Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » OT change prompts protest
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
OT change prompts protest

Tuesday, Apr 26, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Let’s hope some of these folks don’t end up in far more expensive state care

Lisa Kotsirs can’t leave her 29 year-old epileptic autistic daughter alone in a room because she fears her daughter would harm herself. But a looming pay cut for home caretakers triggered by the ongoing state budget impasse could leave Kotsirs with a difficult decision to make.

She and her daughter, Mandy Kotsirs, took part in a news conference Monday at the E.J. “Zeke” Giorgi Center to protest state regulations that, beginning May 1, will cap overtime pay for home caretakers. That means people such as Mandy who need more than 40 hours of care a week must find multiple caretakers to juggle the task.

Mandy needs continuous care because she has severe developmental delays, sensory issues and autism. Her mother works as her personal care worker, earning $13 an hour. About 8,600 personal care workers will feel the impact of the new overtime cap and many families could be forced to place their children in state institutions, Lisa Kotsirs said.

“This [in-home care] is needed … to help have them be more independent and hopefully drastically improve quality of life,” she said. “Caring for people like my daughter is a difficult task and not many people want to do the job.”

But is it really about the impasse?

* Read on

Home healthcare workers, like Templeton, get paid by the department of human services.

Starting May 1st they’re limited to 40 hours of work per week with some exceptions. […]

The department of human services says some people are taking advantage of the system, collecting dozens of hours in overtime pay.

The new rules mean the state will more closely review which workers earn time and a half.

* The fact that SEIU was behind yesterday’s media event suggests there’s more going on here

Home care workers say they regularly work overtime. Now, because they’re required by law to be paid overtime, the Rauner Administration is cracking down on their hours.

Members of SEIU say the Rauner Administration’s new policy limiting hours to 40 a week doesn’t take into account what those who rely on home care workers need.

Those who need more than 40 hours a week can hire additional help under the new rules, but workers say their clients prefer people they know and trust.

“These consumers have built a repertoire with this particular person. These consumers may have disabilities that require specific needs and they may put their trust in one person. They may have worked for this person for 20 years, and now they are changing it where they have to hire someone else to come into their home and provide this assistance,” said Denise Groesch, Center for Independent Living.


There are nearly 9,000 disabled people impacted by the new overtime rules. The union representing home healthcare workers says it is an attempt by the Rauner Administration to avoid new federal rules that extend overtime to those healthcare workers.

You would expect the union to be OK with less overtime because that would mean more people (meaning more members) would have to be hired. But they’re on the side of those receiving care and the organizations providing it.

If there’s fraud, clamp down. Otherwise, why incur the expense of hiring and training more people? I’m not sure I understand this yet.


  1. - illinois manufacturer - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:15 am:

    It is about bashing another union not providing care or saving money. Since this union does not get fair share you really can’t question their motives

  2. - A guy - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:22 am:

    This one is way more complicated than union issues.

  3. - Quill - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:28 am:

    People in the Home Services Program are people with disabilities ages 18 to 59 who hire (and fire) their own personal attendants, or home care workers. The program is designed to be individualized in nature and ensure that people have the dignity of being in charge of their own personal care (like toileting, eating, dressing, bathing). It can take a lot of searching and a lot of time to find the right workers that you will allow to touch your body, and come in your home. Some of these workers also work for more than one HSP customer. The workers who work for more than one person, and accrue more than 40 hours a week, are being asked to choose which person they will ditch, in order to scale back to 40 hours. This is extremely stressful for the customers who rely on these workers, and now must scramble to find new people. In the meantime where there is a worker gap, these people are faced with possible institutionalization. So while there are certainly the interests and the rights of the workers, the existing change can have very serious consequences for people with disabilities. The new overtime policy also thus far has only resulted in a few hundred out of about 5,100 eligible customers with disabilities getting exceptions to approve overtime for their workers. “Eligible” means they either have what is called an “exceptional care rate,” or a court ordered service plan, or a very high level of need. If only a few hundred of the eligible people are being approved to allow overtime for the workers, that signals a problem. And that problem lies in the fact that the state is forcing eligible customers, whose facts they already have on file, to APPLY for the overtime. Just in case, you know, they don’t actually need it. So there is a very serious disability angle here, and the best solution is NOT TO TOUCH THE PROGRAM. The overtime cost is only $7 million a year.

  4. - Quill - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:32 am:

    Everyone in the Capitol already went through the DON score battle. By now you should know that home-based services save the state thousands and thousands of dollars. Why attempt another program change that could result in forcing people into nursing homes, and forcing the state to shell out what could conceivably be well over $7 million? There is a seriously misguided fixation on chopping home services, when in reality they save the state money. It is sickening to always have to be on guard for this program. Never a day without threats. Just STOP.

  5. - Foster brooks - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:36 am:

    Try capping overtime at IDOT. Real savings to be made there.

  6. - Quill - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:37 am:

    Make that, home based services save the state thousands and thousands of dollars per year per PERSON. That’s about 27,000 people in HSP—which is a whole lot of moula. Who attacks a money saver? This is a program worth investing in.

  7. - Fromerly Known As... - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:42 am:

    Lots happening here. Reduced OT costs, but increased training costs. More jobs and members, but less $ for current members without OT. Additional caretakers for patients who may not be comfortable having a new caretaker, but theri current caretakers still work a full 40 hour week with them. No more abuse of the OT system, but fewer hours for those who were following rules.

    This does not fit either side’s ==spin== very neatly.

  8. - Albany Park Patriot - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:48 am:

    The federal policy was never intended to be used as an excuse to cut services for people with disabilities. That looks to be a very likely consequence. This isn’t right.

  9. - Notacop - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:55 am:

    Did I read that right? She is making $13 an hour to care for her own daughter? If they live in the same home, how does she determine what hours are “on the clock”? What oversight is there to this system?

  10. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:56 am:

    “why incur the expense of hiring and training more people?” Rich asks.

    It’s cheaper to pay straight time than overtime could be the answer.

  11. - Sick & Tired - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 11:59 am:

    Seconding Quill, and I add that the SEIU local cited here is well known to fight for social justice issues. Is it really that farfetched to believe that they only or primarily care about the potential money?

  12. - Earnest - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:02 pm:

    >You would expect the union to be OK with less overtime because that would mean more people (meaning more members) would have to be hired. But they’re on the side of those receiving care and the organizations providing it.

    A lot of the caregivers are the families, so the union seems to be listening to its members rather than acting out of self-interest, if that makes sense. Good on them.

    This all came about because of a federal rule change, so that’s not on the state. How they chose to deal with the change if a good topic for discussion.

    Creating a blanket rule about overtime and not addressing the issue of the few people taking advantage of the situation is not the way an effective business would deal with the problem.

  13. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:03 pm:

    ===She is making $13 an hour to care for her own daughter?===

    That’s common. She doesn’t have to go outside the home for employment while making sure her kid is properly cared for. State’s gonna pay one way or another. This way, they’re both not homeless.

  14. - Sick & Tired - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:05 pm:

    Also, these consumers have service plans that cap the number of hours they can receive. For the state to argue that “some people are taking advantage of the system, collecting dozens of hours in overtime pay” is interesting considering they can simply warn consumers and their provider if they go over, then discipline as necessary if they continue to provide more hours than the service plan allows. Of course, if the hours are needed, then I also believe the consumer has a right to request a reassessment of their needs.

  15. - Harry - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:06 pm:

    In an ideal world, maybe home care workers would be salaried professionals and salary would correspond to the real demands of the job including long hours, but in THIS world they are hourly so you have problems like OT abuse for everyone to argue over based on very few facts and lots of opinions.

  16. - Ghost - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:11 pm:

    these folks kicked the union out mostly.

    clamp down on fraud sounds like a magic beans solution. how does one clamp down on fraudulent reporting of hrs worked unless yoy are in the workplace monitoring? install cameras? the answer is tou limit the hrs to 40.

  17. - PublicServant - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:30 pm:

    ===This one is way more complicated than union issues.===

    Yes, and the fatally-flawed, simplistic “solution” put in place by the governor makes this complicated situation worse for everyone, taxpayers included. And Syverson’s “We don’t have any money to pay overtime” line is typical Raunerite spin. We get the money to pay the legitimate overtime from the same place that we get the money to pay the first 40 hours, budget, or no. Syverson, the victim, can easily become Syverson, the legislator, by having the courage to negotiate with the Dems to obtain the revenues needed to support programs like this and balance the budget to pay for all needed state programs. But that take’s courage. Something that Syverson seems to lack. Just hide your head in shame pal because you’re only a victim by choice.

  18. - Unicorn - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:32 pm:

    Many HSP customers require more than 40 hours of care per week. However, anyone working more than 40 hours per week - particularly as a caregiver - at higher risk of burn-out and making critical errors that may not have occurred if the person had not been working excessive hours. An HSP customer is given a set amount of “service dollars” and those dollars, sensibly should be less than the cost of institutional care. So If a customer’s service dollars equal $2600, that customer would receive 200 hours of care per month. However, factor in overtime - if one care giver is providing care of 50 hours per week the cost increases to $3860. That’s an increase of $1260 per month or over $15,000 per year. Unfortunately, when looking at ways to cut spending where dollars aren’t available, capping overtime makes sense. Capping overtime reigns in spending while NOT reducing services.

  19. - A Jack - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:42 pm:

    So the state is going to hire potentially 2/3 more home health workers to fill in the other 16 hours in a day, plus more for weekends? That does seem like a costly proposal.

  20. - Ghost - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:47 pm:

    ajack how is it more costly? overtime is paid at 1.5 times salary. you cut costs by 1/3 by hiring more workers. plus its good to have people for respite and other scenerios where a fill in is needed.

  21. - AlabamaShake - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 12:57 pm:

    **these folks kicked the union out mostly.**

    No, the didn’t. Not even close.

  22. - Quill - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 1:00 pm:

    What many outside HSP do not know is that workers are required to use an Electronic Visit Verification system to clock in and out. You must call the system when you begin the work, and call again when you end. This goes for every HSP workers, regardless of whether they live in the home or not. When people ask “where is the accountability?”, the EVV is part of the answer. It is a new system that was only fully operational within the last year or so, to combat fraud. Now think about this. This means for live-in providers, they have to call in and out literally most if not all of the time that they support their person with a disability. Live-ins are not able to just sort of estimate how many hours they provide service. They must use the EVV to verify it.

  23. - Quill - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 1:03 pm:

    Further, on the issue of live-in providers: there are plenty who are single mothers trying to support their adult child. They cannot work full time due to having to support their adult child. Compensation for HSP services to the adult child helps keep a roof over both their heads. Now consider, if that adult caregiver works 60 hours a week and has to cut back to 40, you can see how their rent or mortgage payments could become endangered, and both face the risk of homelessness and/or institutionalization for the adult child. Serious business.

  24. - Jon - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 1:16 pm:

    This may be one of the few times when it can’t be said Rauner or the GA are the bad guys. State law and the Harris v. Quinn SC case make it quite clear that the state don’t employ HSPs, the clients do. Clients have great flexibility in hiring, firing, etc. who they want, but I can’t see it within the powers of the state to permit the clients to ignore federal overtime laws.

  25. - Quill - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 1:37 pm:

    To spell it out a little more clearly for those who may not understand: the HSP customers hire, train and fire the workers. The State pays the wages, including overtime and the health benefits package. This is what “joint employer” means.

  26. - zatoichi - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 1:52 pm:

    1. The USDOL rule changes on overtime are coming fast
    2. There were just two committee hearings on SB2952 and HB5931 to raise CILA direct service providers (DSPs) minmum wage to $15 from the current average of $9.35. Why? Because nationwide and in Illinois organization simply cannot find enough people to do the work. 30% job opennings and 50% turnover in the year are not uncommon. This health care worker overtime change will simply add to the high volume of people already needed and so far not found.
    3. I thought Illinois was moving to Employment First - everyone will have a community job regardless of disability, integrated into community settings. That is what the advocates are pushing. Here is perfect example of how not everyone fits that model.

  27. - Jack Stephens - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 5:40 pm:


    Cut OT at IDOC facilities. Break up the unions there.

    Hire unemployed Sandwich Artists from the franchise sub shoppes that’ll be closing in the college towns to make the bologna sandwiches.

  28. - Dr X - Tuesday, Apr 26, 16 @ 6:24 pm:

    What would Donna Arduin say? I think she would say that Lisa Kotsirs will get paid for 40hrs and then she can take care of her own daughter for free like other parents. I don’t see much if any sympathy from the Governor’s office for this. This is what you get when you want to disband unions in IL. Run those ads in Nov.

  29. - mitzien - Wednesday, Apr 27, 16 @ 5:01 am:

    Unicorn is so correct with the issues. HSP is a cost effective program. For the most severely disabled who have maximum hours and only one caregiver, paying the overtime of $19.50 in overtime hours could be more costly than nursing home care. Therefore, HSP would not be cost effective for Illinois taxpayers. Dept of Labor says we have to pay it even though the Smart Act was passed to help caregivers making less than or minimum wages. Since HSP pays $13.00 an hour, we went to court and lost our case. HSP is not denying services to our customers but following federal rules and trying to save our program for all users.

  30. - Small Home Health - Wednesday, Apr 27, 16 @ 8:41 am:

    Our small Home Health & Hospice, WIC, Senior Services who serve a county of 7000 are struggling. I wish they could see the people that actually elected them, how much of a struggle it is for them. This political game is hurting the people of the state.

  31. - reality - Wednesday, Apr 27, 16 @ 9:02 am:

    This program is approaching if not already reached a billion dollars to run. Like most programs there is significant fraud that happens. PA,s turning in hours they did not work clients saying they worked it and then splitting the check. EVV is a check and balance to eliminate fraud, with cell phones who says they are ever in the home. As for overtime, please show me any company that allows it’s employees to determine what over time they work and how much. All of these social service programs need to be reviewed and the fraud needs to be stopped. It would save quite a bit of money.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Isabel’s afternoon briefing
* Beyond the horse race
* Cannabis baron ridicules equity programs: "We’re going to give these assets to felons and people that have two heads and all this kind of stuff"
* IEPA says it won't do anything about polluting refineries
* Pritzker stands behind his messaging, claims support for candidates
* A quick Illinois history lesson
* Vallas gets out in front of attacks
* Following the money
* A massive failure
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* Live coverage
* Laurence Msall
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller