Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Reformers blast new FOIA bill
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Reformers blast new FOIA bill

Monday, Dec 1, 2014 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Illinois Public Radio

Illinois residents could have a harder time accessing government information under new legislation before the General Assembly.

The plan, SB2799, makes it harder for people to get repaid legal costs when a government wrongfully denies access to public documents.

At the same time, it makes it easier for governments to keep certain information off-limits.

Groups such as the Better Government Association, the Illinois Press Association (a representative there called the measure the most egregious changes to FOIA since the law was restructured) and the Attorney General’s office are fighting it.

Natalie Bauer, a spokeswoman for the Attorney General, says it will make it incredibly more difficult to obtain public information that taxpayers are owed.

* From Illinois PIRG…

“Transparency in government checks corruption, promotes fiscal responsibility and allows for greater, more meaningful participation in our democratic system,” said Abe Scarr, Director of Illinois PIRG. “This bill moves Illinois in the wrong direction and should be rejected.”

“Democracy is meaningless without a responsible, informed, and active citizenry. In turn, strong public record request laws are essential to inform of the public of government activity,” said Maryam Judar, Executive Director of the Citizen Advocacy Center. “This bill distorts Illinois democracy by limiting people’s access to information about their government activity. The House should not allow this provision to pass.”

The bill makes three significant changes to the state’s Freedom of Information Act.

    · When a government official publicly cites a report or study, the entire report is currently subject to public records requests. Under this bill, only the specific section cited would be open to disclosure. This limits the public’s ability to see supporting documentation, methodology, and possibly conflicting findings in a document being cited in government decision making.

    · The bill would allow government bodies to withhold documents that are primarily factual so long as they include at least one recommendation.

    · The bill would significantly curtail a citizen’s ability to win legal fees from a government body when they violate FOIA. This would significantly limit the public’s ability to hold government bodies accountable when they illegally withhold public documents.

Combined, these changes would significantly limit information accessible to the public and make it easier for government bodies to skirt transparency laws.

The legislation, sponsored by House Majority Leader Barbara Flynn Currie, has been assigned to the totally wired Executive Committee, which meets this afternoon at 4. The underlying shell bill is sponsored by Speaker Madigan.

       

29 Comments
  1. - Downstate GOP Faithless - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 12:43 pm:

    So in an era of transparency, in a state where transparency is at least a perceived issue, we are going to make it easier for the Government to pay for and then suppress information? Seems to be the wrong way for the legislature to head


  2. - Angry Chicagoan - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 12:45 pm:

    I’d like the good government people in Hyde Park to notice that their representative is at the forefront of this. And that it’s getting pushed in the lame duck.


  3. - Federalist - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 12:47 pm:

    Currie, another Democrat liberal who shows very illiberal, un-democratic tendencies.

    And Madigan, what would you expect?


  4. - Yellow Dog Democrat - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 12:47 pm:

    Let’s remember the old adage about not getting terribly excited over every bill filing, even when it is filed by The Speaker.


  5. - Political Animal - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 12:53 pm:

    What we need is legislation to make FOIA broader and more transparency-friendly, not less.


  6. - in the know - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 12:58 pm:

    I totally disagree with this bill. All government attorney opinions should be disclosed to the public and we should impose treble attorneys fees on any successful FOIA requested, maybe even mandatory minimum $50k punitive damages! After all, why should government policy makers get the benefit of competent confidential legal advice, and who cares if the government is making a good faith legal argument about the applicability of FOIA? Plaintiffs attorneys need to get PAID and its the duty of the taxpayer to do so!


  7. - Just Observing - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 1:04 pm:

    Shame on any legislator that supports this bill!


  8. - Will23 - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 1:05 pm:

    This legislation takes the attention away from HB3796 — the other anti-transparency bill that’s likely being taken up by the Senate this week.

    I agree this legislation is bad for FOIA filers and the media, but I equally think it conveniently distracts us from the HB3796…the one that has a greater chance of passing during the veto session.

    Yes, HB3796 may not do as much damage per se, it’s bad news for taxpayers that deserve access to information.

    It’s the old switcheroo…”Now, now…you shouldn’t be upset with us overriding HB3796. At least we didn’t pass SB2799, the one that essentially strips the state’s FOIA law down to nothing.”


  9. - Downstate GOP Faithless - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 1:20 pm:

    I wonder where the outgoing Treasurer stands on this?


  10. - Bradley VanHoose - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 1:20 pm:

    Anyone who googles my name …Bradley VanHoose, Village of Caseyville, Illinois, SWIC and you will see a FOIA battle of epic proportions. If this does not convince you vote against weaking The Illinois Freedom of Information Act, I dont know what will. Shame on any lawmaker who supports bill 2799….SHAME ON THEM.


  11. - Ahoy! - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 1:25 pm:

    I actually not opposed to curtailing a citizen’s ability to win legal fees from a government body when they violate FOIA. At the end of the day the taxpayers lose that money, we should revisit other mechanisms or another appeals process instead of punishing tax payers, I just have to think there is a better way.


  12. - Demoralized - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 1:46 pm:

    Um, Mr. VanHoose, you are what is known as a serial FOIA filer. I’ve dealt with people like you and we ignore you. For good reason.


  13. - Under Further Review - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 2:03 pm:

    This is a really blatant power grab. I carry no brief for “serial FOIA” filers, but I have had experience with bona fide FOIA requests being wrongfully denied by local governments. Thankfully, the AG FOIA request specialist instructed the unit of government that the requests were reasonable and not unduly burdensome. The municipality was ordered to comply with the requests.


  14. - Mouthy - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 2:25 pm:

    - Demoralized - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 1:46 pm:

    Um, Mr. VanHoose, you are what is known as a serial FOIA filer. I’ve dealt with people like you and we ignore you. For good reason.

    Yes, I can see how guys like Mr VanHoose, who apparently wants to see some checks written from the Caseyville hotel/motel fund, would bother guys like you…


  15. - Read the bill - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 2:44 pm:

    The bill does not get rid of attorneys’ fees for requesters - in fact, it expands the right to attorneys’ fees so it will apply even when a public body voluntarily turns over records or settles litigation. That will discourage public bodies from settling these disputes, costing taxpayers even more money and further delaying when the requester can get the records.


  16. - anon - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 2:46 pm:

    The one reform that is needed is to attach penalties for violations of FOIA, which are now penalty-free.


  17. - Ghost - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 3:21 pm:

    The main problem with foia is the time frames to respond are way to short. You get at least 30 days for discovery, they should be extended.

    That said most reporters are pretty cooperative in agreeing to go beyond the time frames in the law.

    Lawyer fees imho should not be available unless the court finds there was no good faith basis for believing the information was protected. This is tax payer money we spend when these cases are lost. And if the public body believes in good faith they are properly excluding information; the public is not served by paying legal fees in this instance imho.


  18. - Ghost - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 3:23 pm:

    One follow up; that state needs to upgrade its antiquated fiscal, budget, personnel, and grants records systems (or lack thereof). In an ideal world they would use a single enterprise system with a publics self service portal for information. Skip the need to submit a foia request, just make it searchable online.


  19. - yinn - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 3:39 pm:

    ==Um, Mr. VanHoose, you are what is known as a serial FOIA filer. I’ve dealt with people like you and we ignore you. For good reason.==

    My municipality occasionally misuses the FOIA exemptions for preliminary drafts and collective bargaining. I hope the loopholes get closed up one day. But, never have citizen requesters been ignored. I have a brand new picture of the commenter called “demoralized” and it ain’t pretty.


  20. - Hoping for Rational Thought - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 4:20 pm:

    SO out of curiosity I looked up VanHooose. I didn’t look at everything but the AG found in his favor and issued a binding opinion against Caseyville. Caseyville IGNORED and NEVER responded to the AG’s inquiries.

    That is flat out wrong. You don’t need to know all the details to know that if a public body IGNORES the State AG that something is rotten. Unbelievable.

    This bill is bad. It does reduce transparency and their is no good reason for it.


  21. - Anyone Remember - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 4:28 pm:

    Ghost -
    “In an ideal world they would use a single enterprise system with a publics self service portal for information.”

    BILLIONS have been wasted by Federal and State governments trying to do that. There are so many laws / exceptions within each state there is no such thing as a governmental equivalent to Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) software like the private sector has. Even if there was, GASB keeps changing the standards, unlike FASB, so there’d be continual updates that had to be purchased.


  22. - Ghost - Monday, Dec 1, 14 @ 6:40 pm:

    Anyone, People soft and SAP etc could do it off the shelf….


  23. - Brad VanHoose - Tuesday, Dec 2, 14 @ 12:53 am:

    To you anonymous posters, thats fine…but why not sign your real name? I do. I would be happy to forego compensation for some legal fees as long as criminal provisions are put into FOIA that allow for stiff criminal penalties against municipal entities…..like the Village of Caseyville, who blatantly and deliberately violate the law. Serial filer? Hardly. Funny you naysayers never offer the solution of compliance. Do you just think you are above the law and will comply as you feel like it. Good luck with that attitude with Lisa Madigan. I have never filed a request for review and had my request/complaint disallowed. Every time I have filed, I have won. I follow the rules. How about everyone just following the law? Why is that so difficult? Next time, have a little courage and sign your name.


  24. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Dec 2, 14 @ 7:58 am:

    There is an exemption for serial filers. While FOIA is important people should not abuse the system by constantly filing requests. Nobody has the time or resources for these types of people. We comply with thousands of requests per year. We don’t have time for the people that file 5 requests a week.


  25. - Demoralized - Tuesday, Dec 2, 14 @ 7:58 am:

    ==I have a brand new picture of the commenter called “demoralized” and it ain’t pretty.==

    Bite me.


  26. - Brad VanHoose - Tuesday, Dec 2, 14 @ 9:29 am:

    Serial filer? Have you read 5 ILCS 140/ The Illinois Freedom of Information Act? The term is called recurrent requester. The provision, though well intentioned…was intentionally misused by the Village of Caseyville. I lodged my complaint, argued my case,the Attorney General agreed. The Village had to pay…..because of bad legal advice AND poor leadership. The Village of Caseyville preferred to make taxpayers pay for their misdeeds instead of following the law. Taxpayers DID pay….then through the bums out on election day. The Victory for me was wiping out an nearly an entire board of dirtbags. In my humble opinion…that is the ideal thing for taxpayers.


  27. - Anyone Remember - Tuesday, Dec 2, 14 @ 9:35 am:

    Ghost -
    Do an internet search on failed government ERP. BILLIONS have been wasted. COTS doesn’t work for government without expensive alterations that may cause the project to fail (federal OPM, for example).


  28. - PJ - Tuesday, Dec 2, 14 @ 9:48 am:

    I’m sympathetic to the spirit of the bill, in that plenty of smaller agencies and municipalities can quickly become overwhelmed by numerous or especially burdensome FOIA requests. In many cases, the FOIA officer acts in this capacity in addition to other, regular duties. Somebody has to do the work, and there can be a cost to performing it. I’m not saying there aren’t weaknesses in the bill, but I definitely get the intent.


  29. - Apocalypse Now - Tuesday, Dec 2, 14 @ 11:25 am:

    So what are the Democrats afraid the public/press may find out? If government put more information on their web sites, there wouldn’t be as many FOI request. Shameful by the Democrats, but the 47% seem to be ok with this.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Debate open thread
* Gannett confirms it's printing Proft's papers
* Question of the day
* Fun with numbers
* Campaign notebook
* Pritzker talks pensions
* SAFE-T Act coverage roundup
* Greising vs. Proft
* Debate preview
* *** UPDATED x2 *** Because... Madigan!
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* Open thread
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller