Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x3 *** Nekritz: Maybe we should pass both bills
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x3 *** Nekritz: Maybe we should pass both bills

Friday, May 31, 2013

* Rep. Elaine Nekritz may have shown the way forward today on stalled pension reform legislation. From the Daily Herald

Nekrtiz said that given the Illinois Senate’s strong rejection of her [pension] proposal Thursday, she’d be open to an idea proposed by Senate President John Cullerton that would have lawmakers approve two competing plans. That would, in theory, let the courts strike one down plan and let the other stand.

Showing the immense legal complexities of the debate, Nekritz said she’d only go along if the two plans were approved in separate legislation, not in one bill.

“That’s something that I think we should consider,” she said.

I’m not sure how they could pass both bills as separate entities because it would be a legal nightmare, unless one was held up with a parliamentary hold while the other moved through the courts. That’s a scenario I told subscribers about weeks ago.

*** UPDATE 1 *** Rep. Nekritz’s spokesperson told me that the parliamentary hold idea (making a motion to reconsider and then keeping it on until it has to be lifted as a backup) is exactly what Nekritz was referring to when she talked to the Daily Herald.

*** UPDATE 2 *** They may need to get something done quick or trouble could be afoot. Reuters

Moody’s Investors Service warned the state of Illinois that its credit rating could fall further if the legislature fails to fix the state’s huge public pension problem.

“Our view is that failure to enact pension reforms could drive the state’s general obligation bond rating lower from A2, which is already the lowest level for a U.S. state,” said Moody’s analyst Ted Hampton.

*** UPDATE 3 *** The obvious problem with the idea is that the court case on the first bill could end up lasting longer than the 98th General Assembly. If that happened, then the parliamentary hold would expire, along with the bill. So, it may very well be a no-go with the Senate Democrats.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - mr. whipple - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:23 pm:

    Or she figures the governor will veto the Cullerton bill.

  2. - ash - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:27 pm:

    Or she could take her blinders off and let go of her punishing plan. If SB2404 were to come up for a vote, it would pass by a much wider margin than the Madigan/Nekritz/Cross plan. Unfortunately, Madigan’s idea of leadership is to only allow votes on the things he likes.

  3. - Anonymous - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:29 pm:

    And the parliamentary hold would be on her bill, right?

  4. - Rich Miller - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:34 pm:

    Anon, Cullerton has already offered to let MJM’s bill take precedence. It was in the original SB1.

  5. - hello Elaine - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:37 pm:

    Someone please inform the representative that her bill went down in flames in the Senate. Ask her why the House won’t vote on both bills as the Senate has done. Ask her why the Senate should provide so much consideration for her failed plan, when the House won’t even vote on SB2404. Ridiculous

  6. - bored now - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:41 pm:

    this is illinois…

  7. - Cassiopeia - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:43 pm:

    Nekritz is making an 11th hour attempt to salvage her political career which may well have gone down in flames last night in the Senate. Her comments when the SS problem was brought up were a classic of what not to say.

  8. - Norseman - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:44 pm:

    Too late, I think the House burned the bridge on the two option approach. The Senate would look silly having trashed the SB 1 and touting SB 2404 as the constitutional alternatve. I think Nekritz suggestion is even sillier.

  9. - Mouthy - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:44 pm:

    Hail Mary won’t work either.

  10. - Norseman - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:46 pm:

    Suggestion of two separate bills passing with 2404 being held.

  11. - Abe the Babe - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:46 pm:

    If you put them on two sepearate bills that means two separate roll calls. Even using the “if and only if SB1 get struck down” language you still have to pass SB1 in the senate.

    It doesnt look likely.

  12. - 47th Ward - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:48 pm:

    If the Speaker calls Cullerton’s bill, it’ll fly through the House faster than grass through a goose. Moodys will be pacified for a while, and additional steps can be taken in the future to further address the financial crunch.

    By no means is this the last word on pensions, but it would be a start to a long and difficult journey through the courts and to (hopefully, with additional work) solvency for the funds and the state.

  13. - GA Watcher - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:48 pm:

    Doing what Rep Nekritz has suggested is quite similar to what President Cullerton proposed with SB 1 at the beginning of session; bifurcate the two options and let the courts decide which is constitutional. I say, go for it, Elaine.

  14. - wordslinger - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:49 pm:

    Maybe Ted Hampton at Moody’s should run for the General Assembly and submit a bill. He has the interests of Illinois’ citizens’ and its future at heart.

    It’s more than galling that these guys think they can weigh in on public policy while its being considered. Go home and get your shine box.

    To paraphrase Otter: “I got news for you, buddy. They’re going to stick it to us anyway.”

    The rating agencies said Illinois had a structural deficit problem. So the state raises incomes taxes, cuts spending, pays down a chunk of bills and the rating agencies stuck it to them, anyway.

    Or perhaps the state should no longer pay Moody’s for its ratings.

    If history is a guide, the rating agencies change their tune when business is threatened.

  15. - Decaf Coffee Party - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:49 pm:

    So the same Senators who railed against SB 1 as being unfair and uncosntitutional should now pass it as the primary bill?
    And Cullerton, having been admonished as a weak leader by Madigan, now should call for a revote on SB 1 to prove Madigan is correct and that he is a weak leader who will always bow to Mr. Speaker?
    As for Nekritz, where to start? She doesn’t anticipate the Social Security issue and, when confronted, says “Don’t worry…that’s only a problem down the road.” Then she says that the three separate bills would be unconstitutional because they a) don’t amount to enough individually to convince the Supreme Court to grant police powers, and b) the (laughable) state “guarantee” of future pension system payments is the tradeoff that makes SB 1 constitutional. She must really believe most Illinoisans are idiots. Or, more to the point, that most don’t really care if retirees get hosed as long as the GA can keep spending on other programs that bring more political capital.

  16. - Jimbo - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:50 pm:

    Thanks Ted, we get it. We are also aware of Ty Fahner’s thoughts on the matter as well as the Tribunes. Really, this is getting old.

  17. - cover - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:56 pm:

    = To paraphrase Otter =

    Wordslinger, I hope you’re not suggesting that the General Assembly hold a toga party.

  18. - Norseman - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:58 pm:

    Great suggestion, Word. Nice cost-saving measure.

  19. - Amalia - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 1:58 pm:

    conference committee

  20. - Roadiepig - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:02 pm:

    Wordslinger- perfect ideas on Moody’s !

  21. - Formerly Known As... - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:02 pm:

    Sure, let’s keep things on equal footing.

    Call the Senate bill in the House to be fair.

    If that goes down in flames as well, then we can talk about passing both of them.

    Otherwise this comes across as the sponsor of the bill grasping at straws, still looking for a way to manuever “my bill” ahead of “their bill”.

  22. - Makandadawg - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:06 pm:

    Last May, I thought she had some answers that could work but now this May she demonstrates no understanding of the arguments against her bills and ideas. She is sticking too close to a bad script.

  23. - zatoichi - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:07 pm:

    The issue of constitutionality of these bills keeps coming up as if it is a complete mystery to the people writing the proposals. Yes, it is very complex. Yes, there are competing ideas. Are there no recognized legal experts anywhere in Illinois who can help create this stuff and stay within the existing law? No retired SC judges, no law school presidents, no high powered legal staff, no pension/actuary experts, just no one who can provide realistic, non-political(?) advice? If the process will likely go through the courts anyway why not bring these kind of people in while developing the proposals? Of course it is much easier to bluster endlessly and look for ways to politically out-flank any opponents. Who would want to stop that?

  24. - El Swerean - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:09 pm:

    “Maybe Ted Hampton at Moody’s should run for the General Assembly and submit a bill. He has the interests of Illinois’ citizens’ and its future at heart.”
    Ready, aim, shoot the messenger!

  25. - Anonymous 1 - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:11 pm:

    Elaine doesn’t listen very well. The Senate HAS voted and rejected her baby. Reminds me of how she and Biss giggled the whole way through Ralph Martire’s unbelievably logical, coherent plan to address our revenue/debt problem. Not listening gets you in trouble in school. Apparently she never learned.

  26. - Bobbysox - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:18 pm:

    What did Rich Miller say a few weeks ago? It’s all about timing. This two-bit two-bill offer went away yesterday evening around 7 p.m.

  27. - wallinger dickus - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:19 pm:

    Here’s how it goes: your team bats and you get three outs, Rep. Nekritz. You sent Adam Dunn to the plate with a feather and he responded as expected. Now the other team gets to bat.

    And who’s to say 2404 won’t satisfy the rating agencies even more than Ms. Nekritz’s constitutionally-challenged litter?

  28. - Oy Vey - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:20 pm:

    Rep Nekritz’ strategy will prove Pres Cullerton is right! His bill is the constitutional one.

  29. - Old and In The Way - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:21 pm:

    There is also the common sense issue. Invoking police powers assumes that there is no other less drastic alternative. Passing legislation claiming police powers because there is no other alternative except if it is ruled unconstitutional then lets trot out this alternative (the pseudo swap) instead. Sounds like the reasoning of a real estate lawyer……oh I guess that’s why it appeals to a desperate Rep. Nekritz.

    Lest it be overlooked there are serious issues with the Cullerton Bill as well. First there is the health care suit that is yet to be heard. That may well make this whole charade moot. Second, a choice cannot be forced into a contractual concession. You can make the choice to trade for consideration but you always have the option for maintaining the status quo. In other words I cannot say that you must make a decision either way that diminishes the condition of your contract. My law professor called it, “Heads I win, Tails you lose.”

    Just back from Louisiana I thought I’d see it all but I gotta say we are something special in Illinois! Pensions are crowding out the budget, that’s why we are increasing spending by $2 billion. As they say down there….blees their heart!

  30. - ILPundit - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:24 pm:

    The Speaker really created this mess. His approach all session has been “once the House solves this issue, we’ll share the solution”. He’s been completely dismissive of the Senate and the hard (and credible) work they have done on this issue.

    He’s done a great job of leading his caucus, and has done a horrible job working with anyone he doesn’t directly control. That’s bad leadership folks.

  31. - Earl Shumaker - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:39 pm:

    Wordslinger: I liked your comments about Moody’s
    Has Moody’s lost some of its “prestige” due to the Subprime securities debacle

  32. - No really - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:47 pm:

    They Bills don’t have the same support so why pass them as if they do? SB1 went down with a huge number of no’s and 2404 passed with a clear majority. The only thing stopping 2404 from being passed in the house is Madigan or as many have said it would pass with a huge majority. So no don’t vote for SB1 again it’s not what the representatives of the people of the state want they want 2404. Further if you vote for both why Quinn would just sign SB1 isn’t that the one he wants. If this is about fixing a problem fix it, pass 2404 rather pass than vote for SB1 hoping the courts decide years from now.

  33. - Bush Twins - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:50 pm:

    Or maybe just, you know… Call the one that has the votes to pass? Or is that too complex? BTW the trib today talked about legislators needing the summer to explain their NO vote. Seems to me they don’t need that much to simply utter “it’s illegal.”

  34. - Harry - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:53 pm:

    How on Earth do you pass 2 totally inconsistent bills without establishing which one takes precedence? What if both are upheld? How does the court or anyone else evaluate the consequences of overturning all or part of one if it does not know the fate of the other–which could be critical in a police power argument.

    This is all nuts.

  35. - Cassiopeia - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 2:58 pm:

    Everything has gotten a little silly and now Governor Goofy is crying veto, veto rather than doing anything constructive.

  36. - ash - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:13 pm:

    Does anyone but Barry Nekritz really care what she thinks? Does He? At this point she is just acting out of a despearte attempt to cause pain to workers, for some strange reason. Her plan went up in flames so she needs to build a bridge and get over it.

  37. - Judgment Day - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:19 pm:

    “Has Moody’s lost some of its “prestige” due to the Subprime securities debacle”

    Assuming they had any to start…. “Prestige” - maybe.. “Honesty” and “Integrity”? Well, different issues…..

    Look, until the feds and the FINE (Financial, INsurance, & Equities) groups come to grips with a whole raft of issues, including how credit rating firms get compensated, we’re stuck with the credit rating system that helped create the whole sub-prime (Mortgage Backed Securities, Credit Default Swaps, Auction Rate Securities, Structured Investment Vehicles, etc.) disaster.

    The way it’s done currently creates incentives for all sorts of bad decision making. But with all the litigation still going on, nobody’s going to be willing to step forward and push to change the system, because then it’s pushed out there that the credit rating system was (and still is) badly flawed. So, the litigation goes (endlessly) forward and everything else waits.

    That does not excuse the State of Illinois, though. Nobody put us in this mess but ourselves. Our biggest problem is that there’s a real likelihood that we could end up with this same pension/retirement issue front and center next year, if not the year after.

    Remember, GASB 68 kicks into effect by 06.15.2014, and that means standardized and far more extensively detailed reporting on pensions and retirement obligations. That’s when we find out how these proposed legislation will really perform.

    Word, nice idea on Moody’s, but it’s useless at this point in time. If you remember, about 18 months ago, the Feds wanted to require certifications from the big rating agencies on each rated security. They had a couple new issues come up to be rated, and the credit rating firms refused to issue credit ratings. And Treasury and the Federal Reserve flat out caved. It was “Stick the fork in, they’re DONE!”.

    Just saying….

  38. - Earl Shumaker - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:33 pm:

    Judgement Day: I appreciate your comments

  39. - RNUG Fan - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:35 pm:

    What is this about a Chicago Teacher pension holiday. Has everyone had complete memory loss?

  40. - RNUG Fan - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:39 pm:

    I want to hear the story about any legislator hearing from anyone BUT the Trib editorial board member or civic committee CEO about the NO vote on SB 1 ……One of SB 1 s supporters cam up with some silly conspiracy about why they only got calls AGINST it an none for it.

  41. - Lotta Liaison - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:44 pm:

    That comment from “ash” should be removed.

  42. - Cook County Commoner - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:45 pm:

    Displeasure with Moody’s is understood. However, if the state runs its finances so that it needs outside money, then it will just have to tolerate meddling from rating agencies.

  43. - Harry Lefkowitz is not your friend. - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:47 pm:

    If I’m Madigan, I revive Cullerton’s original SB 1, with the Part A, Part B approach….tack it onto a Senate bill and pass it over to the Senate and dare Cullerton to find the votes to pass it. This allows MJM to go home saying “not only did Cullerton tank SB 1, but he wouldn’t even call a bill which was once his pet idea. Hey, I was flexible and he wasn’t.” This move would put Cullerton and the SDems into a heck of a trick box with the unions and the editorial boards.

  44. - Makandadawg - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:49 pm:

    I think this new Moody’s quote is not new. It is from January. Really?

  45. - Old and In The Way - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:54 pm:

    Sorry but the process just doesn’t work that way. It might be possible with more time but not literally at the 12th hour…….

  46. - Just The Way It Is One - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:55 pm:

    Thank you Rep. Nekritz. All others may refer to my Comment (#50, I believe) in the “Question of the Day” Post. Right on. Common sense. If it has to come to a choice between doing THIS vs. NOTHing? Then do it–whatdya all have to lose?!

  47. - Old and In The Way - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:58 pm:

    Moody’s should comment on the CPS pension holiday! How about Governor Dufus threatening to veto the bill? He really knows how to scare those legislators! What a hard man!

  48. - Harry Lefkowitz is not your friend. - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 3:59 pm:

    Old and In,

    The system doesn’t work that way? When did the Chicago Teacher Pension Holiday emerge? Wasn’t that like 2 hours ago?

  49. - ash - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:01 pm:

    Why is that? You think she isn’t acting out of desperation or that everyone hangs on her every word?

  50. - Anon - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:02 pm:

    Won’t work Harry - too late. Madigan lost all credibility last night when he announced he was “heading to the mansion.” Teaming up with Quinn is the surest way to instill failure in any endeavor. And when Quinn heard he was heading over he should have ordered his security guys to block the doors. Heres a news flash Pat - Madigan is about to launch his daughter up your chimney - you should be locked in a room with Cullerton and Rahm if you want a future.

  51. - Just The Way It Is One - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:02 pm:

    By the way, to Cassiopeia @2:58 pm, maybe our Blogger missed it, but despise him or not, your utterly insulting reference to “Governor Goofy” is not only way over the top, but utterly ridiculous and ill-informed. Pat Quinn has been both saying and working diligently for years now to get something reasonable passed. Guess you figured you’d just sneak-in and off the cuff, vulgar, and totally uncalled-for “Pot Shot” against Governor Quinn (or is it that you’re working for Rauner, Rutherford, or some other Governor “want-to-be”??!!

  52. - Soccertease - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:03 pm:

    Sounds like desperation to me. Passing two bills, Moody’s calling the shots and leavings the Judge’s Retirement out of the legislation. Is this let’s make a deal with the judges?

  53. - Old and In The Way - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:04 pm:

    Sad to say I will have to read later how this all turns out. I was gone so long I forgot just how goofy and dysfunctional the legislature in Illinois is! Gotta run to catch a flight but I look forward to reading about the next chapter tomorrow! Pensioners, keep the faith!

  54. - Meanderthal - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:19 pm:

    Isn’t Cullerton the godfather of one of Madigan’s children? Can that kid be pulled away from whatever cushy sinecure of a job he may have to broker a deal between his two “fathers”

  55. - Vote Quimby! - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:32 pm:

    ==you’d just sneak-in and off the cuff, vulgar, and totally uncalled-for “Pot Shot” against Governor Quinn==
    Ummmm…what is “vulgar” about Governor Goofy?

  56. - anon - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:46 pm:

    When Governor Quinn approved Squeezy the Pension Python, he opened the door to being called Gov. Goofy. What goes around comes around.

  57. - Lotta Liaison - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:48 pm:

    No. Obviously the Representative is not making a desperate attempt to cause pain to state workers. Do you really believe her goal is to cause pain to state workers rather than save the system? Also, do you think it’s maybe a little crazy to drag an elected officials’ family into the mix?

  58. - walkinfool - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 4:51 pm:

    It’s simple: one plan (SB1) would go 80% or more of the way to solving the related financial problems, and was passed on a bi-partisan vote in the House, and rejected by in the Senate Dems. None of the sponsors ever said this bill would finally solve all the problems, but rather that it would take us a long way to that goal.

    The other (SB2404) goes maybe 30% of the way financially, and passed the Senate easily, but has not been called in the House. Probably because the Speaker still wants to actually solve this problem.

    Of course the easy way out could pass if called, and we would have failed once again to make substantial progress.

    Maybe that’s all we can get right now.

    That’s cowardice, not courage or leadership, by the Senate Dems. Shame on them.

  59. - Decaf Coffee Party - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 5:24 pm:

    “Saving the system” is merely spin. The goal is to have more cash to spend. While they spend money on things like a new arena for the DePaul basketball team. The groups they are targeting now are teachers and state workers. When they have burned through that money, they’ll look for other groups to fleece.

    Who in their right mind, if they had a mountain of bills to pay and were in a “fiscal crisis” so dire that they needed to ignore the constitution, would find $1.2 billion more than expected in revenue and, rather than paying down debt, would turn around and spend it in the very next budget?

  60. - Nice kid - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 5:28 pm:

    Walkinfool, it’s simple only if you ignore that pesky ol’ constitution. And, as far as I can tell, the Cullerton bill would get us to around 90% funding. That is plenty good enough. Looks to me like the speaker is showing at he is short on leadership and long on ego right about now.

  61. - kimocat - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 5:37 pm:

    “Looks to me like the speaker is showing at he is short on leadership and long on ego right about now.” Nothing new there nice kid. I could quote you my one and only conversation with MJM, but his words would get me banned on this site.

  62. - Lotta Liaison - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 5:42 pm:

    I love the black and white statements about how the Madigan bill clearly violates the constitution. It’s amazing the wealth of folks who have studied the case law and can predict the judiciary. A true brain trust around the Capitol!

  63. - Madison - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 5:52 pm:

    Think of this in political terms, we have a solution looking for a problem. Ty and his comrades have declared an emergency, which…is questionable;not even 25% of expenditures. they just choose to have the money for other expenditures. Nekritz and MJM have taken on their base on behalf of these…Republicans. And missed. In politics,never take on your base or a primary and not get the guy.
    I see a lot of exposure here for Ms. N.

  64. - Decaf Coffee Party - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 5:53 pm:

    Eric Madiar, one person who did actually research the issue of constitutionality of pension benefit diminishment and looked at case law, certainly believes SB 1 is unconstitutional.

    Even Rep. Nekritz acknowledged today that the pieces of SB 1 are unconstitutional unless the Supreme Court grant the state “police powers” and/or considers the state’s “guarantee” to finally make the payments it should have been making all along to be a tradeoff for cuts to pension benefits.

  65. - Mama - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 6:01 pm:

    ===Decaf Coffee Party - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 5:24 pm: ===
    I totally agree with your view of the money situation.

  66. - Michelle Flaherty - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 6:32 pm:

    If we’re looking for an 11th hour constitutional test case, let’s go a different route.
    Instead of testing the pension clause, let’s test Aritlce VIII (Finance) Article IX, Section 3. Limitations on Income Taxation.

    That’s the part that mandates a flat income tax and why everyone seems to think we need a constitutional amendment to change it to a graduated, progressive tax.

    But wait, this just in … I’m told we have a fiscal emergency and the constitution no longer matters.

    Well, talk about an opportunity, let’s get a bill filed for a progressive income tax and send it to Quinn and go tell the courts they should ignore the constitution.

    Problem solved.

  67. - PublicServant - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 6:44 pm:

    Great point Michelle. Ignoring the flat tax portion of the constitution would actually address the structural tax deficit that is the root cause of the state’s penchant for using the pensions as a piggy bank that is the root cause of the pension debt problem we have today.

  68. - Jack - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 7:22 pm:

    I like Michelle’s idea. Violating one part of the Constitution would certainly be no worse than violating another part of it. And we could get some entertainment while the millionaires affected bring suit.

  69. - PublicServant - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 7:30 pm:

    Yeah Jack, imagine all the chauffeurs picketing at the capitol while a yacht blockade of the lakefront hits page 1.

  70. - Just The Way It Is One - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 7:57 pm:

    Vote Quinby and anon in the 4 ‘o clock hour–pretty easy to Google what vulgar means, or actually look it up in a printed, reputable Dictionary. Don’t play stupid. It was a cheap pot shot against the Chief Executive of this State. And although creating Squeezy may be somewhat of an unusual or “goofy” approach to addressing an extremely serious problem borne out of frustration IN trying for months TO solve the pension problem in good faith does not make his entire Governship so bizarre so as to characterize the popularly elected Chief Executive of the People of Illinois in an offensive way by slamming him with such a demeaning title. Show some class, or as my parents used to say, “Grow up and act your age…!”

  71. - RNUG - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 8:23 pm:

    Old and In The Way,

    Good to see you back.

  72. - Just The Way It Is One - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 9:14 pm:

    Gov. “Dufus?” Vulgar man, just plain vulgar–cmon–show some class, even if you despise the guy, he’s still the Governor…such explicit outright insults also looks a WHOLE lot like borderin’ on “excessively rabid” there, too, though admittedly, not running this Blog, that one’s not my call….

  73. - Not Rollo Tomasi - Friday, May 31, 13 @ 10:42 pm:

    She is sounding more like Nancy Pelosi every day.

  74. - withstateworkersnteachers - Saturday, Jun 1, 13 @ 12:27 pm:

    here here

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Saturday remap update: Bobby Rush blasts new map; Chris Christie and Mike Pompeo to attack Illinois map; Map called 'dummymander' by DC pundit; Head fake?
* Friday evening updates: New maps aren't as Dem as earlier portrayed; Lipinski eyes comeback on first draft maps; Vaccinated Catanzara muzzled by judge
* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - HDem money update
* IDPH will follow new CDC recommendations on school-associated outbreaks
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Partisan analysis of newly proposed districts
* Question of the day
* COVID-19 roundup
* The Tribune takes a look at Jesse Sullivan's background
* Billionaire governor and spouse reported just $2.2 million in federally taxable personal income last year
* 15,669 new cases over the past week; 54 percent of all Illinoisans fully vaxed; 1,500 hospitalized; 341 in ICU; 2.5 percent test positivity rate
* *** UPDATED x5 *** New congressional maps released
* *** UPDATED x1 - ILGOP gloats *** ILGOP actually raised more federal/state/local cash than DPI during third quarter
* Harmon's chief of staff Jake Butcher recovering from "mild" breakthrough case
* Today's must-read
* Pritzker quietly extends vax deadline during union negotiations while Lightfoot seeks injunction against the FOP
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller