Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x2 - NASW wants “bailout” for human services *** More problems for Exelon bill as governor’s office finds “poison pills”
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x2 - NASW wants “bailout” for human services *** More problems for Exelon bill as governor’s office finds “poison pills”

Thursday, Dec 1, 2016 - Posted by Rich Miller

[Subscriber protection removed because this story is getting out there.]

* As I mentioned at the bottom of the Capitol Fax today, the governor’s folks have found some “hidden surprises” in the Exelon bill. This was provided on background a few minutes ago…

Caucus staff and our staff are finding multiple concerns of items not agreed to and potential poison pills including loose cap language and expansion of prevailing wage.

While the governor agreed to a specific framework, it appears the speaker may be trying to play politics and put the bill in jeopardy.

The administration reserves its [amendatory veto] prerogative if a bill with poison pills for job creators reaches our desk — but it stands by the agreed framework.

*** UPDATE 1 ***   It’s having an impact…


* From the BEST Coalition

Exelon agreed to impose hard rate caps on all customers, but with more than $835 million in spending each year according to Exelon’s House testimony, making the math work was difficult. Pages 21 and 42 of HA4 make clear how they’re gaming schools, hospitals and all commercial and industrial (C&I) customers:

Comparing Apples to Oranges: Using “electric service” as the baseline against which Exelon applies its 1.3% rate cap for commercial and industrial customers including hospitals and schools almost doubles the potential rate increase. “Electric service” includes not just energy but many other energy products. A ZEC, by comparison, is simply priced as a megawatt hour (MWh) of energy. By comparing “electric service” apples to ZEC oranges, Exelon is ensuring far more $$$$ is available than the 1.3% suggests.

    For the 106 largest industrial customers (>10MW), HA4 specifies $59.80/MWh for “electric service” (page 21, lines 18-23), despite $30- 35 being the market price for large C&I customers in IL. Exelon max increase of $0.78/MWh instead of market-based $0.39 - .46/MWh.

    For all other C&I customers like hospitals, schools and retailers, HA4 baseline is $89.00 (page 42, lines 8-14) instead of the market price $35- 40. Exelon max capped increase of $1.16/MWh instead of $0.50/MWh.

*** UPDATE 2 *** From the NASW…

National Association of Social Workers- Illinois Calls For Bailout for Human Services

In light of the fact that it appears the Illinois General Assembly is poised to pass a last minute rate hike bailout for the Exelon Corporation, we are calling on legislators to pass a bailout for the thousands of jobs lost (and that are about to be lost in the human service sector) due to a lack of funding.

We commend the hard work put into the bailout for a corporation who posted a 2.27 billion profit last year, but humbly ask where is the bailout for the human service sector providers who are running up large amounts of debt to cover the state’s commitments?

We applaud the environmental groups who are getting entirely new spending on green initiatives through a ComEd rate increase, but inquire from the general assembly where is the bailout to pay for the spending for contracts that human service providers have already delivered on?

We have lost far more jobs than will be saved by the Exelon bailout, and we are positioned to lose even more in the coming months, however unbelievably it appears the priorities of the general assembly are to the shareholders of a utility company over our homeless, our mentally ill, our child care providers and our students.

The State of Illinois has limited dollars in which to pull from their citizens to service our human service needs before the burden becomes too high. Rather than using those dollars for general fund commitments, the general assembly appears to have chosen to pull some of those funds to save a disproportionate number of jobs and increase a utility company’s bottom line. We would prefer our tax dollars were used to bailout the Illinois social service providers rather then Exelon (via a rate increase).

We are also having a hard time reconciling the justification that a lame duck tax increase (that would finally help fund our human services) should not be done until the newly elected officials are sworn in, however an Exelon bailout in the final days is perfectly fine. Absent a human services bailout bill passing in one day, we request the general assembly follow their same logic and kick the Exelon bailout can to the next general assembly. Which hopefully will be an assembly who will prioritize the jobs of our human service providers with the same urgency the current assembly appears to be placing on bailing out Exelon/ComEd.

       

26 Comments
  1. - Anon221 - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 9:51 am:

    Providing great cover for distractions from the budget issue. Really telling that no one from Rauner’s office even deigned to attend and testify even though there were many requests to do so from the Chairs. Exelon and ComEd may very well get a taste of how Rauner’s CEO management style actually works.


  2. - RNUG - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 9:57 am:

    So it’s OK for one side to use poison pills … but not the other.


  3. - Nobody Sent - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 9:59 am:

    I wouldn’t be surprised if the hidden increases were all Exelon’s idea.


  4. - Ggeo - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 10:00 am:

    The caps clearly apply to the electric bill someone pays. BEST is saying that the caps should only apply to 1/3 of the bill. That’s just silly.


  5. - Anon221 - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 10:02 am:

    And, just in case you are keeping track, Amend 5 was filed late last night, and there is also an Amend 6 now.


  6. - anon - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 10:26 am:

    It will be interesting to see if Rep. McSweeney and Sen. Radogno vote for this lameduck bailout, even as they rail against lameduck votes on controversial issues.


  7. - anon - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 10:27 am:

    Who exactly is BEST? Why are their numbers or statements viable?


  8. - Team Sleep - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 10:31 am:

    I understand the caps issue. But in this instance it would be nice for the Governor to drop his indignation against prevailing wage and just get the deal done.


  9. - wordslinger - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 10:42 am:

    –We have lost far more jobs than will be saved by the Exelon bailout, and we are positioned to lose even more in the coming months, however unbelievably it appears the priorities of the general assembly are to the shareholders of a utility company over our homeless, our mentally ill, our child care providers and our students.–

    Rich, thanks for running the NASW statement. I am highly confident that you won’t see a sentence of it anywhere else in Illinois media.

    Because, you know, it’s all about that personality conflict between Rauner and Madigan and the “budget impasse.” No need to go any deeper than that.

    So Illinois consumers will get taxed in the form of rate hikes to pad the multi-billion annual profits of Exelon, while the state will continue to renege on contracts and run out of business non-profits that serve citizens in need.

    New day in Illinois, indeed.


  10. - JohnnyPyleDriver - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 11:11 am:

    When IL Sen Democrats posted this: “New amendments remove the “microgrid” language and reduced solar rebate, per industry exec. #SenEnrg”

    are they saying that the new amendments reduce solar rebate, or the new amendment removes the language that reduces the solar rebate? Where would i find clarification on this?


  11. - RNUG - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 11:14 am:

    == Where would i find clarification on this? ==

    Go to the GA web site, pull up the bill, and read the various amendments.


  12. - Anon221 - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 11:29 am:

    JohnnyPyleDriver- One of the main points by the AG’s Office at this morning’s hearing:

    It is wildly complex formula that needs to have a deep drill down, not a rubber stamp of trust. The ZEC (payment to the nuclear plants formula) is solid for 3 years minimum. After that, if times have gotten tougher for those two plants, Exelon can go ahead and opt out and close ‘em down. Forget about the supposed 10-13 year life span of this bill if signed.

    However, if rate increases and caps are not sufficient to cover the costs of each of the ZEC, Energy Efficiency, and Solar Rebate programs, guess which programs can immediately be scaled back. I’ll give you a hint- there’s two of them, and neither starts with a Z. So, WHO is this bill really ultimately for???


  13. - Dome Gnome - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 11:31 am:

    NASW has it right. Just say no to corporate welfare.


  14. - JohnnyPyleDriver - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 12:14 pm:

    ==Go to the GA web site, pull up the bill, and read the various amendments.==

    I tried that, but I’m not seeing anything about solar and i don’t really understand how to discover what language was removed. I’m trying to find the absence of something


  15. - JohnnyPyleDriver - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 12:17 pm:

    Anon221, so does the amendment remove that language or does the amendment set that forth?


  16. - Anon221 - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 12:27 pm:

    JohnnyPyleDriver- Now, I’m not being snide, OK :)
    Which Amendment??? They are up to Amend 7 now, I believe. I’ve been listening to the hearings as much as possible, and that is where I’m getting most of my info. I looked at Amend 5 (I think, it’s really getting confusing following this digital paper trail) last night, and there was a LOT of underlined language. That is generally new language, and most of it have to do with the rates. THIS is why this should NOT be voted on today. There are just too many moving parts. And now, there is Rauner spin (for example on the Illinois Review site) that he will now be the savior of the People of Illinois if he doesn’t sign this bill… Because of the Democrats who inserted the changes. http://illinoisreview.typepad.com/illinoisreview/2016/12/exelon-guilty-of-cronyism-across-state-lines.html

    The amount of spin to place the blame on the Dems when it was Rauner’s people doing the negotiating is just plumb crazy!


  17. - JohnnyPyleDriver - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 12:49 pm:

    Anon221

    I don’t know which amendment. I guess that’s probably the heart of my question. I don’t know which amendment I’m supposed to comparing language to. Here’s the tweet that sparked my question:

    “New amendments remove the “microgrid” language and reduced solar rebate, per industry exec. #SenEnrg”

    That was sent early this morning so it has to pertain to one of the first 5 or so amendments right?


  18. - Kegger - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 12:57 pm:

    JohnnyPyleDriver, the solar rebate was reduced by 50%, I believe.

    The amendments that they discussed in committee today were amendments 4 and 5 only.


  19. - Anon221 - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 1:02 pm:

    Johnny- It was probably Amend 5, at that point. Could have been in 4, though. Whichever one it was, the reasoning was to lower the overall cost of the bill. ZEC did get lowered, too, throughout this process, but what will be chipped away first will be the renewable language and programs from here on out. All Exelon really wants is the annual subsidy guarantee. The rest if just for compromisin’.


  20. - Anon221 - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 1:15 pm:

    JohnnyPyleDriver- Open Amend 3 as a pdf, then do a search for microgrid. Do the same for Amend 4. It looks like it was taken out of Amend 3. I didn’t find anything on microgrids in 5 at all.


  21. - JohnnyPyleDriver - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 1:29 pm:

    I was actually more interested in the solar stuff, and boy are there a lot of solar references. I’m starting to go through it now. Just thought I’d ask if somebody knew for sure what was changed.


  22. - JohnnyPyleDriver - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 1:36 pm:

    I’m seeing no reference to solar in Amendment 5. Lots of solar references in Amendment 4, but none appear related to the size of the rebate


  23. - Anon221 - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 1:54 pm:

    JohnnyPyleDriver- Look at Amend 3. There’s a lot of rebate language there that appears to have been removed in Amend 4. No actual rebate amount, just a lot of language that the Commission will have to establish guidelines, et al.


  24. - Ggeo - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 2:04 pm:

    Toward end of amendment 4, rebate was changed from 500 to 250


  25. - JohnnyPyleDriver - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 2:25 pm:

    There it is! How’d you know where to look Ggeo?

    So, for a small 5 kw home solar system, the rebate goes from $2,500 to $1,250.

    That sucks, but that’s more than they’re getting now. Looks like they can still also sell their Renewable Energy Credits, so that’s cool


  26. - Anon221 - Thursday, Dec 1, 16 @ 2:56 pm:

    See 1 pm Crain’s update. Dynegy is NOT happy…
    “(Dynegy CEO Robert) Flexon said in a follow-up interview that Dynegy will spend to defeat any downstate lawmakers who vote for the legislation hiking rates statewide to bail out the two money-losing nukes Exelon has slated for closure.
    If the bill becomes law, the company also will sue to overturn it on grounds it interferes with federal control of wholesale power markets. New York State’s program to subsidize Exelon-owned nuclear plants in that state already is the subject of such a lawsuit, and Dynegy is one of the plaintiffs. “I think you can look to New York to see what we’ll do next,” he said, referring to the lawsuit.”

    http://tinyurl.com/zjblzmq


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Today's quotable
* The Internet is forever, Rodney
* Edgar Fellows Class of 2024 unveiled
* Uber Partners With Cities To Expand Urban Transportation
* Governor Pritzker endorses Kamala Harris for president (Updated)
* Mayor Johnson's actual state ask is $5.5 billion, and Pritzker turns thumbs down
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Pritzker, Durbin, Duckworth so far keeping powder dry on endorsing VP Harris (Updated x7)
* Biden announces withdrawal from reelection (Updated x3)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller