Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 *** McCann’s name floated for 2018
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 *** McCann’s name floated for 2018

Wednesday, Apr 5, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Politico

Turns out an effort has been underway by a segment of the party to recruit state Sen. Sam McCann (R-Plainview) to run against Rauner in a GOP primary. Three sources told us as much, and last night, McCann confirmed to POLITICO he has been approached. Despite Rauner’s financial advantage, a primary from a serious opponent would obviously create a major headache for the governor. Having to defend himself from the conservative wing of the party (I love Trump!) while making himself general election-worthy (I hate Trump!) could prove beyond tricky.

McCann made clear he would not entertain a decision about a gubernatorial run during the legislative session. “I do not intend to think about the concept of running for governor, let alone comment on it, until after May 31st, if at all,” McCann told POLITICO. “There was a significant segment of the party that attempted to recruit me to run as an independent in 2014. I chose not to do that because I wanted to play a role in bringing my party and my beloved state together, not see them both torn apart more than they already were. Fast forward to the present and we see our state more divided and in bigger shambles than ever. It’s heart wrenching,” McCann said.

“I have been casually approached by some within the party about running for governor. I have said to each of them what I will say to you now: I am a patriot. I do not believe it is fitting or proper for anyone of either party to actively and openly campaign for any state office as long as the General Assembly is engaged in its regular spring session. Especially considering the historic times in which we find ourselves,” he said.

HISTORY — You may recall that McCann is a pro-union Republican who went against Rauner and voted for a labor arbitration bill. Rauner and the governor’s political allies heavily targeted McCann in the last primary election, to no avail. McCann is now helping lead the charge against Rauner’s move to privatize nurses in Illinois prisons.

* OK, first of all, McCann is up for reelection next year, so he’d have to give up his seat.

Second, primarying Rauner probably wouldn’t turn out that well for McCann. Remember all the 2016 primary race oppo on his personal finances and the claim that he was Speaker Madigan’s “favorite Senator”? McCann’s voters ignored most of it because they know their guy. He won’t be known statewide so Rauner wouldn’t even have to respond all that much to either the Trump stuff or the social conservative angle (McCann is pro-life).

Third, if labor unions help primary Rauner they could wind up highlighting his moderation on some social issues, which will only help him in the fall. They’ll also give Rauner and his organization a tuneup race and an excuse to blanket the state with ads. But if McCann (or somebody else) sticks to things like the impasse, he could rough Rauner up a bit in advance of the fall campaign.

* But could he win? According to that recent Paul Simon Public Policy Institute poll, Rauner’s job approval rating is 63 percent among Republicans. That’s more than enough to win a primary, of course, but it ain’t great for an incumbent and will hurt him with base turnout in the fall if those numbers don’t improve a lot. There is some room here to bruise him badly in a primary if the poll is accurate and the race is run properly. But a primary is still almost undoubtedly a Kamikaze mission.

*** UPDATE ***  Considering the Statehouse’s usual gossip mill, this recent WMAY interview might be where the rumors actually started

An area Republican lawmaker says he would be willing to support a primary challenger to GOP Governor Bruce Rauner if the right candidate came along.

State Senator Sam McCann made the comment during a live interview with WMAY’s Frank McNeil Monday. […]

McCann says he’s tried to mend fences with the governor, without success…and says the two of them have traveled too far to come back.

And then somebody tells somebody about the radio program and it eventually morphs into Republicans want McCann to run. Or not.

       

35 Comments
  1. - Deft Wing - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:37 am:

    Floated by Sam or someone Sam asked.


  2. - Ok - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:43 am:

    McCanns record is far better than Rauners.


  3. - Honeybear - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:45 am:

    McCann would not fair well. Please don’t jump on me but what about Kirk Dillard? Learner question honestly


  4. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:49 am:

    The only way you’d primary Rauner, and it would make sense, is if you can beat him, or get his negatives “sky high”

    Labor would be better off trying to just run “anti-Rauner” messaging, sans candidate, and focus on hammering and shaking Rauner’s job performance. It’s truly about drinking the message “Bruce Rauner failed”, not allowing, as Rich rightly points out, the Rauner Crew a dry run against a specific candidate and drive themselves to lock in “pluses” for the November tilt.

    If anything, Labor, Labor’s allies, and Democrats need to “see to their own houses”.

    When 2 in 5 Labor households voted Rauner in 2014, it’s ridiculous to think Labor needs to concentrate on defeating Rauner or roughing up Rauner in his primary. Democrats, Social Service advocates, “same thing”. Focus on what YOU can control; driving turnout, educating your supporters, grow and collect more pluses.

    Labor or “whomever” wa to to be impactful in beating Rauner, run “negative issue” ads through the primary, not connected to any candidate, and soften Rauner’s positives, harden the negative numbers Rauner has, and tend to your own house.

    Taking on Rauner, with a candidate, in the primary IS counter-productive.


  5. - Norseman - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:52 am:

    Sam, I’m with you forever as State Senator, but running against Rauner would be a fools errand. Don’t let these folks feed your ego with unrealistic hope.

    Unless you want out of politics in a big way, the Senate is where your career is at right now.


  6. - AlfondoGonz - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:52 am:

    I would love to see some honorable R’s show themselves in the primary.


  7. - PDJT - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:55 am:

    ==* OK, first of all, McCann is up for reelection next year, so he’d have to give up his seat. ==

    Why is McCann up for re-election in 2018? He just won re-election in 2016. Remember, Rauner wasted a bunch of money backing a hand-picked opponent.


  8. - Salonica's Backroom - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:56 am:

    The one thing that I’ll credit Rauner for is his diligent adherence to his message and talking points. He just doesn’t deviate. From a governing perspective, that’s terrible, but from the campaign side it’s a huge asset.

    Any type of rapprochment from the right would force him to adjust his message. And I’m not sure how he’d do fending off populist GOP attacks.

    McCann would have to run a perfect, working-class, grassroots conservative campaign.

    I’d give McCann about the same chance as Pawar. There’s a narrow path, with billions of resources to set up roadblocks.


  9. - TickTickTock - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:57 am:

    I think this talk of 2018 also asks who will be on the ticket? Still Sanguineti? Or was yesterday’s Facebook video a Lt Gov audition for McConnaughay or Demmer? It seems McConnaughay has been close with the Governor and the Governor’s administration.


  10. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 9:58 am:

    “* OK, first of all, McCann is up for reelection next year, so he’d have to give up his seat.”

    McCann just won re-election in 2016, why is he up for re-election again?


  11. - Grand Avenue - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:00 am:

    It’s called 4-2-4


  12. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:00 am:

    What “segment of the party” and what are their “efforts” to date? Who are they? What are they doing?

    Three anonymous sources confirm….what?

    Who are the sources, “Sam, Sen. McCann, and him?”

    Self-serving trial balloon from McCann, pretend-journalism from Politico.


  13. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:02 am:

    Illinois Senate terms are 4-2-4, 2-4-4, or 4-4-2…

    McCann is up again.

    If they drop Ole Slip and Sue for LG, Rauner will have enough time to do that. The question is how much time will they let Slip and Sue know she’s out?

    I’d be a bit surprised if Rauner dropped her. Her invisibility is an asset!


  14. - RNUG - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:05 am:

    I will vote for Sam as Senator as long as he wants the seat. And I would vote for him as Governor also because, unlike Rauner, Sam has actually built and ran a business.

    But to take Rauner on in the primary would be a suicide mission, and Sam’s not that dumb or egotistical. His best move is to stay a Senator for now, let the D’s take Rauner out if they can and partially fix the State’s problems, and if he really wants to be Governor, set his sights on 2022.


  15. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:05 am:

    So McCann would lose his seat and the Primary. I don’t see much downside for Rauner in this scenario.


  16. - working stiff - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:10 am:

    rally the troops on a single front. not a time to divide.


  17. - Nick Name - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:12 am:

    McCann would most likely get trounced in a primary against Rauner, but beating Rauner isn’t the point. Weakening Rauner for the general election: that’s the ballgame.


  18. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:16 am:

    ===Weakening Rauner for the general election: that’s the ballgame.===

    No, not by having a primary.

    A primary allows a “spring training” for the Rauner apparatus, with actual vote totals seen, and weaknesses seen in counties, or townships, towns.

    Why give Rauner the trial run? Why give Rauner an electoral “snapshot” where there needs to be work with vote totals?

    Nope.

    The ball game is to weaken Rauner without Rauner measuring electoral weaknesses with a dry run in a primary.

    If anything, a specific GOP Primary allows Rauner to solidify his own massage and a foil to hone messaging for November.


  19. - Curl of the Burl - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:19 am:

    RNUG - yep. Sam built a ran a business - into the ground. After the primary last year he was taken to court three more times for massive unpaid credit card bills, and one creditor even sued to recover his WORK equipment.


  20. - Norseman - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:19 am:

    === … beating Rauner isn’t the point. Weakening Rauner for the general election: that’s the ballgame. ===

    With all due respect to Sam, he’s not going to weaken Rauner any more than Rauner’s lack of governing is already weakening him. Rauner’s bottomless pile of money will bury Sam’s effort. What is spent on the primary will quickly be replenished. Sam’s only hope would be a major Dem crossover. That will not happen with a Dem gubernatorial primary.


  21. - The Dude Abides - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:28 am:

    It would be a bad idea for Sam and also those who want to make sure Rauner doesn’t get a 2nd term to Primary Rauner for reasons mentioned by OW and others. Save your ammo for the General election.


  22. - Memo From Turner - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:39 am:

    ==If they drop Ole Slip and Sue for LG, Rauner will have enough time to do that. The question is how much time will they let Slip and Sue know she’s out?==
    Good to see OW hasn’t lost sight of his favorite person/obsession, next to Rauner and Payton Prep of course. I thought she was dropped for Rev. Meeks.


  23. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:45 am:

    ==I’d be a bit surprised if Rauner dropped her.==

    Yup. Too much of a signal of chaos. And *way* too much of an insult to suburban women, who will probably take just about any excuse you give them to bolt the Republican Party right now.

    McCann could not win, so I think he only does this if he knows he can’t win his Senate seat again, either, and he wants to trash the house on his way out the door.

    Thus, I don’t think he’s going to do this.

    But primarying incumbents doesn’t usually “weaken” them; instead, it shows that they were already weak.


  24. - walker - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:47 am:

    Smoke bomb


  25. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:47 am:

    It’d be interesting to see what AFSCME did if Sam made the race, though. ‘Cause they’ve crossed over both to oppose Rauner and to support Sam (though I suppose they were one-and-the-same in Sam’s race), but if they do that again, they risk missing out on their first choice in the Democratic Primary (Whoever that is).


  26. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:47 am:

    Meeks, if he would go for it, would be a brilliant choice for Rauner at lg.


  27. - Blue dog dem - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 10:54 am:

    RNUG. Could Sam be considered a fiscal conservative?


  28. - Liberty - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 11:04 am:

    http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-06-16/opinion/ct-edit-senators-20130616_1_pension-reform-pension-bill-tea-party


  29. - Blue dog dem - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 11:13 am:

    Liberty. Thanks. Sounds like not much different than Rauner,MJM,Biss.


  30. - Earnest - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 11:23 am:

    I don’t know if McCann’s the right guy, but I do think it would be good if Republican primary voters had someone to vote for who isn’t anti-union. I’m not sure a primary challenge will lead to Rauner spending less on campaigning or messaging since he’s already running ads now.


  31. - jim - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 11:33 am:

    he’ll never risk his seat. he needs the money.


  32. - RNUG - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 11:33 am:

    -blue dog-

    I see him as pragmatic​ with fiscal conservative leanings while mostly (with an exception or two) moderate on social issues. Others may see him as more conservative on social issues. He is, in at least a few cases, willing to vote his district when they have clearly spoken. And he seems to be a good fit for his district.


  33. - A guy - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 11:43 am:

    Sam is just such a pleasant fella, well liked by almost… (nevermind)

    Silliest thing I”ve read in a while. Equally short on money and charm.


  34. - Generic Drone - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 12:02 pm:

    Don’t be a martyr Sam. We need you in the Senate more than have you be sacrifaced in the primary. Let Rauner win or lose on his own record.


  35. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Apr 5, 17 @ 1:56 pm:

    Sam may not be able to win the Republican Senate primary without Democratic crossover votes. That could tempt him to hit Rauner head on.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reinsdorf says 'I don't want to talk about that' when asked why his ballclub needs another state subsidy
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Fundraiser list
* *** UPDATED x1 *** State's November plan to reduce 'bottlenecks' in migrant shelter/resettlement appears to be making real progress
* In huge blow to Bailey, Trump endorses Mike Bost (Updated)
* Question of the day
* Follow the bouncing ball
* It’s just a bill
* Today's quotables
* Mendoza defends honoring anti-abortion mayor
* 'Never rat on your friends, always keep your mouth shut'
* White Sox make their pitch (Updated x2)
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* End The Natural Gas Ban Now, Aging Gas Lines Are Dangerous
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - EXTRA!
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller