Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » A missed revenue opportunity
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
A missed revenue opportunity

Monday, Apr 27, 2015

* This kinda burns me up a little

A Southeast High School Spartans hooded sweatshirt retails for $26.99 at the Walgreens at Fifth Street and South Grand Avenue.

Also for sale is a Southeast performance T-shirt for $16.99, a Springfield High School hooded sweatshirt for $26.99 and a Springfield High regular T-shirt for $12.99.

There’s nothing stopping Walgreens, or any other store in town, from selling Springfield School District apparel, School Superintendent Jennifer Gill told school board members last week.

There’s also nothing in writing ensuring that the district, individual schools or booster clubs get a cut of the profits made off apparel sold by retailers, she said.

What the heck, man? Why isn’t the IHSA all over this? And why would stores rip off schools like that?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Anonin' - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:30 pm:

    Cause ISHA is gettin’ their end?

  2. - MrJM - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:31 pm:

    “And why would stores rip off schools like that?”

    Ripping off schools is a very popular trend in Illinois.

    – MrJM

  3. - Skeptic - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:34 pm:

    I agree, Rich. Considering that whole blow-up (oops, no pun intended) about sports photos a few years ago, you’d think the IHSA would be on full alert.

  4. - bored now - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:34 pm:

    isha has tons of problems. this would be very low on the list.

    btw, as near as i can tell, many of these problems arise out of the sheer number of high school districts in illinois. it might be less of a problem if, say, there were only 101 or 102 school districts in the state…

  5. - D.P.Gumby - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:37 pm:

    Are we sure one of Brucie’s companies isn’t involved??

  6. - VanillaMan - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:38 pm:

    “At the corner of Happy and Stealthy!”

  7. - A guy - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:41 pm:

    Licensing is not a cheap process. Better be enough upside to make it worth it. If they did, Walgreens would probably drop it. Prices already seem too high to me.
    Not to mention that the IHSA also has many parochial programs participating. My guess is that those programs wouldn’t participate in a group effort.

    Walgreens could voluntarily throw some dough their way. Someone in that district might just want to/need to ask them to.

  8. - Tough Guy - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:46 pm:

    I’ve seen Walmart do the same thing in other towns with the local school’s logo.

  9. - Arthur Andersen - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:48 pm:

    The merchandise is also crappy. Most high schoolers wouldn’t wear it on a dare.

    The local Carholic high school as an “exclusive” with one local supplier. Better stuff at similar prices and the school benefits as well.

  10. - CLJ - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:50 pm:

    1. Why in the world would anyone buy a high school sweatshirt or t-shirt at Walgreens, CVS etc?

    2. If the school’s are not selling their own merchandise, then that’s their own missed opportunity.

    Several years ago, the Tribune had a e-commerce site where you could create clothing for every high school in Illinois. It is where I was able to design my own Southeast High School Skateboarding Team t-shirt. It was rad. I’m pretty sure my alma mater didn’t get a cut on the profits from that either.

  11. - Kaner - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:52 pm:

    Not an IHSA issue. They can only get proceeds from apparel that has an IHSA logo or an affiliated tournament. Individual districts would own the rights to the images of their mascots and names, so the school boards would have to file for some type of copyright/license infringement. That’s if the images and names of public entities are protected at all.

  12. - NIU Grad - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:52 pm:

    This is normal in most towns, especially if the high school isn’t selling quality apparel. Jewel and Wal-Mart do this as well. Also, high schools usually contract their apparel with companies that sell them at overpriced rates as the sole monopoly.

  13. - frustrated GOP - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 2:59 pm:

    A school just needs to copywrite the logo and then enforce it. most mascots and logo are stock items, so there is no extra cost when the school uses it for uniforms and other stuff. But if they think they will sell enough, they need to copy write it. They pay a little extra when they buy stuff. It would make a great art competition too, if done right. BTW, it won’t stop the selling of the old stuff.

  14. - Educated in the Suburbs - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:00 pm:

    Also a not-insignificant number of Illinois high schools have logos or mascots that trademark infringe either colleges or nearby corporations. While most corporations and colleges overlook it, if they start making licensing deals with OTHER big corporations to sell the infringing logo, it’s going to get messy quick.

  15. - Bogey Golfer - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:03 pm:

    So you’d rather see official licensed apparel contracts be required with all the schools so they get a piece of the action. Don’t think Nike or Adidas will be entering into an agreement with Watseka anytime soon.

  16. - Rich Miller - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:05 pm:

    ===So you’d rather see official licensed apparel contracts be required===

    I so love it when commenters attempt to put words in my mouth.

  17. - anon - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:06 pm:

    Maybe the local Walgreen stores offer employment opportunities to high school kids.

    Stores in Springfield sold high school shirts and sweatshirts 40-50 years ago. This is far from some recent development.

  18. - Six Degrees of Separation - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:07 pm:

    Don’t think Nike or Adidas will be entering into an agreement with Watseka anytime soon.

    Can’t wait to buy a pair of those $200 Air Iroquois BB shoes!

  19. - Norseman - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:08 pm:

    === There’s nothing stopping Walgreens, or any other store in town, from selling Springfield School District apparel, School Superintendent Jennifer Gill told school board members last week. ===

    There is nothing stopping Gill or someone from her staff asking these businesses for some revenue from these sales. There may be no legal obligation, but a store may want to consider the appearance to the community if they’re making money of school named apparel and not giving anything to the schools.

    I can’t believe we’re talking about a lot of money. I was a treasurer of a school sports booster club and we didn’t get a huge profit from the sale of apparel.

  20. - Formerpol - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:08 pm:

    Schools need to trademark their logos and name. Then they could stop or license stores who sell unauthorized items. Towns should do likewise.
    May be difficult to trademark a town name; but it’s worth a try. Some law firm could make $$ agreeing to do this work.

  21. - Commander Norton - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:09 pm:

    The schools in Springfield do sell their own apparel that looks a lot better than the Walgreens versions. Still, it should be possible to shame the company into giving the District some sort of cut. We have a lot of businesses that generously support the public schools; it certainly isn’t enough to make up for the lack of state support, but Walgreen’s needs to be guilt-tripped into getting on the train!

  22. - anon - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:19 pm:

    When letter jackets were really popular, who do you think sold them? Department stores, not the schools. Why would a school want to inventory these items and provide staff for a small profit when school districts have no money as it is.

  23. - Former State Employee II - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:20 pm:

    CVS in River Forest sells Elmwood Park High School gear and the EPHS boosters get a very small cut from it.

  24. - Harry - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:26 pm:

    If the school district trademarked the name and it’s enforceable, they should be able to seek redress from either the manufacturer or retailer. If they didn’t, and this has been going on a long time, they may have forfeited their rights–that’s why firms defend trademark and copyright so strenuously

  25. - JS Mill - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:27 pm:

    School names etc. are not the property of the IHSA. They only own the “state series” and they have copy righted that. Any apparel related to the state series can only be produced by a company with an IHSA licensing agreement.

    In general, schools are owned by the public and thus are public domain. No one has to license the name of their local school to re-produce their apparel for sale. For individual schools the market is not huge and they usually turn over the process to boosters or a single company for simplicity sake.

    I don’t mind local businesses getting into the act if it helps their bottom line. They support us (locally) with tax dollars and donations. Here, in small town USA, it is a good symbiotic relationship and we love to see our apparel out there for school spirit’s sake.

  26. - Wensicia - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:28 pm:

    This is not unusual; stores like Walgreens and Jewel sell shirts and hoodies representing more the one high school where I live, often at cheaper prices.

    These same stores, as well as other businesses, often sponsor events at our schools and will employ our special ed students as part of their “School to Work” training programs. That’s a decent tradeoff.

  27. - Stones - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:30 pm:

    The Walgreens across the street from our local HS does the same thing. I think it’s common practice.

  28. - Team Sleep - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:31 pm:

    I was at the Walgreen’s at the corner of Monroe and Lawrence and that location had both bleacher and lawn chairs for New Berlin and Pleasant Plains. The stand-alone chairs were $45! Both of the Springfield area Schnuck’s sell high school apparel as well.

  29. - Anonymous - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:33 pm:

    Hey, WALGREENS - BeTrue To Your Schools 🎵🎶

  30. - NIU Grad - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:37 pm:

    If anything, I’d say this is a good thing. It ensures that community members can buy apparel representing their local school/team. For example, I live in DeKalb and didn’t graduate from DeKalb High School, but consider their football team to be one of the stronger ways to connect with the community. Also, having a market compete for better apparel prices seems to be working better than a school district creating a monopoly with an overpriced apparel company. I’m sure if the schools sold apparel and said that proceeds go into a District Foundation, many parents would opt for that.

  31. - Responsa - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 3:38 pm:

    Thank you for your comment, Wensicia. Yes. You can always buy a school spirit shirt or hoodie cheaper at Jewel or Walgreens than at an in-school kiosk or stand. What may look to many here like only a few dollars of difference in price can make a big impact in many students’ or families budgets.

  32. - plutocrat03 - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 5:20 pm:

    Don’t think you can copyright a public logo or symbol.

    Is it the right thing to do to rebate something back to the schools, you bet.

    Is there a legal requirement?, not so much.

  33. - Cheryl44 - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 5:22 pm:

    It’s been decades since I’ve been in HS, but I know the Oak Lawn Spartans ripped off every single logo from Michigan they could, back in the day. I can’t see them worrying too much about copyright infringement on the stuff they stole elsewhere.

  34. - Lefty Lefty - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 5:37 pm:

    MrJM’s comment has me reaching for the “thumbs up” feature that was here for about 5 minutes during the ill-fated redesign of the site. +1

  35. - Levois - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 5:58 pm:

    There goes my idea to have apparel made for my old high school GO FALCONS!

  36. - CPS - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 6:16 pm:

    Stores in Chicago don’t do this…I guess there are too many schools for them to handle! LOL!

  37. - Michael Westen - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 7:47 pm:

    Maybe Dick Durbin could write a threatening letter to the CEO.

  38. - DuPage - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 8:10 pm:

    A couple of bucks royalty to the schools would be nice, but it is a drop in the bucket of the Rauner induced financial situation the schools are now facing.

  39. - Cubs Win - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 9:21 pm:

    High schools can license their products through the same process the universities use although the revenue would be much lower:

  40. - Illinois Manufacturer - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 9:49 pm:

    Its more a trademark than a copyright and they can take actions to protect it without registration but its easier if they register unless state law somehow doesn’t let them

  41. - Sheesh Hecuka Cupajava - Monday, Apr 27, 15 @ 11:13 pm:

    When I was in high school (2008) I found a niche market in my entrepreneurship class. My class was tasked with creating a product/service and running the business. My HS had a terrible spirit wear at the time, it was outdated, and no one wanted to buy/wear it. So I chose to revamp the spirit wear. Create a new logo. And use attractive Under Armour products. At the end of the class I had $8,000 in sales with a $2,000 profit (half of which I had to give to my charity of choice). My point is, if we were teaching the importance of entrepreneurship instead of Shakespeare, maybe the students could innovated these ideas. My apparel could have gone toe-to-toe with a collegiate team at the time and it sure as heck could have gone against Walgreens.

  42. - Big Mouth - Tuesday, Apr 28, 15 @ 8:06 am:

    Can a public institution that is supported by tax dollars copyright anything?

  43. - Illinois Manufacturer - Tuesday, Apr 28, 15 @ 8:21 am:

    Big - the Universities seem to . I found out Minn sticks the c on its highway environmental statements. If the schools cant the GA should correct that

  44. - D-43 - Tuesday, Apr 28, 15 @ 6:39 pm:

    The schools get their share of the revenues when they license their logos, etc. to the companies that make/distribute those kinds of apparel. Do you think that the school districts wouldn’t sue otherwise?

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Local 150 PAC promotes capital plan in two new TV ads
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* Illinois Credit Unions: People Helping People
* IEPA issues "seal order" on Sterigenics plant
* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend
* Rep. Chapa LaVia will head IDVA after previous appointee bows out
* Question of the day
* Mary Morrissey named new executive director of DPI
* Transparency issues
* It's just a bill
* Amazon leads $700 million investment round for Rivian
* Hysterical much?
* Minimum wage roundup
* Poll: Five points separate five mayoral candidates as union money whacks Daley
* Should the state sell the Tollway to boost the pension funds?
* Southern Illinois state's attorney vows not to enforce assault weapons ban if it becomes law
* Daley would keep hope alive for those who want pension benefit cuts
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...










Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller