Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Is Rauner betting on “Little Trump”?
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Is Rauner betting on “Little Trump”?

Tuesday, Feb 28, 2017

* Reporters asked Gov. Rauner yesterday why he skipped a White House gathering attended by 46 other governors and who he’s met with in the Trump administration

On Monday, the most Rauner revealed is he’s been in “communication” with members of the “Trump administration” on “violence issues.”

“The folks who are developing the policy — different from, you know, media discussion — the policy that we’re actually going to implement, we’re in conversations, I’m personally in conversations with folks developing that,” Rauner told reporters Monday when asked to respond to the perception that he’s been distancing himself from Trump.

The governor did not give specifics about what policy was being considered, nor did he say whom he was talking with from Trump’s administration. Pressed on whether he was avoiding Trump, Rauner said he’d “meet with the president any time.”

* More

On Monday — as governors met with Trump at the White House — Rauner was asked several times why he hasn’t met personally with Trump. The two have only shared a private phone conversation shortly after the election.

Rauner said he spent his weekend speaking with governors and members of the Trump administration about Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act — saying he pushed for “moving slowly and thoughtfully” and fixing the “broken” insurance market on the exchange. He said he also spoke to the Trump administration about coordinating to help deal with Chicago’s gun violence problem.

The governor said he met with members of Trump’s administration — “the folks that are developing the policy” — about a federal policy dealing with violent crime across the country. He declined to discuss specifics of that potential policy change.

“It’s different from, you know, media discussion. A policy that we’re actually going to implement. We’re in conversations,” he said.

Let’s stipulate right up front that there is zero doubt that much of this is about that horribly over-used word “optics.” He has to win the suburbs to be reelected, and Trump did horribly in the ‘burbs.

* But the governor also said this yesterday…

The folks who are driving the policy are the folks who are going to make the difference.

Which seems to indicate that he doesn’t believe that talking to the president will make much difference.

* And that’s part of the same point made in The Atlantic about the stock market’s rise since the election

(T)he stock market might be rising because investors are paying more attention to the people surrounding Trump than to the president, himself. The federal government looks mostly like a conventionally conservative pro-business institution, if you ignore the idiosyncrasies of the Oval Office. Republicans have promised to cut taxes, particularly for rich Americans and business, and there is broad agreement among the GOP to deregulate the financial and energy industries, including rolling back Dodd-Frank. […]

To oversimplify slightly, you could say that the divide between the apoplectic Main Street and cheery Wall Street is the difference between a Big Trump hypothesis and a Little Trump hypothesis. The Big Trump hypothesis says that the president is a vindictive demagogue and a unique threat to Americans norms and institutions, with the potential to wreak havoc on the country’s politics, economics, and culture.

The Little Trump hypothesis regards these fears and declares: “meh.” Instead, it posits that the president will be a loud yet minor figure, sound and fury signifying nothing; a wannabe superhero hemmed in by the limited powers of the executive branch. Rather than rule like a populist demagogue, he will mostly sign bills written by his pro-business staffers and approved by a pro-business Congress. There are extremely smart people who believe in each hypothesis. But the theories are mutually exclusive. They cannot both be true. No matter what happens in the next few years, a lot of people are already wrong about Donald Trump.

* Related…

* Alexander: Rauner can’t dodge Trump forever

* Governor Says He’ll Meet Trump ‘Any Time’

* Gov. Rauner no-show at Trump’s governors’ events

- Posted by Rich Miller        

18 Comments
  1. - Juice - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 10:29 am:

    I disagree that they are mutually exclusive.

    In some policy areas where the President has an interest (immigration and trade), there is a pretty good chance that he will be more willing to push his views forward, and given his propensity to not take criticism well, you could see more seasoned policy people being pushed out and replaced with yes men who are willing to do the President’s bidding.

    But in areas where the President has very little interest (I would argue health care, probably energy, transportation) he is probably going to have a much more hands off approach.


  2. - Linus - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 10:41 am:

    I’m with Juice: These are not strictly, mutually exclusive theories. There’s plenty of room for give and take between Prez and his peeps, depending upon the issue at hand.


  3. - JB13 - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 10:41 am:

    The only people longing for a public meeting between Rauner and Trump are Illinois Democratic operatives itching to slap a photo of Rauner shaking hands with Trump on campaign literature and websites.


  4. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 10:44 am:

    ===are Illinois Democratic operatives===

    You must not have any social media friends who are Trump supporters. Many are not happy.


  5. - ChicagoVinny - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 10:54 am:

    This Little Trump theory seems to be cherry-picking which people around Trump they are looking at, since folks like Bannon or Miller, who aren’t your typical conservative, and have had a heavy hand in policy so far. Big Trump or Little Trump I’m not comforted.


  6. - Annonin' - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 10:57 am:

    BigBrain will need to suck up to Trump folks if he has any hope of winnin’ in ‘18. Heck if keeps playin’ these games they may put up a primary challenge…tee hee.
    Wonderin’ if he and Griff know about Trump buyin’ and sellin’ Palm Beach houses to Ruskies (MSNBC Monday nite) and they are steerin’ clear.


  7. - VanillaMan - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 11:33 am:

    Rauner’s problem is that the movie playing in his head about how government should be, (with himself in the starring role), was interrupted by Donald Trump.

    Trump’s success threatens the Rauner story line which claims that unbridled capitalism solves all societal ills. Trump isn’t a Bush, nor a Romney. Instead Trump is a populist willing to question unbridled capitalism. Trump isn’t global. Rauner has been seeing how his Scott Walker-ish union beat down was rejected by Trump and runner-up Kasich.

    Trump winning the Oval Office is confusing Rauner and his little head movie. These two are very different in their approaches to business. Their approach to the middle and working classes are also markedly different. Rauner doesn’t agree with Trump.

    They aren’t friends.


  8. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 11:49 am:

    At the depth of the Great Recession in early 2009, the DJIA was at 6,626. It’s been on a steady climb since to today’s 20,788.

    I blame Madigan. Makes as much sense as applying it to any other politician.

    In reality, low-cost money encourages corporations to borrow and buy back their own stock, driving up the price of the shares and options held by top execs, plus dividends.

    That means oogats to the structural, long-term problem of increased labor productivity not being rewarded with income growth. That’s a chronic problem in the developed world and the source of much of the economic anxiety and political anger here and in Europe.


  9. - Union Man - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 11:49 am:

    Mini Trump?


  10. - Arsenal - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 11:59 am:

    Ugh, didn’t we talk about “Little Trump” enough in the primary?

    Politically, there’s probably a downside to Rauner, as it gives downstate voters another reason to be suspicious of him. But substantively, I think there’s some wisdom there. There’s little evidence that Trump is the real policy maker on the issues Rauner cares about.


  11. - P. Clemenza - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 12:03 pm:

    When you are always campaigning, it makes sense to take time to meet face to face with Chance the rapper and not with the president. Nothing against Chance, but that can be played up better to the simpletons of Illinois.


  12. - P. Clemenza - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 12:12 pm:

    -The only people longing for a public meeting between Rauner and Trump are Illinois Democratic operatives itching to slap a photo of Rauner shaking hands with Trump on campaign literature and websites.-

    That’s funny, I was under the impression that we would want our elected officials to get meet to solve problems and get things done.


  13. - Arsenal - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 12:15 pm:

    I bet Rauner voters in the suburbs and downstate in particular love Chance the Rapper.


  14. - Rich Miller - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 12:16 pm:

    ===played up better to the simpletons===

    Is that you, Mark Giangreco?

    Try to avoid posts like that, please.


  15. - GOPgal - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 1:00 pm:

    To the extent Trump didn’t do great in IL burbs that’s mostly a function of Rauner and most of the rest of IL GOP not doing their jobs and working against the party’s nominee for the top national office.

    Fact is Trump did very well in burbs in other states where Rs did their jobs, just like Trump did very well with women nationally even though he was running against a female candidate.

    So sick of this fake news from hayseed “journalists” who are as clueless about politics as the incompetent yokel politicians they pretend to cover in this state.


  16. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 1:55 pm:

    The best message democrats could come up with last election was Governor Rauner equals Trump. That was about it, they certainly were not running on their “successes”.

    No one seemed to think Trump would win and he is much more unpopular here in Illinois than the rest of the country.

    Rauner avoiding President Trump is smart politics


  17. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 2:12 pm:

    –The best message democrats could come up with last election was Governor Rauner equals Trump.–

    Huh?


  18. - @MisterJayEm - Tuesday, Feb 28, 17 @ 3:37 pm:

    –The best message democrats could come up with last election was Governor Rauner equals Trump.–

    Huh?

    You’ve already given it more thought than it deserves, wordslinger.

    – MrJM


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Kinda sorta slightly good news for the state, not so much for the city, CPS and Cook
* Question of the day: Golden Horseshoe Awards
* Caption contest!
* Illinois lost 45,116 people in one year
* But his e-mails...
* The hollowing-out of state government
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller