Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Read all the way to the bottom
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Read all the way to the bottom

Wednesday, Oct 28, 2015

* From the very end of today’s Sun-Times story on the Chicago City Council’s passage today of a $755 million hike in taxes and fees

There’s a 66 percent increase in Chicago booting fees along with the green light for City Hall to start using “self-release” Denver boots with a daily fine of $50 if the boot is not returned within seven days.

There’s also a fivefold increase in the maximum penalty seldom imposed against property owners who fail to remove snow and ice from the sidewalk adjacent to their buildings.

Motorists who drive without insurance will find themselves in violation of the city code, with fines ranging from $500 to $1,000 for the first and second offense to $1,000 for every subsequent offense.

For the first time, City Hall will require companies that “aggregate and sell” parking spaces, including those selling spaces through mobile apps, to collect the city’s parking tax, which stands at 22 percent on weekdays and 20 percent on weekends.

Yet another last-minute change would tie the annual permit for overweight trucks to the Consumer Price Index to “better account for the impact of large trucks on city streets.”

* Deep down in the NBC 5 story

In a last-ditch attempt to garner more support for the plan, Emanuel conceded a 2-cents-per-ride fee for ride-share services like Uber and Lyft to help traditional taxi drivers pay their registration fees on Monday. In exchange, the amendment gives ride-share drivers access to airports, but it requires them to register with the city and pay $5 each time they drop off or pick up someone from the airport.

* But the Tribune may have buried the most important detail

The vote came after some last-minute agreements between the mayor and council members, with Ald. Michele Smith, 43rd, securing consideration for a residential property tax rebate program should the mayor’s proposed homeowner’s exemption increase fail to get approved in Springfield. Emanuel had been reluctant to focus on any rebate option for fear it would diminish prospects for passage of his exemption plan in Springfield.

The rebate is the better way to go. Chicago doesn’t have to rely on Springfield, and if history is any guide most people won’t even ask for the give-back.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - The Dude Abides - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 2:21 pm:

    So if Chicago decides to go it alone instead of waiting for Springfield does that mean that the Governor loses leverage with Emanuel helping him with the turnaround agenda?

  2. - Team Sleep - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 2:30 pm:

    First - the picture of Rahmbo on the Trib’s link is awesome.

    Second - good on Alderman Smith for hedging her bets, being proactive and looking out for her constituents.

  3. - Amalia - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 2:36 pm:

    Ald Arena seems to have gotten something re additional revenue for 311 services and Ald Smith got the rebate clause. these aldermen took a smart route. others may have voted no or even yes, and gotten or contributed nothing.

  4. - After Further Review - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 2:49 pm:

    Not that I am generally advocate of higher taxes and fees, but Chicago really ought to impose a fine for property owners who fail to maintain their properties in terms of weed abatement. Other cities and villages have weed abatement ordinances that required owners to treat or cut down weeds. Those who don’t comply or fined or, alternatively, billed if the municipality has to cut down the weeds.

    As you drive through parts of Chicago there are many lots that are covered with weeds and overgrowth.

  5. - Precinct Captain - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 2:59 pm:

    If only the people had voted for Rahm Emanuel, we wouldn’t be facing this Chuy Garcia tax hike! Oh, wait…

  6. - Tone - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 3:06 pm:

    Chuy would have instituted a city income tax, wanted to tax the cities financial exchanges, and any other ridiculous way to grab money from the taxpayers in order to feed his union overlords trough of outrageous benefits. A real estate tax hike is the least problematic of a lot of bad options.

  7. - nixit71 - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 3:33 pm:

    What’s the fine for failing to remove your folding chair from your recently shoveled-out parking spot on the street?

  8. - Just Me - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 3:47 pm:

    Nixit71: That made me giggle. Thanks.

  9. - Put the Fun in unfunded - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 4:00 pm:

    Increasing the homeowner exemption would mean that the same amount of tax would be collected, just spread around differently. Implementing a “rebate” means some of the tax increase is going to be given back. Won’t that reduce the total amount of net revenue?

  10. - Mouthy - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 4:28 pm:

    I’ll take good ole’ Springpatch any day…

  11. - Just Observing - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 4:40 pm:

    === The rebate is the better way to go. Chicago doesn’t have to rely on Springfield, and if history is any guide most people won’t even ask for the give-back. ===

    You can be sure the Aldermen will be pushing the rebate as a means to curry favor with their constituents — the same way the Board of Review Commissioners push assessment appeals with their constituents.

  12. - Just Observing - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 4:43 pm:

    I’m also not entirely sure a rebate scheme is legal. Exemptions are the prerogative of the state legislature, right? So, isn’t this a backhanded, run around the legislature? Perhaps a commercial property owner can sue on that notion. I don’t know if my argument has any merit, but I’m just throwing it out there.

  13. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Oct 28, 15 @ 4:54 pm:

    Rahm will figure out that he cannot solve this problem withoother people’s money .
    Fortunately,Chicago is a wealthy city and pay its own way.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Rauner vetoes second bill to address gender wage gap
* Munger moves to DCEO
* Preckwinkle mayoral announcement roundup
* Follow the money
* Empty threat? Or does somebody know something we don't?
* A couple of quick debate clips
* Supremes side with hospitals on property taxes
* Report: IEPA stonewalls AG until HGOP leader steps in
* A TIF primer
* Raoul's new ad blasts Harold over abortion rights
* Debate coverage roundup
* Question of the day
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller