Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » What’s in a backlog?
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
What’s in a backlog?

Monday, Nov 25, 2013

* From an SJ-R story on the state’s bill backlog

[Comptroller Judy Baar Topinka’s spokesman Brad Hahn] said that a strong tax season this year allowed the office to “aggressively pay down bills” in April and May. By the end of May, the backlog was down to $5.8 billion and vendors were waiting a minimum of two months to be paid, half what they were waiting at the start of April.

That was, however, the high-water mark in the state’s efforts to pay bills on time. By the end of June, also the end of the state’s fiscal year, the backlog was sitting at $6.1 billion.

By Oct. 1, the backlog was up to $7.5 billion, including bills being held in state agencies prior to being given to Topinka’s office for payment. And as of late last week, the total was at $8.8 billion — an even higher number than at the start of April.

Hahn said the office believes the total will hit $9 billion by the end of December, exactly where Topinka predicted it would be last summer. It is the second year in a row the backlog will sit at about $9 billion at the end of the calendar year.

* Drudge had a little fun at Illinois’ expense today…

* But let’s define “backlog,” shall we?

According to the comptroller’s office today, $4.6 billion of that $8.8 billion “backlog” is less than 30 days old. I’m not sure how that can be defined as old bills.

Also according to the comptroller’s office, $1.6 billion of those bills are between 30-60 days old, so that’s not terribly horrible. But, $2.6 billion in invoices have surpassed the 60-day mark since the comptroller received the payment paperwork.

Yes, the trend is not good. But the problem isn’t as bad as reported.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

20 Comments
  1. - wordslinger - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 12:43 pm:

    To me, it’s not a backlog til the juice kicks in. Thirty days from invoice is pretty standard in business.


  2. - downstate hack - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 12:55 pm:

    Does it really matter how it is reported, the bottom line is the State is broke, yet the legislative branch and the Governor has done nothing to really produce a truly balanced budget in this State for years.


  3. - Bogart - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 1:00 pm:

    downstate - I would not call raising our income tax from 3 to 5% “nothing” but if you meant any serious discussion on spending cuts, I agree “nothing”.


  4. - steve schnorf - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 1:34 pm:

    Good point, Rich. There are two parts to a backlog, how much and how long. We will move in the wrong direction for another 120 days or so but we almost always do at this time of the year.


  5. - thechampaignlife - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 1:48 pm:

    ===I’m not sure how that can be defined as old bills===

    Does that less than 30 days number include time spent being held at the agency or just time time spent at the comptroller?

    Why are they held at the agency, anyway? Does interest not start until it hits the comptroller’s office?


  6. - Ahoy! - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 1:49 pm:

    I don’t believe this covers medical bills for employees which I believe is running over 300 days old.


  7. - anonymouse - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 2:03 pm:

    @Ahoy-I was told by a state retiree friend who lives in Fl that Cigna advised him he should be paid for his knee replacement surgery of Sept ‘12 maybe by Dec 2013. Florida Hosp. demanded payment up front.


  8. - Demoralized - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 2:22 pm:

    ==Does interest not start until it hits the comptroller’s office? ==

    The time clock for a bill starts when an agency receives the bill. Interest isn’t due until the bill is more than 90 days past due.

    ==Why are they held at the agency, anyway?==

    Some are “held” because it takes time to process them at the agency. Others are held because there isn’t enough appropriation to pay for them.


  9. - Downstater - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 2:49 pm:

    “Yes, the trend is not good. But the problem isn’t as bad as reported” It’s only bad, if your someone waiting on the check to pay a bill.
    I know, business people who are waiting months for their checks and have to make payroll. Their alternative. Go to the bank and borrow money.Rich, I would assume you would have no problem in not getting paid for 60 days or more for your work. I know, business people who are waiting months for their checks and have to make payroll. So, it is a big deal.


  10. - walkinfool - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 3:10 pm:

    JBT is smart and sensible.

    Given the press’ ineptitude with numbers, and desire to show the worst possible picture — JBT should lead or headline her press releases on payables with the 30-day+ figure as “past due” (many companies only point out the 60+ accounts as worth mentioning), and then note the 90+ accounts which will incur interest penalties.

    Those two numbers would make the most sense to the public. The rest of the numbers are not of much interest, and don’t need to be called out by her, even if they are required to be officially reported.


  11. - thechampaignlife - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 3:27 pm:

    ===Others are held because there isn’t enough appropriation to pay for them.===

    Wow, I didn’t realize agencies could obligate the State to spend money without the funding to pay for it. That seems like a poorly designed system. Theoretically, the funding could never come through and then a court would have to order payment for something the GA may not have wanted purchased. I know this doesn’t happen in practice but still…what exactly does the procurement code regulate if not that you have to have the money to spend before you spend it?!


  12. - Demoralized - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 3:28 pm:

    @Downstater:

    You completely failed to grasp Rich’s point. He didn’t say it wasn’t bad. He said that the number reported as “bad” isn’t really as high as what is reported. Honesty is the best policy.


  13. - Rich Miller - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 3:29 pm:

    === I didn’t realize agencies could obligate the State to spend money without the funding to pay for it. ===

    You read too much into the other comment.


  14. - Demoralized - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 3:29 pm:

    @thechampaignlife :

    Medicaid frequently has more bills than appropriation to pay for them.


  15. - 100 Miles West - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 3:36 pm:

    Maybe my memory is getting bad, but the current backlog is bigger, but not as bad as the early nineties when boxes and boxes of unpaid bills were stacked everywhere at Public Aid. Many local pharmacists were forced to sell out or close their businesses.


  16. - Formerly Know As... - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 4:02 pm:

    The standard for measuring the “backlog” has remained fairly constant for years.

    A quick check of old posts indicate that media, politicians and commenters have used the term at least as far back as 2006, if not earlier.

    From 2008, for example: “Hynes said the state is entering an “extraordinarily challenging period” because it failed to prepare for an economic downturn as it struggles to pay a backlog of bills.” https://capitolfax.com/2008/02/13/dont-look-now/

    Or a 2006 JBT press release: “Even State Comptroller Dan Hynes - a Democrat - says Illinois backlog of unpaid bills is at an all-time high. Illinois is in that bad of fiscal shape, even though Blagojevich raided more than $2.2 billion from pension funds and borrowed more money than any Governor in Illinois history” https://capitolfax.com/2006/08/17/jbt-outlines-37-billion-in-cuts-over-4-years/

    Generally speaking: if we owe it, we owe it.

    The interesting thing, however, is that those bills don’t appear to be generally referenced as a “backlog” in common parlance until they really began piling up in early-mid 2000. Before then, they were mostly just referred to as the bills we owed, sans “backlog”.

    In other words, it is not the means of measuring those bills that has changed. It is the amount owed on those bills that has changed.

    Once we pay the total down again, or get all the payments back down to no more than roughly 30 days late, use of the term “backlog” and attention to the issue will gradually fade.

    Until then, good luck to all of us.


  17. - thechampaignlife - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 4:05 pm:

    ===You read too much into the other comment.===

    ===Medicaid frequently has more bills than appropriation to pay for them.===

    Ah, so this is more like Medicaid claims that don’t have funding. That seems more reasonable than the “Let’s buy a new building!” situation I thought it meant. So does the backlog include other unfunded obligations like back pay for raises?


  18. - Formerly Know As... - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 4:15 pm:

    @100 Miles West - your memory does not deceive. The backlog hit numerous agencies and service providers around the early-mid 90’s.

    Things got back to reasonable levels in the late 90’s, but then started slipping again in 2001. The snowball has continued rolling downhill since, albeit with a few ups and downs. Some useful context and background, should you care to read it:

    www.pontiacdailyleader.com/article/20130504/NEWS/130509602/1006/NEWS?template=printart

    www.ioc.state.il.us/index.cfm/resources/comptrollers-quarterly/edition-1-september-2001-slow-1st-quarter-revenues-exacerbate-cash-flow-problems/


  19. - Demoralized - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 4:35 pm:

    ==So does the backlog include other unfunded obligations like back pay for raises?==

    No, it would not include those.


  20. - JI - Monday, Nov 25, 13 @ 5:40 pm:

    Rich, did you answer the earlier question about what’s included in the voucher age? Saw a later comment, but might have missed your response somewhere.

    Does this count only the time the voucher sits at the comptroller? Or does it also include the time spent at the agencies?

    If it doesn’t include agency wait time, I’m not sure how valuable it really is, as it would essentially ignore all of the Section 25 loophole bills.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* See you Wednesday!
* Pritzker: "The glitch has been fixed"
* Welcome to Springfield!
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Various updates
* $54 million down, billions more to go
* Immigrant miscoding causes state to lose millions of federal dollars
* Corruption roundup
* Sandoval charged with bribery
* Question of the day
* More good news from Rivian
* Pritzker signs bill to cap some out-of-pocket insurance costs for insulin
* A weakened ComEd/Exelon could be a boon to renewable energy companies
* Credit where credit is due
* Poll has Lipinski closing in on 50 in four-way race
* Rep. Ammons issues denial, but is investigated over alleged $80 retail theft
* No refund requested or expected for Lincoln's hat
* Illinois connected, but highly unlikely to blame
* Gaming Board wants feds to return, destroy or sequester leaked files
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Campaign updates
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller