Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Poll: Mendoza leads Munger 40-32
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Poll: Mendoza leads Munger 40-32

Tuesday, Oct 4, 2016

* More from the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute’s recent poll…

In the race for state Comptroller, incumbent Leslie Munger is running to retain the seat she was appointed to by Governor Rauner upon the death of Judy Baar Topinka. She is being challenged by Democrat Susana Mendoza. Mendoza is leading by a 40 percent to 32 percent margin among likely voters. There is a large 22 percent of the voters who remain undecided. […]

Mendoza is leading in the City of Chicago at 52 percent compared to Munger’s 23 percent. Downstate the incumbent, Munger, is leading by 43 percent compared to Mendoza’s 28 percent. The balance of power is held in the Cook county suburbs and collar counties where Mendoza is leading by 42 percent to Munger’s 28 percent.

* That collar county result seems odd to me. Just keep in mind that subsets have much higher margins of error than do the full statewide results…

I’ve seen a couple of other private polls on this race that I wasn’t allowed to share, but they were both pretty close to the state’s generic partisan ballot. This one isn’t far off, either. And it’s why Munger’s TV ad campaign is absolutely crucial.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

36 Comments
  1. - Ahoy! - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:25 am:

    Munger should feel pretty good about polling 23% in Chicago.


  2. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:26 am:

    Her ad where she is gleeful about not paying the Legislators is a bit much. First of all, she is lying about them not being paid, their pay is simply delayed like all other vendors. Second, they did pass a budget, a full one that was vetoed and then the stop-gap. So why are you not paying them (or delaying it) now? I’ve never seen such a jubilant hostage taker.


  3. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:28 am:

    I’m of the belief “see me in 2 weeks after the ads”

    The absolute biggest mistake if Munger loses will be the stalking out the clock with breaking the caps.

    Still feel that Munger should have broke the caps August 15th-ish, then spend, overall, $9 million in a mix of negative ads against Mendoza, after a 2-3 week introduction of Leslie Munger to Illinois.

    Mendoza won’t match the $5 million, think about 6 weeks ago until now and $4 million spent burying Mendoza and defining Munger.

    If Munger loses, by being “cheap”, the irony won’t be lost on me, that’s for sure.

    But…

    “See me in 2 weeks after the ads run”.


  4. - Team Sleep - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:28 am:

    23% in Chicago for Munger - with 22% undecided?! Wow. That is a high amount of undecided voters this close to the election. Unlike previous years the Comptroller’s office has been a steady story in the news and budget impasse.


  5. - muon - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:31 am:

    It looks like the poll lumps suburban Cook with the collar counties. If so Cook could make up half the total in that category. That would explain the suburban results.


  6. - The Captain - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:32 am:

    They’re combining the Cook County suburbs and the collar counties into one number. It’s more common to see that broken out into two separate numbers. The City of Chicago and the Cook County suburbs are about the same size and the five collar counties combined are actually greater than each of those so you usually see the three segments broken out, here it appears to be just two.


  7. - Anon221 - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:40 am:

    If Munger wins, Rauner wins. If Mendoza wins, Rauner will also “win”. He will use Mendoza as a Madigan connection in the blame game to further his bid in 2018. This is Rauner’s “investment” in Illinois.


  8. - chi - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:40 am:

    If Munger is counting on getting 23% in the City to win, she’s in trouble. Rauner only got 20% in 2014 and I don’t see her improving on those numbers.


  9. - Magic carpet ride - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:41 am:

    Madigan will educate the Mendoza campaign that Mungers campaign is funded by Rauner. There is a tremendous amount of money from Bruce but Bruces popularity is waning. Im glad Bruce is not electioneering… /s.


  10. - hisgirlfriday - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:43 am:

    Early voting has already started.

    If Munger’s ad blitz was supposed to push her over the top maybe it should have gone out sooner.


  11. - Honeybear - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:44 am:

    OW you’re quick! I hardly read Rich’s post before I began wondering what you would say.

    So you’re saying, wait till we see the effects of the money surge, then get back at me.

    Now here’s my question and it actually has to do with the recent AFSCME ad.

    Is there such a thing as the narrative high ground and is it more advantageous to seize and hold it first? So for instance, did Munger fail to seize the high ground first and is now defined by Rauners failure OR did she seize it with the Legislature nonpay, barely holds it, then Rauners money locks her in.

    The above polling makes me think she is just off the high ground, mid ridge, but fighting to retake it. Thus the 5 million to push Mendoza off. But can she when it seem that being labeled as the wingwoman hangs around her neck?


  12. - From the 'Dale to HP - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:49 am:

    Munger’s got a shot here… Mendoza better start working a little harder.


  13. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 9:52 am:

    ===So you’re saying, wait till we see the effects of the money surge, then get back at me.===

    Yep.

    Thus snapshot has yet to weigh and measure the Ad campaign and allow saturation, probably at a multiple 7-figure sum.

    This could very well be a basement.

    To your thoughts, and they’re valid, it’s more of a reflection of 1) POTUS voting universe 2) the 22% still undecided, and people are learning about this race 3) Munger not IDing herself as a Republican and thus separating the idea of the partisan split with the hopes of “oh, I like her, Munger”

    The race is literally just starting now. The high ground or positive/negatives leanings in this snapshot with 22% undecided seems to tell me, there room for all kinds of messaging to help, positive or negative.

    Can $5+ million close an 8-point gap with 22% undecided?

    Yes. Quickly. Very quickly.


  14. - Bigly Tronclodyte - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 10:04 am:

    I’d agree more with OW if there was more to Leslie Munger’s campaign than a rich white woman saying:

    “You better do what Daddy Bruce says, or else you don’t get paid.”


  15. - Tron - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 10:17 am:

    This poll is great news for Munger. Already at 23% in the city with another 22% up for grabs. $5 million in ads will only help. Factor in big upside opportunities with those downstate numbers and Munger is looking very, very good.


  16. - Honeybear - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 10:30 am:

    Bigly- Great name but I think OW is correct. 5 million on gap closing can do a lot of damage with a generally uninformed 22% undecided electorate. They watch TV and are I imagine impressionable.
    Look, case in point. I really try to engage in this blog every day. Because of that I imagine I’m in the 1% of informed Illinoisan on state issues. It wasn’t until 5 minutes ago that I looked up what exactly the Illinois Comptroller does. I had an idea but I really didn’t get why it was so important to Rauner, 5 million, important to Rauner till just a few minutes ago.

    So, if I didn’t get it, the majority of undecided won’t get it. That’s a bad place to be. Assumptions killed my Labor sisters and brothers last time. That’s why I personally participated in the calling of all AFSCME’s about this election. We have two phone banks up and running in Alton and Caseyville just for 2 locals 799’s and 1805’s. It’s not calls to the outside. ALL internal AFSCME TO AFSCME.

    We took OW’s suggestion to reduce the 2/5 union households who voted for Rauner

    VERY VERY Seriously.

    We have taken a lot of steps to inform and motivate

    70,000 AFSCME’s in this state.

    We’ll see if that’s enough to fight 5 million $.


  17. - Bigly Tronclodyte - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 10:39 am:

    @honeybear

    Don’t be complacent, but don’t despair either.


  18. - Streator Curmudgeon - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 10:40 am:

    Mendoza is mostly invisible downstate. Based on Madigan’s unpopularity, Democrats could take a hit as his “tools.”

    Who’d have thought there would be any interest in the Comptroller’s race?


  19. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 10:48 am:

    Ugh, my phone recycled …

    To THIS post…

    - Big Muddy -

    I guess we’ll see. You forgot to answer the 3-win and Munger loss question. Must be an oversight.

    - Honeybear -

    You’re on it. That’s YOUR (Labor’s) ball game.

    Control exactly what you can control and maximize your own impact at the highest possible levels in races that can use that impact and get the statewide messaging on Labor speaking with ONE voice.

    Then, then you can say, if you accomplish all that, you’ve done everything you could and the results show that hard work.

    Thanks for the hat tip, but it’s you and all those like you, individually and collectively recognizing where you need to be, not me.


  20. - Team Sleep - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 10:52 am:

    $5 million in a normally afterthought of a race is a lot - and that is just what was dropped last week. I’m sure there will be more. From what I saw over the weekend the ads were on during NFL games. Not cheap.

    Streator - think about it. When was the last time a constitutional office election was held during a presidential year?! I can’t think of one. It’s an oddity and in order to keep people’s interest the money and visibility have to be increased. This is also a “down payment” on 2018 for the full term, and if Munger can pull it out then she’ll have six full years as Comptroller when she runs in 2018.


  21. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 10:55 am:

    ===Munger can pull it out then she’ll have six full years as Comptroller when she runs in 2018.===

    Really?

    I count it will be 4 years. Is my math wrong?


  22. - Annon - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 10:57 am:

    —When was the last time a constitutional office election was held during a presidential year?!—

    1976


  23. - Team Sleep - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 11:06 am:

    Willy - whoops! I think I was going for a full term. Sorry about that. I had a Munger math moment. How’s that for some Tuesday morning alliteration?! :)


  24. - Team Sleep - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 11:10 am:

    10:57 - thanks. I was -4 years old during that election cycle. Hence why it is so rare: it happened 40 years ago.


  25. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 11:10 am:

    - Team Sleep -

    I fed you, you tipped it in brilliantly with an outstanding alliteration. You made the pass look better than it was.

    Maybe the next question is…

    Dear Mendoza Crew,

    Whadda got?


  26. - hisgirlfriday - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 11:11 am:

    I don’t buy the notion that this 22 percent undecided is really undecided in a persuadable sense. More like they haven’t been following the comptroller race, probably won’t follow it, and will probably vote for whatever party they come down for in the president and Senate contests.


  27. - Not It - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 11:23 am:

    I’ve never understood why Madigan even created this election. Isn’t it way better to just blame Rauner and his party for all the problems in state government? If Mendoza wins don’t the Democrats now have skin in the game?


  28. - hisgirlfriday - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 11:45 am:

    @Not It

    What is so hard to understand?

    Dems are up in the race at the moment. If they win, they can use Mendoza to squeeze Rauner on the budget in terms of how or what bills get paid. But just as a general matter of basic politics it’s better for Dems to have one of their own in power in a statewide office and Dems fare better in Illinois during presidential years and it’s easiest to unseat an appointed incumbent in their very first time running for election.

    And the notion that Dems suddenly have skin in the game via Mendoza but didn’t with Dem majorities in the legislature is just batty.


  29. - Union Dues - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 12:00 pm:

    It would seem to me that people who are still undecided come election day would likely vote party.


  30. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 12:01 pm:

    ===people who are still undecided come election day===

    Hence the ads.


  31. - Restore sanity - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 12:03 pm:

    I think it is lazy polling to not include all candidates that will be on the ballot. There are third party candidates who will be on the ballot and pull from the Republicans and Democrats. I really can’t take these polls seriously. Although, I would predict Clinton, Duckworth, and Mendoza win.


  32. - Six Degrees of Separation - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 12:25 pm:

    ===there are third party candidates who will be on the ballot==

    Name one who isn’t in the POTUS race. The Greens and Libertarians will cancel out each other’s 1% in the downballots.


  33. - Anon221 - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 12:28 pm:

    hisgirlfriday- “If they win, they can use Mendoza to squeeze Rauner on the budget in terms of how or what bills get paid.”

    True, but they need to be very careful on that tactic. Rauner is runnin’ for re-lection (not a typo-intended snark), and he will be sure to use any blockades by Mendoza as campaign fertilizer. “Because Madigan” will take on a whole new level of viciousness. Rauner doesn’t care if bills get paid or not. He doesn’t have any skin in the game. This is his retirement hobby.


  34. - Anonymouth - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 12:49 pm:

    To put those numbers in context, Freirichs got about 76% and Pat Quinn got 77% in 2014. Judy got a higher percentage because of who she was, not because of party. Those Chicago undecideds are going to break HARD for Mendoza.


  35. - walker - Tuesday, Oct 4, 16 @ 1:42 pm:

    Mendoza is in fact working very hard at retail politics all over the state. Munger has her outgunned both in ad messages, and in money to deliver them.

    I’m with OW — ask again in two weeks.


  36. - albl - Friday, Oct 14, 16 @ 12:36 pm:

    Munger’s family looks like a nice family in her tv ads, but they appear as if they came from a lilly white country club with their matching blue sports coats.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Question of the day
* It's (still) just a bill
* Just own it, dude
* *** UPDATED x1 *** FBI raids Ald. Austin's ward office
* Fun with numbers
* The hollowing out of state government
* Lightfoot pushes back against critics
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Campaign updates
* Two Bradys, two rhetorical approaches
* Justice Burke under fire again for appointments
* Crosstown open thread
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller