Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Roskam’s flip-flop on Trump
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Roskam’s flip-flop on Trump

Wednesday, Oct 12, 2016

* Last week, Congressman Peter Roskam told the Daily Herald this about Donald Trump

Roskam said the election is a “binary choice” and he was planning to vote for Trump.

* And then came Monday

Several suburban Republicans in Congress would not say Monday whether they are following House Speaker Paul Ryan in his decision not to defend or campaign for their party’s nominee for president. […]

U.S. Rep. Peter Roskam of Wheaton, previously the No. 4 member of the House who’s worked closely with Ryan, called Trump’s comments and the attitude that they reflect “disgusting and corrosive. They fly in the face of every lesson (my wife) Elizabeth and I taught our daughters and sons about how men and women should interact.”

Asked whether Roskam still intended to vote for Trump, Roskam spokesman Davis Pasch would not comment.

Roskam, in his statement, said of Trump: “He says he has changed and this is not who he is today. Political figures in the past have claimed to change, and some of them have been sincere. Donald Trump is the only person who can prove he means what he says now, and he’s got work to do.”

* On Tuesday morning, his spokesman e-mailed the paper

“I can confirm he is still planning to vote for Donald Trump”

* And then

Just hours after saying U.S. Rep. Peter Roskam was planning to vote for Donald Trump, spokesman David Pasch on Tuesday rescinded the remark.

Instead, Pasch released a written statement saying Roskam is undecided on how he will vote Nov. 8.

“Hillary Clinton has already disqualified herself by her actions and deeds,” Pasch wrote in an email Tuesday afternoon. “Donald Trump has 28 days left to convince him (Roskam) that he’s the right person to fix our broken tax code, bring accountability to the federal government, and restore American leadership to the world stage.”

- Posted by Rich Miller        

34 Comments
  1. - Federalist - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:31 am:

    So if these Republicans don’t vote for Trump are they going to come out and say they will vote for HRC, and why, OR that they do not plan to vote for President.

    A little honesty and courage, please.


  2. - Team Sleep - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:32 am:

    One of my favorite “Family Guy” moments came when Peter Griffin longingly looked back on his “soup vs. salad” decision and expressed disdain that he chose soup.

    This is not one of those decisions. Yes or no would suffice.


  3. - Anon221 - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:32 am:

    28 Days… think Trump can complete “rehab” in that amount of time??? Not likely.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BUSPNN8Svw


  4. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:33 am:

    I am a Roskam constituent and emailed him Monday asking him to help get Trump off the ticket. In this household Trump is costing the Republicans 5 votes. Some of them the party may lose for decades.

    Don’t k now what effect my email had, but am glad that Roskam is reconsidering.


  5. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:41 am:

    What wondrous revelations could 70-year-old Trump bring forth to convince these quivering GOP Towers of Jello like Roskam as to his fitness for office, after everything they’ve seen and heard over the last year?

    If you can’t make up your mind about Trump, one way or the other, how can you possibly see yourself as someone who should be making the tough decisions in Congress?

    Such weasel-word fear and cowardice — Rauner should make Roskam his term-limits poster boy.


  6. - Michelle Flaherty - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:42 am:

    C’mon Pete, this isn’t new for you.
    Did you vote for George Ryan?
    Did you vote for Alan Keyes?

    You’ve had plenty of practice at this.


  7. - Dance Band on the Titanic - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:42 am:

    If Roskam hasn’t been able to figure his decision out by now, what does he expect Trump to change over the next four weeks to help him decide?


  8. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:48 am:

    ===”Donald Trump has 28 days left to convince him (Roskam) that he’s the right person to fix our broken tax code, bring accountability to the federal government, and restore American leadership to the world stage.”===

    OMG! My coffee just squinted out my nose.

    Trump wouldn’t change if he had 28 years because he thinks there is nothing wrong with him.


  9. - Mama's Time- out - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:49 am:

    - Anonymous - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 10:48 am:


  10. - Aldyth - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 11:03 am:

    So, the only consideration is if Trump can fix the tax code, etcetera? His maltreatment of women and his objectifying them as nothing more than instruments of his pleasure is irrelevant, if he can fix the tax code?

    Wow.


  11. - Responsa - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 11:07 am:

    I pine (it’s futile I know) for the more respectful days when people did not feel entitled to grill others about (or some apparently feel forced to tell) what they are going to do in the sacred privacy of the voting booth, or publicly have to justify for whom they plan to vote. How about a simple generic “Just as everyone should, when I cast MY ballot I expect to vote my conscience and for the candidates whom I believe will best address the specific issues I most care about. Next question.” That response avoids a trap, would suffice, and is especially appropriate in a 24/7 news cycle world where circumstances in both parties at any time may affect or change views and opinions. It’s too late for this election but maybe pols will learn something about the fast moving video and digital world we inhabit and not make the same unforced errors next time.


  12. - @MisterJayEm - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 11:22 am:

    I’m stunned that the political protégé of Henry “Youthful Indiscretions” Hyde could be capable of inconsistent and partisan moral outrage.

    Stunned I tells ya!

    – MrJM


  13. - JS Mill - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 11:29 am:

    Roskam has little courage or character.

    Don’t, I repeat don’t, reference your wife an daughters and then essentially support Trump by failing to denounce him.

    Trump said he did certain unspeakable, unconscionable things to women. Bragged about it.


  14. - Stones - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 11:33 am:

    Very statesman like. Sheesh!


  15. - Cheryl44 - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 11:42 am:

    How are you going to get that man off the ballot? The ballots are printed and distributed. Some people have already voted.

    And after a year (which seems like 10) of Trump piling on every single one of us who isn’t a rich white man, why is this suddenly a problem for the GOP?


  16. - @MisterJayEm - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 11:47 am:

    “why is this suddenly a problem for the GOP?”

    Because the GOP cannot win elections without winning ‘college-educated white women’. Republican officials are making a mathematical decision, not a moral one.

    – MrJM


  17. - hisgirlfriday - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 11:54 am:

    What a toad.

    If Trump keeps going the way he’s going though I wonder whether we might see some surprise seats flip. 538 has an interesting map of how the county vote could flip toward either Clinton or Trump.
    Based on this, Roskam could be in real danger.

    Also, seeing this map makes me more annoyed by the DCCC going so crazy against Davis last cycle when he should be in so much more jeopardy now.

    http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/clinton-trump-vote-maps-2016/


  18. - dogtrot - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 12:15 pm:

    Hmm. Scurrilous, contemptible, arrogant? Yep, that’s Peter Roskam!


  19. - wordslinger63@gmail.com - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 12:19 pm:

    Responsa, when were those days that officeholders weren’t tied to the unpopular presidential nominee of their party?


  20. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 12:23 pm:

    Some of us Republicans have opposed Trump consistently on the basis of policy and temperament. The ick and outrage factor has added to our ranks. As OW says, it is the politics of addition.


  21. - Annonin' - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 12:32 pm:

    Is Petey tryin’ to hijack Darin LaHood’s title of Biggest Empty Suit IL Delegation?


  22. - Responsa - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 12:34 pm:

    Word–sure they were “tied”, and everyone in America understood that. But I don’t recall them talking about it, or the media pressing them on a daily basis to endorse or condemn their party’s nominee, do you? Trump is the current poster child. But Dems have had a few real stinkers too who would not have fared well in this anything goes environment. We are in uncharted territory now and I don’t see any good coming from it.


  23. - Team Sleep - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 12:38 pm:

    Friday - that was an excellent question. Perhaps they were concerned of a 2012 repeat (when Dr. Gill defeated Matt Goetten in a surprise primary upset)? Or when Daniel Davis took down a well-funded, Durbin-recruited Joe McMenamin during the 2008 primary? Unless the DCCC comes in and clears the decks - which is not really their strong suit - then that is a roll of the dice every time. Davis is formidable enough and has expressed support for unions and higher education. He is not a “Raunerite”, either.


  24. - Sir Reel - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 12:39 pm:

    “Trump” and “accountability” in the same sentence. Right.


  25. - Ron - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 12:49 pm:

    Internal Republican polling is now showing them losing the house. They have no one to thank but themselves for nominatimg Orange Mussolini.


  26. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 2:07 pm:

    Ron, If the polling holds, it will be a very busy two years. Unlike Obama, HRC will use that time to lock in solutions.


  27. - Illinois Bob - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 2:17 pm:

    Why are we surprised by all this GOP waffling? It’s worked for them in the past. We elected a GOP congress to end Obamacare funding and put enough pressure on the other side for real, useful health insurance reform, but they bailed on us once elected. WE elected them to stop the growth of the Federal government and minimize the deficit to the percentage of GDP growth, but they sold us out to get money to their buddies. They’ll say anything to maintain the power and privilege of office and few have serious commitment to those conservatives that elected them. Why should this be any different?


  28. - Ron - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 2:48 pm:

    Bull Moose, I agree. I had to vote for Duckworth in case the populace of our country is dumber than I think. We need a Democratic Senate to check Trump.


  29. - Ron - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 2:49 pm:

    My greatest joy was voting against my Democratic state Rep. Madigan needs to be stopped.


  30. - Mokenavince - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 2:57 pm:

    Roskam still undecided give me a break. We all know who we are going to vote for. Trump and Clinton are who they are. Trump has come close in the polls, but he is to far down now to beat her.
    The Trump will prove once and for all the party of No needs to change.


  31. - 60611 - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 3:15 pm:

    Remember when Joe Wilson (R-SC) shouted “You lie!” at Pres. Obama? Roskam was sitting right next to him.


  32. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 4:51 pm:

    60611 Guilt by association?

    Ron. Since Trump cannot avoid fighting with the Republican Speaker of the House, he has little chance of passing anything anyway.


  33. - DuPage - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 6:02 pm:

    I just saw reports that Trump made it a practice to walk in on women as young as 15 years old as they were changing into swimsuits. Trump explained that he owned the pageants and was just doing inspection tours. This won’t play well in Peoria, or DuPage County. You better get off the Trump boat, Mr. Roskam, before it sinks and pulls you under.


  34. - Illinois is a Socialist State - Wednesday, Oct 12, 16 @ 8:10 pm:

    Sissy Boy Republican


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Pritzker implores protesters to "not force a difficult second rebuilding on our small businesses in the course of expressing your very justified pain"
* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Pritzker thanks Dr. Ezike, extends financial protections, points to progress, says no more daily COVID-19 briefings - Calls Trump tweets "reprehensible" - "I want to send my condolences to the family of George Floyd, and also to every African American in this country" - Defends budget decisions - Credits Illinoisans for progress against virus - No bill signing ceremonies - Hopes testing progress continues - "It seems as if President Trump is withdrawing us from the rest of the world" - No out of state travel plans - Talks contact tracing - Asks Illinoisans to be careful during reopening - Will sign Medicare for undocumented seniors bill - Refuses to criticize Lightfoot for Trump comments - Talks about difficulties in securing testing locations - Dr. Ezike and Pritzker respond to question about what they've learned about themselves and leadership - "We're no longer in a stay at home order"
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller