Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » ALEC’s constitutional convention resolution awaits approval of full House
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
ALEC’s constitutional convention resolution awaits approval of full House

Wednesday, Apr 26, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller

* From HJR 32’s synopsis

Makes application to Congress under the provisions of Article V of the Constitution of the United States for the calling of a convention of the states limited to proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government and limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government.

The measure’s chief sponsor is Rep. Bob Martwick (D-Chicago), but it has several GOP co-sponsors. The proposal was unanimously approved by the House Executive Committee on March 30th.

* Common Cause is not a fan…

While Illinois citizens remain transfixed by the daily news of events in Springfield and Washington, D.C., a serious threat to our democracy has been quietly gathering steam. Through House Joint Resolution 32, a bipartisan group of State Representatives have issued a call for the State of Illinois to request a convention to amend the Constitution of the United States. This proposal is part of a well-funded highly-coordinated national effort by conservative advocacy groups who are seeking to bypass the Congress and use the vague language in Article V of the Constitution to fundamentally alter the nature of our democracy.

“Every Illinois citizen should be terribly concerned about the reckless calls in this state for a constitutional convention,” warned Brian Gladstein, Executive Director of Common Cause Illinois. “There simply aren’t any rules to limit the nature or scope of what could put on the table once a convention is called and provide megadonors the opportunity to restrict or completely take away some of our most fundamental rights. We just can’t risk it.”

Back in 2015, Common Cause issued a report entitled The Dangerous Path: Big Money’s Plan to Shred the Constitution, that laid out its concerns about calls for a constitutional convention, including:

    THREAT OF A RUNAWAY CONVENTION: There is no language appearing in the United States Constitution that would prevent a constitutional convention from being expanded in scope to issues not raised in convention calls passed by the state legislatures, and therefore could lead to a runaway convention.

    INFLUENCE OF SPECIAL INTERESTS: An Article V convention would open the Constitution to revisions at a time of extreme gerrymandering and polarization amid unlimited political spending. It could allow special interests and the wealthiest among us to re-write the rules governing our system of government.

    LACK OF CONVENTION RULES: There are no rules governing constitutional conventions. A convention would be an unpredictable Pandora’s Box; the last one, in 1787, resulted in a brand new Constitution. Indeed, the group that is advocating for HJR 32 openly discusses the possibility of using the process to undo hard-won civil rights and civil liberties advances and undermine basic rights extended throughout history as our nation strove to deliver on the promise of a democracy that works for everyone.

    UNCERTAIN RATIFICATION PROCESS: A convention could re-define the ratification process (which currently requires 38 states to approve any new amendments) to make it easier to pass new amendments, including those considered at the convention. This happened in 1787, when the convention changed the threshold necessary for ratification.

    THREAT OF LEGAL DISPUTES: No judicial, legislative, or executive body has been given a clear authority to settle disputes about a convention, opening the process to chaos and protracted legal battles that would threaten the functioning of our democracy and economy.

    APPLICATION PROCESS UNCERTAINTY: There is no clear process on how Congress or
    any other governmental body would count and add up Article V applications, or if Congress and the states could restrain the convention’s mandate based on those applications. Notably, a separate call for a constitutional convention seeking a federal balanced budget amendment that is being funded by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), a corporate juggernaut masquerading as a charity, insists that it is just six states shy of meeting the threshold, even though 16 of those state resolutions came from a failed attempt to call a convention decades ago.

    POSSIBILITY OF UNEQUAL REPRESENTATION: It is unclear how states would choose delegates to a convention, how states and citizens would be represented in a convention, and who would ultimately get to vote on items raised in a convention.

The language in HJR 32 appears to have been pulled directly from ALEC’s model bill library, and perfectly illustrates the threat of a runaway convention. The measure generally calls for amendments imposing term limits for members of Congress and the judiciary, “fiscal restraints on the federal government,” and limits on the power of the federal government. The vague language in this measure was first introduced in 37 different state legislatures in 2015, and it has already been passed in nine states.

It should also be noted that it is not only conservative groups that are pressing for a constitutional convention. In fact, in 2014, the General Assembly issued another resolution seeking a constitutional amendment to overturn the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United. That effort was primarily being lead by the left-leaning group known as Wolf PAC. Although Common Cause Illinois is committed to fighting against the corrosive presence of big money in our political system, it believed then as it does now that the risks associated with this plan are simply too great.

“We will continue to fight against any demand for an Article V convention, no matter who is leading the charge,” said Gladstein. “We are committed to safeguarding our democratic principles, and we hope that our elected officials in Springfield will join us in this fight.”

They make a good point about this being a copy of ALEC’s model bill. Click here for the Illinois resolution. Click here for the ALEC model.


  1. - Dan Johnson - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 11:35 am:

    Our constitution could use some improvements. The more opportunities for people to debate improvements and consider how we can make our government more effective and modern, the better.

    Hope over fear! (Despite this originating as a conservative initiative, I’m for it. I’d like a far more small-d democratic federal government (abolishing or limiting the powers of the US Senate and the derivative anti-democratic impacts from the Electoral College, fixed terms for judges instead of lifetime appointments, and a much stronger emoluments clause are a few things I’d like to debate).

  2. - Sir Reel - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 11:37 am:

    Wait a minute.

    Are these the same conservatives who are always talking about “strict contructionists,” who decried Obama’s executive orders as “unconstitutional,” and on and on?

    It’s great for judicial limitations, reigning in the President, etc. But now it’s not?

    Never satisfied.

  3. - JTF - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 11:42 am:

    This would be a gold mine for the wealthy and special interests and a sucker’s bet for everyone else. People who are for this because they want to generally “shake things up” are similar to the Trump voters who wanted to “drain the swamp” and wanted a wildcard as President. They also play video games by pressing the reset button a lot. Not sure that works as well in real life…

  4. - cdog - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 11:43 am:

    Glad to see this. I was not aware this was happening. Need to catch up, now!

  5. - Scamp640 - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 11:43 am:

    This is why Rauner wants to redraw electoral district boundaries and why Democrats must resist. Separation of Church and State, the value of public versus private goods, and the very foundation of American democracy is at risk if the ALEC folks have their way. Just look at what has happened in recent Iowa state elections to get taste of what could happen. This is not some overwrought snowflake rant. ALEC policies are anti-democratic policies at their core.

  6. - anon2 - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 11:45 am:

    While I agree with Dan, I also recognize that almost every interest group on both sides of the political spectrum has opposed a State Con-Con. The State Con-Con referendum gets clobbered every two decades. I can’t imagine those same groups supporting a federal Con-Con. In short, a federal Con-Con isn’t in the cards, even though the U.S. Constitution could use some updating, just as state constitutions have gotten.

  7. - Nick Name - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 11:48 am:

    In a significant departure from the ALEC model, HJR 32 specifically instructs, “That the convention delegates from Illinois are hereby instructed not to support any amendment proposals regarding term limits for federal officials or for members of Congress…”

    So that’s good. In fact it could be the only reason why the House Dems are taking up ALEC’s far right wing agenda: to attempt to thwart it.

  8. - Chicago 20 - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 12:04 pm:

    Once a constitutional convention starts there is no telling where it will head.

    With unlimited monies pouring in for lobbying and influence our republic will be under siege.

    Rule of thumb is if ALEC is involved it won’t be good for the 99%.

  9. - Honeybear - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 12:09 pm:

    I’ve always thought that Rauners plan of perfidy was created by ALEC.

    Corporate Coup

  10. - anon2 - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 12:15 pm:

    While Americans revere the Framers of the Constitution, they also fear a repeat of what the Framers did in writing a whole new document. What was a good idea is now to be feared, even though the revered Framers put a Con-Con option in the Constitution.

  11. - Puddintaine - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 12:15 pm:

    Soooo, now Power to the Peoples is bad?

  12. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 12:28 pm:

    If you think “the people’s” interests are driving this constitutional convention crap, you’re either gullible or part of ALEC.

  13. - Nick Name - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 12:31 pm:

    “Soooo, now Power to the Peoples is bad?”

    What Anonymous @12;28 said. If it’s driven by ALEC, it is anything but power to the people.

  14. - Texas Red - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 12:43 pm:

    These things are tricky and they certainly have consequences, we are sinking in debt and stuck in an untenable situation due to the the 1970 Illinois constitutional convention …
    “The benefits of which shall not be diminished or impaired.

  15. - Jimmy H - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 1:00 pm:

    - Honeybear - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 12:09 pm:


  16. - Dee - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 1:02 pm:

    The push for a convention has been going on for awhile, funded by Koch brothers and other billionaires. Last I checked 28 states had initially passed resolutions calling for a Con-Con, a handful of states have rescinded their resolutions. 34 states need to submit an application for a Con-Con to be called (the count had peaked at 32 I believe). NY Times ran an article in Summer 2016 here, there’s lots of other good coverage out there on why this is a terrible idea, who is bankrolling the effort and why:

  17. - Norseman - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 1:04 pm:

    This is a disaster waiting to happen. Rather than improve our democracy, it will lead further away. As we’ve seen played out in the presidential election we have a majority of states controlled by a minority of the population. They will further institutionalize that disparity.

  18. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 1:30 pm:

    I trust the original founding fathers more than any group we could assemble today. We have a Constitution that can be, and has been, amended piecemeal when needed.

  19. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 1:45 pm:

    - Scamp640 - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 11:43 am:

    There is NO separation of Church and State in the Constitution

  20. - Dan Johnson - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 3:03 pm:

    anon2 is right - almost every established organization opposed the state con-con, but I go back to Abraham Lincoln on whether people would accept any proposed changes to our constitution:

    “Why should there not be a patient confidence in the ultimate justice of the people? Is there any better, or equal, hope in the world?”

  21. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 3:53 pm:

    Anonymous at 1:30 was me.

  22. - Rhino - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 5:11 pm:

    I think that Dan Johnson is quoting Lincoln out of context. When Lincoln said that didn’t he mean “Northern people” or people who thought like him?

    I’m happy to have a convention composed of people like me but not people who are influenced by ALEC. So, the answer is NO.

  23. - Rhino - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 5:15 pm:

    Oh, I forgot to add, the language about term limits does not bind anyone. It looks to me like a trap for the unwary.

  24. - Beauwillie - Wednesday, Apr 26, 17 @ 8:29 pm:

    The prospects of an Article V amending convention are very real and truly frightening. All it would take is to compromise a super majority of our State legislatures (75%), suborn their lackeys, and enlist a cadre of manipulators to pull the strings. Estimates have been made that it would only take around 20,000 co-conspirators and $10 billion dollars to pull this off, chump change for those like George Soros and the Koch brothers. Of course, this would have to be kept secret until it’s a done deal which should not be difficult considering the makeup of this group. Much of this may already be in place and must be rooted out and neutralized by groups like Common Cause.

  25. - Bill Walker/Bill - Friday, Apr 28, 17 @ 8:35 am:

    One thing not mentioned in this article is the fact Congress is currently counting the applications and already arrived at its first set meaning a convention call is mandated. In fact, 11 convention calls in total are mandated. See: for details.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Feds to provide more migrant funding... Just $19.3 million for Illinois
* Question of the day
* It’s just a bill
* Bill to expand IVF/infertility insurance coverage overwhelmingly passes Senate
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...







Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller