* Assistant DCEO Director Andria Winters and I didn’t hit it off too well. The first time we ever talked we wound up in a loud and extended state policy argument and didn’t speak much to each other for weeks afterward. We’ve long since patched things up, however, and I always get a kick out of hanging with her and her husband Aaron. Those two are something, man.
Winters leaves DCEO today to become Intersect Illinois’ new president. Intersect Illinois is described as: “A private organization working collaboratively with the Department of Commerce to increase our competitiveness for jobs and investment.” It’s the privatized DCEO, basically.
Andria was the policy director for Motorola Mobility and was also director of strategic initiatives for the company’s foundation. She worked for US Sen. Mark Kirk in a high-level job and currently serves on the Illinois Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s board of directors. We still don’t always agree, but she’s a darned good person.
From a press release…
“Intersect needs leaders who understand the best that Chicago and Illinois offer. Andria brings a wealth of knowledge of key regional growth sectors as well as how to break down bureaucratic barriers for business,” added Ted Souder, Head of Industry, retail for Google. “She is a great addition to the team and will be an important conduit for businesses and economic development organizations.”
“My concern with the proposal so far, is they’re largely based upon re-ramping the payment schedule and slowing down the payment schedule and backloading it,” he said. “That’s what we’ve done in Chicago for decades and it’s the reason Chicago has the worst credit rating of any city other than Detroit.
* Well, the inimitable Fran Spielman put one and one together and got veto threat…
Although the City Council easily approved the mayor’s plan to slap a 29.5 percent tax on water and sewer bills to save the Municipal Employees pension fund, the Illinois General Assembly still needs to sign off on employee concessions tied to the deal as well as the funding schedule.
Same goes for the mayor’s plan to save the Laborers pension fund, bankrolled by a previously-approved, 56 percent tax on monthly telephone bills. […]
In an emailed statement, Molly Poppe, a spokesperson for the city’s Office of Budget and Management, said the governor fails to recognize that Chicago is moving “from a woefully insufficient contribution level set by state law that ensures bankruptcy in the next ten years to a responsible payment plan with a ramp” to an “actuarially required contribution” that “ensures actuarial funding in perpetuity.”
Pressed on whether Rauner was, in fact, threatening a veto, his spokesperson Catherine Kelly would only say that the “dialogue” continues about “enacting comprehensive pension reform for both the city and state.”
“Unlike the state, the city of Chicago is taking steps to address its challenges head-on . . . While the state’s credit rating is susceptible to rating downgrades, we think Chicago’s identified pension funding proposals should forestall further downward rating pressure,” the report states.
“Illinois’ unprecedented budget impasse is ultimately political and the path to compromise is still unclear . . . By operating without a budget for so long, state leaders have created a structural budget gap too severe to address without significant new revenues or drastic cuts.”
The last time Rauner vetoed a Chicago pension bill, both chambers overrode it with a couple of House Republicans jumping on board. So, a veto might be futile again. We’ll have to see.
So, essentially he paid a blackmailer in the Philippines. For what? Well, that’s apparently blacked out above. And then the blackmailer wanted even more money and that’s when things got really weird.
*** UPDATE 1 *** Oof…
In statement, frmr Rep. Ron Sandack says he was target of int'l crime ring that lured him to engage in "inappropriate online conversations."
*** UPDATE 2 *** From what I’ve been able to discern from reading online stuff, the first thing to do when this happens is to shut down all social media accounts so that the blackmailer can’t ping friends/contacts/followers. Sandack, you will recall, abruptly shut down his social media accounts several days before he abruptly resigned. Sun-Times…
Sandack said counterfeit social media accounts started appearing, which he said jeopardized his online identity.
“Nonetheless, I was a victim. Poor decisions on my part enabled me to be a victim and, as a responsible citizen, I reported it and have been working with the police throughout their investigation,” Sandack said in the statement. “I want it to be clear that no aspect of my involvement in this incident was related to my position as a State Representative nor was the computer state property.
“I’m human. I made a mistake for which I am remorseful and ashamed; especially because I have hurt my family, and there is no greater self-inflicted wound than that.”
*** UPDATE 3 *** Ain’t that the truth…
Jim Durkin: "I respect Ron Sandack’s decision to resign on July 25 and believe he did the right thing."
* From the Sun-Times write up on yesterday’s editorial board debate with the comptroller candidates…
Mendoza’s campaign has also sought to highlight that Munger has listed Elizabeth Brandt, mayor of Lincolnshire as her campaign chairwoman. Of importance is that Lincolnshire in December adopted right-to-work rules, passing a controversial labor ordinance that gives union-covered employees the option of whether or not to pay dues.
But Munger on Thursday denied Brandt’s involvement in her campaign, calling it an “error” that she did not remove her from paperwork filed with the Illinois State Board of Elections.
Brandt’s name is still listed on her paperwork for her comptroller campaign.
* That’s not all the comptroller said. Munger claimed that she didn’t really get her comptroller campaign off the ground until this year. “I did not update my paperwork,” she said.
* If Brandt wasn’t such a gung-ho poster mayor for a hugely controversial attempt to impose a local “right to work” ordinance (with a big assist from the legal arm of the Illinois Policy Institute) this would be no big deal. But she is, so it’s a legit issue whether Munger or the Republicans or anybody else care to admit it. If you elevate a person like that to such a place of prominence in your official campaign, you have to answer for it.
And because the Illinois attorney general has declared ordinances like the one that Brandt engineered illegal, it’s not just a local issue. It’s a statewide issue because if Brandt and the Illinois Policy Institute succeed, other municipalities could follow. Keeping her on as campaign chair for ten months after that ordinance passed implies agreement.
And, by the way, as I write this, she’s still listed as Munger’s campaign chair.
…Adding… From the Munger campaign…
Susana Mendoza was Rahm Emmanuel’s outspoken Campaign Co-Chair. If she wants to play guilt by association, we ask her;
Does she take responsibility for Rahm Emmanuel’s record $543 million property tax hike?
Does she responsibility for Rahm Emmanuel’s $239 million water and sewer tax hike?
Does she take responsibility for Rahm Emmanuel’s $60 million garbage collection fee?
Does she take responsibility for Rahm Emmanuel $48 million taxi and ride hailing service fee hike?
Does she take responsibility for Rahm Emmanuel’s $40 million amusement tax hike on computer “cloud” services and streaming?
Emanuel is spelled with one “m,” and despite saying it was an “error” to not file paperwork changing her campaign chair, Munger still hasn’t done it.
Otherwise, what do you think?
…Adding Even More… Apparently, Ms. Brandt didn’t get the memo about not being involved…
Illinois may be operating on stopgap budgets into 2019, a local legislator warned this week.
“I want to be blunt with you,” state Sen. Pat McGuire, D-Joliet, told the Joliet Junior College Board of Trustees on Tuesday. “I hear from more and more of my colleagues that we might force Illinois to subsist on stopgap budgets through fiscal year 2019.” […]
He said the forecast for more stopgap budgets is based on a belief that Gov. Bruce Rauner will continue to attach his turnaround agenda proposals to full-year budgets. Democrats have opposed the Republican governor’s turnaround agenda. […]
McGuire said funding problems facing higher education also has led to talk of consolidating some of the state’s nine public universities. Possibilities being discussed, he said, include combining Eastern Illinois University with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as well as combining Chicago State University with the University of Illinois at Chicago.
Thoughts?
*** UPDATE *** Oops…
Senator Pat McGuire, D-Joliet, issued the following statement to clarify his recent remarks regarding the status of higher education in Illinois.
“I am not aware of any discussions at any level of government about consolidating state universities. What I attempted to say at Tuesday’s Joliet Junior College Board of Trustees meeting is that absent any apparent plan to stabilize Illinois higher education, suggestions are being tossed about. I regret I did not communicate that clearly, and I regret any harm done to those schools named.
“I am eager to work toward an Illinois higher education plan.”
* The Southern Illinois has been interviewing legislative candidates. Here’s part of the paper’s sitdown with Sen. Gary Forby (D-Benton)…
“We’ve got to sit down and make things work. We’ve got to tighten our belt up. You’ve got to cut back.” Forby said legislators need to go through the budget line-by-line and look for areas to cut before they consider a tax increase. He said only then would he consider a new proposal to raise revenue.
Asked whether he thought that had not happened in the past, Forby, who has been in the General Assembly since 2001, said there’s more work to be done. He said he’s never voted for a tax increase because of that. Forby said one area where he thinks the state could save money is in the elimination or reforming of Central Management Services, because he believes that agency causes many duplication of services throughout state government. But he did not name other big-ticket items he could support cutting. Rather, Forby talked only in general terms about the need for the state to tighten its belt. […]
Forby said that to the best of his knowledge he has not supported a tax increase during his time in the General Assembly. He voted against temporarily raising the corporate and personal income tax in 2011 that then-Gov. Pat Quinn signed into law. According to newspaper records, Forby supported a similar bill to raise the income tax in 2009 that didn’t become law, making a last-minute decision to change his vote from “present” to “yes.”
“I cannot go home and throw my nursing homes out in the street, shut my hospitals down and not pay our bills,” Forby was quoted as saying after the vote. “It’s definitely going to hurt me, but you know what sometimes you have to do the right thing. You just can’t lay back and hide all your life.” Forby has been criticized by his opponent for that vote. Forby said this week he didn’t recall that vote.
“I don’t think I’ve voted on taxes since I’ve been up there,” he said.
Still, going forward, Forby said he believes that “everything should be looked at” when it comes to finding ways to balance the budget. Whatever is passed will need bipartisan support, Forby said.
“It’s time for Gary Forby to stop lying in a desperate attempt to save his political career and start telling the truth. He voted to nearly double the income tax and expand the sales tax.” - Illinois Republican Party Spokesman Steven Yaffe […]
(I)n 2009, Forby voted for a $5.2 billion tax hike on all Illinoisans. The bill would have doubled the state’s income tax and expanded the sales tax. Forby then defended his vote, telling the Southern that, “sometimes you have to do the right thing.”
Forby should “do the right thing” and be honest about his record.
* While we’re on the topic of southern Illinois, click here to check out an op-ed by Jimmy Dean, a local radio personality. Dean writes about the various candidates’ positive attributes. Quite refreshing in this day and age.
Human Rights Campaign criticizes Schneider ad in IL-10: The gay rights advocacy group is taking issue with a new TV ad that former Democratic U.S. Rep. Brad Schneider is running against Republican U.S. Rep. Bob Dold in the North Shore 10th Congressional District.
In the ad, a female narrator says: “Dold and the Republicans even said employees could be fired, just for being gay.” The picture accompanying the words shows Dold in between photos of Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and GOP House Speaker Paul Ryan.
Dold is the only House Republican to receive the endorsement of the Human Rights Coalition and Dold was the first House Republican to become a co-sponsor of the Equality Act.
“Bob Dold has repeatedly voted in favor of federal nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ people. And he has made clear through his votes and support for marriage equality that he believes in a world where everyone, including LGBTQ people, can live free from fear of discrimination,” David Stacy, the group’s government affairs director, said in a statement.
To back up its claim, Schneider’s campaign website cited a January 2010 interview Dold gave to WLS-AM 890 radio.
“Dold said gay people shouldn’t be given ’special rights’ to ensure that employers are prohibited from firing someone because of their sexual orientation,” the Schneider campaign says in a footnote.
The DCCC also points to a vote Dold took earlier this year. He joined six other Republicans who support gay marriage in opposing an amendment that would have kept the prohibition on anti-LGBT discrimination by federal contractors out of a bill that created the option to review and repeal federal regulations.
The Dold campaign insists that the vote — on a so-called motion to recommit — was a procedural maneuver, not a substantive policy vote. Most members of the majority party typically vote against motions to recommit.
Dold voted for amendments offered by Reps. Sean Patrick Maloney and Scott Peters that protected President Barack Obama’s executive order prohibiting discrimination against LGBT employees of federal contractors.
* Um, wouldn’t it be better if they just worked out their problems with the guy and keep him around? I mean, for crying out loud the university has been screaming about the lack of money for well over a year, just laid off a ton of staff, and now they’re gonna shell out big bucks to get rid of a guy who has received high marks from faculty and other leaders? This makes no sense…
Sources: severance for outgoing #CSU president Calhoun, let go after 9 months on job, could be as high as $600,000 #ChicagoTonight
Faculty members say Calhoun’s hands were tied when he was hired. The board of trustees created a four-person management team that consisted of Calhoun and three other administrators that would make all the administrative decisions. The professors we spoke to say those other administrators are close with the trustees and with the university’s former president, Wayne Watson – whose own tenure was marked by scandal, but who was being paid severance and is currently on the board. They believe Watson and other trustees wanted to call the hiring and spending shots, and that Calhoun suffered from one fatal flaw.
Rauner said this week that his administration will look closely at appointing new trustees to the board. Four trustees’ terms are up in January.
“I’m still trying to sort out, our team’s trying to sort out, exactly what’s going on there,” Rauner said Thursday. “We’re going to do a thoughtful process to try to find highly qualified individuals to serve on that board. The second thing I’ll say is, Chicago State is a very important institution. We’d like to see them do well. I would like to be very supportive of them. But in the past, for many years, they’ve had management problems and they’ve had significant financial difficulties. And I’d like to see them better run.”
Trustees at financially troubled Chicago State University voted Friday to approve a separation agreement with President Thomas Calhoun Jr. that includes a $600,000 payment.
The vote was 6-1 to accept Calhoun’s resignation. Trustees are scheduled to choose an interim president later Friday.
Former Gov. Jim Edgar and Chris Kennedy, former chairman of the University of Illinois Board of Trustees and son of the late Robert F. Kennedy, will speak at a luncheon called “Elections 2016: Candidates, Chaos and Consequences” in Springfield on Sept. 27.
The Better Government Association program will feature BGA president and CEO Andy Shaw having a “candid conversation” with Edgar and Kennedy about the election season. Natalie Bomke, reporter and anchor at Fox 32 TV in Chicago and daughter of former state Sen. Larry Bomke, R-Springfield, will be emcee.
There are several local sponsors to the event, with Isringhausen Imports the presenting sponsor.
* After releasing his doctor’s report this week which claimed he has made a “full cognitive recovery,” Sen. Mark Kirk is now running a TV ad about his stroke…
The Kirk For Senate campaign has launched a new television ad, titled “Determined,” highlighting Senator Mark Kirk’s determination to recover from his stroke and represent Illinois with fierce independence.
I remember holding the hand of the paramedic and knowing something was very wrong.
I thought that was the last human being I would ever touch.
As I learned to walk and climb again, I thought of our Illinois families struggling to get by.
After facing death, Mark returned even more committed to serve.
Bucking his party to support marriage equality and fight to combat gun violence.
I was determined to return to the Senate, to do the job you elected me to.
* Rolling Meadows Mayor Tom Rooney basically now has a lock on replacing former Sen. Matt Murphy, who officially submitted his resignation today. The last remaining major candidate, Palatine Township Republican Committeeman Aaron Del Mar, has dropped out and endorsed Rooney. From Del Mar…
For those of us who believe in reform and know change is desperately needed in Springfield, nothing is more important than a strong, unified Republican Party. That is why today I am withdrawing from consideration for the Senate seat in the 27th district and endorsing Tom Rooney. Tom has been an effective, reform-oriented mayor in Rolling Meadows and I’m confident he will bring the same type of leadership to Springfield. I look forward to continuing to serve at the local level.
The vote was likely going against Del Mar anyway, but this all but seals the deal.
*** UPDATE 1 *** This is a nice gesture for a retiring member…
Illinois Senate Republican Leader Christine Radogno announced today the appointment of Senator Dave Luechtefeld (R-Okawville) as Deputy Minority Leader. Radogno made her announcement as the resignation of Senator Matt Murphy, announced last month, became official on Thursday.
“I have had the privilege to know and work with Dave Luechtefeld for 20 years,” said Radogno. “Dave is a tireless fighter for the needs of southern Illinois, while also demonstrating his leadership skills and ability to see the state as a whole. Dave and I began our careers as freshman seatmates on the floor of the Illinois Senate. With this appointment, he will end his career as my seatmate.” Luechtefeld, who has served in the Illinois Senate since 1995, was previously serving in leadership as the Assistant Minority Leader.
“I appreciate the opportunity to serve as Deputy Leader through the end of my term,” said Luechtefeld. “As Illinois continues to face many difficult challenges in the months ahead, I am hopeful that as Deputy Leader I can contribute in a new way in meeting those challenges.”
Today’s appointment takes effect immediately. The position carries no increase in salary. Luechtefeld is not a member of the General Assembly retirement system and will receive no General Assembly pension.
Northwest suburban Republicans on Thursday chose Rolling Meadows Mayor Tom Rooney to replace departing state Sen. Matt Murphy, a move that came after a string of other candidates dropped out of the running.
Rooney, 48, says he’ll step down in the coming weeks from his village post as he transitions into representing the 27th Senate District, which includes parts of Palatine, Mount Prospect, Prospect Heights, Arlington Heights, Rolling Meadows and Inverness.
* Gov. Rauner was asked today about the transportation funding “lock box” constitutional amendment that voters will have a say on this November.
You’ll recall that the Tribune fiercely editorialized against the proposal, calling it “Illinois’ diabolical ‘Safe Roads Amendment.’” You might also recall that Rauner’s former chief of staff is working on behalf of the proposed amendment, so it’s highly doubtful that Rauner actually opposes it.
The governor’s response…
Um, that’s a good question. I’m, I’m really not gonna comment on it. It’s going through its own process.
The Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES) announced today that the unemployment rate in August decreased -0.3 percentage points to 5.5 percent and nonfarm payrolls decreased, based on preliminary data released by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and IDES. The decrease in Illinois’ unemployment rate is largely due to a decline in the labor force. Job growth is still below the national average, with Illinois -46,400 jobs short of its peak employment level reached in September 2000.
“In this 30-day snapshot, manufacturing losses were heavy, which contributed to more than half of the month’s decrease in nonfarm payroll jobs,” said IDES Director Jeff Mays. “The surveys have shown a great deal of fluctuation over the past year; seeing how the numbers develop over the long-term should make the trend clear.”
“Illinois residents continue to drop out of the workforce at a concerning rate, driven out by the steady loss of jobs and anemic growth,” DCEO Acting Director Sean McCarthy said. “If our state enacted the structural reforms necessary to get Illinois growing at the national rate, we could create 200 new jobs every day and put Illinois back to work. Instead, the state lost 8,200 jobs and nearly 20,000 people gave up looking for work.”
In August, the two industry sectors with the largest gains in employment were: Leisure and Hospitality (+3,400); and Professional and Business Services (+2,000). The three industry sectors with the largest declines in employment were: Manufacturing (-4,400); Financial Activities (-2,600); and Education and Health Services (-1,900).
Over the year, nonfarm payroll employment increased by +40,100 jobs with the largest gains in Leisure and Hospitality (+23,000); and Professional and Business Services (+17,000). Industry sectors with the largest over-the-year declines in August include: Manufacturing (-11,800) and Information Services (-3,600). The +0.7 percent over-the-year gain in Illinois is less than the +1.7 percent gain posted by the nation in August.
To put this into perspective, those 4,400 manufacturing jobs lost in just one month almost equals the 4,600 new manufacturing jobs created in Illinois over the last seven years.
Social service providers are appealing a judge’s dismissal of their lawsuit asking the court to force payment on contracts with the state of Illinois.
The Pay Now Illinois coalition said Thursday morning that it intends to appeal Cook County Judge Rodolfo Garcia’s Aug. 31 ruling to an Illinois appeals court. Garcia says the issue belongs in a higher court.
The coalition includes nearly 100 social service providers. The group sued in May over fallout from the state’s budget stalemate. They argue the state breached its service contracts and they are owed roughly $160 million collectively for services, including health care and programs to fight homelessness.
The list of appellants is now down to 47. Click here to see the full list. Mrs. Rauner’s Ounce of Prevention is still on the list.
DCCC Chairman Ben Ray Luján today announced that attorney and small-businessman C.J. Baricevic has earned a spot in the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s (DCCC) competitive Emerging Races program, indicating that his campaign has shown promising strengths and has demonstrated the ability to fight on behalf of hardworking people in Southern Illinois.
Since announcing his campaign for Congress, Baricevic has outraised his opponent Republican Mike Bost, was the first to air a television ad, and has received the endorsements of, among others, United Steelworkers and the Alliance for Retired Americans.
Baricevic is up against freshman GOP Congressman Mike Bost. We’ll have to see if the DCCC gets heavily involved or if this is just a press pop.
But Baricevic spokesman Barzin Emami said that while the campaign would take the help, it had issues with the national party. He had said earlier this year that Baricevic would welcome DCCC support, and a DCCC spokesman told the Post-Dispatch in April that it would never take the Bost-Baricevic race off its list of possible takeovers. […]
Baricevic has been trying to separate himself from the national Democratic Party and President Barack Obama on two key issues: trade and coal. Both are important in Southern Illinois, as steelworkers and coal miners have seen their livelihoods buffeted by international trade agreements and the Obama administration’s clean-power environmental push, which has helped cripple the coal industry.
Baricevic argues that clean-coal technology should allow for a better 20-30 year transition away from coal than Obama has pushed.
“We have never really been one to cater to the national party,” Emami said. “We don’t agree with all their platform. We are Southern Illinois Democrats. A Southern Illinois Democrat is different from a Nancy Pelosi Democrat.”
Pelosi must not poll well. So, it’s sort of a double-edged sword. But I’m sure they’ll be happy to have the dough.
What’s true is Leslie Munger flat out lied at the Chicago Tribune last week when she denied that her campaign chair is Elizabeth Brandt when official documents signed by Munger herself show Brandt, the leader of the movement to slash the paychecks of thousands of Illinois private sector workers, is in fact her campaign chair.
Brandt is the Mayor of Lincolnshire, Munger’s home town. She is leading the fight for a local “right to work” ordinance.
* The candidates are debating at the Sun-Times today…
Mendoza brings up Munger's listed campaign chair again. Munger denies she's still her chair. Mendoza brings out the paperwork.
According to the Illinois State Board of Elections, Brandt is listed as Munger’s campaign chair. [Munger’s campaign manager Phil Rodriguez] called the incident a misunderstanding Wednesday and confirmed that Brandt is the comptroller’s campaign chair.
I don’t get it.
*** UPDATE *** From Tina…
Hey Rich,
I’m writing a story now, but Leslie didn’t deny that Brandt is on the paperwork. She just denied that she’s involved in her campaign. She called it an “error” that she didn’t take her name off.
Meh.
A campaign chairperson has duties. And she’s been the chair for quite a while now.
* A new report from the US Census shows that Illinois’ median household income rose 3.7 percent to $59,588 between 2014 and 2015. That’s right about the national average increase of 3.8 percent.
Indiana’s median household income rose 2.1 percent during the same period to $50,532. Michigan’s rose 2.4 percent to $51,084. Minnesota’s rose 3.2 percent to $63,488. Ohio’s rose 3.5 percent to $51,075. Texas’ rose 4.8 percent to $55,653. California’s rose 4.0 percent to $64,500. And New York’s rose 3.3 percent to $60,850.
* Another Census report released today found that the number of Illinoisans living in poverty fell by 0.8 percent in 2015 vs. 2014, equal to the national average. That number is now 14.4 percent, about a point lower than the national average. Indiana’s fell by 0.7 percent. Michigan’s fell by 0.4 percent. Minnesota’s fell by 1.3 percent. Ohio’s fell by 1.0 percent. Texas’ fell by 1.3 percent. California’s fell by 1.1 percent. And New York’s fell by 0.5 percent.
More numbers, including the number of people living at less than half the poverty rate and those below 125 percent of the poverty rate are here. I have some errands to run, so have a look and discuss in comments.
The battle between Illinois Gov. Bruce Rauner and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel continues after the city council voted to raise water and sewer taxes.
Emanuel wants the money to go toward underfunded city pensions. He also needs Rauner and state lawmakers to approve his plan to change pension benefits.
But Rauner is critical of the mayor’s proposal.
“My concern with the proposal so far, is they’re largely based upon re-ramping the payment schedule and slowing down the payment schedule and backloading it,” he said. “That’s what we’ve done in Chicago for decades and it’s the reason Chicago has the worst credit rating of any city other than Detroit.
OK, I get that. But, to a lesser degree, isn’t that similar to what the governor tried to do when he failed to stop the Teachers’ Retirement System from lowering its presumed rate of investment return? That was a kick the can down the road moment if there ever was one.
Current and former members of the military and their families can enjoy free food and entertainment at the Executive Mansion Saturday as guests of Gov. Bruce Rauner and first lady Diana Rauner.
The Rauners are hosting Military Family Day to acknowledge their service.
“This is really an opportunity just to show our appreciation to current active-duty and veteran families,” Diana Rauner said in an interview Wednesday. “We make, of course, great ceremony of many events during this time, but this is one that it a little bit more of a low-key, fun way to show appreciation to families. That’s the most important part of all of this.”
Rauner described the event as “your basic down-home party with activities for children of all ages.” She said that will include baseball and football games, carnival games, crafts, music and a princess parade with Disney princesses, along with a visit from Big Bird and Elmo from “Sesame Street.” There will be a video game truck for older children, and the Illinois Historic Preservation Agency will be bringing some Civil War re-enactors to the event.
This Saturday’s event will be privately funded. Click here to RSVP by Friday (it says September 12th at the link, but that’s been changed).
A conservative-backed organization says it will continue efforts to topple the Illinois law limiting campaign contributions, after a judge ruled the law constitutional.
The law caps how much individuals, corporations, and political action committees can give.
Committees controlled by the legislative leaders are subject to caps too, but only in the primary. There’s no limit on what they can give to candidates during the general election.
Liberty Justice Center attorney Jacob Huebert says the law is set up to help the leaders maintain power.
“When you have that power, you really can make or break a candidate. You can say: Well, I have can give unlimited money to you, or I can give unlimited money to your opponent,” he said. “It’s very easy for the leader to be in a position to effectively buy off people, or threaten people, who would challenge his leadership. And so this ability to give all this money helps them stay in that position. They can use it to maintain their own power.”
* Here’s what the Illinois Policy Institute’s organization really wants to do, however. From Liberty Justice Center attorney Jacob Huebert…
We have only asked the court to strike down all contribution limits, not to impose new limits on anyone. If the courts ultimately strike the limits down, it will be up to the General Assembly to enact a new scheme of fair limits if it chooses.
And striking down all contribution limits for everyone would make life easier for… ?
* Arizona voters have a ballot question in November to legalize marijuana in small quantities. The story has an Illinois angle, so I thought you might like to see it…
The campaign to prevent cannabis legalization in Arizona recently accepted a half-million dollar donation from a pharmaceutical company accused of peddling a dangerous narcotic painkiller off-label.
Drug company Insys made the donation to Arizonans for Responsible Drug Policy on Aug. 31, according to information posted by the Arizona Secretary of State. The revelation has lent support to longstanding claims by legalization proponents that drug companies view cannabis as a source of competition for their more addictive, dangerous and expensive products. […]
The large donation from Insys to the anti-legalization campaign is particularly notable because the company only markets a single product: Subsys, a sublingual spray form of the synthetic opioid painkiller fentanyl. Fentanyl is stronger than heroin, highly addictive and can cause lethal overdoses. It was fentanyl that led to the accidental death of the musician Prince in April.
In August, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan filed a lawsuit against Insys, accusing the company of promoting Subsys to doctors for off-label uses, in violation of federal drug laws. Madigan claims that the company’s “desire for increased profits led it to disregard patients’ health and push addictive opioids for non-FDA approved purposes.” […]
A 2014 study by researchers from Johns Hopkins University found that states that legalized medical marijuana saw significant drops in opioid overdose deaths.
* From AG Madigan’s press release…
Attorney General Lisa Madigan today filed a lawsuit against the pharmaceutical company Insys Therapeutics, Inc. for deceptively marketing and selling Subsys, a highly addictive opioid drug significantly more powerful than morphine and intended exclusively for the treatment of breakthrough cancer pain, to physicians treating non-cancer patients for off-label uses like back and neck pain in an effort to rake in high profits.
Madigan alleges that Insys illegally marketed its painkiller to doctors who prescribed high volumes of opioid drugs instead of focusing its marketing on oncologists treating cancer patients, who are the intended recipients of the drug. Insys’ irresponsible promotion of a prescription opioid is particularly concerning as studies indicate that people who abuse prescription opioids frequently move on to using heroin as a cheaper and more readily available alternative. In fact, according to the American Society of Addiction Medicine, four out of five new heroin users started their addiction by misusing prescription painkillers.
“This drug company’s desire for increased profits led it to disregard patients’ health and push addictive opioids for non-FDA approved purposes,” Madigan said. “It’s this type of reprehensible and illegal conduct that feeds the dangerous opioid epidemic and is another low for the pharmaceutical industry.”
The lawsuit stems from Madigan’s investigation into allegations that Insys was marketing Subsys broadly as a treatment for breakthrough pain associated with chronic conditions, including back and neck pain, despite the lack of FDA approval for those uses. Insys also pushed doctors to prescribe the higher and more expensive doses of Subsys, contrary to FDA mandates aimed at keeping patients on the lowest effective dose.
Madigan’s investigation revealed that doctors across the country were rewarded for prescribing Subsys to non-cancer patients for off-label uses, including payments for sham speaking events and dinners at expensive restaurants. In Illinois, the top Subsys prescriber was Dr. Paul Madison, who wrote approximately 58 percent of the Subsys prescriptions in the state. Madison is an anesthesiologist who treats few, if any, cancer patients. More than 95 percent of the Subsys prescriptions written by Dr. Madison did not relate to breakthrough cancer pain. Madison was indicted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Chicago billing insurers for procedures he did not perform.
Madigan’s lawsuit against Insys seeks to permanently bar the company from selling its products in Illinois and impose financial penalties for violating the Consumer Fraud Act. Madigan’s office continues to investigate other opioid manufacturers for similar practices.
Nick Klitzing, executive director of the state GOP, said that while Rauner has supported the party over the last three years and is committed to “electing Republicans up and down the ticket who share his commitment to fixing Illinois through real reform, he is not involved in the day-to-day workings of any campaign.”
“Yeah, I’m asked that all the time and I do want to emphasize: I’m really not involved. People say, ‘Well, governor, you must be involved in these races.’ I’m really not involved in races,” [Gov. Rauner] said this week. “I’m encouraging everybody who … might be a public servant to get involved, I’m doing that; but I’m not involved in races per say — predicting races or advising races. I’m not involved in that,” he said this week.
Illinois Policy Action, an arm of the Illinois Policy Institute, is backing a new documentary called “Madigan: Power, privilege, politics,” which the group has dubbed “an unprecedented look at the life and influence of Illinois House Speaker Michael J. Madigan, one of the state’s most powerful political figures of all time.”
The 60-minute documentary is to be released in October — weeks before the November election — and will be available online and at “select movie theaters throughout the state,” a statement from Illinois Policy said.
The Illinois Policy Institute — and its CEO John Tillman — are closely aligned with Rauner, whose epic war with Madigan and Illinois Democrats held the state’s budget at an unprecedented impasse. […]
Those appearing in the documentary according to Illinois Policy: “Chicago Tribune columnist John Kass, University of Illinois professor and political observer Dick Simpson, former Illinois Senate President Emil Jones, law professor and former drafter of the 1970 Illinois Constitution Ann Lousin, former state Sen. Steve Rauschenberger, Rob Blagojevich who is the brother of former Gov. Rod Blagojevich, political blogger Rich Miller.”
The Emil Jones stuff ought to be good.
* This is the explanation I was given by the documentary’s producer…
Emergent Order, based out of Austin TX is trying to create a dialogue about why the state of Illinois is in poor shape. Many fingers have been pointed at Michael Madigan, but we’re trying to do a fair/balanced piece about what’s really at the center of it all. We’ve interviewed both people who support and dispute that Madigan is to blame. Interested in your take on that and any other relevant info you’d be willing to contribute.
Seemed harmless enough.
I had no idea that the Illinois Policy Institute was behind this thing, but I did get a couple of hints during Tuesday’s interview when some of the group’s stories were used as a basis for a few of their questions. They also asked me about Rauschenberger, which I thought was kinda odd.
So, I have no clue what they’re gonna do with my interview.
