Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Can Rauner’s 25 percent prisoner reduction goal be met?
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Can Rauner’s 25 percent prisoner reduction goal be met?

Thursday, Feb 23, 2017

* From the Kearney Courier

Gov. Bruce Rauner’s goal to reduce the state’s prison population by 25 percent can be achieved, but only if extensive changes are made to the criminal justice system, according to two members of a state commission that issued recommendations on prison reform.

Retired 11th Judicial Circuit Judge Elizabeth Robb and Andrew Leipold, law professor at the University of Illinois College of Law, were panelists Wednesday for a forum sponsored by the McLean County League of Women Voters and the Central Illinois chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union. Both served as members of Rauner’s commission to develop proposals to cut the state’s prison numbers by 25 percent by 2025. […]

Robb cited current drug laws with enhanced penalties as one of the areas recommended for change by the commission. The add-ons for selling drugs near schools and parks disproportionately affect African Americans in urban areas and “are not effective and not a deterrent,” said Robb.

Commission members also reviewed the reasons people are sent to prison and explored alternatives to incarceration, including a law that has added 700 people to the inmate population for stealing vehicles.

“We can make a cut in the prison population by changing that law,” said Robb.


- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Truthteller - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 10:12 am:

    He hasn’t produced a balanced budget or fulfilled any other of his stated goals. His record doesn’t bode well for success here

  2. - New Guy - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 10:12 am:

    Just fire 25% of the IDOC staff and release 25% of the prisoners.

  3. - VanillaMan - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 10:13 am:

    I believe this goal can be met if we freed all the imprisoned public officials we’ve locked up.

  4. - Texas Red - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 10:15 am:

    Of course it can; 25% less inmates means less IDOC guards and lieutenants to pay, and less AFSCME folks to deal with

  5. - DuPage Saint - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 10:24 am:

    They should be more specific. Always speak of low level drug dealers and users who do not belong in prison. Yes some laws maybe over kill but I doubt many first time offenders end up in prison. Multiple arrests multiple positive drug tests end you there. What is the law that put 700 more people in jail for stealing cars. Did this include fleeing and eluding? What are the criminal history of the 700? Unless it is very serious lots of these people have lots of chances to avoid prison. Most are doing life on the installment plan

  6. - Telly - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 10:24 am:

    IDOC can unilaterally lower the prison population through their management of the parole system. They can parole more inmates and choose to not “violate” and reincarcerate parolees who get in trouble for minor infractions after being released. The numbers can be relatively significant, but it’s a short-term fix and 25 percent is probably not achievable.

  7. - IRLJ - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 10:41 am:

    A dramatic cut in the prison population will take a culture change in the direction of prosecution and sentencing that is driven less by the news cycle and more by the sound exercise of discretion when figuring out from whom society needs protection.

  8. - zatoichi - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 11:12 am:

    So on one hand, keep the community safe so get those criminals off the street. Do the crime, to the time. On the other hand prisons are too crowded and cost too much so let 25% go free back to the street. Ah.. pick a lane.

  9. - Last Bull Moose - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 11:24 am:

    The Governor can use his powers to pardon here. Assign a team to review the 700 people jailed for auto theft. Keep the dangerous ones in and let the others out.

    He can use that approach on other laws that he wishes to change. This would be real leadership.

    If more people are put on parole, make sure the parole officers are in place in advance. Otherwise you have no defense when a parolee does harm, and some will do harm.

  10. - IRLJ - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 11:29 am:

    Achieving a dramatic drop in prison population will require a change in prosecutorial culture aimed at thoughtful protection of society from those who truly are dangerous, rather than protection based on the day’s headlines and sloganeering by politicians.
    Drug-selling near a church or school is a law that rightfully was aimed at those who might plan such a crime. Instead, it’s been used to enhance the sentences of those to whom the nearness of a church or school was totally incidental, and unintended.

  11. - Cassandra - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 12:41 pm:

    Release more elderly prisoners, assuming they have someplace to go. I believe the risk of re-offense goes down drastically as prisoners enter their 50’s, and I also believe this population is growing rapidly along with the general increase in the elderly population. Prisons really cannot and should not be long-term nursing homes.

  12. - LibrarianRyan - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 12:51 pm:

    What about the people in prison for weed use. While I don’t condone the use of any drugs, with other state legalizing weed, if the only drug office is for weed, let them out. Let them move to Colorado.

  13. - Amalia - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 1:35 pm:

    DuPage Saint is on it. keep the people in prison who need to be there. decide who needs to be in prison. if laws need to be changed, change them. But criminal history plays a role in deciding if someone should be put in prison. that cannot be forgotten. there are not people inside for a first marijuana offense. there just aren’t. look at Minnesota which used a matrix that adjusted sentence to prison capacity. that had very bad long term effects on the community.

  14. - Anon - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 2:07 pm:

    Change 1,000 feet enhancement to 500 feet, make possession w/intent of less than a gram a class 3 and within 500 feet a class 2 upgrade (down from the current class 2 and class 1) which would mean that there would be less Class X by background sentences based on a class 2 drug case.

  15. - @MisterJayEm - Thursday, Feb 23, 17 @ 2:18 pm:

    “there are not people inside for a first marijuana offense. there just aren’t.”

    That anyone is inside for a marijuana offense is morally perverse.

    – MrJM

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed until Tuesday
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Tribune asked 16 mayoral candidates to release tax returns, 6 complied
* A rough idea of what they're looking at
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Rauner was wrong about "record levels" of unionization
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY: Stava-Murray updates
* Pritzker's inauguration ball tix will benefit Cabrini Green Legal Aid Clinic and Illinois Fairgrounds Foundation
* Rauner claims he's been too busy to reflect on his term
* Pritzker's day in DC
* *** UPDATED x3 - Morrison wants emergency meeting of ILGOP - McConnaughay explains - Schneider responds *** Rauner says he tried to drop out of race after primary
* Feds re-raid Ald. Burke's office
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller