Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Today’s number: $700 million
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Today’s number: $700 million

Monday, Jan 30, 2017

* Tribune

The state has a record stack of unpaid bills that’s expected to hit $15 billion by July if nothing is done, and it must fork over interest when it’s late paying them. Putting a hard dollar figure on those interest costs is difficult, however.

A bipartisan budget-forecasting group says the state owes at least $370 million alone in interest on bills for state employee health care during the 18-month stalemate. The Democratic comptroller’s office estimates the state will have to pay $700 million on interest based on what it’s spending in the current budget year, a number more than twice the state’s previous high water mark. The Republican governor’s budget office declined to provide any estimate, saying it “cannot speculate” on future costs. […]

Rauner’s office has declined to put a figure on what the state will owe in interest due to the impasse. And until early December, Rauner was able to make that stick because the comptroller, Leslie Geissler Munger, would not provide an estimate either. Rauner appointed Munger to the job, but she lost to Democrat Susana Mendoza in the November election.

Mendoza’s office puts the state’s interest costs from this year’s budget at $700 million, acknowledging the ultimate figure is a “moving target” depending on how much more the state spends in the coming months.

The estimate is based in part on last year’s spending, when state government operated without a full budget but continued to spend money based on court orders, laws and spending agreements. Illinois is in a similar position this year, as a temporary six-month budget expired with the new year, once again leaving universities, social service providers and prisons without funding.

Not that I’m all that confident about this particular comptroller’s projections, but the governor’s budget office does cost projections all the time, so it’s kinda weird that they won’t do projections on this topic.

Every year, for instance, it has done a five-year cost and revenue projection. It also projects costs in every budget it puts together. And it only recently projected next fiscal year’s cost for the Senate’s grand bargain.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Precinct Captain - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 11:12 am:

    It is more than “kinda weird” that Rauner’s GOMB can’t come up with basic projections for interest payments. And their even weirder statement that they “cannot speculate” on future costs logically applies to their quest to invalidate the so called ‘grand bargain’ and whine constantly about health insurance and worker’s compensation insurance.

  2. - Last Bull Moose - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 11:24 am:

    As the reality worsens it becomes more important to hide facts and honest estimates.

  3. - wordslinger - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 11:26 am:

    –…so it’s kinda weird that they won’t do projections on this topic.–

    It’s not weird at all. The projected new revenues of the Turnaround Agenda does not even cover the juice, much less the principle, on the increased backlog of bills.

    Hard to keep your reputation as a “fiscal conservative” among some Chicago media types if that news gets around.

  4. - RNUG - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 11:26 am:

    The Governor’s office isn’t going to give Rich any numbers … because he actually reads them and does the math.

  5. - Finally Out - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 11:46 am:

    The interest amount has to be huge. As an example, I was just reimbursed a couple of weeks ago for dental work done in the fall of ‘15. Last week I received the interest check for $130.42! One claim for one person over a year old. We need a budget!

  6. - Sir Reel - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 11:48 am:

    Remember, this $700 million or whatever it is will be paid by taxpayers. What a waste.

  7. - Anonymous - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 11:49 am:

    “Rauner-controlled state agencies often hold on to vouchers for months before turning them into the comptroller’s office for payment, so how much the state will have to pay in interest this year depends on how much further Illinois falls behind on its bills.”

    Clumsy attempt to minimize the deficit by the Frat Boys?

  8. - Anon - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 11:51 am:

    I’m sure there are many small vendors who don’t like going without payment for their work. But I’ll bet there are some big ones, probably friends of Bruce, who are enjoying the impasse for the interest. If someone billed the state for $100 million two years ago that’s about $18 million in profit at 9% per year.

  9. - Steve - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 11:55 am:

    The great moments of balanced budget provisions , in the state of Illinois.

  10. - Blue dog dem - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 12:10 pm:

    I wonder if their cost and review projections use declining populations.

  11. - WhoKnew - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 12:15 pm:

    - Last Bull Moose -
    ‘As the reality worsens it becomes more important to hide facts and honest estimates.’

    I was gonna’say figures lie and liars figure, but your message is more on point!

  12. - Earnest - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 12:22 pm:

    A Governor who wanted a budget passed would be putting pressure on from a money perspective instead of touting accomplishing such as increasing state spending (schools). Wouldn’t be hard to post on a daily basis how much the lack of a balanced budget is adding to the ultimate cost to people of Illinois. That would have people focused on the passage of a balanced budget rather than who is speaker of one chamber of the legislative branch or to whom he gave clocks.

  13. - PublicServant - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 12:27 pm:

    ===Rauner’s office has declined to put a figure on what the state will owe in interest===

    Rauner’s office seems very adept at not putting figures on things…like his TA. He learned his lesson with Rich, I suppose.

  14. - Menard Guy - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 12:29 pm:

    Let’s see now, $700 million in interest to save $300 million in turnaround? Good lord, what have we allowed these people to do??

  15. - P. - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 12:45 pm:

    Just to get the editorializing part straight, the two-month-old comptroller’s office isn’t credible and the governor’s office is kinda weird since they are punting when it comes to critical budget stats resulting from the a crisis they have been steering for two years?

  16. - Dan Johnson - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 1:03 pm:

    Can we amend the Prompt Payment Act so the Fortune 500 companies who are owed lots of money don’t collect 18% interest a year? I appreciate the little guy could use the juice, especially to get a loan from one of these companies that have popped up, but the big guys really don’t need the interest. Maybe we only pay 18% on the first 20 million and after that we just pay the prime rate?

  17. - Demoralized - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 1:18 pm:

    ==Rauner-controlled state agencies often hold on to vouchers for months==

    ==Clumsy attempt to minimize the deficit==

    This isn’t a new thing, though it is much larger in scale than before. You can’t send a bill to the Comptroller for payment if there is no money to pay it. You have to hold it at the agency until there is money to pay it.

  18. - Anonymous - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 1:18 pm:

    Wife, a State retiree, just got reimbursement on a dental from June, 2015. Yes, 2015! Bill was $150: interest she got was about $22.

  19. - CapnCrunch - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 1:52 pm:

    “Can we amend the Prompt Payment Act so the Fortune 500 companies who are owed lots of money don’t collect 18% interest a year? …”

    How about allowing the State retirement systems to purchase all these accounts receivable from vendors. The vendors get paid on time and the retirement plans earn the 18%. It’s as safe as buying US Treasury bills.

  20. - Annonin' - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 2:00 pm:

    Here is a surprise that seems to be missing from Tribbie piece. The amount of interest is in part tied to who gets into the vendor assistance and when

  21. - Dan Johnson - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 2:17 pm:

    Great idea CapnCrunch, but it’s still taxpayers shelling out money we don’t need to.

  22. - CapnCrunch - Monday, Jan 30, 17 @ 2:55 pm:

    You’re right Dan. But as long as this mess exists the $$ at least are going to help pay a debt that taxpayers are ultimately responsible for rather to the pockets of private investors. And we get the economic effect from the circulating $$.

  23. - Rabid - Tuesday, Jan 31, 17 @ 7:26 am:

    Tax boost Bruce will have quite a record to run on for reelection

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Question of the day
* Veterans Affairs official who almost became director had to resign over sexual harassment, racial slurs
* *** UPDATED x1 *** False advertising?
* Sharkey tries to have it both ways
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Skillicorn to face primary opponent
* Elections have consequences
* *** UPDATED x1 *** South suburban leaders say they got the short end of the stick yet again
* It's all show business
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Question of the day
* Pritzker addresses Hickey report
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...





Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller