Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Rauner vetoes bills pushed by disability advocates, first responders, unions
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Rauner vetoes bills pushed by disability advocates, first responders, unions

Friday, Jul 29, 2016

* And now, on to the vetoes…


* From his veto message…

Today I veto House Bill 4351 from the 99th General Assembly, which would amend the Illinois Act on Aging to restrict the State’s flexibility in how we assess and serve Illinois’s elderly and physically disabled residents.

This bill is very similar to House Bill 2482, passed by the General Assembly last year, and which I returned with an amendatory veto for many of the same concerns I raise today. Although well intentioned, this bill would lead to serious unintended consequences.

First, this bill would lock into statute that an individual with a particular threshold score on the Determination of Need (DON) assessment tool would be eligible for both institutional and home and community-based long term care services. Instead, an individual with the threshold score should be entitled to institutional or home and community-based care. Many members of the General Assembly have long worked to transition the state from a reliance on institutional-based care to a focus on community care options that improve patient quality and cost efficiency. However, House Bill 4351 inhibits this transformation in the way the State delivers services for the elderly and disabled.

Second, to the extent that a motivating factor behind this legislation is to preclude a raise in the minimum DON score used to determine eligibility—as originally contemplated under the SMART Act (Public Act 97-0689)—I have no intention of raising the DON score. In light of this commitment, there can be no good reason to unnecessarily restrict the State’s ability to move from institutional-based care to community-based care through this legislation.

Finally, this bill would inhibit the Illinois Department on Aging from creating a new program, the Community Reinvestment Program (CRP). This program is designed to provide a multitude of flexible services for non-Medicaid individuals currently being served under the Community Care Program (CCP), and it furthers the State’s commitment to serving individuals in their own home and community rather than in nursing homes. CRP is also projected to produce savings of nearly $200 million during the next fiscal year. By precluding the launch of CRP, this bill would prevent the State from managing ever-rising costs and jeopardize our ability to ensure that essential community services remain available for the approximately 44,000 non-Medicaid persons now served by CCP.

…Adding… SEIU press release…

House Bill 4351, sponsored by Rep. Greg Harris (D-Chicago) and Sen. Daniel Biss (D-Evanston) would have prevented Rauner from manipulating the Determination of Need (DON) Score and limiting eligibility to seniors, which Rauner attempted last year. This is in addition to a proposed $200 million cut to CCP, which, in early talks, Rauner is proposing to replace with for-profit ride sharing vouchers, food vouchers and dry-cleaning services as an untried, unproven way to eliminate the in-home caregivers represented by SEIU Healthcare Illinois.

As a result of Rauner’s risky proposals, some 44,000 seniors are at risk of forced institutionalization.

Following is the response of Rep. Greg Harris:

“Sadly this veto by Gov. Rauner is another in his ongoing campaign targeting childcare, people with disabilities and senior citizens. We should be encouraging seniors to remain in their own homes and low-cost community settings instead of driving them into more costly institutions and nursing homes.”

* Other bills were also vetoed today…

Today I return Senate Bill 1059. This bill would allow retired state university employees who return to work after receiving a lump-sum retirement distribution to receive additional health benefits without making additional contributions to the retirement system.

Under current law, state university employees have the option to receive a one-time, lump-sum payout from the State University Retirement System upon retirement. A retired employee who elects to accept the lump-sum payout is not eligible to participate in the State’s health care program. If a retired employee later returns to work for the State after accepting a lump-sum payout, he or she no longer contributes to the State Retirement Systems and, therefore, is ineligible to receive additional future retirement benefits.

Senate Bill 1059 would allow a retired employee who accepts a lump-sum payout and then returns to work to participate in the State’s employee health care program, even though he or she would not be required to contribute to the State’s retirement systems going forward. The bill would establish an unequal benefit distribution and expose the State to unforeseen, unfunded costs to the historically underfunded State Employee Group Insurance Program. Rather than increasing retirement-related costs to the State, I urge the General Assembly to work with me on comprehensive pension reform.

* And…

Today I veto Senate Bill 2439, which amends the Illinois Pension Code to impose additional pension liability for police and firefighters on local governments, despite a local referendum rejecting such an expansion. It is identical to Senate Bill 763, which I vetoed last year.

Public safety workers deserve the right to earn good pension benefits. However, current law already provides a mechanism by which a municipality can provide pension benefits to police officers and firefighters. Benefits are mandatory in municipalities with the population of at least 5,000 people and can be created by referendum in those with fewer than 5,000 residents. Thus, in smaller municipalities, the decision rests directly with the people who will have to pay for additional benefits through higher property and other taxes.

This veto is necessary because Senate Bill 2439 would allow municipalities an end-run around local referendum results. If this legislation becomes law, a municipality could impose new pension obligations by a resolution of its governing body even if residents overwhelmingly reject the same by referendum. At a time when local governments in Illinois are struggling to make ends meet, we should not stifle direct democracy by permitting local governing bodies to ignore taxpayer’s wishes.

* And…

Today I veto Senate Bill 2531 from the 99th General Assembly to prevent yet another hindrance to economic development in Illinois.

The bill requires an economic development council that receives public money to include members of a labor council and persons from minority groups on its corporate board. Diverse representation, particularly minority representation, on corporate boards is an admirable goal and one every corporation should seek to attain. However, corporate boards should also be representative of the constituencies they serve and need flexibility to ensure that representation. Mandating certain representation on every economic development corporation that receives public monies is a one size fits all approach that ignores that many of these local and regional councils may be best served with different representation that reflects their specific mission.

Further, the vague drafting of this legislation is likely to have unintended consequences. For example, “economic development corporation” is defined as “an organization that receives public money that promotes the development, establishment or expansion of industries.” This broad definition will likely lead to the inclusion of corporations whose works bears no relationship to traditional economic development. In addition, many corporations that would fall within this definition are dedicated to representing the interests of the management side of business. Forcing the inclusion of the labor representatives on such a board is in direct conflict with such a corporation’s interest.

This bill is one of three pieces of legislation passed by the General Assembly this year that impose arbitrary mandates on groups trying to further economic development in Illinois. Last year Illinois lost thousands of jobs, and I continue to hear that businesses are leaving our State. Rather than imposing inflexible requirements on entities trying to bring jobs to the Illinois, I encourage the General Assembly to focus on passing legislation designed to further economic development.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

15 Comments
  1. - illini - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 2:50 pm:

    What a surprise - yet another Friday afternoon news dump !!!


  2. - Honeybear - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 2:53 pm:

    Queue the mailers in three, two, one


  3. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 2:56 pm:

    Asked to comment, Fake Mrs. Diana Rauner, First Lady and President of Ounce of Prevention said she supports her husband, and agrees with his Business Decision to hurt the most needy(?)

    Fake Mrs. Rauner also noted Bruce has no social agenda.


  4. - CCP Hostage - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 3:11 pm:

    No surprise but disappointing nonetheless. I’ve been waiting all afternoon for this veto.


  5. - Anon221 - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 3:11 pm:

    Those that plan to vote Yellow or Red in the override session, need to take a good hard look in the mirror. You will be determining the fate of those who are truly some of the most vulnerable in our society. So, do you squeeze a body or extend a hand?
    This presentation is still up on the IDoA website- https://www.illinois.gov/aging/CommunityServices/Documents/oasa_presentation.pdf.
    Study it. The Community Care Program is also under attack on various Rauner fronts, too. Limiting hours for caregivers, for one. Medicaid applications are now taking over a YEAR to process, and families are having to provide the same information over and over and over again while bills add up. This veto of HB4351 only adds to the squeezing.


  6. - @MisterJayEm - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 3:16 pm:

    “I have no intention of raising the DON score. In light of this commitment, there can be no good reason to…”

    When a man of Bruce Rauner’s integrity says he has “no intention” of doing something, you can take that to the–

    No, not ‘bank’, the other one. You know — the one with the piles of trash, teeming with filth and vermin? [snaps fingers] ‘Landfill’!

    You can take it to the landfill.

    – MrJM


  7. - Stuff Happens - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 3:30 pm:

    I’m confused. So now we’re saying that health benefits *ARE* tied to pensions? Seems like just yesterday the State was arguing differently.


  8. - TwoFeetThick - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 3:39 pm:

    “I continue to hear that business are leaving our State.”

    Oh yeah, Governor? Well I continue to hear that they’re not. See how easy that is? Why don’t you prove me wrong with some real numbers, and not with what you “hear.”


  9. - Groundhog Day - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 3:41 pm:

    “When a person tells you who he is, believe him”


  10. - Ghost - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 3:47 pm:

    So the rich white guy who sits on an all white board is opposed to mandating diversity where public funds are involved. Because the white folks need flexbilty to keep appointing other whites and we dont want to hinder that.

    that veto was white wash


  11. - Sense of a Goose - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 3:51 pm:

    –I continue to hear that businesses are leaving our State.-

    If only there was an agency charged with economic development that could quantify this information… Hearing this from his sources that tell him AFSME’s strike begins September 1st?

    Not really speaking to the merits of the legislation but the quality of the explanation. Bad mouthing the state helps economic development considerably. At some point, he may have to defend all he has done to improve our economy. Apparently, not yet though.


  12. - Nick Name - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 3:57 pm:

    “It’s not personal, Sonny. It’s business.”


  13. - Honeybear - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 4:03 pm:

    Sense of a Goose,
    –If only there was an agency charged with economic development that could quantify this information–

    There used to be an office that did that. Funny that it’s gone now. Scrubbed from the website even.


  14. - DuPage - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 4:39 pm:

    No surprises, Rauner type of action and Rauner type of explanations.


  15. - Precinct Captain - Friday, Jul 29, 16 @ 4:42 pm:

    The final veto is not a surprise. “Zero” is the amount of diversity Rauner is good at achieving. Zero.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Rauner vetoes second bill to address gender wage gap
* Munger moves to DCEO
* Preckwinkle mayoral announcement roundup
* Follow the money
* Empty threat? Or does somebody know something we don't?
* A couple of quick debate clips
* Supremes side with hospitals on property taxes
* Report: IEPA stonewalls AG until HGOP leader steps in
* A TIF primer
* Raoul's new ad blasts Harold over abortion rights
* Debate coverage roundup
* Question of the day
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller