Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Alvarez says Preckwinkle pension bill is unconstitutional
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Alvarez says Preckwinkle pension bill is unconstitutional

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

* Probably expected

Cook County State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez has torn a gaping hole in pension reform legislation being pushed in Springfield by Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle.

In a move loaded with political implications, Alvarez’s office wrote a legal opinion declaring that the bill “is unconstitutional” because it would reduce benefits in the county’s current pension system without bargaining those changes with employee labor groups.

The bill represents “a unilateral imposition of changed terms, many of which diminish and impair existing retirement annuity benefits,” states the letter, which is signed by Daniel Gallagher, deputy state’s attorney and chief of the Civil Actions Bureau. Preckwinkle’s proposal cannot stand after a recent Illinois Supreme Court decision tossing out pension changes that reduced benefits for state employees, the opinion says.

Preckwinkle’s office had no immediate reaction to the May 21 letter, which is labeled a “confidential attorney client communication.” Crain’s obtained a copy from a source who declined to be named.

The opinion is potentially very bad news for Preckwinkle, whose bill already faced heavy head winds in Springfield, where legislators are caught up in a wider budget war.

Sigh.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

32 Comments
  1. - Lil squeezy - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 2:52 pm:

    Water is wet.


  2. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 2:55 pm:

    Boy, “Sigh” is right.

    At some point, all the shrubbery is on fire and there’s no other fire to start…


  3. - Precinct Captain - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 2:57 pm:

    Alvarez knows a lot about unconstitutional actions, prosecuting people without due process based on torture and corruption.


  4. - Amalia - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:00 pm:

    Is Preckwinkle running again?


  5. - JS Mill - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:01 pm:

    Seems like this was obvious given the ILSC decision.

    Might be different if it was bargained and agreed to by the various impacted bargaining units.


  6. - 47th Ward - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:01 pm:

    That’s the problem with getting a legal opinion, you might not like the answer.

    It would be pretty dumb (and needlessly expensive) for Preckwinkle to try to take this to a court now. Therefore, I figure there is a 50-50 chance that she will.


  7. - AnonymousOne - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:01 pm:

    At what point will everyone stop knocking on the door of those in the pension systems to pay for what was taken from them and pony up and pay the bills? How many more attempts, how many more years, how much more interest on the debt?


  8. - Juvenal - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:02 pm:

    Probably expected?

    Understatement of the day.


  9. - A guy - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:04 pm:

    If you put a ball on a tee, you can’t act surprised when someone with a “Big Bertha” comes along and swings hard.


  10. - D.P.Gumby - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:04 pm:

    May be correct, but Cook SA has not been the fount of legal wisdom.


  11. - facts are stubborn things - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:06 pm:

    The fact that this even needed an opinions is stunning. A fifth grader could read the supreme court ruling on pensions (at least the key parts of it)and have told you this.


  12. - anon - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:08 pm:

    In the brief moment before the paywall kicked in, it looked like the legal opinion was requested by Cook County Commissioner Larry Suffredin, not Preckwinkle. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Even the less than legal giants at the SA can shoot a fish in a barrel.


  13. - Amalia - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:16 pm:

    what’s most interesting about this is the Suffredin comment that “this is not a monarchy.” that is a pretty big dig at Preckwinkle coming from Larry.


  14. - Enviro - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:21 pm:

    The Preckwinkle Pension Bill is another example of kicking the can down the road. The bill is unconstitutional and will not solve a problem that can only be solved with new revenue budget cuts.

    “If you kick the can down the road, you delay a decision in hopes that the problem or issue will go away or somebody else will make the decision later.”

    http://www.usingenglish.com/reference/idioms/kick+the+can+down+the+road.html


  15. - John Parnell - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:22 pm:

    Preckwinkle just wants to have an issue for her reelection campaign. I hope the circuit court throws the case out for being frivolous.


  16. - Anonymous - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:23 pm:

    === In a move loaded with political implications, Alvarez’s office wrote a legal opinion declaring that the bill “is unconstitutional” because it would reduce benefits in the county’s current pension system without bargaining those changes with employee labor groups. ===

    And what about the employees that do not belong to a bargaining unit? The opinion may be correct that the propsoed legislation is unconstitutional, but its reasoning seems flawed.


  17. - No Raise - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:26 pm:

    Classy move by Alvarez. Too bad Lisa Madigan didn’t do the same after last year’s health insurance ruling.


  18. - Norseman - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:32 pm:

    Alvarez can read. Preckwinkle, not so much,


  19. - Garland - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:33 pm:

    How long will it take for Moody’s to downgrade the County’s credit rating?


  20. - Wake Up! - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:40 pm:

    Anonymous at 3:23.

    You should read the opinion and not rely on the Crain’s article.

    The opinion says nothing about bargaining with labor groups. It talks about the contractual relationship established at the onset of an employee’s entry into a retirement system. That’s different than the terms of a collective bargaining agreement.


  21. - anon - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:41 pm:

    All’s Well That Ends Well. SA Alvarez is no profile in political courage, but if she was motivated to do the right thing by payback for Queen Antonia’s backing of a rival candidate for SA, so be it.


  22. - jimbo2 - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:44 pm:

    Correct me if my old brain is acting up. But, isn’t Preckwinkle supporting one of her staff to run against Alvarez?
    I know the bill is questionable but this must have been a satisfying decision to deliver.


  23. - crazybleedingheart - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:46 pm:

    Sounds like “60 Minutes Alvarez” is mad she’s being challenged.


  24. - anon - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:49 pm:

    A satisfying decision to leak?


  25. - Frank Ambrose - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 4:15 pm:

    I worked with Alvarez well before she was the elected Cook Co. SA. She was a good lawyer, reviewed the facts and a decision and didn’t cut you loose when the press didn’t like to decision. Wish AG Lisa would have issued a review like this and saved the State a lot of time and money


  26. - Cold - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 4:31 pm:

    If the bill passes, will AG madigan defend or will she pass it off to SA Alvarez?


  27. - Cheryl44 - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 6:08 pm:

    Anita Alverez ought to be in jail


  28. - Truthteller - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 6:31 pm:

    Preckwinkle is a fraud. Kudos to Alvarez for standing up to Joe Berrios’s dear friend


  29. - Amalia - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 6:37 pm:

    Truthteller is spot on. what happened to the Toni we all knew way back when? The Berrios (and his fellow travelers) thing is totally puzzling. And is she running again?


  30. - chanclagirlee - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 9:28 pm:

    This is a very insightful development given the ridiculous political overtures coming from the Preckwinkle camp. If Toni had her “hand picked” candidate for State’s Attorney in office this opinion would have been written according to HER order. Chilling political power grab. The media should wake up and smell the real wanna be political boss here.


  31. - zonz - Wednesday, May 27, 15 @ 7:58 am:

    Gumby,
    Are you talking about Daniel Gallagher, deputy state’s attorney, and if so can you disclose what your experience with him has been?
    In any case pls back up your slam.
    _________________
    - D.P.Gumby - Tuesday, May 26, 15 @ 3:04 pm:

    May be correct, but Cook SA has not been the fount of legal wisdom.


  32. - FatVegan - Wednesday, May 27, 15 @ 11:25 am:

    Alvarez is an excellent lawyer who cares deeply about the victims of crime. Preckwinkle is a criminal rights activist who cares more about the rights of criminals than their victims. Her “so called” pension reform plan is unconstitutional too.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed until Tuesday
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Tribune asked 16 mayoral candidates to release tax returns, 6 complied
* A rough idea of what they're looking at
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Rauner was wrong about "record levels" of unionization
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY: Stava-Murray updates
* Pritzker's inauguration ball tix will benefit Cabrini Green Legal Aid Clinic and Illinois Fairgrounds Foundation
* Rauner claims he's been too busy to reflect on his term
* Pritzker's day in DC
* *** UPDATED x3 - Morrison wants emergency meeting of ILGOP - McConnaughay explains - Schneider responds *** Rauner says he tried to drop out of race after primary
* Feds re-raid Ald. Burke's office
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller