Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » It’s just a bill…
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
It’s just a bill…

Wednesday, Apr 29, 2015

* But this one may be important. Lisa Ryan

A proposal in the Illinois Senate would make sure students are completely recovered from concussions before returning to athletics or the classroom.

Each year, there are 200,000 concussion-related emergency room visits for children and teenagers in the U.S. For one Chicago lawmaker, that’s not just a statistic.

Both of Democratic Sen. Kwame Raoul’s kids have sustained concussions. Raoul says his teenage daughter, Mizan, is still recovering from one she received one when she was playing basketball in January. At first, nobody realized it was a concussion. […]

A proposal Raoul is sponsoring would expand high school concussion policies to elementary and middle schools. It also requires guidelines for when students can return to school and athletics after sustaining a concussion.

* Seth Richardson has more

Raoul said the legislation is not a mandate with any sort of penalties. Each district would form a concussion plan and team based on resources available.

Schools currently have to follow Illinois High School Association regulations when deciding if a player can return. However, those rules only apply to high schools, while Raoul’s bill would extend to both middle and grade schools.

IHSA associate director Kurt Gibson, who has previously said he was skeptical of the bill, said he is now a supporter since it requires each district to come up with a concussion policy based on their resources.

* This looks like a reprinted press release

State Representative Natalie Manley (D-Joliet) is sponsoring legislation that would prohibit Illinois from double taxing income that is earned in another state when the taxpayer’s home office is based in Illinois.

“Right now Illinois residents are taxed on most income received in other states, rather than just income earned in Illinois,” said Manley. “This wouldn’t be an issue if the other states didn’t also tax those wages, but they do. Our working families are being hit hard enough with the many different taxes that are imposed upon them, and the last thing we should be doing is taxing them twice on the same income.”

Manley introduced House Bill 675, to prevent the double taxation of certain income for Illinois residents. Under current law, if an Illinois resident earns income from another state then that person is required to pay taxes in both states under certain circumstances. The legislation would instead only tax the wages earned in Illinois based on the number of work days the employee is performing services in Illinois. Out-of-state earnings would be excluded from Illinois income taxes.

“We are the only state that implements this double taxation, and it hurts our taxpayers,” Manley said.

I say it looks like a press release because the bill didn’t make it out of the House by last Friday’s deadline and is now in Rules.

* Another press release

Illinois is joining several other states in passing legislation that would dramatically increase the potential liability for marketers in the event of a data breach. The Illinois Senate voted 35-13 to approve a bill (SB1833) drafted by the Illinois Attorney General that would add “consumer marketing information” to the definition of personal information under the state’s data breach law. It would require notification if there is a breach of “information related to a consumer’s online browsing history, online search history, or purchasing history.” Illinois Bill SB1833 now moves to the Illinois House of Representatives, where it will likely have substantial support.

At first blush this certainly sounds appealing considering all the data breaches that have occurred in recent times; however, for those that market products on the internet, the inconsistent laws across the country are truly a field of potential liability landmines. […]

This unprecedented expansion of the scope of the current data breach law could cost Illinois companies millions of dollars each year to protect non-sensitive information that poses no material risk of identity theft or financial harm to residents. In addition, consumers could eventually succumb to “notice fatigue” if they receive notices about breaches that involve no serious risk of harm to them.

* And moving along to Chicago

When Chicago’s most powerful alderman began pushing for legislation that could mean big money for a major industry, it seemed only a matter of time before Edward Burke got a generous campaign contribution from someone who stood to benefit.

The City Council proposal that would promote the ethanol business has not yet been approved.

But the check for Burke, the Council’s $10 million man, is not stuck in the mail.

The Archer Daniels Midland Co. — the local agribusiness giant that’s among the world’s biggest ethanol producers — recently gave $20,000 to a political committee led by Burke.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 1:18 pm:

    The proposed ordinance is garbage. Trying to require gas stations to carry a higher blend ethonal gas that is bad for engines, hurts the mpg and is not recommended for use by car manufacturers. But Burke got paid so guess what Chicago it will happen.

  2. - OneMan - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 1:27 pm:

    In terms of ‘returning to school’ seems to me that should be at the discretion of the parents and a health care professional mostly IMHO.

  3. - 1776 - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 1:45 pm:

    To her credit, Rep. Manley sat down with the business community to discuss a very technical and complex issue. There are ongoing discussions with Revenue to try and reach consensus.

  4. - Carhartt Representative - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 1:54 pm:

    I can’t really get upset about corruption in Chicago governance. If this bothered the residents, they wouldn’t have reelected Rahm.

  5. - Wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 2:07 pm:

    Well, if Burke and ADM are for it, you know it’s good for you.

    Ethanol is a government subsidized scam, falsely sold as “green” and promoting “natiional security.”

    Yet ethanol takes just about as much carbon-based energy to produce as it provides and takes an enormous amount of fresh water. And we’re producing record domestic oil and gas now. In fact, U.S. based refineries are net exporters of oil products.

  6. - Judgment Day - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 2:12 pm:

    The “Data Breach” issues really needs to be thought out a whole lot better before the State starts passing legislation.

    There’s a lot of unanticipated consequences that can happen when you get into this area. For example, one of the biggest areas of concern in the tech community is the whole security environment surrounding the Affordable Care Act.

    This isn’t ideology, it’s technology.

    And trying to ‘establish’ liability for data breaches? Folks, it’s a constantly changing Target (bad reference) - If you pass something in this area, better plan on updating it monthly - maybe every 2 weeks.

    Not saying there isn’t need, but really doubt this is the answer.

    MAYBE we should re-purpose the NSA to fight cyber crime/data breaches instead of spying on us.(Sorry, editorial comment there…:).

  7. - mcb - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 2:40 pm:

    I’m not saying we need higher or lower ethanol blend standards, but the amount of disinformation out there on the fuel is mind boggling. It is absolutely not true that “ethanol takes just about as much carbon-based energy to produce as it provides”, not even close. Years ago an oil industry shill tried to claim it took more energy to produce than it gave (even he didn’t claim more carbon based energy), he only got his results because he used bad data, then counted sunlight(received by growing plants), energy from the water cycle(rainwater received by plants), and plenty of other badly calculated pseudoscience to get his completely dishonest results.
    It does however take more energy to explore for, extract, refine, and deliver gasoline than you get out of it, so the comparison is a joke anyway.

  8. - Nick Naylor - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 2:57 pm:

    You have to question ADM’s judgment here…I mean really? Hiring John Kelly?!?

  9. - Arthur Andersen - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 3:02 pm:

    Interesting, if perhaps slightly skewed data, mcb.

    Now, can you address the impact of E15 on all the pre-flexfuel cars/trucks on the road? Lower fuel mileage? Deterioration of non-metallic components? Give us something on that.

  10. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 5:34 pm:

    mcb is absolutely correct on the ethanol issue.

  11. - Wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 5:42 pm:

    Mcb, my source was the “oil company shills” at “Mother Jones.”

    No Big Corn shills in Illinois, I’m sure.

    I suppose using all that groundwater to produce ethanol prevents floods or something.

  12. - Plutocrat03 - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 5:52 pm:

    Ethanol actually is worse for the environment than straight gasoline per the California Resources Board.

    Let’s follow the money and see why e15 won’t die. Let’s focus on something more fun like Burke’s nanny (security detail). It should be brought up each time he brings up a bill.

  13. - mcb - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 6:02 pm:

    I’m not an advocate for e85, just trying to clear up misconceptions. Ethanol isn’t perfect or awful. There are lots of bad decisions and legislation that have been based on bad info, including apparently CARB’s whacked out view. (A lot of that is based on bad analysis, such as bad energy equivalency formulas; or studies that look at corn as food or fuel, when DDG’s have meant that the same bushel is used for both)

    I would whole heartedly agree that there are better options like electric(eventually, once the infrastructure and range are improved), and even with biofuels, biodiesel is a far better option.
    The problem is that unlike Europe, Americans as a whole don’t want diesels, so there are few passenger cars that can take advantage, thus severely limiting growth potential for the fuel. It also doesn’t help that the EPA and federal standards seem determined to do everything they can to kill diesels.

  14. - Harry - Wednesday, Apr 29, 15 @ 11:32 pm:

    I checked my owner’s manual and using E15 will void my 2013 Honda’s warranty. No ifs, ands, or buts. A 2014 would be OK. I’m sure Burke gets a new Caddy or Benz every year so he wouldn’t care, but the rest of us poor slobs might… but I don’t have $20K to give him so I guess I’ll just have to drive from Hyde Park to Lansing or Oak Park or some such to gas up, burning about 3-4 gallons per trip. Real environmental.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* ILGOP pledges to "continue to oppose taxpayer funding of abortion"
* The Madigan PR campaign continues
* Climate change denier warns of mob violence if renewable energy is expanded
* Pritzker, Frerichs announce loan program for furloughed federal workers
* Today's quotable
* A twofer for Preckwinkle
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to this morning's edition
* Question of the day
* First Class all the way
* Manteno Veterans' Home tests show "low levels of Legionellosis"
* Pritzker signs EO committing Illinois to Paris Climate Agreement
* The Dome is leaking
* It's Time To Put Our Progressive Values Into Action
* More on Pritzker's HB40 EO
* Yeah, that'll work well
* Report: Ald. Solis recorded conversations with Ald. Burke
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller