Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x2 - Madigan: “No hostage-taking” - Talks collapse as Dems pull the plug *** Madigan likely to speak after leaders meeting
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x2 - Madigan: “No hostage-taking” - Talks collapse as Dems pull the plug *** Madigan likely to speak after leaders meeting

Friday, May 27, 2016

* For the first time in a while, House Speaker Michael Madigan will likely talk to reporters after today’s leaders meeting, which has already begun. Keep an eye on our live coverage post for updates. BlueRoomStream may also have a live video feed, which you will find here if they set it up in time.

*** UPDATE 1 ***  I’m told Senate President John Cullerton said at the meeting today that the two sides were too far apart to produce results by Tuesday and asked for a short-term budget to get the state through the election. Speaker Madigan concurred.

Republicans maintained that they’re very close to a bipartisan deal and repeatedly pled with the Democrats to reconsider, but eventually the governor ended the meeting.

…Adding… SJ-R

“There was a dramatic change in tone today,” said Senate Republican Leader Christine Radogno following a short meeting between Rauner and the four leaders Friday morning. “The Democrat leaders essentially pulled the plug on negotiations. They want to push the balanced budget reforms off until the fall, after the election.”

…Adding More… As subscribers know, Democrats on the collective bargaining working group proposed a way to work around the governor’s previous demand that health care be taken out of collective bargaining rights. It found favor with the governor. So, I’m not sure what Speaker Madigan is talking about.

*** UPDATE 2 *** The rhetoric is really heating up. Tribune

Emerging from Friday’s private meeting, Senate Republican Leader Christine Radogno said Democratic House Speaker Michael Madigan and Senate President John Cullerton had asked for a “timeout” until after the November election and had walked away from negotiations for a grand compromise that Rauner remains publicly optimistic about despite the odds against it. […]

Madigan, for his part, defended the spending plan that he pushed through his chamber, saying it was “a bill that will provide no hostage-taking.”

“We’re not going to hold hostage people that need education, like elementary and secondary education, or higher education. We’re not going to hold hostage people that need health care. We’re not going to hold hostage people that need social services,” Madigan said. “There will be a complaint that the state does not have sufficient money to pay for that budget, and I have said for the last year and a half, I’m prepared to negotiate with the governor to find the money to pay for those services. My first choice in finding money would be taxing the wealthy.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Ducky LaMoore - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:35 am:

    Don’t tie budget to non budgetary items. Work in moderation. Blah blah blah blah blah. Are we supposed to expect something different? Please prove me wrong, Mike.

  2. - Lucky Pierre - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:43 am:

    He promised to work cooperatively and professionally with the Governor and work in moderation not the extreme on a combination of cuts and revenue. The appropriations bill that he ran through is in direct contradiction to that pledge on all counts. Live up to your promise Mr Speaker the time for politcal games is over.

  3. - ILPundit - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:46 am:

    Strikes me as a very big deal that Cullerton delivered the message at the meeting today that there will be no grand compromise.

  4. - Fusion - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:49 am:

    ==Republicans maintained that they’re very close to a bipartisan deal==

    Does “very close” still mean what I think it means?

  5. - Oswego Willy - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:49 am:

    Cullerton says no deal…

    When the “deal maker” can’t see a way…

  6. - steward - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:53 am:

    “incl action on employee healthcare”

    Wait, wut?!?

  7. - Hamlet's Ghost - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:55 am:

    @Lucky Pierre

    The appropriations bill that he ran through is an opening bid.

    Time for the Governor to file his own appropriations bill in response.

  8. - Hamlet's Ghost - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:56 am:

    Edit to correct:

    Time for the Governor to direct his GA leaders to file the Governor’s approved appropriations bill in response.

  9. - Anonymous - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:56 am:

    No grand bargain with hostage takers. No surprise. Talk apples to apples something will happen.

  10. - AC - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:57 am:

    I’ll second the question from Steward. What’s this about employee healthcare as a new demand?

  11. - Macbeth - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:58 am:

    What’s the employee healthcare demand? I thought that was an AFSCME thing. Wait — are they trying to move healthcare out of collective bargaining?

  12. - Johnnie F. - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 9:59 am:

    So the Governor attempts and urges the Legislature to intervene in employee heathcare negotiations now, but earlier this week ripped into the Legislature for attempting to intervene in negotiations with HB580.

  13. - thunderspirit - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:00 am:

    If the two sides are, in fact, “very close to a bipartisan deal” and it has been scuttled by Speaker Madigan, that’s on him.

    If Governor Rauner did, in fact, inject “new demands, incl action on employee health care”, that’s on him.

    The truth is likely somewhere in between; but if had to bet, I know where my money would go.

  14. - steward - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:06 am:

    I remember waaaay back that Rauner wanted employee healthcare removed from collective bargaining so he could realize those millions in savings he built into the first budget regarding healthcare.

    First I’ve heard that it’s back as a new demand for the budget.

  15. - RNUG - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:07 am:

    == When the “deal maker” can’t see a way… ==

    That is the ball game in a nutshell

  16. - Annonin' - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:07 am:

    Seems like the Cullerton proposal tubes the working groups, wrecks CPS and may interfere with all the BigBrain $5 million summer of hate speech.
    How will Katrina and other opinion writers cope with this development?

  17. - Jack Kemp - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:08 am:

    Hamlet’s Ghost, the Governor’s appropriations bills have been filed since February. Try again.

  18. - Rich Miller - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:08 am:

    ===First I’ve heard that it’s back===

    It isn’t. Working group had devised a workaround. It had bipartisan support.


  19. - RNUG - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:11 am:

    RE healthcare, I obviously wasn’t there, but my guess is he wants to unilaterally and immediately impose the healthcare changes proposed in the AFSCME contract.

    People forget that the AFSCME healthcare is extended to all State workers and and also the schools / colleges / universities … plus all “state” retirees. That’s why it matters.

  20. - Norseman - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:14 am:

    === I’m told Senate President John Cullerton said at the meeting today that the two sides were too far apart to produce results by Tuesday ===

    As others have said, this is the telling statement. Too bad the era of good feeling didn’t start earlier.

  21. - steward - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:16 am:

    Then what was McKinney saying?

  22. - Anonymous - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:20 am:

    Inserting new “asks” this late in the process proves my theory. This governor will never, ever, sign a budget. “Shake up Springfield, may have to shut it down awhile.” He said what he meant and means what he said.

  23. - JS Mill - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:31 am:

    @RNUG- I think the AFSCME healthcare is offered to schools. Not many take it though, longstanding issues with state paying healthcare bills that most districts do not want to deal with as I understand it. We have our own insurance.

  24. - Nick Danger - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:33 am:

    Madigan = political calculus, always

  25. - Rich Miller - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:33 am:

    ===Inserting new “asks” this late in the process proves my theory===

    That is exactly the opposite of what happened.

  26. - Birdseed - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:42 am:

    No new asks = Madigan was afraid his members were getting close to compromise = Pull plug.

  27. - wordslinger - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:43 am:

    –”They want to push the balanced budget reforms off until the fall, after the election.”

    What “balanced budget reforms” is Sen. Radgno talking about? Or is that just random produce that came out of the word-salad shooter? Just bizarre.

    If all this great progress is being made behind closed doors, why not inform the public as to the details? Or the broad strokes, even? Seems to me the p.r. advantage would be enormous.

    Nothing’s real until it’s in public and people will put their names to it. Academic exercises in problem-solving are not necessarily progress until someone steps up.

    If I recall, the governor assured everyone, repeatedly, in Spring 2015 that great progress was being made in the behind-doors working groups.

    What were the results of all that great progress?

    It’s what you do, not what you say.

  28. - cassandra - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:45 am:

    I did wonder what Rauner was going to be doing for two years if he agreed to a tax increase and dropped most or all of his business agenda. Two years of cutting ribbons and kissing babies? Doesn’t seem like him. I hope he releases the partial social service funding and sweeps every other fund he can reasonably sweep to mitigate the continuing crunch. And, as a member of the country’s shrinking middle class, I’m glad my taxes apparently won’t go up just yet.

  29. - @MisterJayEm - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:48 am:

    “I’m sorry, we’re just too far apart.”
    “No! We’re so very close to a deal!”
    “Are you kidding? There’s no deal and we’ve already given you almost everything you want.”
    “Yes, ‘almost everything’. See? We’re so close to a deal!”

    – MrJM

  30. - Sue - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:50 am:

    Now onto the ILRB and an impasse/implementation and call it a day

  31. - Anonymous - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:50 am:

    Why doesn’t the Governor introduce a budget bill just for education funding to keep schools open. Let Madigan kill it if he wants, and everyone will know who caused the education meltdown.

  32. - burbanite - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:56 am:

    The Governor could have injected what is perceived as a new ask in the meeting today. I don’t know that he didn’t. He doesn’t always think before he talks so he may have not even realizing it, you never know. I wish they taped these mtgs, no one ever seems to agree on what happens in them.

  33. - Thoughts Matter - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:58 am:

    Say what you will Madigan passed a budget that covered the needs of the most amount of citizens of the state with the least damage to those least able to live thru it. Taxpayers would bear the brunt of it. That’s the way it works. Those of you thinking ‘ not paying for anyone but me’ are getting ready to see what that looks like - and you will find out just exactly what services you really DO want the state to pay for, I bet you or your family or friends will be affected more than you think.

  34. - Grandson of Man - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 10:59 am:

    I’m very sorry to see this happening. So many are suffering and will suffer much more if nothing is done.

    I admit I don’t know much about workers comp, but if businesses are complaining about costs and are citing reform as very important in decisions of location, that’s an area where there could be compromise.

    We can get a property tax freeze without potentially taking away workers’ rights to bargain over wages. That would create double standards among government employees, because state workers would have the right to bargain over wages but local government workers might not.

    It would also put workers at a long-term disadvantage compared to the super-high earners, who would get hit with the same flat income state tax increase as everyone else and not be compelled to shoulder more of the burden than anyone else. Meanwhile workers could have long-term inability to bargain over something as important as wages.

  35. - Cassandra - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 11:14 am:

    I figured out that my family would probably save more from a property tax freeze than from a decision not to increase the state’s flat income tax. But I live in a high property tax area. Not sure how it would work out generally for middle class earners.

    But our plight is real. Some of those leaving the middle class are, indeed, moving up-nationally the percentage of high earners is increasing-they will feel an income tax increase less. So the flat tax becomes more regressive if this trend continues. Our state political leaders really need to address this. Because income inequality seems to be the country’s future.

  36. - Anonymous - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 11:30 am:

    So did they or didn’t they reach an impasse? And who declared it? Can the Labor Relations Board help answer that? /s

  37. - Huh? - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 12:14 pm:

    Sign on the door over Madigan’s shoulder “Where deals and budgets go to die”.

  38. - Formerly Known As... - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 12:19 pm:

    Speaker Madigan’s comment: Mission Accomplished.

    Bi-partisan talks and any immediate compromise have been successfully scuttled.

  39. - Formerly Known As... - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 12:40 pm:

    ==He said what he meant and means what he said.==

    =“I don’t necessarily agree with the first part of your remarks, that in the end this will be negotiated between the governor, and the leaders. I don’t necessarily agree with that,” Madigan said. He later added, “(T)here are conversations going on but I don’t think you should proceed under any presumptions that are based upon what happened in the past… I don’t necessarily presume that there will be some kind of a deal put together between the governor and the legislative leaders.”= Mike Madigan July 17 2015

    Indeed. He said what he meant, and means what he said. He decided last year. No compromise. No reforms. No alternatives. No change. No progress.

  40. - X-prof - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 1:11 pm:

    Cassandra === I figured out that my family would probably save more from a property tax freeze than from a decision not to increase the state’s flat income tax. ===

    Your calculations are correct, and they would work out similarly for most IL taxpayers. Your tax expense in sales and property taxes (both regressive) are greater than your expense from our low, flat income tax (t’s neutral, neither regressive nor progressive). Overall, ours is one of the most regressive tax systems in the country because it lacks a graduated income tax to counteract the other regressive taxes AND because our flat income tax is unusually low (this forces the regressive property and sales taxes to be heavier than in most states).

    One short-term fix is to raise the flat income tax rate in return for a freeze, or even a reduction, in property and sales taxe rates. Longer term, we need a constitutional amendment to allow a graduated income tax in line with those in most other states to make our system less regressive.

    Available data indicates that these changes need not hurt the state’s economy; in fact, there is considerable evidence to the contrary.

  41. - Ahoy! - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 1:38 pm:

    –Madigan, for his part, defended the spending plan that he pushed through his chamber, saying it was “a bill that will provide no hostage-taking.”–

    No hostages (except taxpayers) just more than $7 billion in accounted for spending. I have trouble wrapping my mind around this kind of logic, the money is not there, just because you appropriate it does not make it magically appear. While we’re at it, let’s make unicorns the official horse of Illinois.

  42. - Nick - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 2:47 pm:

    I’m confused. How can things be pushed off until after the November elections unless they come to an agreement on say a 6-month budget? Schools have to open before November.

  43. - Anonymous - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 4:13 pm:

    @ Sue
    Please start offering solutions for once instead of constantly complaining. I am so sorry you are having such a bad day and have to take it out on everyone else that disagrees with you.

  44. - Union Man - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 4:14 pm:

    Rauner is the Problem.

  45. - Formerly Known As... - Friday, May 27, 16 @ 4:16 pm:

    =We’re not going to hold hostage people that need education=

    Except for when we hold them hostage to reform the funding formula. But that’s different. /s

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* *** UPDATED x1 - Checked wrong box *** Oberweis files FEC paperwork to run for US Senate in 2020
* Local 150 PAC promotes capital plan in two new TV ads
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* Illinois Credit Unions: People Helping People
* IEPA issues "seal order" on Sterigenics plant
* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend
* Rep. Chapa LaVia will head IDVA after previous appointee bows out
* Question of the day
* Mary Morrissey named new executive director of DPI
* Transparency issues
* It's just a bill
* Amazon leads $700 million investment round for Rivian
* Hysterical much?
* Minimum wage roundup
* Poll: Five points separate five mayoral candidates as union money whacks Daley
* Should the state sell the Tollway to boost the pension funds?
* Southern Illinois state's attorney vows not to enforce assault weapons ban if it becomes law
* Daley would keep hope alive for those who want pension benefit cuts
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...










Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller