Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » HDems look to keep government running, stopgap under discussion
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
HDems look to keep government running, stopgap under discussion

Tuesday, May 30, 2017

* Sun-Times

Illinois House Democrats still don’t have enough support to pass a Senate revenue bill that includes an income tax hike, or their own tax proposals — and a June 30 budget deadline appears to be a new goal line for a budget plan with just two days left in the regular session calendar.

While adjournment is scheduled for Wednesday at midnight, the new fiscal year begins on July 1. The state hasn’t had a full budget since July 1, 2015, amid a political war between Gov. Bruce Rauner and Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan. And a partial budget expired on Jan. 1, leaving public universities and social service agencies struggling to survive.

“The first of July is the real deadline for having a budget in place so the state can continue to operate,” said State Rep. Greg Harris, D-Chicago, who is serving as Madigan’s chief budget negotiator.

It becomes more difficult to pass legislation on June 1 when a three-fifths majority is needed. The governor has criticized the Senate revenue plan, and there aren’t enough Democrats to override him if he vetoed it.

When the House Dems start talking about June 30th, pay attention. It could be a long summer.

* AP

Illinois, which hasn’t had an annual budget since summer 2015 - the longest of any state in modern history - is running a deficit of as much as $6 billion and sitting on a $14.5 billion pile of overdue bills.

We’re so unique!

* Tribune

As negotiations continued late into the evening Monday, questions remain about whether the House will choose to take up an annual budget at all, or if there will be a repeat of last year when the chambers couldn’t agree on a plan to send to Rauner. Negotiations continued throughout June, resulting in a temporary budget that ensured schools opened on time and universities and social services were funded for six months.

“What good is it to pass a budget that doesn’t go anywhere?” said Rep. Fred Crespo, D-Hoffman Estates, who serves as an appropriations chairman. “Really the endgame should be, ‘How do we keep government running to help the people we are supposed to help?’ Whether it’s at 100 percent, it’s at 80 percent, it’s at 50 percent. To me, that’s the fundamental question that we are losing sight of. We are spending a lot of time on a budget that might not happen.”

Crespo noted that even if Democrats did pass a budget, they would not be able to override a possible Rauner veto. That would take 71 votes, but there are just 67 Democratic members. He said if lawmakers blow past the Wednesday deadline, it’d put pressure on Republicans to cut a deal.

Rep. Greg Harris, who serves as a budget point man for House Speaker Michael Madigan, said Democrats will “cross that bridge as we come to it.”

“The governor, as he has shown, has no concern about just vetoing any budget and driving the state further into ruin. That’s what he’s done in the past, but we can’t fail to do our jobs and send him a responsible budget,” Harris said.

Keep in mind that Gov. Rauner has repeatedly said he will veto a stopgap unless he gets a permanent property tax freeze. Maybe they’ll just wind up calling it something else. As noted above, it could be a while before we know.

Keep a close eye on our live coverage post for constant updates.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - 47th Ward - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 10:17 am:

    In a normal year the HDems would want to conclude business before June 1, so they could keep the HGOPs away from the table. As we know, this isn’t a normal year, and since any short or long term solution is going to require HGOP votes, there is no reason to see June 1st as a hard deadline.

    It looks today like the HGOPs will need to put about 20 votes on the tax hike bill(s). If things go downhill and the HDems go with their own plan, then they’d still need at least 7 HGOPs to break with Rauner. Probably not going to happen, but as I said, any “real” solution requires Republican votes, so going into overtime was a foregone conclusion.

  2. - taxation = civilization - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 10:22 am:

    It has been two years and it seems like the Democrats are still flat footed, caught with no legislative strategy or messaging designed to corner rauner. Hold up k to 12 funding, send rauner a budget with some property tax relief and a bigger tax hike. Force him to do something that’s damaging either way.

    I’m just confused, where’s Madigans game?

  3. - Precinct Captain - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 10:25 am:

    Rauner says a stopgap budget requires a permanent property tax freeze, but a grand bargain budget requires only a four year property tax freeze?

    The man’s negotiation “skills” would be laughable if it weren’t for the massive destruction he is causing Illinois.

  4. - Derp - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 10:42 am:

    Precinct captain, are you assuming he is “negotiating” with the goal of reaching a deal? What makes you assume he wants a deal

  5. - Grandson of Man - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 10:56 am:

    “It has been two years and it seems like the Democrats are still flat footed, caught with no legislative strategy or messaging designed to corner rauner. Hold up k to 12 funding, send rauner a budget with some property tax relief and a bigger tax hike. Force him to do something that’s damaging either way.”

    I agree with much of this. Democrats should pass property tax relief and put the pressure on Rauner. The House passed it in 2015. Can’t they come down from a permanent freeze to four years?

    Political ineptitude is terrible. See the political reality and try to win in it.

  6. - RNUG - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 10:58 am:

    No stop gap; no, K-12 schools funding.

    The school funding is the only leverage out there. You pass it, there will never be a budget.

  7. - don the legend - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 11:08 am:

    In exchange for a do nothing property tax freeze and a w/c adjustment that the average voter won’t understand, it does not add up at all that Rauner would sign an income tax hike that puts us right about where we were when he got elected (4.95/5%) and create new service taxes.

    He has ducked and dived for so long now he has left himself painted into a corner of his own making. Rauner cannot make a deal as he loses his only campaign issue: “Blame Madigan”.

  8. - Original Rambler - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 11:10 am:

    47th Ward is spot on. June 30 is the date.

    I’m with RNUG 100%. Stopgaps, under any name, are like prolonged trips to the dentist. Let’s force the issue finally and pull the tooth!

  9. - Texas Red - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 11:14 am:

    Dems 67 means their caucus has the numbers to pass the Senates Tax revenue bill. They just don’t want to, instead they are using the veto as cover. Fear of going on the record in support of higher taxes is preeminent to them.

  10. - Anon221 - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 11:26 am:

    Agree with RNUG. Dems need to just go ahead and take the hard votes on the tax hike(s) and send it to Rauner with no (probably) Republican votes. Yes, Rauner will veto it. He would probably veto anything at this point, even if it was a totally Republican budget. His field of goalposts is much more important, and Republicans are expendable.

    If a stop gap is sent, Rauner really wins. But if a total budget is sent, Republicans will need to explain to their home districts why school can’t be open an entire year (most have enough reserves until the second semester, and even then they are really going to be hurting), or why Rauner’s version of a stopgap (K-12 only IF he line items) is so much better for the State than a full budget.

    Either way, the Dems need to force the Republicans to either take hard votes after May 31st or on overrides, or show their true colors of Red and Yellow while they wait with their hands out for Rauner’s greenbacks.

  11. - taxation = civilization - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 11:26 am:

    I really hope the dems withhold school funding unless it’s attached to a budget. I’m not sure if they’ve got the courage to do so.

  12. - Jimmy H - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 11:36 am:

    Yep! No k-12 funding. Rauner said he might have to shut things down, give him the shutdown. Rauner wants it, he will own it. Let Rauner explain to parents his short term pain concept.

  13. - JLR - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 11:55 am:

    The only possible way this will end would be a total government shutdown.
    I hope ASCME will not strike because they have no money in a strike fund.
    There will be no compromise. So I hope that K-12 is not funded until there is a budget agreement. RNUG is right.

  14. - Ghost - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 12:22 pm:

    Give the Gov a lump sum, note it had to be done becuasr the gov proposed budget was not balanced and his agencies submitted budget requests that exceed revenue, the govs lack of request for any new revenue, and let the gov wear the hat for what doesn’t get paid.

  15. - Grandson of Man - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 12:26 pm:

    I too agree with RNUG: no stopgap budget. We can’t play these games anymore. We need a full and balanced budget. I would be okay with a two-year property tax freeze, if that’s the most Democrats are willing to give. Rauner would refuse it, but he could be attacked for rejecting a property tax freeze, just like Democrats will be attacked because of voting for only two years.

  16. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 12:30 pm:

    ===Give the Gov a lump sum, note it had to be done becuasr the gov proposed budget was not balanced and his agencies submitted budget requests that exceed revenue, the govs lack of request for any new revenue, and let the gov wear the hat for what doesn’t get paid.===

    Absolutely. No. Way.

    1) Quinn. Quinn has this and it was a complete disaster, more of a disaster than Quinn was on his own.

    2) Rauner doesn’t care. Without MOUs, the mere idea that contracts have worth now is a complete joke. Giving Rauner complete autonomy with a lump sum would make any contract worthless, given the history, personal and gubernatorial, Rauner will hurt people first, last, always.

    3) Republicans, before becoming Raunerites, made clear the Lump Sum Budget should never be repeated. Deciding to now go against that with the uncertainty of Rauner himself would be to encourage Illinois demise… at a quicker pace than we’re already seeing.

    4) … and finally, revenue. Rauner can’t make even his wildest hopes and dreams come true for the damaging of Illinois without an increase of revenue. Who would want their taxes raised when Rauner decides to close EIU?

    Nope. No lump sum. Not healthy for Illinois. Quinn proved that theory.

  17. - JLR - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 1:08 pm:

    One other possibility would be for the Democrats (House and Senate) to pass a balanced budget.
    That is what constituents would truly understand. This is what Rauner needs. No Tax Increases.
    A balanced budget. Get going Dems.
    End this NOW.

  18. - Grandson of Man - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 2:31 pm:

    Dems having a pretty good day in the ‘Patch, passin’ two-year property tax bills in the Senate and the minimum wage hike bill in the House.

    Kudos and good job to the Senate Republicans who voted for the property tax bills.

  19. - wordslinger - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 3:03 pm:

    –Dems 67 means their caucus has the numbers to pass the Senates Tax revenue bill. They just don’t want to, instead they are using the veto as cover. –

    LOL, the veto is a “cover?”

    Did you just wake up, Rip? In dozens of attempts, how many of Rauner’s vetoes have been overridden?

    My old wood shop teacher could count them up on one hand. And he didn’t have many fingers on either hand.

  20. - ??? - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 3:20 pm:

    Texas Red - the House GOP hasnt had the cajones to offer up their own budget solutions and spending cuts. They are more than welcome to propose a budget with deep spending cuts, but until they do, they are hardly profiles in courage. What have they been doing for the last two years, besides voting “no” on everything proposed by the Dems and those stupid robocalls. They are worthless. Gutless, too.

  21. - peon - Tuesday, May 30, 17 @ 10:15 pm:

    I would prefer to see a bi-partisan set of cuts and revenues to achieve balance, but that seems out of the question.

    We are allowed a formula in the school funding bill, so - maybe crazy - but why not put a formula in the budget appropriation that cuts by factor across the board (unless court orders prevent) based on an assessment of revenue at the start of the fiscal year, and then a revenue assessment again at the mid-point of the fiscal year.

    That would encourage a bipartisan revenue solution (or supplementary bill).

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Remap update
* Reader comments closed for the Thanksgiving break
* How federal money can be used to indirectly repay the remainder of the state's Federal Reserve loan
* 21,034 new confirmed and probable cases; 87 additional deaths; 1,982 hospitalized; 384 in ICU; 150 on ventilators
* A special Thanksgiving message
* IDES describes huge obstacles to explain its late report
* Unclear on the concept
* D'Amico, trade unions put Kelly over the top
* Open thread
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller