Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Poll: 60 percent give Rauner a negative job rating
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Poll: 60 percent give Rauner a negative job rating

Tuesday, Jun 21, 2016

* A new Anzalone Liszt Grove Research poll taken June 9-14 of 601 likely voters found that 60 percent rated Gov. Rauner’s job performance as negative, with “Not so good” at 21 percent and “Poor” at 39 percent. Just 33 percent said he was either doing a “Good” (26 percent) or “Excellent” (7 percent) job.

…Adding… It should be noted that this is not a “traditional” way of asking about approval ratings. But there are different ways of asking the question.

50 percent said they had an unfavorable opinion of Gov. Rauner, including 35 percent who had a very unfavorable opinion. Just 35 percent said they had a favorable opinion of Rauner, with a mere 11 percent saying they had a very favorable opinion of him.

By contrast, President Obama’s fave/unfave numbers were 63/34.

* The poll also had some bad news for ComEd and Exelon’s energy proposal and for legislators who vote for it as-is. The wording of the polls seems more professional than the one released earlier this month by Exelon, but they are quite negative. Still, as an issue test, they’re interesting. But the sample size for the competitive legislative district over-sample is probably too small to rely on here.

Click here for the full results. Click here for the summary. Click here for the press release.

* After all the push questions, they found that 81 percent oppose the Exelon bill’s “demand charge.” No surprise, considering the loaded questions, but that’s actually the same result as before the final question was asked. But check this out

Which of the following reasons do you think a legislator in Springfield is most likely to support this law?

    They think it will benefit average utility customers 13%
    They think it will be good for the environment 8%
    Total Positive Reason 21%

    They think it will be good for big corporations 21%
    They took campaign cash from a big utility company 41%
    Total Negative Reason 63%

    [vol] Don’t know/Refused 17%

Which of the following reasons do you think Bruce Rauner is most likely to support this law?

    He thinks it will benefit average utility customers 14%
    He thinks it will be good for the environment 6%
    Total Positive Reason 19%

    He thinks it will be good for big corporations 31%
    He took campaign cash from big utility companies 28%
    Total Negative Reason 59%

    [vol] Don’t know/Refused 21%

The people have a low impression of everybody.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

28 Comments
  1. - Delimma - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:40 pm:

    It may be low, but is it wrong?


  2. - Jerry - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:43 pm:

    —>The people have a low impression of everybody.


  3. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:43 pm:

    The poll showed Obama with 63% favorable and 34% unfavorable???


  4. - Triple fat - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:44 pm:

    That is why I would like to draft the President to run for Governor of The Great State of Illinois!


  5. - Huh? - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:44 pm:

    “Excellent” (7 percent) job.”

    1.4% - These people are the ones with money and they are the ones who matter the most. I don’the care about everyone else.


  6. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:50 pm:

    I don’t think there is any way possible Obama is at 63/34 unless all democrats were polled.


  7. - Blue dog dem - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:51 pm:

    I really must be out to lunch. I think Rauner is horrible. I think Obama is horrible. By the way , I think Trump is horrible. And I think Hillary is horrible. Must be something I ate. But I have been on edge since they took away my Oreos…


  8. - @MisterJayEm - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:54 pm:

    60 percent rated Gov. Rauner’s job performance as negative, with “Not so good” at 21 percent and “Poor” at 39 percent. *** 50 percent said they had an unfavorable opinion of Gov. Rauner, including 35 percent who had a very unfavorable opinion.

    Sure makes that Tribune Editorial claiming that “Democrats support him, privately” look like a load of tronc.

    – MrJM


  9. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:56 pm:

    ===I don’t think there is any way possible Obama is at 63/34===

    Favorable is different than job approval, but…

    ===Obama’s net job-approval rating has risen nearly 20 points since Trump became the G.O.P. front-runner and the party’s inescapable face last summer.===

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/26/magazine/will-trump-swallow-the-gop-whole.html?_r=0


  10. - The Velour Nail - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:56 pm:

    A Saturday Evening Republican recently told the group I was with rather angrily (three generous cocktails into the evening) that Rauner is a failure because he has not done enough to shut down the government and cut off spending. The guy that made the statement was fired up about Trump and would probably give Rauner a negative rating if polled because in his view Rauner had gone soft and not pushed things over the brink . . . . crazy days. Makes you wonder how much of that 60% could be turned if Rauner truly went over the edge.


  11. - Angry Bird - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:58 pm:

    Wow


  12. - Reality Check - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 1:59 pm:

    I don’t think it’s accurate to say “the people have a low impression of everybody”.

    The results you cite suggest that if Rauner and legislators support a bill that benefits big business, most voters would think their motivation would be to benefit big business, or harvest campaign cash.

    President Obama’s 2-1 approval certainly shows that people have a favorable impression of him. His strong approval is the mirror image of Rauner’s strong disapproval, in fact.


  13. - AnonymousOne - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:00 pm:

    Puzzling how anyone other than the untouchable uber wealthy could possibly think Rauner is doing an excellent or even good job. What are his accomplishments to date? Other than ruining a whole lot of peoples’ lives, I can’t think of anything constructive that he’s achieved. If I’m wrong, I’d like to see a list of his improvements in our state.


  14. - Stones - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:04 pm:

    The people are angry - no doubt about it. I’m just not sure how we get past it given events on the state and national level. I truly do worry about the future of our country.


  15. - kimocat - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:07 pm:

    Maybe Ilinoisans are coming slowly around to the sick joke played on them by Rauner and co. As far as Pres. Obama’s ratings responding so well to the phenomenon called Trump — Obama looks like the embodiment of the ultimate statesmen compared to a GOP operatives description of Donald Trump — “Cheeto Jesus.”


  16. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:08 pm:

    Blue dog, you’re not necessarily out of touch unless you foolishly believe that somehow you’re a representative sample of all Illinoisans.

    You’re not.

    Nobody is.

    That’s the inherent beauty of politics.


  17. - Ducky LaMoore - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:09 pm:

    I am having an Office Space moment. It is like everyday that the Governor gets out of bed is the worst day of his life. So literally, every single day is worse than the one before it. (Wow, that’s messed up-)


  18. - Juvenal - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:14 pm:

    #winning


  19. - ok - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:16 pm:

    Who is “Solar City?” And why are they polling on the Governor’s race? Something doesn’t connect here.


  20. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:20 pm:

    ===Who is “Solar City?” And why are they polling on the Governor’s race?===

    First, use the Google.

    Second, pollsters often throw in political questions on stuff like this. They don’t always release them, however, because, well, they will need a certain governor’s signature. Kudos to them, but, wow.


  21. - Annonin' - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:20 pm:

    Hey Capt Fax missed the real good news…BigBrain doesn’t S* as bad as a utility…happy days are here again’


  22. - aunt_petunia - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:21 pm:

    The poll didn’t offer a lower ranking than “Poor”?


  23. - forwhatitsworth - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:36 pm:

    Who are the 7% that would rate Rauner as excellent?


  24. - BEST Dave - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 2:54 pm:

    To answer your question ok, Solar City is a national rooftop solar developer that opposes the demand charge because of its negative impact on rooftop solar.

    What is most interesting to me about this poll is that before any arguments are presented, right off the bat 81% of Illinois folks oppose demand charges and 78% support net metering. Those results are just stunning.


  25. - Commonsense in Illinois - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 3:19 pm:

    Am I on the banned list? I posted a comment over an hour ago and it hasn’t appeared. If I am banned, let me know so I can pay my fine…serve my time…whatever.


  26. - Chicago Cynic - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 3:41 pm:

    Commonsense, sometimes comments are placed in an auto-moderated holding place. I know it’s happened to me and it’s not usually personal (unless we are on the banned list).


  27. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 5:13 pm:

    ===Obama’s net job-approval rating has risen nearly 20 points since Trump became the G.O.P. front-runner and the party’s inescapable face last summer.===

    Absolutely.

    Clinton’s negatives are high — until you compare them to Trump’s. His are shockingly high.

    I never thought that Trump actually wanted the gig.I figured he was brand-building, on the cable and radio yakkers’ dime, and was just as surprised as anyone else when he won.

    Now he’s riding the tiger, and he can’t figure out how to stay on or get off.

    When I have my tinfoil hat on, I can see him withdrawing, because the process is “unfair.”

    He’s 70 years old. What, in his history, suggests that he actually wants that brutal job?


  28. - Anon - Tuesday, Jun 21, 16 @ 9:41 pm:

    I will continue to say this, the numbers do not look good for the Gov right now, but 2 years is forever in politics. If PQ is the the Dems nominee, Rauner will win reelection. If Durbin, Dart, or possibly Kennedy get in the race, the Gov’s office has a good chance of going back to the D’s.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Appellate court vacates ILRB ruling that AFSCME contract negotiations were at impasse
* Two Rauner interviews, two Rauner answers on migrant caravan
* Question of the day
* Erika Harold's "promiscuity" comments compel Sen. Lightford to share her story
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Campaign updates: Morrison; DeWitte; Curran
* Pritzker outspending Rauner on Facebook by more than 12 to 1
* Cook moves Bost race from "Toss Up" to "Lean R" as new poll shows growing lead
* Harold says she's not accountable to governor, president in new TV ad
* Rauner-funded candidate denies being "Rauner Rino"
* Some new ads in congressional districts
* Private citizen tried to remain private
* *** UPDATED x4 *** Rauner's new TV ad is a real doozy
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller