Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** No vote on Madigan pension amendment, conference committee to be formed
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** No vote on Madigan pension amendment, conference committee to be formed

Tuesday, Jun 18, 2013 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Subscribers were told much more about this earlier today, but here’s a quick e-mail from Rep. Elaine Nekritz’s spokesperson…

I’m told the House committee this afternoon will not be acting on the new version of SB 2404 this afternoon. Testimony will be presented on the bill in a subject matter hearing.

Also, I’m told the plan for tomorrow is for the Senate to non-concur on the House-approved amendment to Senate Bill 1 that make up the House pension plan. The House would then refuse to recede, sending the issue to a conference committee.

The “new version of SB 2404″ is Speaker Madigan’s amendment which guts Senate President Cullerton’s union-negotiated bill. No vote means MJM has backed off a bit. A good sign.

And Madigan opposed formation of a conference committee last week. That position has changed. Again, subscribers know more.

*** UPDATE *** Subscribers were told about this as well

It could be a two-fer session: Pension reform and concealed carry veto override.

          Click here to help buy presents for LSSI foster kids!

  1. - Cassiopeia - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 10:53 am:

    Its beginning to sound as if an actual deal could be in the works.

  2. - dave - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 10:55 am:

    Doesn’t Cullerton get crushed in a conference committee?

    Yes, the Senate will still have to approve whatever comes out of the conference committee, but if I am the Sen Dems, I wouldn’t want to head into a conference committee when the other 3 caucuses are against me.

  3. - Loop Lady - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 10:57 am:

    God I hope so…this is just unbelievable…I know that State employees will pay for legislative malfeasance, but we need a solution yesterday…

  4. - Joe M - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 11:07 am:

    I don’t know much about conference committee procedures. But from the Illinois Legislative glossary at:
    they give this definition of a conference committee:

    Conference Committee
    An even number of legislators, 5 from the Senate and 5 from the House of Representatives, who attempt to resolve differences between versions of a specific bill or joint resolution passed by their respective bodies. The conference committee reports recommendations back to the General Assembly for further action.

  5. - Bud - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 11:07 am:

    There’s hasn’t been a conference committee in some time. 2000, 2001 maybe.

  6. - low level - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 11:10 am:

    @dave - perhaps, but it might also provide cover for some in his caucus to support the stronger version.

  7. - Give Me A Break - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 11:19 am:

    The good old conference committee, now there is something from the past. Remember when the state budget was a conference committee report?

  8. - Downstater - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 11:26 am:

    Madigan must have read the poll results concerning his daughter and read the press releases by Bill Daley.
    SB 1 or something close to it will be the right solution to an improved financial picture in Illinois.

  9. - Makandadawg - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 11:27 am:

    So when would a report from the conference committee come back to the GA for action? Are there any deadlines that matter?

  10. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 12:23 pm:

    Finding the “conference committee” was the Great Snipe Hunt pulled on interns back in the day.

  11. - Norseman - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 12:36 pm:

    Over the last couple of days, I’ve seen some uniformed comments that come from folks who think the conference committee is akin to the electoral college in that if you have three caucuses approve, then it is approved. Espousing this as a means to overcome Senate Dems position. This is not how it works. Each chamber’s majority gets 3 out of 5 conference committee members. If a majority of the conference members sign (6), then it’s filed with the Secretary of the Senate and the Clerk of the House and then brought up for a vote. I rarely saw an actual conference committee meeting. Most of the time, the sponsor after talking with the opposite chamber sponsor and a few key solons has a staffer prepare a report which then gets circulated. If the first conference committee is voted down, then a second can be tried. It that is voted down, then the process is done.

    Consideration of conference committees fall within the deadlines set by the chamber’s leadership.

  12. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 12:42 pm:

    ===Doesn’t Cullerton get crushed in a conference committee?===

    See Norseman’s comment. They may get outvoted in a conference committee, but they can still vote it down on the floor.

  13. - South Suburban Voter - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 12:53 pm:

    If they pass pension reform in July what would be the effective date?

  14. - Formerly Known As... - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 1:00 pm:

    === backed off a bit ===

    Chisel this date in stone.

    The times they are a’changing.

  15. - Bill White - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 1:03 pm:

    === If they pass pension reform in July what would be the effective date? ===

    If by 3/5ths majorities, whenever they want.

    If by simple majority no earlier than June 1, 2014.

  16. - Formerly Known As... - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 1:04 pm:

    The question becomes:

    Did the Speaker do this because he felt it was the right move for the state?

    Or because he thinks it might take pressure off the Attorney General to provide a legal opinion on the proposal(s)?

    Doubtful it works if his motivation is the latter. She’ll still be pressed to follow precedent and statute on a potentially unconstitutional proposal.

    Time will tell.

  17. - low level - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 1:05 pm:

    Yes- if anyone cares to, a look at the journals from either chamber towards the end of Spring session (which changed in 1995) will show many votes on “Approve Conference Committee Report #1″ aka CCR

    No guarantee either chamber would approve, although you would think (hope) that whatever emerged would have enough votes to be approved. That is where the 3 of 4 caucus observation probably comes in.

  18. - In the know - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 1:32 pm:

    And I remember the HGOP days where conference committee reports were placed in drawers, the rules for staffers, never let the copy leave your cold dead hands! Seriously, wouldn’t this be a chance for the GOP both Senate AND House, to wrest control from Speaker? I mean really, he’s committed to this process so he can’t very easily
    “pocket veto” the CCR, so IF they suddenly shifted towards Cullerton, they could hand Speaker is only truly public defeat in….well. decades. Am I missing something here? I think THAT was why the Speaker was concerned about the CCR process, lack of control.

  19. - Norseman - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 1:49 pm:

    === That is where the 3 of 4 caucus observation probably comes in. ===

    If that one caucus happens to be the Sen. Dems, it’s as dead as a doornail.

  20. - wishbone - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 2:39 pm:

    “I’ve seen some uniformed comments…”

    Ah, those comments all dressed up in uniforms and standing at attention.

  21. - Rudy - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 2:56 pm:

    I hope our Senate Dems remain independent-minded, despite all the pressure and threats they must be getting. They sat down with the primary affected interest group–the union–and negotiated a compromise position–the original SB2404. They should now just keep their word.

  22. - low level - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 3:23 pm:

    @ Norseman - With 40 votes, clearly the SDems aren’t going to get rolled or any other such thing - no matter how it was done

    Rather, that is the strength of the conference idea. A chance for all involved - esp the SDems - to find a solution, or at least ad much pf a consensus as possible that can move us forward on this very serious issue.

  23. - low level - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 3:25 pm:

    @ Rudy Right - they should go with that and we can have special sessions until Oct 31

  24. - Ruby - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 3:44 pm:

    On the bright side, the stock market and therefore the state pension investments continue to outperform all expectations for an improved economic outlook for the fiscal year ending July 1st 2013. We were in much worse shape when the Wall Street bankers plunged us into a deep recession five years ago.

  25. - Norseman - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 3:45 pm:

    === With 40 votes, clearly the SDems aren’t going to get rolled or any other such thing - no matter how it was done

    Rather, that is the strength of the conference idea. A chance for all involved - esp the SDems - to find a solution, or at least ad much pf a consensus as possible that can move us forward on this very serious issue. ===

    LL, conference committees are such an important consensus building tool, it hasn’t been used since the 94th General Assembly - that I could find. Back in the old days when this was a frequently used action, it didn’t have any consensus building strength. As I mentioned, most of the conference reports I worked on didn’t involve any face-to-face meeting of the conferees.

    I don’t know why you feel the need to romanticize this action. The only thing to take from it is that the leaders decided on a procedural process.

  26. - low level - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 4:09 pm:

    LOL - not Romanticizing anything. In fact, as a lifelong Dem, I find nothing about pensions to be romantic.

    It just seems like something that might work better than what was originally planned for the special session. From what the original plan was, it looked as if we might get Special Sessions #596. This may work.

  27. - Dude Abides - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 4:21 pm:

    If the Conference Committee results in passing a bill that is more onerous to employees and retirees than SB2404 is it safe to say that the Union will take it to court and there won’t a decision until next year?

  28. - dupage dan - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 4:29 pm:

    So, if a bill comes out of the committee that is approved by both chambers, does that mean that PQs call for a special session was a good thing to do? Does he get the props for that? Will his approval ratings surge? Will he sign it into law or AV the thing to death? Stay tuned…….

  29. - Bobbysox - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 4:32 pm:

    Credit will be short-lived when whatever they come up with (if they can pass it) is found to be unconstitutional.

  30. - dupage dan - Tuesday, Jun 18, 13 @ 4:44 pm:

    There was a suggestion that MJM is looking for cover when his tough bill is declared unconstitutional after PQ signs it into law - the whole idea that he can blame it on the SC and that clears the decks for LM to rise to the gov mansion and MJM can muscle another tax hike to pay for the whole thing. Sounds tidy but then these conspiracy theories usually do.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Afternoon roundup
* The labor beat
* Alden Global Capital is expanding their usual business of gutting newsrooms to buying up mobile home parks
* Question of the day: 2022 Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Winnebago County state's attorney regrets past remarks, says SAFE-T Act "more of a collection issue"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** House Firearm Safety & Reform Working Group rolls out its new bill
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Morning briefing
* Open thread
* Live coverage
* 2022 veto session cheat sheet
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller