Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » New House rules proposed by Leader Durkin
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
New House rules proposed by Leader Durkin

Tuesday, Jan 24, 2017

* Yesterday, a commenter wondered why the House Republicans didn’t propose an alternative to Speaker Madigan’s proposed rules, which have been sharply criticized by the GOP and the Illinois Policy Institute as autocratic.

Well, House Republican Leader Jim Durkin filed a rules proposal yesterday. You can click here to read through it. I asked the HGOP early this morning for quick highlights of some of their proposed changes…

1. Creates specific requirements for advance notice of Rules Committee hearings, including identification of the measures to be considered:

    One-hour notice for floor amendments & concurrence motions

    72-hours notice to consider referral of bills to committee

    24-hours notice for any other purpose

Currently, the Rules Committee often meets without providing any public notice; and it does not identify the legislative measures to be considered at the hearing.

Also requires a 2/3 vote for the Rules Committee to bypass standing/special committee consideration and advance floor amendments and concurrence motions to full House. In other words, such a motion to expedite business would require support from both the majority and minority party members of the committee.

2. Creates a public review period before action on committee amendments by requiring at least two-hours advance notice for an amendment to be considered in a committee.

Currently, committee amendments must be filed with the Clerk by 3 p.m. on the preceding day, but there is no requirement to provide public notice that such amendment may be considered at hearing of a particular committee.

3. Extends the Public Review Period for Floor Amendments (currently 1 hour) - Creates a longer public review period before committee consideration of floor amendments and concurrence motions by requiring that advance notice of a public hearing be given no later than the calendar day before the date of the hearing.

With the current one-hour notice requirement, a floor amendment can be filed, posted for a hearing, and adopted to the bill, and the bill passed by the House, all on the same day.

4. Restores a requirement in the House Rules that each bill be referred to a standing or special committee during the first year of a G.A. In 2013, the Democrat majority removed this decades-old requirement, thereby allowing the Rules Committee to kill a bill by preventing its consideration in a standing or special committee.

5. Second reading of bills during perfunctory session would be prohibited. In order to expedite the consideration of bills when the full House is not in session, the Clerk is often instructed to read bills a second time during the perfunctory session. This practice sometimes allows a bill to be approved by committee and then read by the Clerk on the same day, thereby allowing final passage on the following day.

Your thoughts?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

16 Comments
  1. - Lew - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 8:55 am:

    Not my job!


  2. - cgo75 - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 9:06 am:

    With Speaker Madigan’s tenure seems like he should be able to make the rules as he sees fit.


  3. - Honeybear - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 9:08 am:

    Is an hour enough. Seems like that requires that they have people on sight. Seems to cut out folks like me who find out hours later. I know I’m a learner but there are issues huge to me. If this stuff happens that fast I don’t even have time to email Rep. Stuart on my next break before its to late. Seems even the proposal is undemocratic. jeez if this is the improvement. I had no idea.


  4. - LakeviewJ - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 9:09 am:

    Mostly grandstanding. Leader Durkin has no supporting last minute gut-and-replaces when it serves his purposes.

    I’d be good with #4, and would go further to say every bill should receive at least a subject matter hearing, but only if it came along with limits on the number of bills a member could introduce.

    That’s not to say that the Madigan Rules shouldn’t change. I fully agree that the power should be diffused from the Speaker to the chairs and individual members of the majority party.


  5. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 9:10 am:

    I’m very pleased to see the HGOP Caucus engaged in this way by putting forward that they aren’t going to be “that” group of minority caucus with the “we kan’t do nuttin” mentality.

    I’m tried of members of the HGOP caucus that troll with their 140 character negativity while sitting in the body and complaining they can’t do “anything”.

    If the HGOP wants to end the defeated mentality that infects not only their caucus and those who closely follow the inter workings, this is the way to respond and say clearly, “You want us to stop whining and engage, here ya go”

    Good to see. Glad that a move like this is being done.


  6. - A guy - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 9:17 am:

    None of these proposals are unreasonable at all. Like HB, there are a couple that could even go a little bit further.

    The very purpose of having “rules” is to ensure fair play. You don’t have to bend them if they’re crooked in the first place.


  7. - Deft Wing - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 9:32 am:

    Watch for full committee hearings on Durkin’s proposed Rules with extended Floor debate and a vote on those proffered Rules to follow thereafter. /s


  8. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 9:48 am:

    - Deft Wing -

    I’m confused, you advocate the “mushroom-ing” of HGOP members?

    HGOP members and Durkin, don’t do anything, don’t propose or advocate anything…

    “It won’t go no wheres, so don’t do nuttin”

    That’s embarrassing to advocate.


  9. - Fixer - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 10:09 am:

    Better than I expected initially. I can see this slowing down some bills that don’t necessarily need the extra time, but those are few and far between. Overall I like this proposal.


  10. - Earnest - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 10:15 am:

    >I’m very pleased to see the HGOP Caucus engaged in this way by putting forward that they aren’t going to be “that” group of minority caucus with the “we kan’t do nuttin” mentality.

    Agreed. Good on Leader Durkin for putting something out there. It’s great, and too rare, to see someone offer an alternative when they oppose something.


  11. - Rabid - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 10:23 am:

    The GOP wants to right their wrong and change the rules at halftime for the win


  12. - Chicago_Downstater - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 10:48 am:

    @A guy

    “The very purpose of having “rules” is to ensure fair play. You don’t have to bend them if they’re crooked in the first place.”

    Well said!

    These rules seem–on their face anyways–to be reasonable & worthwhile.

    I don’t know if Madigan and the HDems will let them through, but I think they’d be foolish to fight them all. It might go a long way towards future negotiations if they give Durkin and the HGOP at least a few.


  13. - Hamlet's Ghost - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 10:51 am:

    The minority will want to slow things down and the majority will want “efficiency” - - if the GOP held the majority, each side would be arguing the opposite side.


  14. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 11:11 am:

    Why not go bolder? Skimming through the text, it looks like Durkin kept the insanely high number of committees in his proposed rules. Why not push for more structural changes like reducing those numbers?


  15. - Anyone Remember - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 12:40 pm:

    LakeviewJ
    “but only if it came along with limits on the number of bills a member could introduce.” That was the ONLY rule of Pate’s that Madigan didn’t keep. Pate limited senators to 5 introduced bills and 3 bills passed by the House.


  16. - DuPage Dave - Tuesday, Jan 24, 17 @ 6:17 pm:

    How’s this for a rule? Fewer secrets, more public review.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed until Tuesday
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Tribune asked 16 mayoral candidates to release tax returns, 6 complied
* A rough idea of what they're looking at
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Rauner was wrong about "record levels" of unionization
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY: Stava-Murray updates
* Pritzker's inauguration ball tix will benefit Cabrini Green Legal Aid Clinic and Illinois Fairgrounds Foundation
* Rauner claims he's been too busy to reflect on his term
* Pritzker's day in DC
* *** UPDATED x3 - Morrison wants emergency meeting of ILGOP - McConnaughay explains - Schneider responds *** Rauner says he tried to drop out of race after primary
* Feds re-raid Ald. Burke's office
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller