Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » U of I: No constitutional right to a faculty position
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
U of I: No constitutional right to a faculty position

Thursday, Jan 29, 2015

* I find it nearly impossible to argue with this U of I press release…

The University of Illinois must balance all of the interests of its campuses and the institution in reaching any decision, particularly one as important as granting a positon as a member of our faculty.

Last summer, while Steven Salaita was still under consideration for a tenured position to teach courses comparing issues related to the experiences of Native Americans to issues related to Palestinians and the Middle East, Dr. Salaita began demonstrating that he lacked the professional fitness to serve on the faculty of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Specifically, Dr. Salaita began making a series of statements via social media on precisely the subject matter that he proposed to teach at our University. For example, on June 19, 2014, after three Israeli teenagers were reported kidnapped and presumed dead, Dr. Salaita posted a statement on Twitter which read: “You may be too refined to say it, but I’m not: I wish all the f**king West Bank settlers would go missing.” Dr. Salaita continued to post this comment even after the three teens were found murdered later that month.

Dr. Salaita also posted statements such as:

    “Zionist uplift in America: every little Jewish boy and girl can grow up to be the leader of a monstrous colonial regime.”

    “If #Israel affirms life, then why do so many Zionists celebrate the slaughter of children? What’s that? Oh, I see JEWISH life.”

    “Zionists: transforming antisemitism [sic] from something horrible into something honorable since 1948.”

    “Let’s cut to the chase: If you’re defending #Israel right now you’re an awful human being.”

These statements and many more like them demonstrate that Dr. Salaita lacks the judgment, temperament and thoughtfulness to serve as a member of our faculty in any capacity, but particularly to teach courses related to the Middle East.

As Dr. Salaita admits in the complaint he filed today, the offer he received in October 2013 from the American Indian Studies Program was at all times subject to the ultimate approval of the Board of Trustees. This is consistent with the Statutes of the University of Illinois and the past precedent of the University. Dr. Salaita was well aware of the importance of this final approval. At no time was Dr. Salaita hired as a faculty member. His appointment was always subject to approval by the Board of Trustees.

On September 11, 2014, after carefully considering all of the issues related to Dr. Salaita’s proposed appointment, the Board of Trustees voted 8-1 not to approve Dr. Salaita for a position on the faculty. Two weeks ago, the Board emphatically reiterated that its decision is final and will not be reconsidered.

The Board’s decision concerning Dr. Salaita was not reached hastily. Nor was it the result of external pressures. Indeed, the Committee on Academic Freedom and Tenure concurred that “donor influence” was not a basis for the decision. The decision did not present a “new approach” to the consideration of proposed faculty appointments. It represented the careful exercise of each Board member’s fiduciary duty and a balancing of all of the interests of the University of Illinois. In the end, this is a responsibility that cannot be delegated nor abdicated.

Today, Dr. Salaita has filed a complaint in federal court. Among other accusations, he contends that the individual trustees and administrators of the University of Illinois are liable for intentionally inflicting emotional distress by refusing to provide him with a faculty position. The University of Illinois intends to vigorously defend against these and each of Dr. Salaita’s other meritless claims. The University has attempted to negotiate a settlement for his reasonable losses and expenses, but he has refused those offers.

As a private citizen, Dr. Salaita has the constitutional right to make any public statement he chooses. Dr. Salaita, however, does not have a constitutional right to a faculty position at the University of Illinois.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 12:58 pm:

    Freedom of Speech doesn’t guarantee everyone likes wgat you will say, that only good can come from your statements, and you won’t be held responsible for your statements.

    You are free to say it, you’re also free to face the ramifications of your words.

  2. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:00 pm:

    The first thing U of I has done correctly in a while.

    I would not want my children learning anything from a person making such vile statements as Mr Salaita. Good riddance.

  3. - Soccermom - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:02 pm:

    This is well done.

  4. - PublicServant - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:07 pm:

    I wonder what he’s tweeting about U of I? He has the right to his opinion, but not to a job. And emotional distress is funny. I wonder if he thought about the emotional distress his tweet might cause the families of those three kids that were missing when he tweeted it?

    Good riddance!

  5. - Filmmaker Professor - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:09 pm:

    Not so fast. This all hinges on whether at the time of the Tweets, he was actually an employee. This is not nearly as cut-and-dried as many of you might think; there is an enormous amount of precedent of faculty members being treated as and actually working as employees before technically being approved by the Board of Trustees. If he is ruled to have been an employee, then he has a constitutional right to free speech — along as that speech doesn’t break any laws, which his didn’t — away from the classroom without being punished by the government, which in this case, would be a state university.

  6. - Archiesmom - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:10 pm:

    Well said.

  7. - old-pol - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:10 pm:

    “…(no) constitutional right to a faculty position…”
    Agree- but he does have a right to have his employment rejected for reasons permitted by law and not for his political beliefs or exercise of his 1st amendment rights. The U of I is a public employer and thus subject to the rules against discrimination in hiring.

  8. - Filmmaker Professor - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:11 pm:

    And let me add, the Center for Constitutional Rights would not have taken this if it didn’t feel he had a good case. This is not the law firm of Larry, Moe, and Curly, Ambulance chasers.

  9. - Demoralized - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:12 pm:

    It amazes me the stupidity exhibited by some people. Only in the mind of the twisted does it seem rational to think that you can say and do what you want and you can get a pass from everyone for saying or doing it because of your 1st Amendment rights.


  10. - A guy - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:13 pm:

    Take a walk Dr. You tweeted yourself right out of a good job. Thanks for doing that. It made the decision much easier. Ciao.

  11. - Demoralized - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:14 pm:

    ==If he is ruled to have been an employee, then he has a constitutional right to free speech — along as that speech doesn’t break any laws, which his didn’t — away from the classroom without being punished by the government, which in this case, would be a state university==

    That’s just dopey. So what you are basically saying is that you can do and say anything you want and your employer can’t do anything about it. One word - BULL.

  12. - Rahm's Parking Meter - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:15 pm:

    Rare praise for the U of I from this NIU Alum. Well done. Salaita was denied tenure within the rules of tenure. And personally, as a Jewish American citizen of the State of Illinois, I find his statements disgusting, revolting and factually incorrect. Not well done, Professor.

  13. - Peoria Guy - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:19 pm:

    Hear, hear!

  14. - Federalist - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:21 pm:

    Even if you believe that such statements are protected for a tenure faculty member, she was not tenured. Case closed- or at least it should be but don’t count on it yet.

  15. - Sir Reel - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:21 pm:

    “Ultimate approval of the Board of Trustees” says it all.

    As my old boss used to say, everybody works for somebody.

  16. - Ron Burgundy - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:25 pm:

    He’s entitled to his views, and I’m entitled to mine. In my view, he exhibited poor judgment and I would not want him teaching students at U of I either.

  17. - wayward - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:27 pm:

    Salaita wasn’t a great hire, IMHO. I took a look at his dissertation and wasn’t impressed. However, this situation did expose a serious problem with UI’s hiring process — basically, the BoT approval was treated as a rubber stamp and faculty were commonly expected to move to Illinois and start work before their hire was officially approved. So Salaita is probably entitled to some compensation for that, but I’m not convinced he’s entitled to a faculty position.

  18. - Wordslinger - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:32 pm:

    I’d say there is a lack of judgement, temperament and thoughtfulness there.

    You know, it is possible to oppose certain Likud policies toward the Palestinains without being an anti-Semitic nut. There are Jewish members of the Knesset who do it evey day.

  19. - Soccermom - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:32 pm:

    Wayward, that’s a good point. The process seems odd, and this controversy may make it difficult for U of I to attract new faculty going forward. (I am not referring to the political issue - -just the idea that they are expected to pull up stakes and move before their jobs are approved.)

  20. - Carl Nyberg - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:42 pm:

    How many people has UIUC let go for supporting Iraq War? Drone strikes? Torture? Wars illegal under US Constitution or UN Charter? Israel’s war crimes & genocide against the Palestinians?

    Having zero compassion for using state power to kill, torture, exploit & oppress Muslims is not only acceptable, it’s the dominant culture in the United States.

  21. - Jorge - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:43 pm:

    You can say what you want…however there are consequences for what you say. Just ask Mitt.

  22. - ChelseaBlue - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:45 pm:

    I can’t help but wonder what the public reaction would have been had his message been flipped 180 degrees. What if his criticism was of the Palestinians rather than the Israelis, but still delivered in the same profoundly injudicious manner? Would he be teaching at the U of I now?

  23. - White Denim - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:47 pm:

    Filmmaker is right that this hinges more so on whether or not Salatia was actually an employee and less so on what was said. Any cases like this I can recall from recent memory (a professor tweeting that the families of NRA members should all be shot, for example) were adamantly defended by first amendment groups like FIRE. That professor got to keep his job–the speech was protected. Since Salatia was a probationary employee, I wonder if those same kinds of protections apply.

  24. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 1:49 pm:

    I think many of you are missing some of the legal issues that make this a harder case for U of I. The First Amendment only protects free speech from the government, so as a general rule, an employer can fire or not hire someone for things they say — however, U of I IS the government, so the First Amendment DOES protect someone in that case. And while tenure is a nice protection, you don’t have to have tenure to be protected by the First Amendment (in fact, I would argue it’s one of the reasons why nobody in the public sector needs tenure - the case law is pretty clear that your speech is protected if you work for the government unrelated to whether or not you have tenure). The only unclear matter is whether he was constructively ‘employed’ and therefore entitled to the protections. If not, then he’s probably out of luck.

    Having said all that, if I were a U of I trustee, I would probably have made the same decision and let the courts sort it out. The guy really doesn’t belong in the classroom.

  25. - Wordslinger - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:01 pm:

    Chelsea, this public person’s reaction is the same to all the murderous haters that say the world would be a better place if Gaza were bombed into the Stone Age, or that all Muslims have to wear the jacket for all crimes committed by those who are Muslims.

    But Carl raises a very critical point. We in the United States have gotten awfully comfortable dropping bombs all over the world for many decades and writing off the death of innocent civilians as “collateral damage.”

    It happens all the time with these whack-a-mole drone strikes targeting some loudmouth banditos in Asia and North Africa.

    Those civilians don’t view themselves as “collateral damage.” And in WWII, beforre the obfuscating wordsmiths got wise to the p.r. problem, dropping bombs from the sky on civilians was officially called “terror bombing.”

  26. - How Ironic - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:19 pm:


    “The First Amendment only protects free speech from the government, so as a general rule, an employer can fire or not hire someone for things they say — however, U of I IS the government, so the First Amendment DOES protect someone in that case.”

    That’s nonsense. The government is free to hire/fire whom it wishes based on the content of their speech.

    Do you really think just because you have a ‘gov job’ you can go off half cocked, and denigrate whole swaths of a population and have zero consequence?

    The U of I doesn’t deny Dr. Salaita the ability to say what he said. But the same freedom to express one’s self, doesn’t EXCLUDE the possibility of having serious consequences.

    That’s like saying a state worker that answers the phone for their department, and uses a negative slang “Hey mister N-word”, couldn’t be fired on the spot simply because he’s got a govt job.

    Please don’t ever try to use your expert legal analysis outside of your armchair. And I’d even hold off using it there.

  27. - Nicholas - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:21 pm:

    Salaita’s lawsuit is based on constitutional and contractual claims. It will not be dismissed because of the arguments made in this press release by the University. Once a lawsuit survives the motion to dismiss, Salaita is entitled to “discovery”and will demand all of the emails, phone records, and minutes of Chancellor Wise and the BOT. Now, how big will the settlement offer from u. of I. be? Whether or not you agree with Salaita’s lawsuit, Chancellor Wise screwed up big time by unilaterally pulling the hire. That will cost us and it makes a mockery of shared governance that Chancellor Wise claims to hold dear. She and the BOT should be held accountable for this mess.

  28. - Anon. - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:21 pm:

    Carl Nyberg — “Zionist uplift in America: every little Jewish boy and girl can grow up to be the leader of a monstrous colonial regime.” is not a criticism of Israeli policy or an argument in support of Palestinian rights. How about coming up with an example of where someone on the U of I payroll said “we should target our drones at children” and kept his job before claiming that this is a one-sided policy by the university?

  29. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:22 pm:

    ==to teach courses comparing issues related to the experiences of Native Americans to issues related to Palestinians and the Middle East==

    Which certainly would have been taught in a rational academic, objective and subtly balanced fashion.

  30. - ZC - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:25 pm:

    You -do- actually have a right to a job, at least for a contractual length of time, no matter what you say, in an academic position (excluding illegal speech, such as taking out a contract for murder, or sexually harassing a colleague. Or evidence you are incapable of handling a classroom say without persistently screaming at and intimidating your Jewish students. But as to the latter, outside tweets wouldn’t by themselves mean his in-classroom conduct wasn’t responsible. I know plenty of profs in academe who are militantly pro-Palestinian, but they are very fair in how they present the issues within a classroom).

    This is all what “academic freedom” means, and why you can’t too-easily make an analogy to speech in the everyday workforce. It’s one of the greatest job perks, what makes being an academic so empowering. (It’s generally not the pay). Whether academic freedom is not that necessary these days, or it defends too much behavior that is simply obnoxious, is a fair debate. But, it remains that at least for now it is U of I policy - and lord, if there’s anywhere I would paint a broad brush to protect the academic freedom of all scholars, wherever they fall on the divide, it’s Israel-Palestine.

    That statement about West Bank settlers going missing is horrifying and I suspect I wouldn’t be a fan of Dr Salaita’s, but it’s clearly not an incitement to violence that gets remotely close to any illegal conduct.

    But that all said, I -do- see the argument that he was not yet an employee. A university looking at an academic hire (and here the private sector analogy is fair) certainly might take a quick look at an applicant’s twitter feed, and say, “No thanks.” That part is undeniable (if the case precedent is correct). There is certainly no right to be -hired- in the first place. As far as that goes, Salaita is in the same boat with every college graduate who didn’t realize his Facebook page was accessible to the employer considering his application.

  31. - Huh? - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:29 pm:

    “… while … still under consideration for a tenured position to teach courses … ”

    From my reading of the post, Steven Salaita was not an employee of the University. So the guy shots off his mouth and doesn’t like the consequences.

    The University ought to counter sue for costs.

  32. - AuH2O - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:42 pm:

    The vote was 8-1 against bringing this guy on board? Who’s the dope that voted for him?

  33. - Ahoy! - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:44 pm:

    I believe in Palestinian State hood and that our 100% support of Israel no matter what it does is immoral and I will never understand it (outside of being completely political). That being said, there is no way I would have hired Salaita.

    There is such thing as free speech just as there is accountability.

  34. - Federalist - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:50 pm:

    I was in academia for 30 years. Unless you are tenured you really have few job protection rights.
    He may get another year if they did not fire him in time.

    As far as I can determine from the above info, he was not yet even on a tenure track position.

    Of course, this will get political and who knows what will happen. But I have seen tenure track faculty members fired even with three years of service (not yet tenured) and they are history.

  35. - jim - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:50 pm:

    Chicago lawyer James Montgomery voted for him on free speech grounds. He didn’t say anything about the contractual question.

  36. - jim - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:52 pm:

    re being hired on tenure track, Salaita was scheduled to receive a tenured position at the UI from the start because he resigned from his tenured position at Virginia Tech.
    He was actually between jobs, having quit at VTU and not yet officially hired by the UI trustees, as his contract required him to be.
    If he hadn’t resigned at VTU to come to the UI, he’d still be there on the English faculty.

  37. - VanillaMan - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:56 pm:

    Antisemitism (also spelled Anti-Semitism or anti-semitism) is prejudice against, hatred of, or discrimination against Jews as a national, ethnic, religious or racial group. A person who holds such positions is called an “antisemite”. As Jews are an ethnoreligious group, antisemitism is generally considered a form of racism.

    If he was throwing around the word “Israeli”, or “Likud”, or placing conditions upon his statements reflecting a political opinion, then I’d cut him some slack although I disagreed with him.

    However, his comments could leave a listener or reader to believing he is a racist against Jews. Even giving him the benefit of a doubt, the University cannot and should not hire someone so poorly able to make a statement on Middle East issues without resorting to such unprofessional and hateful language.


  38. - Keyser Soze - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 2:59 pm:

    There is a general feeling among a great many in the academic world that “academic freedom” in that venue pemits one to say anything, no matter how vile or offensive. Those who espouse that view have confused the first amendment with their presumed “right to permanent employment” via tenure. Fortunately the Board of Trustees nipped this problem in the bud.

  39. - Qui Tam - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 3:14 pm:

    Nicholas @2:21pm makes the most relevant point.
    Illinois has a statewide policy of violating its own rules and procedures aside when it wants to retaliate against someone. While most seem convinced that it was justified in this case, there are plenty of other cases that don’t get these kind of self-serving press releases to win over the masses.
    As a prospective public employee, Dr. Saliata clearly misjudged what rough place Illinois is.

  40. - Left Leaner - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 3:29 pm:

    UofI has the right to employ people who have the ‘professional fitness’ to perform the jobs in which they serve.

    Does Dr. Salaita have the right to post those statements on social media? Absolutely. Does the UofI have the right to evaluate those statements in determining his professional fitness to perform the job for which he was hired? Absolutely.

  41. - Pat C - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 3:31 pm:

    Kenneth Howell

    So, why does this guy have a valid case and Ken Howell didn’t????

  42. - CapnCrunch - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 3:33 pm:

    “Salaita wasn’t a great hire, IMHO. I took a look at his dissertation and wasn’t impressed…..”

    Apparently you are not alone, he is currently unemployed and living with his parents.

  43. - Pat C - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 3:38 pm:

    he is currently unemployed

    The brutal truth is, there are a LOT more professors available than there are jobs for them. It’s not easy to get established, and its even harder to change schools. Regardless of this problem, he is likely really hard pressed to find employment.

    That’s what makes hires like Bill Ayres and his wife so infuriating. There were MANY people who could have ably filled those jobs.


  44. - Responsa - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 3:51 pm:

    I supported Chancellor Wise and the board’s decisions with respect to not hiring Salaita, and I strongly support the University of Illinois’ position in this lawsuit. Most people, if they’re being honest, know there are serious problems in academia, where more and more it seems many of the supposed “teachers” especially in the social sciences want to tell students *what* to think– and do everything BUT teach students *how* to prepare themselves for critical thinking and working and living in the real world they’ll encounter once they’re beyond college walls. In-the-flesh, self-important Steven Salaita encapsulates this disconnect of academic purpose perfectly. He’s the poster boy. He has shown he has no business teaching at our flagship university or getting tenure anywhere else in the State of Illinois. Thank goodness his tweets outed his clear inability to teach that course in a neutral manner in time for the University to dodge a bullet.

  45. - Filmmaker Professor - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 3:51 pm:

    uh, excuse me. Check Bill Ayers academic record. You couldn’t “just” replace him. He was a superstar in his field — whether you like it or not.

  46. - Filmmaker Professor - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 3:53 pm:

    Of course Salaita is unemployed; he was branded an anti-semite and fired. Who the hell do you think will hire him now?

  47. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 3:59 pm:

    ==So the guy shots off his mouth and doesn’t like the consequences.==

    Not very smart for a professor.

  48. - Pat C - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 4:05 pm:

    Bill Ayers academic record

    He published a lot. So do the vast majority of professors. Or they try do. I give him credit - he chose a field where its very hard to show that you had no actual results.

    He writes, the fanboys oohh and ahhh, they publish him, see how great he is?

    I seriously wonder, if his writing had been submitted anonymously, how far he would have gotten.

  49. - Filmmaker Professor - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 4:07 pm:

    Ok Responsa, it’s gloves off time!

    “Most people know … many of the supposed ‘teachers’… want to tell students *what* to think …”

    And you and “most people” know that how? By sitting in on these college classes? How many have you and “most people” sat in on over the past year? There are about 6000 or so (my guess) classes being conducted this semester at UIUC. How many of them have you gone to in order to claim that *many* are the way you say they are? 5000? 4000? “Most people know” means “I saw it on Fox News.”
    The reason cases like Salaita and Bill Ayers are so shocking, and the reason why so many of you are stunned that the constitution allows professors so much leeway in the classroom is because … IT HAPPENS SO RARELY. 99.5% of university faculty conduct themselves in a totally professional way. American Universities are the envy of the world! Students from every country in the world flock to the US to study here; I don’t see thousands of US students flocking to China or Korea to get a degree.
    Stop believing the Fox b.s. and apply some of the “critical thinking” we aren’t teaching!

  50. - Wordslinger - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 4:08 pm:

    Bill Ayers had huge clout in this town.

    His old man ran Commonwealth Edison for sixteen years and was on the boards of the biggest corporations, banks, and bigfoot civvie groups in Chicago.

    You think you come in from the cold and go to the front of the line with a smile and a shoeshine?

  51. - Skeptic - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 4:16 pm:

    I’m no Constitutional expert, but IIRC, the 1st Amendment says “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.” There is no law involved here, just a job. Just like the Duck Dynasty dude.

  52. - Responsa - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 4:19 pm:

    Filmmaker Professor–Trying to paint Dr. Salaita as a poor helpless unemployable victim when in fact he brought it all on himself is a no go, regardless of the outcome of any specific contractual issues you raise. Maybe he could go back to VTU. Or were they secretly happy and relieved to see him go? It would seem that Illinois’ flagship University would have been a big step up for Salaita. He certainly did not handle this well.

  53. - siriusly - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 4:30 pm:

    I am so pleased with U of I for putting out that statement. So often organizations go with the “no comment” whenever litigation is involved, but clearly they needed to comment.

  54. - Pat C - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 4:46 pm:

    Bill Ayers had huge clout in this town


    So, he needs to check his privilege? :))))

  55. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 4:51 pm:

    How Ironic. Sorry - you’re just wrong. The government cannot fire someone for what they say, certainly not a tenured professor, unless it falls into a unprotected category, such as those noted by ZC above. And there are limitations on the government’s ability to base hiring decisions on speech. The First Amendment was the basis for the Rutan case in the Supreme Court. (And please don’t fall back on the First Amendment saying ‘Congress shall make no law …’ First, the Supreme Court has held for more than 50 years that this applies to all levels of government. Second, it has long determined that the limitation goes beyond making a law.) Having said that, this case will turn on whether he was constructively ‘hired’ into the tenured position or not. If so, he could win. If not, then the speech he engaged in is most likely in a category that could be taken into account when considering his hiring. As it should be.

  56. - Jocko - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 4:51 pm:

    Someone should tell Salaita to seek tenure at a nearby elementary school, then discuss his NAMBLA membership on social media.

    Let me know how that turns out.

  57. - How Ironic - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 5:02 pm:

    @Pat C
    “I seriously wonder, if his writing had been submitted anonymously, how far he would have gotten.”

    Yes, same goes for just about any writer, ever. Dope.

  58. - CapnCrunch - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 5:06 pm:

    “….apply some of the “critical thinking” we aren’t teaching!”

    You could hurt yourself engaging in “critical thinking” with the UIUC faculty. They are not going to allow students to be exposed to discordant expressions or ideas that might be personally offensive and hurtful (Chief Illiniwek) except when they are (Salita).

  59. - How Ironic - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 5:23 pm:

    How Ironic. Sorry - you’re just wrong. The government cannot fire someone for what they say, certainly not a tenured professor, unless it falls into a unprotected category, such as those noted by ZC above.”

    Please sell your armchair, your honorary law degree has been revoked.

    The Gov’t, is free to hire/fire workers based upon speech in the workplace. Just like private employers.

    And your addition of ‘tenure’ has absolutely nothing to do with free speech and the constitution.

    The professor wasn’t tenured, so that doesn’t even matter.

    Just because you have a gov’t job doesn’t give you superpowers to spout off any nonsense during work and be free from consequence.

    Nice try though.

  60. - Dr X - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 5:26 pm:

    Acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable!

    Isn’t this the future for right to work at colleges? Say the wrong thing and you’re gone. Make an admin angry, you’re gone. Interpret a fact and you’re gone. Make the wrong textbook selection and you’re gone. Don’t say anything but post something to social media and you’re gone. Ah freedom.

  61. - Arthur Andersen - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 6:04 pm:

    Nicholas, you clearly have a clear grasp of the issues at hand here. I’m a bit troubled by the end of your post, though; if the leadership of the UI had made a determination that Salaita lacked the professional fitness to serve as a faculty member, how is the Chancellor’s action “unilateral?” Are you arguing for faculty input through the Senate? Something else?

    I back the UI’s decision 100 percent and would have done the same thing if an employee I hired popped off like that before his first day of work.

  62. - Filmmaker Professor - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 6:12 pm:

    CapnCrunch, kids wear chief illiniwek shirts to my classes all the time. they are free to express their opinions on it too. Racial stereotype mascots are not appropriate for any public school that claims to respect all people. Chief illiniwek is gone because the NCAA ruled that it is offensive. if you have a problem with that, take it up with them. got nothing to do with Salaita.
    And if the faculty of UIUC are so bad, why are 40,000 students willing to voluntarily pay $20K per year and up to attend? nobody is forcing them. Free Market. Yet my classes are full every semester. None of my classes are required. The marketplace has spoken. I’m worth the money,

  63. - How Ironic - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 6:20 pm:

    @ Dr. X

    “Ah freedom.”

    Why is it that the loudest mouths at the party spouting off about ‘Freedom of Speech’ seem to forget the part where ‘Freedom of Speech’ doesn’t mean ‘Freedom From Consequences’?

    The good Dr. is ‘Free’ to keep posting his thoughts and opinions to social media. He can buy a bullhorn, and now with all of his ‘extra time’ stand in the town square and scream it to passing citizens.

  64. - Dr X - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 8:02 pm:

    @how ironic

    You missed my cynical point - even inoffensive speech would be grounds for dismissal in a “right to work and shut your mouth state”.

    This whole thing would have a great teachable moment about our relationship with Israel and the double standards in our international policy…but you can only say the right things when it comes to that. So the “consequences of freedom” are another way of saying we don’t like dissent.

  65. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 8:15 pm:

    HowIronic: “The professor wasn’t tenured, so that doesn’t even matter.”

    Salaita was hired at the UI with his tenure already in place. He was transitioning from one tenured position to another.

    Was Salita actually employed at the UI as a tenured faculty member at the time of his firing? Perhaps he was, or perhaps he wasn’t - the courts will decide this issue.

    One thing needs to be abundantly clear, however: If Salaita was in fact a tenured faculty member, then it would be highly inappropriate to fire him regardless of what you may think about his comments. You cannot fire a tenured faculty member for purely political reasons without violating his or her constitutional and contractual rights. This is never appropriate, and that’s what this controversy is all about.

  66. - Responsa - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 8:43 pm:

    This may help: Following are two direct quotes from the U of I’s statement today.

    *Last summer, while Steven Salaita was still under consideration for a tenured position to teach courses…”

    * “Dr. Salaita admits in the complaint he filed today, the offer he received in October 2013 from the American Indian Studies Program was at all times subject to the ultimate approval of the Board of Trustees. This is consistent with the Statutes of the University of Illinois and the past precedent of the University. Dr. *Salaita was well aware of the importance of this final approval. At no time was Dr. Salaita hired as a faculty member. His appointment was always subject to approval by the Board of Trustees.”

    Since in his own complaint Salaita never claimed that anyone — much less anyone with authority — promised him that Board of Trustees approval was not needed or was waived, how can he also claim to be an employee? This seems like a glaring defect in his complaint. As such, Salaita will have great difficulty trying to convince a court that his contingent offer was actually an enforceable agreement.

  67. - dr. reason a. goodwin - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 9:10 pm:

    I predict Salaita will win this. The hiring procedures at universities are so fuzzy that actual board approval is almost an afterthought. Employees are often well into their jobs before that approval comes.

  68. - Midway Gardens - Thursday, Jan 29, 15 @ 10:59 pm:

    The UIC is going about this by not objecting to the specifics of his speech but that they demonstrate his lack of fitness for a position. Their best argument. But the UIC Faculty report generally supports Salaita

    We’re going to see cuts in many good programs. Sad that we fund radicals in the American Indian Department and spend money over this lawsuit. The UIC hiring process does not follow good business practices and it’s probably going to mean this guy gets a job for life on my dime.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Rauner issues executive order barring legislators from representing clients at PTAB
* Kennedy: Limit top progressive income tax rate to less than 6 percent
* Question of the day
* Next week's House session cancelled
* *** UPDATED x2 - Pritzker "Did Chris Kennedy Just Endorse Bruce Rauner?" - Kennedy campaign tries to explain *** Kennedy says Rauner "should be applauded" for "trying to do what he thinks is best for the state of Illinois"
* Sen. Donne Trotter retires
* Illinois payrolls were up just 0.5 percent last year
* Vitriol continues in Durkin's primary race
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Judge clears courtroom in Rauner lawsuit hearing
* You can't "fully inform" voters without money
* State agrees to a $400 million consent decree
* Rate Prizker's new online ad
* Rauner gets another property tax press pop
* Emanuel pokes Rauner over Amazon comments
* Rauner's new Pritzker ad cost just $11,900
* Kennedy unveils health care plan
* Gov. Rauner gets his own blog
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






* Democratic Candidate for Attorney General Nancy.....
* Democratic Attorney General Candidate Kwame Rao.....
* The Sunday Spin: Politics with Rick Pearson Ful.....
* WBBM’s At Issue: Bob Fioretti, Candidate for Co.....
* Ives discusses marijuana, DACA as she looks to .....
* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax a.....

* Sangamon County Jail increases inmate mental health services
* Truck driver charged in fatal accident in West Virginia
* U of I's capital plan will focus on facilities
* Bald eagle takes flight at Litchfield lake after rehab
* Bill would give rural Illinois schools high-speed internet
* Northern Illinois utility says customers can get assistance
* EXCHANGE: Basketball bookends Vietnam veteran's story
* EXCHANGE: Brown's Chicken murders changed business forever
* Thousands protest Trump at Illinois women's marches
* $1.9M in Mellon Foundation grants aid UIC humanities studies

* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax appeals
* Outdoor sports participants hoping for larger cut in farm bill
* U of I trustees approve 4th-straight tuition freeze
* Rauner to air extended ad of Pritzker, Blagojevich on wiretap
* Mendoza to keynote Women's March Saturday in Springfield
* Chicago mayor vows to step up Amazon second headquarters bid
* Under the Dome Podcast: More Blago-Pritzker talk, Rauner confirms Duke is racist
* U of I withdrew 35 job offers after background checks
* Frerichs: Can't get tax break for using college savings plan on private K-12 tuition
* Illinois governor to air extended ad of rival, Blagojevich on wiretap

* How important is job flexibility? Our survey wants to know.
* Like our roundup? Share it around.
* What you need to know about the L.A. Times 'frat-boy executive' scandal
* Law firms' 2018 resolution: Less paper
* Could this company become Chicago's own Salesforce?

* Patriots will return to Super Bowl after rallying to beat Jaguars
* Anti-Trump protesters rally downtown
* 2 ‘Dreamers’ in Chicago wait for word on program’s future — and their own
* At comedy festival touched by harassment, panel of women looks for solutions
* Fred Hoiberg, Bulls players aren’t about to apologize for ruining tank job
* Senate moderates to pitch leaders on plan to end shutdown
* UIC student goes on ‘Shark Tank’ to pitch his idea for a better weight clip
* What Matt Nagy’s coordinator search tells us about the Bears head coach’s style
* In ‘All My Sons,’ guilt and denial over wartime profits and losses
* Safe Passage program expands to 14 more schools

* Moran: Waukegan joins the list of communities swinging and missing at Amazon's HQ2
* Patriots storm back to knock off Jaguars 24-20, advance to 8th Super Bowl in 17 seasons
* One year after Trump inauguration, protesters march in Loop
* Billionaire couple from Toronto were murdered by multiple people, private investigators believe
* Actions will speak louder than words for Blackhawks
* A year of Trump's 'America First' agenda has radically changed the U.S. role in the world
* Larry Nassar case shows courage of victims, shamefulness of enablers
* Shut down this shutdown habit
* J.J. Watt, Greg Olsen and Benjamin Watson finalists for NFL's Walter Payton Man of the Year award
* Evangelicals continue to apply moral relativism in dealing with Trump, but at what cost?

» Chicago Schools Chief: Cost A Driver In Special Ed Overhaul
» One Year Later, Women’s March Demands More Than Attendance
» State Week: Education Funding, Pritzker-Blagojevich, Rauner-Duke
» Sheriff Offers To Help Review Police Shootings In Suburban Cook County
» A Prescription For Fruits And Veggies: One Solution To Food Insecurity in Illinois
» A Call For Transparency
» 2 Illinois Governor Candidates Spend $26M In Last 3 Months
» State Board of Education: Double School Funding Now
» Lawmakers Demand Fast Internet For Rural Schools
» 2 Dreamers Discuss Helping Other Immigrants Amid Uncertainty

* Rauner goes after Madigan's other job
* Madeleine Doubek: May we better value journalism and the journalists
* Our View: Springfield needs more than a cautious plan for Y block
* Statehouse Insider: Rauner goes after Madigan's other job
* UIS Perspectives: Public affairs internships lead to success
* Petty, Davidsmeyer both decry anti-Petty calls
* Ed Rogers: High stakes for Trump at the World Economic Forum
* Scott Reeder: Formula for political success is to listen to voters
* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax appeals
* Outdoor sports participants hoping for larger cut in farm bill

* 5 juveniles struck by car in St. Louis; 1 in critical condition
* UI Women's Tennis vs Florida State
* Tazewell, Woodford marriages, divorces: Jan. 21, 2018
* Random Acts of Kindness: Stranger rescues dog in rush hour
* Missing 10-year-old from Missouri found safe
* Followup file: Overlook senior housing taking shape in Moline
* Car flipped on its roof in Decatur accident
* Dense fog advisory remains for northern counties
* Calendar: See Macon County government meetings for Jan. 22-26
* Big story: At Joe's, 50 years of haircuts and life lessons

* The Latest: Fight breaks out in Eagles parking lot
* Brady leads Patriots back to Super Bowl, top Jaguars 24-20
* Depay scores winner as Lyon beats league leader PSG 2-1
* Mount Prospect adds free textile recycling to refuse collection
* Bids to start at $1.2 million for Lake in the Hills shopping center

* Congressman Randy Hultgren Disagrees with ...
* Bipartisan Illinois criticism follows Trum...
* Shutdown Stalemate As Immigration Negotiat...
* Time Magazine's Powerful New Cover Feature...
* Letter: Talk to tax preparer about GOP tax...
* Rep. Hultgren: It is Not Safe for Salvador...
* Hultgren makes strong mark on nation's new...
* US places Pakistan on special watch list f...
* Our view: End patronage at Algonquin Towns...
* Dissident artist Ai Weiwei and US Rep. Ran...

* This RSS feed URL is deprecated...
* Tom Cotton flip-flops, confirms Trump's pr......
* Open ine: Tom Cotton flip flops, confirms ......
* BND readers sound off on child porn priest......
* Trump attacks serve no purpose - San Anton......

* This RSS feed URL is deprecated...
* Senator who lost her legs in Iraq calls Tr......
* Senator who lost her legs in Iraq calls Tr......
* Duckworth calls on Congress to reclaim war......
* SEE IT: Sen. Tammy Duckworth blasts Presid......

* Patti Blagojevich slams Rauner's campaign ad using Blagojevich FBI wiretap, and other Chicago news
* Women's March: The Sequel, or this time we have a destination
* Sketchbook.
* From Bev Johns: The ISBE and legislators turned a blind eye to CPS special education mess.
* Hearing aids print money and executives steal it.
* Sketchbook.
* Observing Epiphany With A Plunge In The Lake
* Michael Pfeiffer, Former Crew Server, Missing
* Don't Get Conned By The Armani Jacket Scam
* Sketchbook.

* Illinois Awarded Funds to Offer Advanced Training on Detecting Impaired Driving
* Illinois EPA Announces Upcoming Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events
* IEMA Highlights Emergency Preparedness for People with Access and Functional Needs in May - Ready Illinois website offers preparedness tips for people, caregivers
* First Lady Launches Illinois Family Connects
* Governor and Lt. Governor Unveil 2016 Journal of Local Government Shared Service Best Practices

* New Nokia flagship leaks with five camera lenses and Snapdragon 845
* Android 8.0 Oreo will roll out to Sprint HTC U11 on Monday
* Apple's New iPhone X Video Focuses on Selfies Taken With Portrait Lighting
* Samsung Galaxy S9 internal change, Razer Project Linda dates & more – Pocketnow Daily
* Women’s March embraces collaborative social app Crunchet
* Portrait Camera App 'Focos' Gains Real Lens Optical Effects and Improved Shooting Mode
* Shell wants to turn smartwatches into smartphones on a wing (or two)

* Advocating for retired non-numbers
* Getting ready for Soxfest 2018
* White Sox seeking new flagship radio home
* Engel working to steady barrel in Year 2
* WLS parent company looking to end White Sox radio deal
* Inbox: Who replaces Rodon in the rotation?
* 2018 South Side Sox Hall of Fame Ballot

Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller