Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Huh?
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Huh?

Friday, Dec 20, 2013

* In a long story about how members of the state’s congressional delegation legally use their campaign accounts for meals, travel and other expenses was this weird revelation about Congressman Aaron Schock

Schock’s campaign spent $407 at a Lombard studio that offers ultrasounds for expectant mothers and $452 at a Peoria maternity boutique, all of which were identified on the disclosure forms as gift expenses.

Um, OK.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

30 Comments
  1. - Jimbo - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 8:41 am:

    Wow. I’m sure it is nothing. Absolutely sure, but seriously who thought no one would notice this?


  2. - Darienite - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 8:44 am:

    While the table in the article was extensive, the article dealt with a lot of nickel-n-dime stuff.
    To the point, Bill Foster spent 7.7 million from funds raised, the largest amount spent by the Illinois Reps. Just over $5M (65%)went to ‘Media and Advertising’. In the last year he has been my US rep, I have yet to receive a mailing from him. The article gave no ink to this information.


  3. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 8:50 am:

    Maybe Congressman Schock was taking wrapped Christmas or birthday gifts for the Ultrasound to see what people got him(?)


  4. - Stones - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 8:53 am:

    Certainly don’t want to jump to conclusions but it’s hard to understand those type of expenditures from a campaign fund.


  5. - wordslinger - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 8:55 am:

    What do you book that under, Constituent Service? Future Constituent Service?


  6. - Montrose - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:04 am:

    This development is really going to wreck his abs.


  7. - 47th Ward - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:07 am:

    And I thought the cuff links would be the problem for Schock.


  8. - walkinfool - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:17 am:

    When will people learn?

    This is not what campaign funds are donated to be used for. The candidate doesn’t own them;they are given in trust to be used for winning campaigns.

    It is an insult to the donors to misuse their funds, regardless of the rules.


  9. - RonOglesby - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:23 am:


    This is not what campaign funds are donated to be used for. The candidate doesn’t own them;they are given in trust to be used for winning campaigns.

    As to when they will learn? when they are prosecuted for a crime. Until then politicians make sure the rules are pretty loose on these things just so they can get away with using the money… No rules for them. But if you forget to check a box on a form or expense that one dinner… just wait for that audit.


  10. - wordslinger - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:33 am:

    On second thought, perhaps these expenses should be booked under Constituent Serviced?


  11. - Plutocrat03 - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:38 am:

    “It is an insult to the donors to misuse their funds”

    That is only true if the donors care. When you have Congressman Rush who funnels 1 of 4 donated dollars directly to his wife to run seemingly nonexistent campaigns, I think the donors donate with a wink and a nod.


  12. - Mom - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:43 am:

    I’m going to guess a gift to a struggling mom as part of a PR move to promote healthy pregnancies or life issues.


  13. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:46 am:

    - Mom -,

    You may be on to it! Mail piece or video.

    - wordslinger -, you last post was priceless.


  14. - Norseman - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:50 am:

    Word for the win!


  15. - Robert the Bruce - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:53 am:

    Excellent guess, Mom. He’s far too savvy to use his own campaign funds for hush money as others implied.

    Or it could be a gift to one of his three siblings, each of whom is married with children. Maybe one is struggling financially? But if it is that, he will have some explaining to do.


  16. - Hank - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 9:57 am:

    I never even noticed that he had a baby bump. Must be the cut of the clothes


  17. - Just Observing - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 10:27 am:

    ===
    “It is an insult to the donors to misuse their funds”

    That is only true if the donors care.
    ===

    True. Donors that give because they feel they derive some sort of benefit may not care. Those that give for ideological reasons would probably care. If I was running a campaign against Schock, I would mail this article, highlighting the most damning sections, to all his disclosed donors in an effort to dry up future money.


  18. - A guy... - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 10:30 am:

    Poor guy was trying to keep this gift to a needy person discreet. But, alas, the paper trail caused it to become public news. Methinks he hid it right where it could and would be found (i.e. didn’t hide it). Now there’s nothing left to do but tell the whole very touching story.


  19. - Loop Lady - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 10:35 am:

    Meh, being kind to a constituent in need should not generate any sort of negative press…good for him if this is the case…he should use this to his advantage as I’m sure he will…


  20. - Chicago Cynic - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 10:44 am:

    Rich, why did my tongue in cheek post cross the line and get deleted?


  21. - A guy... - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 11:00 am:

    Cynic, read your comment again, listen for the whistle, go and sin no more. You only get confession once with Rev. Miller.


  22. - Chicago Cynic - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 11:10 am:

    A Guy,

    Worst kept secret…sigh.


  23. - Nonplussed - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 11:12 am:

    How long before the story that this mother kept the baby, put it up for adoption–did everything but abort?


  24. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 11:21 am:

    - Chicago Cynic -, lol.

    To the Post,

    It’s the week of Christmas, after petitions, it has no legs on its face, and now even “hiding it in plain sight” for a bump for ONE needy family/woman is not the stuff of good politics as a blind pat on the back. It gets an “explanation” only if it makes it a multi day event. Schock will dictate how long it’s a story.


  25. - Ghost - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 12:29 pm:

    Did some good deeds, and didn’t try to take credit for it, which is by definition the heart of a good deed.


  26. - wordslinger - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 12:35 pm:

    –Did some good deeds, and didn’t try to take credit for it, which is by definition the heart of a good deed.–

    The dude has a gig at $174K with golden perks and bennies. He doesn’t have to pick up a check for a meal or airfare if he plays his cards rights.

    If he wanted to do a good deed anonymously, I imagine he could have scraped up $850 without tapping his campaign fund and reporting it.


  27. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 12:40 pm:

    ===If he wanted to do a good deed anonymously, I imagine he could have scraped up $850 without tapping his campaign fund and reporting it.===

    In reality, who would say, “Charge that through the Campaign, wait until we get that sweet bump after this is ‘discovered’ and we bring out what it as for!”

    Yikes!


  28. - Formerly Known As... - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 1:42 pm:

    The Tribune needs to do a follow up story.

    One that quotes donors on their view of these expenditures. Not the big-wigs, either.

    Donors making less than the $174,000 a Congressman makes.

    Donors giving $10 or $20 to the candidate instead of going to the movies that night or out for ice cream, because they believe in that person.

    Let’s hear what they think about this judicious use of their post-tax dollars.


  29. - Formerly Known As... - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 1:45 pm:

    Better yet, put these candidates in a room with those donors. Let’s hear them explain how it was so vital their $ went towards baby booties or a suite at the Ritz.

    Or $130,000 worth of trips to Las Vegas, Mexico and other sunny destinations.

    Or how more than $.25 of every dollar donated goes to the candidate’s wife.

    Ugh.


  30. - Ghost - Friday, Dec 20, 13 @ 2:56 pm:

    Word I think life is making you a bit cynical :)


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Open thread and another LSSI reminder
* In defense of Mary Todd Lincoln on her 200th birthday
* Caption contest!
* Rauner says he'll file end of term report, clear clemency backlog
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Pritzker roundup
* Cook County Public Guardian sues DCFS: "Abject moral and human rights failure"
* Mendoza signature clearance rate is high during first round
* Your holiday season moment of Zen
* Pritzker criticized over lack of Active Transportation Alliance members on his transition committee
* Color me skeptical
* Pritzker heading to White House today
* Sen. Schimpf wants Satanic sculpture removed from rotunda as Rep. Bryant introduces condemnation resolution
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller