Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Cullerton will call pay raise rollback bill
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Cullerton will call pay raise rollback bill

Thursday, Jul 30, 2015

* Subscribers were already informed of this development

Senate President John Cullerton will support a bill to halt legislative pay raises during the Senate session next week, despite calling the measure “blatantly unconstitutional.” […]

House Speaker Michael Madigan on Tuesday pushed through a bill to block the cost-of-living increases, calling it another effort to meet Rauner “half way” as the budget impasse drags on.

On Wednesday, Cullerton told the Sun-Times Editorial Board that he’ll call the bill next week.

“We’re going to call that next week, and I’m going to support it,” Cullerton said, adding that “it’s blatantly unconstitutional,” but “nobody’s gonna sue.”

If it gets to the floor, it passes.

* Mark Brown writes about the Cullerton statements

Pardon me if I don’t salute this as a great victory for democracy.

The legislative pay hike, as Madigan observed last week, is a “diversion” from the serious business in which Rauner and the General Assembly need to be engaged of passing a balanced budget.

Eliminating the pay raise itself amounts to less than $250,000 in savings on a budget with a multibillion-dollar hole, although Democrats claimed they had increased the savings to about $500,000 by also getting rid of planned increases in per diem and mileage reimbursements paid to legislators. […]

Just the same, Democrats should have been smart enough to forgo the pay raises on their own without any prompting from Rauner, not because it was the right thing to do, but because they should have anticipated the governor would exploit it to make it more difficult for them to prevail on the important stuff.

I’m particularly surprised that Madigan, normally a master of such diversions, didn’t act sooner.

I’m surprised, too, but Madigan is not ever known for moving fast until he’s ready.

The bigger surprise is that he didn’t make a huge show out of halting the pay hikes when he knew the GA was headed for overtime.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - tominchicago - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:21 pm:

    I agree. this is the first notable mistake that MJM has made so far. You would think that it would have been an obvious move given how much mileage Quinn got our “denying” legislator’s salaries last year.

  2. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:24 pm:

    Gov Rauner says he wants to pay employees and AG Madigan is out the same day with a press release outlining all the ways it is unconstitutional. Then she files suit.

    The House takes action that is ==blatantly unconstitutional== and the AG responds with crickets?

    I respect her and give her the benefit of the doubt, but the AG is at risk of undermining her own credibility.

  3. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:26 pm:

    ===The House takes action that is ==blatantly unconstitutional===

    The House’s action might not have been because members hadn’t yet been paid. The Senate’s will be. We’ll see.

  4. - Juvenal - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:27 pm:

    Perhaps this is a question for RNUG, but isn’t the impact on new legislators like Avery Bourne gonna be much more that a one year hit of a couple grand?

    Assuming they never make that percent hike up, it repeats and compounds each year, right? And then compounds even further in retirement?

  5. - @MisterJayEm - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:30 pm:

    “it’s blatantly unconstitutional,” but “nobody’s gonna sue.”

    Peak Illinois.

    – MrJM

  6. - AC - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:33 pm:

    Good to see this distraction removed, and it’s not as if this is the first bill known to be unconstitutional that’s been called for a vote.

  7. - walker - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:34 pm:

    ==”…I’m going to support it,” Cullerton said, adding that “it’s blatantly unconstitutional,” but “nobody’s gonna sue.”==

    I get the politics, but boy is that a bad standard for legislative behavior!

  8. - x ace - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:36 pm:

    Madigan and Cullerton are Lawyers , Rauner is not. All three now want to violate the Constitution . Other legislators are lawyers too.

    Does an Illinois Lawyer have any special license risks if the lawyer knowingly supports or knowingly takes Unconstitutional Action ?

    Or are legislators immune ?

  9. - The Colossus of Roads - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:39 pm:

    People make decisions all the time, some good, some bad, some lucky and some unlucky. To second guess someone’s decision is very easy. Whether he should have done this earlier is debatable, however, he has now told the public, I did this for the taxpayers and the Governor. I do care. Let’s try to move on with some compromises.

  10. - Tony - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:39 pm:

    “it’s blatantly unconstitutional,” but ….
    This state’s entire leadership is a disgrace.

  11. - Wensicia - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:41 pm:

    Does this set a precedent?

  12. - Archiesmom - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:44 pm:

    I know Senators who don’t want to vote for it because of the constitutional issue, but it’s a much bigger headache for them to have to defend that vote in 2016 when the “you voted for a pay raise whilst the state burned” mailers come out. They’re the ones suffering the harm through the rollback, and this is one case where principle is getting sacrificed to political reality.

  13. - Archiesmom - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:46 pm:

    if you want to talk ethics, this is nothing compared to voting for a blatantly unconstitutional pension reform bill.

  14. - a drop in - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 1:52 pm:

    I don’t think the AG can sue on her own. I think someone needs to “complain”.

  15. - Norseman - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:02 pm:

    === I get the politics, but boy is that a bad standard for legislative behavior! ===

    They’ve done it before and they’ll do it again.

    === Does this set a precedent? ===

    I’m inferring your asking if this somehow legitimizes the action because they took this vote. No. The constitutional provides an individual right. The GA can’t legislate it away.

    If that’s not what your were thinking see my statement above your question.

  16. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:02 pm:

    I don’t think the AG can sue on her own. I think someone needs to “complain”==

    She absolutely can, on behalf of “The People of Illinois”

  17. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:04 pm:

    ==The House’s action might not have been because members hadn’t yet been paid==

    Maybe it was not. Salary would seem to be established and confirmed at the start of the pay period, but if they have not actually received their payment some could argue it is not a ==change in salary==. As you said, ==we’ll see==.

    The circus continues.

  18. - burbanite - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:08 pm:

    While the AG can issue an opinion. She can’t take court action until the Senate votes and the Governor signs. It isn’t ripe yet.

  19. - A lawyer - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:10 pm:

    I’m 100% sure Lisa Madigan will go to court to block this because it is unconstitutional to reduce a legislator’s pay during the term. Riiiiight.

  20. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:15 pm:

    ==Whether he should have done this earlier is debatable==

    Had he done this even slightly earlier, the constitutional pickle he now put Dems in never would have happened.

    The way he finally did it also hangs the Senate out to dry ==the Senate wasn’t consulted beforehand and won’t be back to town until after legislators receive their first paychecks with the COLA increases in them==.

  21. - A lawyer - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:16 pm:

    Article IV, Section 11 of the Illinois Constitution prohibits reduction of a legislator’s pay during the term. So why move this? Can you say phony - baloney nonsense?

  22. - cdog - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:43 pm:

    I heard a radio news broadcast yesterday that ended this story by saying — “the savings from repealing the GA payraise, is LESS THAN Gov Rauner’s NEW EXECUTIVE RUNNING THE STATES’ DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION!!!! whoa!

    It is the truth. It’s just numbers.

  23. - Triple fat - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:57 pm:

    But can the opposition criticize him for not proposing unconstitutional legislation then criticize him for passing said unconstitutional language? You bet they can and will once the Court rules it Unconstitutional. I think the Speaker’s timing on this was impeccable.

  24. - A guy - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 2:58 pm:

    And for the first time in American History…

    “nobody’s gonna sue”.

    That’s pretty powerful all on it’s own.

  25. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 3:05 pm:

    A guy:

    That’s a FIFTH thing Madigan has given Rauner - Tort Reform.

  26. - Demoralized - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 3:06 pm:

    That was me above

  27. - Loop Lady - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 3:30 pm:

    This is pathetic on so many fronts…the three egotists should be ashamed of themselves…

  28. - Formerly Known As... - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 3:46 pm:

    ==I think the Speaker’s timing on this was impeccable==

    Madigan’s timing makes Senate Dems pick between him or the constitution. It ends poorly.

    If they pick the constitution, they keep a very unpopular pay raise while not fulfilling basic job requirements like passing a balanced budget. If they pick the speaker, the Attorney General almost certainly has to sue to stop their unconstitutional actions or she loses credibility.

  29. - Wordslinger - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 4:16 pm:

    Whatever. It’s a hangover from Quinn trying to make nice with Big Brain Bruce by pulling his Banana Republic move on legislative pay.

    Means nothing.

    Back in grown up land, about 80% of FY16 is in the clear.

    For all intents and purposes, the budget is done, without the governor’s input or any “victories.”

    All that remains is fhe heavy lift of funding $7 billion in anticipated social service, higher ed, and group insurance with $2 billion in available revenue.

    FAFSA has to be in place in a couple of weeks for the kids going back to school.

    It’s lunacy to think that the governor will take the heat on eliminating social services in every legislative district in the state. Seriously, who thought that was possible? They’re demented.

    And insurance? Give me a break.

    It’s strange, after all these months, that the Rauner crew thinks they can still bluff, after they’ve folded, time and time again, every time they got called.

    Who wouldn’t want to play poker with these guys?

  30. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jul 30, 15 @ 8:53 pm:

    I wonder if Senate Repubs will vote for an unconstitutional bill?

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Kinda sorta slightly good news for the state, not so much for the city, CPS and Cook
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Caption contest!
* Illinois lost 45,116 people in one year
* But his e-mails...
* The hollowing-out of state government
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...







Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller