn’s office the other day. Brought back memories of the late 1960’s.

    Wacky never goes completely out of style in some quarters.

  3. - Cincinnatus - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:19 pm:

    Rich said,

    “Thousands” will be accurate, I suppose, but not truly descriptive.”

  4. - Mouthy - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:20 pm:

    Fracking has been going on in Southern Illinois for decades. I know a person in the business 35 years ago. People act like this is something new…

  5. - Mouthy - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:21 pm:

    Make that “knew” a person….

  6. - New Name - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:22 pm:

    I like my water en fuego, thank you very much.

  7. - Chavez-respecting Obamist. - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:24 pm:

    I’m not convinced fracking that close to the New Madrid is a good idea, but I’m not completely against it either. I think I might be if I lived down there.

  8. - Cincinnatus - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:42 pm:

    - New Name - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:22 pm:

    “I like my water en fuego, thank you very much.”

    Slide 8:

  9. - Just Observing - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:43 pm:

    === Thousands in Illinois Urge State Reps To Oppose SB 1715 ===

    I bet it is thousands if you include those that are quietly in their minds urging their reps.

  10. - anon sequitor - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 1:58 pm:

    Mouthy, I invested in a fracking well more than 25 years ago. It started out very good, but like a lot of Illinois wells, it became a “stripper” within a year or two. Nice short term paycheck. though.

    Nothing new here. Keep moving.

  11. - Loop Lady - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 2:17 pm:

    Ok, where does 640,000 gallons of water go after it is injected? To the sky? Nope, it’s a sealed process. Even if 99% of the water used is recovered, a percentage fracking wastewater becomes part of the ecosystem where it is used, with all the other liquids generated from the practice.

  12. - dazed & confused - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 2:28 pm:

    Remember, it’s not over until the frack lady sings. I can’t wait to hear the sound of her sweet voice so we can get this bill passed to create some jobs in this state.

  13. - DanL60 - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 2:30 pm:

    Tens of protesters.

  14. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 2:34 pm:

    - a percentage fracking wastewater becomes part of the ecosystem where it is used, with all the other liquids generated from the practice. -

    Most of it remains trapped in the shale. This is actually one of my concerns, as this essentially wastes the water forever.

    However, we have a lot of water in Illinois, and I think the benefit of using more natural gas vs. petroleum and coal outweighs this concern.

  15. - JoeVerdeal - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 2:50 pm:

    —-it’s not over until the frack lady sings—-

    I love it, dazed & confused….!!!!

    Good one.

  16. - Keyser Soze - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 2:54 pm:

    The complete combustion (i.e., oxidation) of natural gas (CH4) generates Carbon Dioxide (a green house gas)and steam (i.e.,H2O, also a green house gas).

  17. - Allen Skillicorn - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 2:55 pm:

    Yeah, 10,955 peoples against clean burning Nat Gas.

    Lets get off coal first folks…

  18. - Small Town Liberal - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 3:03 pm:

    Keyser - No doubt natural gas isn’t a completely clean fuel, but it’s greenhouse gas emissions are about half those of burning coal.

    Also, the extraction and transportation produces less emissions, it’s a lot cleaner to transport gas by a pipeline than coal by diesel burning trains or trucks.

    I’ve said it before, it’s not the end all be all solution, but it’s a much better bridge than what we’re doing today.

  19. - Nosmo King - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 3:10 pm:

    =Most of it remains trapped in the shale. This is actually one of my concerns, as this essentially wastes the water forever.=

    Well, not “forever”. Someday, when water is as scarce as oil, Illinois jobs will be created to extract that water from the shale. See, we Illinois DOES care about jobs.

  20. - Nosmo King - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 3:12 pm:

    @Steve =Imagine a world without public_____ ( you fill in the blank).==

    Restrooms? That would be a bummer.

  21. - Downstate Illinois - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 3:17 pm:

    Well if MoveOn is against fracking it must be bad. Obviously, we can’t keep doing something we’ve been doing for 50 years without any major problems. Who needs 50,000 jobs anyway.

  22. - New Name - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 3:32 pm:

    Perhaps I quoted too liberally from Cincinattus’ link to Popular Mechanics to prove him wrong.

    Rich just deleted my response.

    Here’s a redacted version that doesn’t quote from Popular Mechanics.


    Right back atcha Cincinattus. Some of the better-known videos of flaming water faucets in fracking areas are the result of naturally occurring gas pockets. (The natural gas is why the frackers are in the area after all.)

    But others are a direct result of fracking.

    Curiously, one of the groups most heavily promoting counter-claims that flaming water faucets are somehow fakes is something called “America’s Natural Gas Alliance”.

    I wonder if they’re on the side of the frackers or the people who live in those areas… Hard to tell.

    And while freshwater aquifers may be protected by thousands of feet of rock in deep-drilling sites, toxic surface spills have definitely poisoned groundwater previously used for drinking and regulators are investigating whether or not shallow-drilling sites are causing leaks of toxic fracking fluid into aquifers.

    Again, not all fracking poisons water supplies, but some fracking operations clearly do.

    From your own link to Popular Mechanics — claims #4 and #7 debunk your debunking.

  23. - 47th Ward - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 4:04 pm:

    Here are some fun numbers: Cubs 9, Sox 2, bottom of the 7th. Navarro just hit his second HR of the game, a 3 run shot.

  24. - Keyser Soze - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 4:23 pm:

    My natural gas factoid serves two purposes. First, while fracking uses large volumes of water to open tight rock formations, the released hydrocarbons, when collected and burned, create steam (i.e.,water). So, does a fracked well then ultimately produce more (or less) water (i.e., steam) than is used to make the well productive? For the general case, I don’t know; the answer most likely varies from one well to another. Secondly, USEPA has made the case, accepted by SCOTUS, that CO2 is a pollutant per the Clean Air Act. This is because CO2 is a recognized green house gas that is thought by many to be responsible for climate change, or warming, take your choice. The conundrum here attaches to the fact that steam (water vapor) is also a green house gas. Water vapor is actually a more potent green house gas than carbon dioxide. Thus, the reasoning that finds CO2 to be an air pollutant must logically also find that steam (water) is an air pollutant. If so, the Clean Air Act should seemingly also regulate the emission of steam (water). Am I missing something here?

  25. - jake - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 5:04 pm:

    To Keyser Soze–

    Yes, you are missing something. Nature has very efficient systems for regulating the amount of water vapor in the air, so the effect of human activity in releasing water vapor into the air is essentially negligible. The systems for regulating carbon dioxide are not nearly as robust, so human emissions of carbon dioxide have produced, and are continuing to produce, significant increases in the atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide.

  26. - Mouthy - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 5:07 pm:

    Darn 47th, I was going to watch the game tonight. Oh well, at least the Cubs are winning….

  27. - wordslinger - Wednesday, May 29, 13 @ 10:09 pm:

    Here’s a fun number: three straight Hawks wins.

    Hey Detroit, no cup for you. Coffee is for closers!

  28. - Sunshine - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 7:42 am:

    When I was in the oil business in 1982-89 we employed Fracking on nearly all our oil and gas wells. We used acid and sand with water injected under very high pressure. It was very effective.

    If wells are properly completed, Fracking can be safe. However… many wells in Southern Illinois were not properly completed and many fresh water zones in the area are contaminated with brine water from lower, higher pressure formations.

    Fracking should not be permitted in wells within 1,000 feet of the lowest fresh water zone. But, in many cases that that is below the shale bearing natural gas and oil.

    It’s a tough call at best, has the potential for far greater production, but has great risk to fresh water zones.

    Add to this issue the fact that a great portion of the oil will leave the country for higher dollar sales overseas.

    We need to include in any Fracking legislation the provision that all oil and natural gas produced in Illinois from Fracking should be sold in the US or taxed heavily by Illinois if not.

    I think the primary point of increased oil production is less dependency on foreign oil? What helps assure us of the oil staying in the US? It is an illusion, much like the Keystone Pipeline. Nearly all that oil is destined for “tax free” export out of Texas. Little if any actually stays in the US.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Open thread and another LSSI reminder
* In defense of Mary Todd Lincoln on her 200th birthday
* Caption contest!
* Rauner says he'll file end of term report, clear clemency backlog
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Pritzker roundup
* Cook County Public Guardian sues DCFS: "Abject moral and human rights failure"
* Mendoza signature clearance rate is high during first round
* Your holiday season moment of Zen
* Pritzker criticized over lack of Active Transportation Alliance members on his transition committee
* Color me skeptical
* Pritzker heading to White House today
* Sen. Schimpf wants Satanic sculpture removed from rotunda as Rep. Bryant introduces condemnation resolution
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller