Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Mostly “ups” I think
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Mostly “ups” I think

Thursday, Dec 17, 2015

* Tribune

Former Democratic Congressman Brad Schneider of Deerfield, trying to regain his 10th District House seat, has been facing several ups and downs in his campaign for the March 15 primary nomination against Highland Park Mayor Nancy Rotering.

Already, former congressman, federal judge and White House counsel Abner Mikva has withdrawn his support for Schneider and moved to Rotering’s camp. So has former U.S. Sen. Adlai E. Stevenson III. In addition, U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky, a member of the House Democratic leadership team, has pulled her endorsement of Schneider.

Schneider still has the backing of House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer, as well as seven of the 10 Democratic members of the Illinois congressional delegation and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. And on Wednesday, his campaign announced it had been endorsed by the politically active Service Employees International Union Illinois State Council.

Schneider and Rotering are vying for the nomination to take on Republican U.S. Rep. Robert Dold of Kenilworth in the North Shore district. Dold won the seat in 2010, was ousted by Schneider in 2012, then defeated Schneider in 2014.

“Voters are ready for a strong, progressive leader with a principled track record of getting things done,” Rotering said in a statement, noting that the backing of Mikva and Stevenson came as a result of Schneider opposing the Iran nuclear deal backed by President Barack Obama.

Mikva and Stevenson’s withdrawal means almost next to nothing. I mean, how many Democratic primary voters are going to take their endorsements to heart? Schakowsky is different because in a Democratic primary she might carry a little bit of weight, particularly with liberals.

Rotering has done a very good job of publicizing her town’s efforts to enact an assault weapons ban ahead of a state deadline. That district is ground zero for gun control support, particularly in a Dem primary.

But independent-minded, somewhat hawkish Jewish voters are very influential in that district, so Schneider opposing the Iran nuke deal probably isn’t fatal and perhaps just the opposite. Then again, this is a primary race, not a general.

Schneider has the name rec and will have the money. Rotering is a fresh face and has a proven ability to get her name out there.

Am I missing anything? Your predictions?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - JackD - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 11:24 am:

    Mikva’s endorsement is still helpful. Many progressives in the district think Schneider ran a poor campaign last time around. It’s close but I’m guessing Rotering.

  2. - Amalia - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 11:29 am:

    Rotering. the recent win for Highland Park on the assault weapons ban was big for her with the progressives there active on the issue. also, she’s pleasant vs. Schneider not.

  3. - The Doc - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 11:30 am:

    Justified or otherwise, Schneider has gained a reputation as a bit aloof. Perhaps more importantly, I’d argue that the district’s Jewish voters are relatively less hawkish about Israel as it has become a more partisan issue, and after witnessing Bibi’s unfortunate and poorly timed foray deep into the U.S. national political scene.

  4. - Almost the Weekend - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 11:32 am:

    Rich has Emily’s List played a role in helping Rotering raise money? If so that might be able to help her. That was very beneficial for Bustos in 2012 from what I remember.

  5. - Anon - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 11:45 am:

    I almost feel bad admitting this, but I thought Adlai Stevenson was dead… But he hasn’t held office in my life time, so there’s that, right?

  6. - A guy - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 11:53 am:

    I agree a bit with JackD. Oddly, Mikva still has some pretty decent juice with a significant number of Jewish voters up there. I suspect, enough to tilt the balance.

  7. - Precinct Captain - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 12:00 pm:

    Schneider has an edge because of his recent incumbency and everything that comes with it, but it won’t be a blowout.

  8. - wordslinger - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 12:09 pm:

    Polling has shown that American Jews are more supportive of the Iran nuke deal than the American population as a whole, and self-described Liberal Jews even more so than other Liberals.

    The fiction propagated by the neo-cons that American Jews monolithically support Likud on the Iran deal is just that. It’s fiction in Israel, as well, including within the military and intelligence establishment.

  9. - LC Anonymous - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 12:24 pm:

    Even the “hawkish” Jews in that district are more in favor of the Iran Deal than against it. That will be a huge deal when it comes to voting in March. They have a choice between two Jewish candidates, one for the Iran Deal and one against it. One who stood with the President (who is still popular their), and one who didn’t. Advantage Rotering.

  10. - slow down - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 12:27 pm:

    I think it’s a tough hill to climb for Rotering given Schneider’s incumbency like advantage but anyone who has watched her over the last few years should understand that she’s very smart, extremely well organized and a very effective campaigner. Neither Schneider nor Dold should underestimate her.

    One other point I’d make is that other than the Iran nuclear deal issue, there really is very little substantively to separate the two. My sense is that this helps Schneider given that he enjoys an incumbency like position in the 10th.

  11. - Louis G Atsaves - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 1:08 pm:

    This race is happening in my back yard. Rotering is taking it to Schneider, but I believe he will edge her out in the primary. He has strong name recognition as compared to Rotering, who outside of Highland Park is working to get her name known.

    Schneider has some difficulty making a case for himself, which has plagued him in the past. Rotering to her credit has a more focused message.

  12. - Southside Markie - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 1:27 pm:

    Mkiva’s nickname was “Landslide Abner” for a reason. He never carried that district himself by more than literally a few thousand votes, at most. Its not my backyard, but its hard to believe he has that much influence.

  13. - Just Observing - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 1:37 pm:

    I agree with Rich — Mikva and Stevenson don’t mean much anymore, especially to the average Dem primary voter — maybe a bit more to the big money folks. Schakowsky is a bit more relevant. But I believe Schneider will beat Rotering by at least 10 points. She just doesn’t have the name ID, nor a compelling reason to choose her over Schneider. Plus, half the voters in the district probably think Schneider is still the current Congressman.

  14. - Orzo - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 2:18 pm:

    Rotering has the advantage of being a fresh face with some momentum on the issues. Schneider has some name recognition, but has never been beloved. He’s the political equivalent of real estate’s “tired listing.” She’ll win the primary.

    I am shocked that some people believe Ab Mikva’s name is not still golden for any Democrat over 50 (a large portion of the district). The reference to his close races is uninformed–that was in the general, and the district was quite different then. Anyone running in this District would love to have Ab’s endorsement.

  15. - TenthDem - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 2:20 pm:

    Nancy is trying very hard to win over the Ilya Sheyman wing of our party by saying she’s a strong progressive. Many are falling for it, but it’s clear that there’s little to no difference between Brad and Nancy and I very much prefer Brad’s style and odds at winning back the seat.

  16. - TenthDem - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 2:21 pm:

    Also, while I love Ab Mikva, people need to recognize that he never represented half of this Tenth District.

  17. - Little Red Hen - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 2:22 pm:

    Mikva is still huge up there. He would win himself if the election were held today. Goodbye, Schnieder.

  18. - ProduceGuy - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 6:20 pm:

    Schneider is fundamentally a blue dog on economic issues - the Congressman from Mesirow Financial (his wife’s firm) who looked after Wall Street not main street and who advocated a 3-1 cut in spending over increasing revenue. He also is a lousy and inexperienced politician - his 2014 loss to Dold was an anomaly since Boustos, Duckworth and Foster got relected that year from less D+ districts. Nancy has work to do to get her name out. It would be foolish if the DCCC backs Schneider in the primary because of his two year nothing burger stint in the House. Looks like the Democratic nominee will win in 2016, but what about 2018?

  19. - Sue - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 7:04 pm:

    There is going to be a very contentious referendum on the ballot seeing how the local school board just approved asking HP residents to spend 200 million on reconfiguring the K - 8 schools including the building of a single middle school to replace 3 smaller buildings. 200 million will be the largest school referendum in State history and the community is very split. Rotering’s predecessor, a well respected finance professional has come out against the referendum but Rotering has been silent, a knock on the issue of her so called leadership. The voting participation in HP will be huge and it’s hard to see how this referendum will pass given the impact on real estate taxes and because the school Board if successful will be bussing students on 45 minute commutes to the new middle school where thee now go to neighborhood facilities. Rotering is walking a tightrope not commenting on this issue and it is likely the issue will drive all the fiscally conservative voters to come out and vote, at least in HP this will help Brad S who is certainly not a liberal tax and spend typical Dem

  20. - Hockey Fan - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 10:33 pm:

    Sue - that’s the oddest argument. While your facts may be right, that referendum will increase turnout in her hometown. It will help her - but not that much. It’s one small part of the Congressional district. Saying that a school referendum will hurt her is weak.

    Rotering has momentum and energy. Brad is slipping in my opinion

  21. - Zeke - Thursday, Dec 17, 15 @ 10:52 pm:

    There are still thousands of voters on the North Shore - perhaps mostly older - who would vote for anyone endorsed by Stevenson and Mikva, let alone Schakowsky.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Remap update
* Reader comments closed for the Thanksgiving break
* How federal money can be used to indirectly repay the remainder of the state's Federal Reserve loan
* 21,034 new confirmed and probable cases; 87 additional deaths; 1,982 hospitalized; 384 in ICU; 150 on ventilators
* A special Thanksgiving message
* IDES describes huge obstacles to explain its late report
* Unclear on the concept
* D'Amico, trade unions put Kelly over the top
* Open thread
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller