Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Unclear on the concept
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Unclear on the concept

Wednesday, Aug 31, 2016

* From a Peoria Journal Star editorial on remap reform

Perhaps Quinn has a magic incantation to use on the Supreme Court, starting with using “simple, clean, and pristine” language impossible to poke constitutional holes through even by the most motivated. We just have three questions regarding the referendum Quinn hopes to get on the ballot in 2018, in time for the 2021 map:

Will Madigan still be speaker of the Illinois House? Will Madigan still be chairman of Illinois’ Democratic Party? Will the Supreme Court still have a Democratic majority?

If the answer is “yes” to all three, well, good luck to Quinn, but he’ll forgive us for not holding our breath on any map “reform” worthy of the word.

What that editorial board wants is not remap reform, but a Republican state. Talk about a “magic incantation.” Sheesh.

I mean, if the maps are drawn fairly and without political considerations, who’s to say that Madigan would definitely lose control of the House? This is, after all, a Democratic-leaning state, despite Gov. Rauner’s 2014 win. How are you gonna “fairly” draw lots of Republican districts in Chicago and the south suburbs? And, remember, Madigan kept the gavel eight out of ten years of a Republican-drawn map in the 1990s. So, if he can win under a relatively unfair, partisan map, how is he supposed to be guaranteed to lose under a fair, non-partisan map?

And how are fair legislative district maps gonna end Madigan’s chairmanship of the Democratic Party of Illinois or change the balance on the Illinois Supreme Court?

If this is the bar they’re setting, they should also thunder against the current fair map proposal.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

54 Comments
  1. - walker - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:17 am:

    Remap reform has become a political symbol with emotional impact far beyond its practical potential.


  2. - walker - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:22 am:

    You might be misinterpreting the Editorial. I think they’re saying that if the Dems remain in control, which they will, then Quinn’s proposal will never get thru the courts regardless of its content.


  3. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:23 am:

    ===Madigan kept the gavel eight out of ten years of a Republican-drawn map in the 1990s.===

    This.

    Like Bear Bryant, Madigan has the skills to beat “his with yours” and then turnaround and beat “yours with his”.

    Maps are just the deciders how Madigan can do it.

    Raunerites throughout Illinois are ALL the same. Their talking points and voting records say it’s so.

    Madigan chooses candidates that fit districts, Raunerites “sell” candidates that sell out their districts.

    “Simple”.

    Rauner winning in 2018 will decide the maps, but that doesn’t mean Raunerites will control the state.

    Quinn’s proposal doesn’t guarantee Raunerites controlling Illinois either.

    Four out of five with a map designed to defeat you? Madigan evolved in his candidate choices as the demographics helped. The Republicans just got caught with old demographics and unrealistic candidates matching them.

    Ball game.


  4. - D - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:29 am:

    The 1991 legislative map was drawn by the Senate Republicans whose sole purpose was to ensure a republican Senate. Thus there was less consideration of Republican control of the House, hence the House only went Republican for 2 years.


  5. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:30 am:

    walker, I’ve read that a dozen times and in no way do I see your possible angle.


  6. - Ron Burgundy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:31 am:

    Agree with walker. I think the point was even in Quinn’s proposal there is room for a court majority to find a hyper-technical reason to reject it if that is what they want to do.


  7. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:32 am:

    D, that’s an interesting piece of spin, but not at all what I recall from the time or what I’ve read.

    Keep in mind that if a grand total of just a few hundred votes had gone the other direction in two races (Radogno and Luechtefeld), the Senate Dems would’ve won the majority in 1996.


  8. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:33 am:

    The PJS is interested in reaching specific conclusions, not in changing the process.

    That being the case, they’re better off taking the 50-50 shot that the GOP will draw the map under the current system after the census, assuming Rauner will be re-elected.

    I suspect that’s what the GOP is going for, anyway, considering the strangely incompetent lawyering that went into the last two redistricting efforts, plus the failed term-limits ballot initiative.

    Keep those issues alive for the elections.


  9. - My New Handle - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:33 am:

    Proposing how the court may or may not rule on whatever Quinn, or anyone else, offers is pure speculation. The PJS has always, in my experience, been a haven for simple minds longing for simple solutions.


  10. - Cubs in '16 - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:33 am:

    I interpret it the same way as walker and R.B.


  11. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:34 am:

    ===…find a hyper-technical reason to reject…===

    Is that “code” for obvious constitutionality questions?

    If the language brought forth isn’t crisp and direct to the Constitutionality, it’s going to be shot down.

    These proposals need to pass muster, no matter the number of signatures attached to the unconstitutional language.


  12. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:36 am:

    ===If the answer is “yes” to all three, well, good luck to Quinn, but he’ll forgive us for not holding our breath on any map “reform” worthy of the word.===

    How does that mean what the dissenters here say it means?


  13. - Ron Burgundy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:37 am:

    Sure, they need to pass muster OW. But this court seems to go to great lengths to avoid saying how. If they have a way in mind, let’s see it. Instead we get a new nugget of insight every two years, and a whole new reason to shoot it down, which could continue to play out ad infinitum. My point is, if they don’t want it to pass muster, there are plenty of creative ways to make sure it won’t, no matter what it says.


  14. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:38 am:

    - D -,

    I think I would’ve taken my chances with that map in the 1990s versus a Democratic map, no matter what alleged spin makes it “heavy” for one over the other.

    Seriously, with that map, only 1 win, even after reassessing the ramifications of demographic changes?

    That’s on Daniels’ Crew, not on a GOP Senate-leaning map.

    With respect.


  15. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:41 am:

    ===But this court seems to go to great lengths to avoid saying how.===

    So Judicial Activism, legislating from the bench is “fine” here?

    I think the seperation of powers needs to be consistent, not cafeteria-like.


  16. - Cubs in '16 - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:41 am:

    ===If the answer is “yes” to all three, well, good luck to Quinn, but he’ll forgive us for not holding our breath on any map “reform” worthy of the word.===

    How does that mean what the dissenters here say it means?

    Because as long as Madigan has ‘control’ of the House and, presumably, the SC, no real reform will pass. It’s more of the “Because….Madigan” cynicism.


  17. - Ron Burgundy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:42 am:

    -How does that mean what the dissenters here say it means?-

    I think they are trying to say, perhaps inartfully, that if those three things are true, then they don’t think anything is getting through this particular Court.


  18. - walker - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:43 am:

    Rich: I didn’t say it was clear. LOL


  19. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:44 am:

    - Ron Burgundy -,

    With respect,

    Are you also saying there are no legal minds in Illinois skilled enough to clearly make a “clean” amendment, given the multiple rejections as a template?

    I can’t believe the millions spent for this can’t attract a competent attorney, or attorneys, that understand where the last two failed?

    Attorneys are victims to not understanding the constitution?

    Again, with respect.


  20. - Rich Miller - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:49 am:

    === then they don’t think anything is getting through this particular Court.===

    I just don’t see it.


  21. - Ron Burgundy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:50 am:

    I am not saying that, OW, but in return are you saying that elected judges are not capable of moving the bar constantly to reach the decisions they want to reach, no matter what the attorneys put before them? So that, perhaps, only one amendment passes muster in over 40 years?


  22. - pundent - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:52 am:

    =find a hyper-technical reason to reject it=

    I’d suggest re-reading the decision and re-reading the dissent. Those that voted in the affirmative pointed to the language in the constitution. Those that dissented used political arguments. Was it a partisan decision sure. But you can’t call a strict reading of the constitution as “hyper-technical”. The law is the law. As much as I dislike Quinn and question his motives he’s at least acknowledging that.


  23. - walker - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:58 am:

    Given the language and source, well, good luck to the reader, but we won’t hold our breath waiting for an interpretation worthy of repeating.


  24. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:58 am:

    ===… are you saying that elected judges are not capable of moving the bar constantly to reach the decisions they want to reach, no matter what the attorneys put before them?===

    I don’t see this or the recent decisions at moving any bar at any time. These rulings are technicalities or unknown language.

    These decisions default to strict constitutional interpretation.

    Nothing ambiguous by going strict constitutional.


  25. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 9:59 am:

    “aren’t”

    Ugh. Apologies.


  26. - DuPage - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:01 am:

    Who paid for all the TV commercials for “independent” maps? You can bet anyone appointed to the “independent” group will have strings attached, and will owe political favors that will be called in.
    What if Ken Dunkin is appointed? Would he be counted as a Democrat?


  27. - RetiredStateEmployee - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:12 am:

    What other occupation would be best served by firing the experienced help and hiring all newbies? The concept eludes me. So let’s get a lot of inexperienced folks in there and everything will be better? Hard to justify with logic.


  28. - The Captain - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:13 am:

    One last point on remap and then I’ll stop beating this dead horse.

    All of the focus has been on General Assembly remap reform and none on the Congressional map making process. The GA map is a zero-sum game, every map has the same number of districts so if you add to one district you have to take from somewhere else. Partisans can only make one area stronger by making one area weaker, zero-sum.

    Not so with the Congressional map. We currently have 18 CD’s, down from 19 a decade ago and down from 20 the decade before that. Partisans drawing the congressional map when it went from 20 districts to 19 or from 19 down to 18 had a tremendous advantage because it’s not zero sum. This is the least fair part of our map making process and it receives very little attention if any at all and was not part of either of the last two proposed referenda.


  29. - VanillaMan - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:13 am:

    Unclear on the concept?
    Try unclear between the ears!

    This editorial is full of so many holes and assumptions, it does a disservice to those of us in favor of reforms.

    Biased foolishness that had I handed it in to Professor Green would have been forced down my throat in little pieces.

    What if the folks there knew a little bit about how our government works before they let the rest of us know how little they know?

    Did someone get paid for that?


  30. - Hamlet's Ghost - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:19 am:

    Gerrymandering works by “packing” and “cracking”

    In a successful gerrymander, the opposition party wins districts by large margins and loses districts by small margins while the dominant party wins everywhere by solid but not landslide margins.

    Winning an uncontested race wastes votes.

    Therefore, f the party in control gives itself large numbers of uncontested candidates that is evidence that the gerrymander is less efficient than it could be - in other words large numbers of Democrats running in uncontested House races is statistical evidence against effective gerrymandering rather than statistical evidence of gerrymandering.


  31. - Louis G. Atsaves - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:19 am:

    I think that what Rich Miller is trying to tell us is the entire remapping issue boils down to one word: “trust.”

    No one trusts anyone else on this subject. And forget trusting Quinn or even giving him a chance on this, Quinn had the opportunity to throw that gerrymandered map back into the face of the legislature but instead, leapt to sign it like a good puppy dog rewarded with a belly rub for being obedient. Why wait to hear what he had to say? He has zero credibility on this subject these days.

    And the reformers cannot be faulted for following the “roadmap” hinted at by Judge Mikva, because the Illinois Supreme Court was free to disregard or substitute their own roadmap. Roughly 600,000 signatures, millions spent and the result remains the status quo. The public, the pundits, the press, all feel that justice was swept out the back door with the rest of trash in the alley. I’ve read the 4-3 Supreme Court decision several times now and whatever “roadmap” exists in our Illinois Constitution is at best, speculative. The Supreme Court is dropping no hints here, nor is it required to. Justice Thomas’ sarcasm in his dissent resonates for that reason.

    Madigan may very well remain “King” (as several columnists and editorial pages have called him) even with a “fair remap” but that is all speculation. The Democratic Party of Illinois may very well keep their veto proof majorities in both chambers with a fair remap, that that too is all speculation.

    What is clear is that unfair maps of legislative districts and “gerrymandering” has been completely pinned on the Democratic Party of Illinois, Speaker Madigan (and as Chairman of the Party) and President Cullerton (to a lesser extent). Pinned may be the wrong word here, maybe “superglued” to their foreheads is more accurate.

    All attempts at deflection (The Democrats would have won anyway) (Reformers stupidly packaged their last effort) (Republicans not running candidates in every single district) fail.

    Gerrymandering and the current system equate to cheating. The Democrats here in Illinois can thank their national party for pinning the cheating label on Republicans in other states on redistricting gerrymandering. Gerrymandering = cheating. Gerrymandering = unfair. Gerrymandering = Democrats in Illinois.

    Get over it Democrats. You’ve won. Celebrate your victory and stop being so damned defensive about it. Elected officials in Illinois pick their voters. Voters do not pick their elected officials. Why aren’t all the Democrats in this state celebrating this judicial victory right now?

    Greg Hinz in Crain’s said it best: “Thank you very much, Illinois Supreme Court. We can get to democracy in some other century.”

    So stop the deflection Democrats. Own up and embrace the status quo on mapping legislative districts. And revel in the glory of victory!


  32. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:25 am:

    Oh - Louis G Atsaves -

    ===Roughly 600,000 signatures, millions spent and the result remains the status quo.===

    This is not a legal argument. Signatures do NOT equate constitutionality.

    But… you already knew that.


  33. - Louis G. Atsaves - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:35 am:

    Willy, I didn’t make a legal argument there. You are correct and thank you for pointing out the extremely obvious. It was a political argument.

    Let the Democrats wear this one like a “Scarlet Letter” during their campaigns. They asked for it. They are all celebrating, right? Right? I see no flood of celebratory press releases from any of them praising the Illinois Supreme Court. All I see is some lame deflection attempts.


  34. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:45 am:

    - Louis G Atsaves -

    The reason I can’t share in your mocking glee is exactly why I know Rauner is a phony in this process, maybe more phony than Quinn.

    Rauner is willing to spend millions and point out, as you did, the political.

    Yet, Rauner AND the Fair Maps Crew can’t find language that can pass muster?

    It’s not about fair maps for Rauner, here, no, it’s about making fresh stale arguements, with no legal argument to make it possible.

    When I see amendments that can pass at least the smell test, I’ll share your “glee” at “Blame… Madigan”


  35. - cgo75 - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:59 am:

    There’s no way Illinois is ready for the Republicans to take over the House or Senate. I’m a fairly consistent GOP voter and even I can admit that would be disaster! I agree that’s what the PJ Star is angling toward and it’s the wrong move.


  36. - Louis G. Atsaves - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 11:02 am:

    “Yet, Rauner AND the Fair Maps Crew can’t find language that can pass muster?”

    If I am reading the majority opinion of the Illinois Supreme Court correctly, they cannot. Their “strict construction” of that provision seems to rule out any real efforts in the form of referendums. Thus, the sarcasm of Justice Thomas does resonate.


  37. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 11:06 am:

    ===Their “strict construction” of that provision seems to rule out any real efforts in the form of referendums.===

    I guess then none can.

    Maybe Rauner can “cutback” then on finding an amendment?

    Right? Exactly right.


  38. - Louis G. Atsaves - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 11:21 am:

    “Maybe Rauner can “cutback” then on finding an amendment?”

    From what I’m reading, Rauner’s recent speeches statewide seem to be pointing towards “pressure your legislators” to support such reforms, and not “pressure the court.”

    So, you may be right, although the Fair Maps group is asking for a rehearing, so I guess at the very least, the matter will remain in the news when the “rehearing denied” order comes out and the press rehashes the whole story again. Then there will be another press release or statement from the governor and . . . and . . . and . . . probably right around early voting time!

    Either way, I don’t see this issue is going away. Voters are going to be constantly reminded of it one way or another. And gerrymandering = cheating and gerrymandering = Illinois Democrats . . . ouch!


  39. - Ron Burgundy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 11:28 am:

    If only it was 1980 and the Cutback justices still comprised the Court. A bipartisan opinion with a bipartisan dissent.


  40. - D - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 11:54 am:

    Rich and Oswego Willy, from conversations I had back in 91/92 with those involved, the Republican Senate staff ran the Republican remap operation and kept the House Republican staff basically out of the process. Also during that time and since the House Campaign operation was not as good as the Seante’s.


  41. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 12:05 pm:

    ===Also during that time and since the House Campaign operation was not as good as the Seante’s.===

    So…

    It’s the map’s fault… that Daniels’ Crew wasn’t as solid?


  42. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 12:31 pm:

    Well, - Louis G Atsaves -

    Don’t let it be said you’re for reform… over politics….


  43. - Louis G. Atsaves - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 12:42 pm:

    ” . . . Don’t let it be said you’re for reform… over politics…. . . .”

    If such political action leads to reform, then let the end justify the means.

    In the meantime, party on with your status quo pals!


  44. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 12:49 pm:

    ===
    If such political action leads to reform, then let the end justify the means.

    In the meantime, party on with your status quo pals!===

    “I’m frustrated too, but reforming Illinois is more important than a budget”

    I know you want to hurt people… if it’s worth it… to you.

    The status quo now is destroying social services and higher ed.

    Do you want me to quote Crain’s on Rauner and Illinois is worse with him as governor.

    Cheer the destruction of Illinois, - Louis G Atsaves -


  45. - Louis G. Atsaves - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 1:25 pm:

    Nice deflections there Willy! When you lose the argument you change the subject. I’m impressed. Well, sort of, but not quite.

    This is Illinois. Reform takes a back seat to the status quo. Always. The status quo is good. The status quo is what makes Illinois so exceptional. The status quo is why everyone living within its borders is thrilled and happiest as can be. No deficits. Everyone paid on time. No one from Illinois was ever left behind.

    And then Bruce Rauner was elected and everything immediately fell apart! The status quo Democrats and their party leader called their greatest accomplishment the past 18 months was maintaining the status quo!

    Gerrymandering = cheating = Democratic Party of Illinois.

    So if repeat that line 100,000 times, do I get to change my name to “Lake Forest Louie”?


  46. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 1:42 pm:

    ===This is Illinois. Reform takes a back seat to the status quo. Always. The status quo is good. The status quo is what makes Illinois so exceptional. The status quo is why everyone living within its borders is thrilled and happiest as can be. No deficits. Everyone paid on time. No one from Illinois was ever left behind.===

    Crain’s…

    “By nearly every measure, the state is worse off since Rauner took office.”

    That Rauner, when he fails, he takes everyone down…

    ===And then Bruce Rauner was elected and everything immediately fell apart!===

    Crain’s…

    “By nearly every measure, the state is worse off since Rauner took office.”

    Hmm.

    ===So if repeat that line 100,000 times, do I get to change my name to “Lake Forest Louie”?===

    Up to you how you want your name.

    But, you can’t change that…

    “By nearly every measure, the state is worse off since Rauner took office.”

    That repeated enough for ya?

    The status quo now… Rauner, by nearly every measure Illinois is worse off since… Bruce Rauner.

    So… you play politics, hurt people… hostages…

    I’ll wait for language that’s constitutional, and hope that when it passes muster it’s not held hostage.


  47. - Louis G. Atsaves - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 2:38 pm:

    @Willy, you forgot to comment on this line: “. . . The status quo Democrats and their party leader called their greatest accomplishment the past 18 months was maintaining the status quo! . . .”

    Or maybe you didn’t forget. It just doesn’t fit your narrative in deflecting away anything that doesn’t fit your narrative.

    I await your words of wisdom.


  48. - pundent - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 2:47 pm:

    Louis - You seem to grasp the larger point. I believe that most of us that post here, including OW, have recognized over the years all the problems associated with the status quo. At issue is Rauner’s deliberate and intentional efforts to make things worse and the notion that it’s somehow justifiable. The status quo was bad, Rauner purposely made it worse.


  49. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 2:55 pm:

    Oh - Louis G Atsaves -, LOL…

    Governors own.

    You know that, “Pat Quinn failed”

    I didn’t forget it, I was actually hoping you’d have Rauner play victim again.

    Crain’s understands. You don’t. Unless it’s Pat Quinn.

    Right on time, you played victim as I figured. “Thanks!”


  50. - Twirling Towards Freedom - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 3:27 pm:

    It’s saying that, as long as Madigan is Chair of the party and the majority of justices are Democrats, the Court will not approve any meaningful reform. Basically, Madigan and the Supreme Court he controls won’t allow it.


  51. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 3:27 pm:

    To bring this ALL back…

    If the goal is the political until November, then a lot of people got duped in a purposely flawless-written amendment.

    If you cheer this “failure” as leverage instead of feeling frustrated AND duped, you may be a Raunerite.

    If you want something on the ballot, write it right the first time.

    Superstars, those who never failed at anything ever, they aren’t failing here, except at failing to be an honest broker to bring change.

    Lastly, get me a clean, constitutional amendment, then let’s talk about the merits. Discussing 569,000 signatures is disingenuous to the discussion of the constitutionality.


  52. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 3:29 pm:

    “flawed”


  53. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 5:47 pm:

    “What that editorial board wants is not remap reform, but a Republican state.” True dat.


  54. - Ron - Wednesday, Aug 31, 16 @ 10:09 pm:

    Illinois will likely lose two more congressional reps in upcoming census. The state is losing population while most are growing.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Question of the day
* Repubs use Pelosi fundraiser to whack Dems
* Bill surfaces to kinda address Reinking gun issue
* Gubernatorial candidate McCann cites apparent anti-vaxxer group in opposition to bill
* It's just a bill
* Tronc to guild: No
* If you're gonna legalize it, make sure to do it right
* Biz groups fighting off tax "bounty hunter" which they accuse of breaking the law
* Ives will tour the state, says "I’m not going to hide or go away"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Hotline ranks Rauner most vulnerable, Pritzker announces "Rauner Lie Alerts," Rauner unveils @PritzkerMadigan Twitter account
* Dems may try to override Rauner veto as gun supporters rally
* Fako: "Democrats and progressives are advised to put the culture of the failed past behind them"
* *** LIVE *** Session coverage
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* Illinois Democrats' plan to override gun dealer.....
* Illinois Democrats' plan to override gun dealer.....
* Illinois Democrats' plan to override gun dealer.....
* Letter: Better uses for campaign cash - Quad-Ci.....
* Gun Owners Rally In Springfield While Gun Deale.....


* Coach's accusers: Schools should end relationships with him
* Woman charged in bitcoin murder-for-hire is released
* Dozens of schools keep ties to coach accused of sexual abuse
* 3 days after fatal shootings, Tennessee Waffle House reopens
* Illinois Democrats' plan to override gun dealer veto fizzles
* Racing group buys Virginia's Colonial Downs for over $20M
* Man charged in Chicago fire that killed 4 dies before trial
* Dubuque lock and dam reopens after temporary repairs
* 16th DUI conviction gets man 16 years in prison
* GOP leader wounded in shooting is set to hit campaign trail

* Schoenburg: Libertarian Kash Jackson wants to protect rights
* Plans to override gun dealer licensing veto fizzle
* Pro-gun advocates crowd downtown Springfield for annual rally
* Illinois State Fairgrounds on endangered sites list
* Illinois Senate votes to raise age to buy tobacco to 21
* Illinois State Fairgrounds, Thompson Center on endangered sites list
* Prospects of gun dealer licensing veto override appear to be fading
* Illinois Proud Penny Drive gets boost from local organizations
* Under the Dome Podcast: Gun legislation showdown at the Capitol
* Senate OKs bill to increase home care workers' pay

* Illinois House says no to sales-tax 'bounty hunting'
* Illinois pays price for budget uncertainty in $500 million deal
* Illinois pays price for budget uncertainty in $500 million bond offering
* Trump tax-cap workaround picks up steam—and some legal backing
* Forget Caterpillar's freakout. The S&P 500 profit picture looks rosy


* Girl, 16, missing from Washington Park
* Woman accidentally shot by brother in Englewood
* Woman stabbed to death in Chicago Lawn
* Dear Abby: Husband blabs every secret I tell him
* Horoscope for April 26, 2018
* 2 Chicago Police officers injured in Far South Side crash
* Cubs lose in Cleveland but see winning trip as start of normalcy to season
* Arizona’s only black legislators chastised after race talk
* Man inappropriately touched himself as girls walked by in Jefferson Park: police
* 51-year-old man shot to death in South Shore: police


* Who is not in “Avengers: Infinity War”?
* Woman fatally stabbed, thrown from car on Southwest Side
* Ford to shed all car models except for Mustang and Focus over next 4 years
* DNA brings arrest of ex-police officer in Golden State serial killer case after decades
* Manhunt underway for suspect in killing of Maine sheriff's deputy
* Central American asylum seeking caravan reaches U.S. border
* GOP victory in Arizona still setting off alarm bells that Democrats could flip Senate
* Bears in position for a beautiful first night of the NFL draft
* Solo homers doom Cubs in 4-1 loss to Indians
* 2 in custody after retired officer kills man trying to carjack him: police


» Illinois Lawmaker Considers Legislation After Nashville Waffle House Shooting
» Gun Owners Rally In Springfield While Gun Dealer Lincensing Veto Remains
» April 25, 2018 - Full Show
» Illinois State Fairgrounds Named On Endangered Historic Places List
» Food, Agriculture And Politics In The Next Farm Bill; Evangelicalism In The Age of Trump
» A Flexible Schedule Is The Wellness Benefit Workers Want
» Bill Could Award Legionnaires’ Victims’ Families $2M From State
» Jailhouse Informant Bill Clears State Legislature, Heads to Rauner's Desk
» Time Running Out For Illinois' Gun Dealer Licensing Legislation
» April 24, 2018 - Full Show


* Schoenburg: Libertarian Kash Jackson wants to protect rights
* Plans to override gun dealer licensing veto fizzle
* Our View: Advisory group for SCVB could benefit city
* Our View: Legislators should adopt revenue estimate resolution
* Pro-gun advocates crowd downtown Springfield for annual rally
* Illinois State Fairgrounds on endangered sites list
* Illinois Senate votes to raise age to buy tobacco to 21
* Illinois State Fairgrounds, Thompson Center on endangered sites list
* Prospects of gun dealer licensing veto override appear to be fading
* Illinois Proud Penny Drive gets boost from local organizations


* Bela Milano restaurant enjoys boost from St. Elizabeth's traffic
* Lyric Theatre at Illinois: She Loves Me
* LaDonna Sue Clover
* Toni' Intravaia
* Donald Cranston
* Janna Hausler
* Norma Jean Ohlau
* Starletta Mae Kerley
* Phyllis Jean Borgsmiller
* Body found near Litchfield in Montgomery County


* Capela scores 26, Rockets eliminate Wolves with 122-104 win
* After shaky start, Chicago White Sox's Giolito looks to get into form
* Chivas wins CONCACAF title, beating Toronto on penalty kicks
* Baseball: Libertyville powers past Stevenson
* Boys tennis: Kernagis leads Glenbard West past Wheaton North

* Krishnamoorthi presses White House for res...
* Are Illinois Congressmen safe in wake of D...
* It's official: If you prepaid your propert...
* A quick look at a few congressional races ...
* Illinois Republicans honor Barbara Bush
* GOP breaks the glass as House outlook dark...
* Letter: Congrats, Rep. Hultgren - Northwes...
* Pioneer Center for Human Services to hold ...
* Illinois Credit Union League focuses on ad...
* Indians feel that US is no longer immigran...

* Bipartisan prison reform bill stumbles in ......
* Kushner-backed prison reform bill stumbles......
* A like for Europe's new policies on Facebo......
* Jackson troubles shine light on a fact of ......
* Durbin praises FDA's new measures cracking......

* On Twitter, Hillary Clinton is a 'wife' ab......
* Tammy Duckworth and Working Moms Like Mine...
* The Senate celebrates Sen. Tammy Duckworth......
* Editorial: Up to the task...
* I'm a legislator and a mom. Tammy Duckwort......

* Chicago’s ugly brawl for 2018 may well be within the Tribune ranks itself
* Arizona.
* Arizona solidarity.
* Why Is Online Learning Seeing a Surge in Popularity?
* Why an iTunes Model for Online Learning Is Bad for Educators
* Microsoft launches new online training courses for aspiring AI engineers
* How AI and machine learning are redefining cybersecurity
* Virtual reality excites Baylor students, professors for the future
* Granite State College Closes Claremont Campus
* Dispensary block parties, THC dinners, and more 4/20-friendly events


* IEMA Highlights Role of Volunteers in Disasters
* Governor Rauner activates State Emergency Operations Center in Springfield
* February Flooding Information
* IEMA Urges People to Prepare for Severe Weather
* Governor issues state disaster proclamation for flooding in Iroquois, Kankakee, Vermilion Counties

  
* Real Boxing devs preparing to launch top-down shooter Space Pioneer in May
* Samsung breaks quarterly profit records yet again, mostly thanks to chips and high-end phones
* Google’s new Tasks app gets the job done, but just barely
* Amazon fixed an Alexa flaw that allowed devices to eavesdrop
* Nintendo Switch drives staggering 500 percent profit jump
* Optus announces wholesale mobile deal with TravelSIM
* HTC U12: All the rumors in one place (Updated April 26)

* White Sox Minor League Update: April 25, 2018
* Kopech, Adolfo among prospect performers
* Your Fan Questions Answered!
* Giolito opens 5-game set in Kansas City
* Bats let Felix off hook, stymied by 'pen in loss
* Abreu day to day with flu-like symptoms
* Moncada hits 1st leadoff HR -- off King Felix


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller