Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Kirk campaign admits contact with “whistleblowers” after Duckworth settlement
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Kirk campaign admits contact with “whistleblowers” after Duckworth settlement

Thursday, Jul 28, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From the National Review

Two women suing Representative Tammy Duckworth, the Democratic nominee for Senate in Illinois, rejected an agreed upon settlement offer on Wednesday, forcing the case to go to trial next month, according to the Daily Herald.

The timing is unfortunate for Duckworth, who is running to unseat Senator Mark Kirk, one of the most vulnerable Republicans up for reelection this year. The formal rejection of the settlement comes the day before Duckworth is set to take the stage at the Democratic National Convention. And per the Herald, the trial will take place on August 15, in the heat of campaign season. […]

Some Democrats suggested the timing of the two women rejecting the lawsuit was suspect, coming the day before Duckworth’s address in Philadelphia.

[Mark Kirk campaign manager Kevin Artl] says the campaign had no discussions with the two plaintiffs about their decision, and says they were under the impression that the whole case had been settled, noting that they had already begun running an ad attacking her for settling. Artl adds that he spoke with the two women by phone in their capacity as whistleblowers, saying they reached out to the campaign after the settlement was announced to tell their story.

Hmm.

* I followed up with Artl…

They reached out to us the week following the announcement of the settlement. They wanted to tell their story. We have talked to many whistleblowers who have felt bullied and ignored by Duckworth.

* Related…

* Kirk Campaign Utilizing Snapchat To Tie Duckworth To Blago

       

23 Comments
  1. - Norseman - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 9:44 am:

    How convenient!


  2. - @MisterJayEm - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 9:46 am:

    [Googles ‘Third Party candidates’ & ‘Illinois’ & ’senate’]

    – MrJM


  3. - Randolph - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 9:49 am:

    Artl should have been fired if he didn’t try to talk to them.


  4. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 9:58 am:

    I wonder if they will help with the extra legal fees?


  5. - hisgirlfriday - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 10:01 am:

    So this is really all Kirk’s got?

    I can’t wait til he has to pick his third fake write-in for prez candidate after Colin Powell endorses Hillary.


  6. - Ghost - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 10:14 am:

    yeah because disgruntled bad employees never try to blame everyone else and reach out to others willing to persecute their crazy.


  7. - Louis G. Atsaves - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 10:19 am:

    Why would Kirk run all those ads attacking Duckworth over the “settlement” when there is no settlement? Take off the tin foil hats. Take the quotations off “whistleblowers” and put it on “contact.” The infamous Duckworth routinely loud, over the top and ugly campaign statements have taken their toll on this issue and with the campaign as a whole.


  8. - Responsa - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 10:29 am:

    ==- Ghost - @ 10:14 am:==

    That is one strange comment.


  9. - AlfondoGonz - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 10:30 am:

    I am shocked, SHOCKED, to find out meddling occurred here!


  10. - Belle - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 10:35 am:

    It seemed to be a rather meager settlement but I don’t know what kind of evidence they had.
    They were already angry (no one sues a person because they’re pleased) and Artl contacting them probably got them riled up again.
    But, the Duckworth campaign should have kept their mouths shut.
    She leaned on her employees too intensely–plenty of people are going to understand how that happens.
    We have to assume Duckworth is a tough cookie. She was a pilot during war time and remains tough through dealing with severe injuries.


  11. - Rich Miller - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 10:35 am:

    ===Take the quotations off “whistleblowers” and put it on “contact.”===

    Get your own blog.


  12. - pundent - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 10:42 am:

    The fact that this case appeared to settle for legal fees incurred tells me all I need to know about the underlying allegations. I can understand the whistleblowers being unhappy with the outcome but their attorneys negotiated a settlement which put no money in their pockets. If your own legal counsel is telling you that’s a “good deal” it says something about the merits of your case. I’m sure all of the tinfoil hats will now come out and claim that Duckworth got to the judge or the opposing attorneys. But there seems to be little evidence that there’s anything here. I’m by no means a Duckworth supporter I just don’t think this is the issue that Kirk rides to victory with.


  13. - Jocko - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 10:51 am:

    The only winner that will come out of this thing is Artl, although I think he tripped up saying “We have talked to many whistleblowers…”

    Such as?


  14. - Juvenal - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 11:03 am:

    Pundent:

    The cases were twice dismissed outright.

    Perhaps the AG shouldn’t have described the suits as “frivolous.” Perhaps McGrath should not have repeated the term.

    Call them “nuisance” suits if you like.

    But “whistleblower” seems like a stretch for charges that have been dismissed twice and were being settled for zero damages.


  15. - pundent - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 11:30 am:

    Junvenal - Spot on.


  16. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 11:31 am:

    @Juvenal:

    The case was not dismissed with prejudice, so the case was not terminated.

    If a complaint filed by a plaintiff is dismissed, but leave is granted to refile a new complaint, the case is not necessarily over. Such a ruling relates to a deficiency in the original pleadings which could possibly be corrected by filing a new complaint.


  17. - Aroldis For Prez - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 11:32 am:

    The allegations against Congresswoman Duckworth are nothing to sneeze at, and Mr. McGrath wasted no time insulting the whistleblowers after the original settlement was announced. Her team has no one to blame but themselves for this issue coming back to the surface.


  18. - Mr. Glass - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 11:32 am:

    To be fair they were in fact whistleblowers who experienced workplace retaliation. I don’t fault them for reaching out. Especially after their complaints were originally unheard of.


  19. - Walmart Manager - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 11:38 am:

    Rides to victory, probably not, but the issue is just looks bad for the Duckworth camp.


  20. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 12:52 pm:

    For the record, it’s “National Review”, not “The National Review”. The writers there hate that mix up


  21. - Anonymous - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 1:00 pm:

    Like Eurythmics lol.


  22. - A guy - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 1:37 pm:

    ===Kevin Artl says the campaign had no discussions with the two plaintiffs==

    ==They reached out to us the week following the announcement of the settlement.===

    These statements appear to be completely contradictory to me.


  23. - Ted - Thursday, Jul 28, 16 @ 6:34 pm:

    The reality is: Duckworth’s campaign handled the situation terribly and intentionally downplayed the legitimacy and seriousness of the claims made by the two women.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Afternoon roundup
* Since my name was used in the debate...
* Question of the day
* Rockford’s new permanent casino posts big numbers
* Today's quotable
* End of an era
* Astonishing results from Illinois Supreme Court commision study on lawyer bullying
* The Importance Of Energy Storage
* Open thread
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2024
September 2024
August 2024
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller