Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Close or not? House gay marriage vote looms
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Close or not? House gay marriage vote looms

Thursday, May 30, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

* As I told subscribers earlier today, the most pervasive rumor at the Statehouse is that the gay marriage bill will be called for a vote today. I’m not sure what to believe at this point. Here’s the Illinois Observer’s take

A top Democrat told The Illinois Observer on Wednesday night, “The roll call is in the high 50s. It’s close; it’s almost there.” […]

Some pro-marriage equality activists, who have been chafing at the Illinois House’s inaction this spring while other states have swiftly approved their own same sex marriage bills, have grown increasingly frustrated with House Speaker Michael Madigan, arguing that he only needs to “twist some arms” to get to 60.

“Madigan is loathe to force a member to vote against his or her district and to anger a majority of his or her constituents,” said an insider. “That’s how expensive primary challenges are created, which waste money needed to beat Republicans in the fall.”

The insider also noted that a string of controversial votes taken during the spring legislative session could ignite multiple primary contests for Democrats next year.

“The pension vote and the conceal carry vote have already exposed multiple Democrats to potential primary challenges,” said the insider. “A risky same sex marriage vote will just expand the pool of Democratic incumbents staring at a primary fight.”

There’s no doubt that Chicago-area Democrats could be looking at primary challengers because of this year’s controversial session.


* Meanwhile, President Obama
spoke about the gay marriage bill last night in Chicago

America is probably more tolerant, more accepting of difference than any time in our history. Obviously, you’ve got an African American President, a former and soon to be again female Speaker of the House. The work that we did together to end “don’t ask, don’t tell” is something that I could not be prouder of. But we also know that there’s still a lot of people who are excluded in our society and we’ve got more work to do.

Here in Illinois, we’ve got a vote on same-sex marriage that’s going to be coming up in the state legislature. And I just want to say for the record it’s something that I deeply support. I wrestled with this for a long time and I am absolutely convinced it is the right thing to do. And we have to make sure that wherever we go, we are reminding people that the essence of America is that everybody is treated equally under the law without exception.

       

24 Comments
  1. - Downstater - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 10:51 am:

    =a former and soon to be again female Speaker of the House. =
    Yeah! Like that is going to happen.


  2. - wordslinger - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 10:51 am:

    There’s your Obama cover, said it Chicago, for anyone who wants it or thinks they need it.


  3. - Anonymous - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 10:52 am:

    A former, and soon to be again, female Speaker of the House.
    DO NOT COUNT ON IT!


  4. - Amalia - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 10:52 am:

    equality is equality. Good luck, Rep. Harris!


  5. - DaveM - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 10:58 am:

    Hope the rumors are true. Pass this bill, Illinois.


  6. - Want to Marry - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 11:04 am:

    In Rhode Island, same sex marriage supporters ran well funded primary challenges to several state senators, including the Judiciary Committee chairman. (The RI House was fully supportive, the opposite situation from Illinois). While they didn’t win the races, they came close enough that it focused the survivors’ attention and helped change their votes, thus winning the prize.

    Supporters in Illinois need to be prepared to fund primary challenges to house members if it comes to that.


  7. - Grandson of Man - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 11:06 am:

    If this bill is not called, or if it does not pass, it sounds easy to blame the Democrats who don’t support it. While that may be partially true, blame must also go to Republicans. They have to do better than only a few legislators voting Yea.

    What is the equilibrium point on this issue nationally? Have many of the blue/purple states that support SSM already passed it, and the issue will settle down, or is the “tide” still rising? In other words, will more and more states pass it? Because it passed everywhere it was called, I hope that if they don’t have the votes, they don’t call it. It would be embarrassing to me if it was defeated.

    Since the vote count must be very close, there aren’t many arms to twist for Madigan, and thus the political risk is smaller. Or maybe just call it, and if it gets defeated, ramp up the political battle to a new level.


  8. - Beth - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 11:22 am:

    @Want To Marry:

    Not accurate. The primary challenges in RI were very modestly funded. Despite that, several did succeed in ousting incumbents. Several others put normally safe incumbents within a few percentage points of defeat. Had RI not passed marriage equality this year, then you would have seen a fully funded primary effort. As you will in IL if the House fails to come through.


  9. - Carl Nyberg - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 11:24 am:

    Northside DFA tries to be aware of potential challengers in Dem primaries in Chicago and I’m not hearing about a bunch of activity on this front. It might be happening and I’m unaware.

    BTW, if people do want training, DFA is sending its national training team to Chicago July 6-7. One can register at the DFA website.

    The training is good to hone one’s skills in field, media and fundraising. And it’s a good opportunity to network with other Dem activists.

    But I do get a sense that a large number of people feel like the Illinois General Assembly isn’t working well for them. Some of the stuff MJM says even gives this impression.

    Given the widespread dissatisfaction with Illinois legislators there should be lots of challenges b/c they aren’t doing a particularly good job.

    Defeat incumbents, it motivates the others to perform better.


  10. - 47th Ward - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 11:28 am:

    I can see how a pension vote encourages some Dem primaries in the Chicago area, depending on how well organized the teachers want to be next cycle. However, I don’t see marriage equality stirring many primary challenges. A vote for CCW with super preemption will give some challengers an opening, but there isn’t the same kind of infrastructure for gun control candidates to tap into as there is with AFSCME, IFT, IEA, CTU, etc.

    In other words, for those Chicago area Dems worried about a primary, marriage equality should be the least of their concerns.


  11. - Seabrook Fan - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 11:43 am:

    Agree with @47th. Ask Sullivan or Sandack about fears from Ds when it comes to primaries on this issue.


  12. - Want to Marry - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 11:50 am:

    Is the Illinois SSM effort underfunded enough and unorganized enough that Dems shouldn’t fear primary challenges? I’m contrasting this with Minnesota, where they spent $12M+ fighting off an amendment and another $2M+ lobbying and are now moving their fundraising into a PAC to support SSM supporters.


  13. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 11:55 am:

    Pew put out an analysis earlier this week regarding the fact that momentum for gay marriage may well stall nationally after this summer.

    In essence, the states most likely to support it have already approvied it, or are currently considering it.

    The other 35 states or so appear unlikely to join their counterparts in the near future. The momentum simply isn’t there, according to Pew.

    It will be interesting to see how things play out.


  14. - Just Watching - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 11:59 am:

    I hope they run it even if they don’t have the votes. Just to get a snapshot of the rollcall. Flush out how close they really are.


  15. - Zak - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 12:10 pm:

    @Want to Marry:

    I think Illinois is facing some greater hurdles to begin with than the other states that voted for marriage equality. First of all, the state is a totally different animal than MN, RI, or DE, and I personally don’t even begin to really understand it’s complex political machine(s).

    The “Freedom to Marry” campaign may be just as strong there but simply have more to deal with; as much as I am proud of MN United for All Families, for example, I am pretty confident that a campaign like that would have been crushed in Illinois. That’s OK, because it worked exactly where it was tailored to work, but I’m just saying that the landscape of that state does not make this as straight-forward a game - one that has only been further complicated by these massive robocall efforts in Chicago organized by Rev. Meeks and others.

    Chicago politics, everyone.*

    (*Joke, joke! I know this is an at least somewhat unfair stereotype, and I think Chicago is actually really fascinating politically.)


  16. - reformer - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 12:13 pm:

    I can’t think of any City House Dems who lost primaries in the last three cycles. I know Barrios and Burke had tough races, but they won.


  17. - Pot calling kettle - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 12:46 pm:

    I think part of the difficulty lies in the rapidly changing attitudes of voters. I suspect there are some legislators who do not know where their constituents are, but if they did, they would vote yes,


  18. - Tom B. - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 12:49 pm:

    The logic on this is backwards.

    When those primaries come, people reach out to the progressive community to fund them. Anyone who thinks they’re going to vote against the unions, Chicago/Cook activist crowd who cares about guns, and then rebuff the call of their President and further discrimination by voting against gay marriage is going to ward off primary challenge has this wrong.

    That invites a primary challenge from all three groups. Best move is to actually vote for gay marriage (or any one of those items) to lessen the impact.

    Primary challenges come from the left, not the right.


  19. - Skeptic - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 12:55 pm:

    The three rules for success: Don’t trust, don’t trust, don’t trust.
    If the votes were there to pass SB10, it would have been called by now. Comments from Harris and others who say the votes are there, are not believable until the vote is called and the bill is passed. It is irresponsible for Harris and others to claim the votes are there, yet also say we are close. What the heck, do they think we are stupid. If the votes are there, call the vote!


  20. - RichR - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 1:45 pm:

    I think Formerly Known As just doesn’t understand the point about Pew. There are only a few states left that can adopt same-sex marriage by statute. The overwhelming majority have constitutional barriers, which in most cases requires at least one vote in the legislature (possibly subject to supermajority) and a referendum to repeal the constitutional ban. For example, Nevada passed a resolution to repeal its ban recently, but it will have to pass another in 2015/16, sending to a 2016 referendum. So for some states, even action in the next year will only set up the possibility of change a few years from now. Hence the impending stall. Because the burden is higher, there will necessarily be a lag before states reach the point where there is enough support in the electorate to translate into constitutional change.


  21. - Chicago Cynic - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 2:15 pm:

    47 is absolutely right. That “insider” seems to be laying cover for the Speaker to stay out of it. It’s simply not a serious threat.

    I mean, how would that primary campaign go exactly? “I agree with Rep. xxxx on most issues but he’s out of step with our values.” Yea, that always gets the dust flying in Democratic districts…


  22. - Random Task - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 3:09 pm:

    How much actual clout does Obama have in Illinois?

    He has never been able to successfully promote to many ideas here. When he went to the US Senate, Obama was unable to anoint his successor in the Illinois State Senate. Kwame Raoul, who had been working in Evanston a short time earlier, curried favor with the committeemen and got the spot.

    His efforts to recommend Valerie Jarrett as his appointed successor in the US Senate went no place and he entered office under and ethical cloud for using intermediaries to sound out Governor Blagojevich.

    Obama’s personally lobbying failed to secure Chicago the Olympics.

    Obama did help get Alexi Gianialouias elected Treasurer, but that did not turn out so well and Alexi lost the US Senate seat to Kirk despite Obama’s support.

    The President’s endorsement of same sex marriage plays to his base, but is anyone in Springfield actually listening?

    I doubt it. Legislators are going to choose for themselves.


  23. - austinman - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 3:25 pm:

    There Will Be Some Primaries In Certain Legislative Districts If Certain Reps Vote For ssm, Especially ON The South And West Sides OfTheCity, I WaS Just Told To Count On It.


  24. - Just The Way It Is One - Thursday, May 30, 13 @ 4:28 pm:

    So the Prez is “ABSOLUTELY CONVINCED” it should pass–that’s hardly just “support” for the idea–his true colors on the issue have now become about as bright color behind it as you could imagine he had been all along–despite what he preached about back in 2008…!


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to today’s edition
* Uber’s Local Partnership = Stress-Free Travel For Paratransit Riders
* IEA releases member poll, with eye on major pension upgrade
* Finally, a CTU fiscal proposal that doesn't involve magic beans
* Go read the rest
* As lawsuits and strike threats fly, Pritzker calls on Stellantis to live up to its commitments on Belvidere plant
* Today's quotable: George McCaskey
* Buried nugget and magic beans
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition and some campaign stuff
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller