Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Remap reformers say they’ve collected 400,000 signatures
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Remap reformers say they’ve collected 400,000 signatures

Tuesday, Nov 17, 2015 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Either the Democrats get in front of this issue, or they’re gonna get run over by it

More than 400,000 Illinoisans have signed petitions to put the Independent Map Amendment on the November 2016 ballot.

These petition signers want to give voters a choice between an independent commission drawing state legislative maps in a fair and transparent manner and the current system where politicians draw the maps to maximize partisan advantage and protect incumbents.

The non-partisan Independent Maps coalition announced Tuesday that it has collected 402,109 signatures and is now more than two-thirds of the way to its goal of collecting 600,000 signatures.

“Just like in Ohio where on November 3rd a redistricting reform initiative passed 71-29 percent, Illinoisans are clamoring for change in the way state legislative maps are drawn,” said Dennis FitzSimons, Chair of Independent Maps. “After seeing 60 percent of state legislative races go uncontested in November 2014 because of slanted maps drawn to discourage competition and protect incumbents, voters want to fix a rigged system.” […]

“We reached the 400,000 mark about five months earlier than the 2014 campaign, and we will continue collecting signatures until it is time to deliver our petitions to the State Board of Elections next May,” he said. “To put an amendment before voters, the Illinois Constitution requires a minimum of 290,216 valid signatures, and our goal is to collect more than twice that number as insurance against petition challenges by the entrenched interests who oppose reform.”

       

39 Comments
  1. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 10:40 am:

    Sweet. Another opportunity for the governor to declare victory on one of “his” reforms so he can get to the heavy-lifting of cleaning up the FY16 mess.


  2. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 10:46 am:

    Don’t kid yourselves, Independent Commission drawing state legislative maps can be purchased (rigged) to favor the governor’s party.


  3. - Ducky LaMoore - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 10:47 am:

    I hope this goes through.


  4. - Ahoy! - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 10:51 am:

    Assuming the courts do not help the Democrats out by ruling that only the legislature can make changes to the legislature…


  5. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 10:55 am:

    Word is right. Why the Governor held on to this for months, as a “nonnegotiable” structural reform, before agreeing to discuss the actual budget, is a mystery. It has been clear for months that he had another route to get what he wanted on remapping. This might have simply provided political cover for less popular demands.


  6. - walker - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 10:57 am:

    Anonymous above was me.


  7. - justacitizen - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:00 am:

    Where can I sign the petition? Seriously.


  8. - Tequila Mockingbird - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:01 am:

    Hmm, let’s see… Trust the process to an independent commission? Or to the folks that have always done it so well?
    Where do I sign?


  9. - morgan - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:02 am:

    I would be in favor of introducing a constitutional amendment to put ALL of the following (popular items) to a public vote. If we are going there for term limits and remap, let’s have a progressive tax rate, increase the minimum wage and get some limits on campaign contributions while we are at it.

    They would have to each be introduced and voted on separately, I assume. But if not…let’s offer up the package deal.


  10. - Captain Illini - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:05 am:

    Rich, I understand your angst regarding Dem’s getting up to speed, but BB (before Blago) during the 26 year reign of republicans and two separate census - mapping opportunities, the same twisted gerrymandering occurred.

    I think the ballot question answers the “should” part of legislative mapping, but further refinement of the law would answer the “how” part.


  11. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:06 am:

    Yes indeed. Where do we sign?! We may have rose tinted glasses on this matter right now, but considering the conniving, divisive process as is, I’ll put on the glasses willingly.


  12. - Norseman - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:06 am:

    Looking good. Next stop will be a court challenge. We’ll see if the group is correct when they say the new language addresses the constitutional issues.


  13. - morgan - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:06 am:

    Perhaps I’m too cynical, but I’d rather trust a known bias that has to go through the legislative process than a “supposedly” independent one.

    And, no, the current map system isn’t working for me, I’m in a district that is designed for one party’s success (and it is not the one I belong to).


  14. - Team Sleep - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:09 am:

    Word and Walker - just my take, but Rich’s two cents on this is probably why Rauner did that. He will remind people in late 2016 and late 2018 that the Dems went into this process kicking and screaming and seemed to have no interest in any redistricting efforts. He will likely note that they gerrymandered Illinois to pieces in 2001 and 2011 and that they resisted change. That would be my take.

    And given the cases out of Texas and Arizona, my guess is that SCOTUS would take up this issue if it becomes a court battle and drags on for a while.


  15. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:15 am:

    TS, my guess is that the governor’s interest in this issue is about the same as term limits, just to keep it alive as a talking point.

    Kind of goofy that a sharp guy like Rauner flogged that obviously unconstitutional term-limits amendment last year.

    But, then again, he was able to collect a lot of voter information with it, and its getting tossed by the courts kept it alive as a campaign talking point.


  16. - nona - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:21 am:

    Dems should get their own proposal out there that does not require mapmakers to respect municipal boundaries, thus concentrating Democratic voters in fewer districts. In a blue state, that is getting more diverse by the day, Dems would benefit from a truly fair map.


  17. - Hal - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:31 am:

    ==Don’t kid yourselves, Independent Commission drawing state legislative maps can be purchased (rigged) to favor the governor’s party.==

    Exactly right. There is no such thing as an independent anything when it comes to politics and government, particularly when it comes to something as crucial as district mapping.

    If they really want to get the bias out, they’d do it with a computer. An “independent” commission could, perhaps, be formed to act a some sort of backstop, but any changes to what the computer decides would have to be made in broad daylight, in front of the media and anyone else who cared to watch.


  18. - Very Fed Up - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:38 am:

    One thing we can all agree on. If Madigan again sends in his lawyers to try and keep us from voting on this and republicans control the process in 2020 they would have every right to draw the most extreme gerrymandered maps possible. Madigan and camp would have 0 right to argue or complain.


  19. - Thrillinois - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 11:51 am:

    Of all the rhetoric regarding term limits and the like, I actually agree with a fair map process. Term limits would just replace the face but keep the mindset the same. If districts are competitive, hopefully legislators would not be so steeped in ideology on either side.


  20. - 4 percent - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 12:09 pm:

    The Courts won’t allow it on the ballot.


  21. - jake - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 12:19 pm:

    I am one Democrat who favors this reform. It has clearly worked in Iowa. I went to the Iowa state party Jefferson-Jackson State Democratic dinner and was impressed by how different the entire feeling of the Democratic Party is in Iowa. More competitive general elections lead to more competitive primaries. They also lead to more centrist office holders from both parties, who can work across party lines when necessary.


  22. - Dr Kilovolt - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 12:33 pm:

    I favor reform, as long as similar efforts are being mounted with similar enthusiasm in red states. Otherwise, this looks to me like Republican scheming to maintain their gerrymandered advantage in the House at the national level for as long as possible.


  23. - nona - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 12:41 pm:

    As far as red states, the article says Ohio ratified redistricting reform Nov.3rd.


  24. - mokenavince - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 12:50 pm:

    I hope this pass’s . Iowa does it so should we.
    It’s not perfect ,but what is.


  25. - Precinct Captain - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 12:53 pm:

    Why would FitzSimons cite the Ohio amendment? Redistricting experts are highly suspicious of its intent, considering it was legally worded to be gamed by a majority party.

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/30/1435204/-Ohio-Republicans-give-voters-a-chance-to-reform-legislative-redistricting-but-buyer-beware


  26. - Bogey Golfer - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 1:02 pm:

    In agreement with independent remapping. Who has a petition?


  27. - Timmeh - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 1:23 pm:

    I agree that gerrymandering is a problem that needs to be addressed, but I don’t think independent maps is the way to do it. I’d rather make it less advantageous to game the map with multi-member districts.


  28. - Angry Chicagoan - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 1:50 pm:

    Not to pour cold water on this, but unless more of a balance starts to emerge between the urban and rural distribution of voters, a “neutral” map will favor Republicans out of the gate. A large part of why Madigan’s map includes so many elongated districts on the south side of Chicago was to find ways of including both Democratic and Republican voters in most districts rather than having a great many Democratic voters concentrated in a handful of vote sinks. Then again, the elongation of one of these districts (Dunkin’s) makes him more difficult to primary than you would think by including River North Rauner Republicans in what was previously a South Side district.


  29. - ZC - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 2:39 pm:

    It is a heckuva lot easier to say “independent commission” then to specify how you get to an independent commission.

    Again, not 100% opposed but trying to lay out all the ways this could go wrong.

    If you have an independent commission, then you have to figure out who -picks- this independent commission. And then you need safeguards on that these “pickers” are truly independent, and then that the process that picks the pickers who pick the commission is nonpartisan, and back you go.

    Again not saying it can’t be done, but I’ve looked fairly closely at the methodology proposed and I’m not at all convinced Mike Madigan can’t game this system, if he sets his mind to it.


  30. - Tom Joad - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 3:05 pm:

    It is amazing that so many people are willing to sign a petition to appoint people they don’t know and haven’t a clue as to who would be members of the “non-partisan” committee. Who are these people? Who will pick them? Do they have to be vetted to find out if they are democrats or republicans? Who will do the vetting? This looks like a trap to cover a Republican takeover.


  31. - LeaLou - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 3:42 pm:

    How much do you trust Frank Mautino, a Democratic representative, to be fair as he appoints the “reviewers” to appoint the “commissioners” who draw the map?


  32. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 4:11 pm:

    Keep signing everyone. This is the most important referendum in our lifetime.


  33. - Come on Man! - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 4:14 pm:

    I have been seen these “gentlemen” passing at train stations in the Suburbs. A bunch of out of town roughnecks really turning people off.


  34. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 4:18 pm:

    “out of town roughnecks” passing the goo-goos petition?


  35. - AlabamaShake - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 4:51 pm:

    **It has clearly worked in Iowa. I went to the Iowa state party Jefferson-Jackson State Democratic dinner and was impressed by how different the entire feeling of the Democratic Party is in Iowa. **

    Causation and correlation are not the same thing.

    There are many problems with the IL Dem Party - I don’t think that the maps are the cause of most/any of them.


  36. - Last Bull Moose - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 5:15 pm:

    Like Timmeh, I favor multi-member districts. This reads as an improvement over what we have.


  37. - internal angel - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 7:32 pm:

    They should use TIGER files(census data) to do the districts.


  38. - Triple fat - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 8:03 pm:

    Over 400,000 signatures, eh? I wonder how many of them thought they were signing a petition to raise the minimum wage…


  39. - cannon649 - Tuesday, Nov 17, 15 @ 8:06 pm:

    Like it -
    Where do I sign.
    Term Limits Now


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the holidays
* And the winners are…
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to previous editions
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Report: Far-right Illinois billionaires may have skirted immigration rules
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards (Updated)
* Energy Storage Brings Cheaper Electricity, Greater Reliability
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2024
November 2024
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller