Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » *** UPDATED x1 - ILGOP responds *** CTU may sue to block school funding reform law over tax credits
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
*** UPDATED x1 - ILGOP responds *** CTU may sue to block school funding reform law over tax credits

Thursday, Aug 31, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller

* The Chicago Teachers Union is considering some very risky legal options

If the union successfully challenged the tax credits, the entire school funding measure would be “invalid” under a provision lawmakers inserted into the legislation. That would include the new money authorized for CPS.

Previously, an Illinois Appellate Court in 2001 upheld a state income tax credit of up to $500 for parents for paying “qualified educational expenses” that exceed $250 for the education of children in K-12 private schools.

The credit was challenged based on the state constitution prohibiting government money for religious purposes, including a ban on spending to “aid” or “to help support or sustain any school” that is “controlled by any church or sectarian denomination.”

In its 2001 ruling, the Appellate Court noted that a tax credit “does not constitute public funds” received by the government. Instead, “it merely allows people to keep more of their own money.”

So, if the CTU does file a lawsuit and it’s successful (which seems doubtful, but whatever), then the entire evidence based model would be enjoined and $7 billion in state school funding would be halted.

Over a $75 million pilot project.

*** UPDATE ***  ILGOP…

“The Chicago Teachers Union has a long history of brinkmanship and intransigence, and their refusal to accept the bipartisan school funding compromise is no different. CTU’s opposition to a five-year, $75 million tax credit scholarship pilot program is not only unreasonable, it puts the education of millions of Illinois schoolchildren at risk. We implore them to try something different for a change - be reasonable and support compromise.” - Illinois Republican Party Spokesman Aaron DeGroot

The Chicago Teacher’s Union is threatening legal action over the new evidence-based school funding formula that received bipartisan support just because it contains Illinois’ first-ever school choice pilot program.

If successful, their latest temper tantrum would block Illinois schools from receiving over $7 billion dollars in state funding all in the name of brinkmanship and refusal to compromise.

Democrat gubernatorial candidates are already jumping on board with Chicago Teachers Union in yet another example of Chicago Democrats kowtowing to CTU regardless of how unreasonable they’re position is.

Daniel Biss and Pritzker-running mate Julianna Stratton actually voted against the school funding compromise, opting instead to protect the status quo and their own political interests.

J.B. Pritzker himself has said he would’ve voted no, and Chris Kennedy’s campaign has even been fundraising on taking educational opportunities away from underprivileged kids.

Once again, the Chicago Teachers Union says jump, and the Democrats ask ‘how high,’ all to the detriment of Illinois schoolchildren.

* Related…

* Bernard Schoenburg: Sen. Manar pushed school funding changes for years: But Manar had known of the problem for a much longer time. It was when he was in college, in the mid-1990s, he recalls, that he accompanied his mentor, the late state Sen. VINCE DEMUZIO, D-Carlinville, to hear a speech on the need for school funding changes from then-Gov. JIM EDGAR, a Republican. It was in 1997 that the last major revision to school funding in the state was passed, Manar said.


  1. - Whatever - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 10:53 am:

    ==Over a $75 million pilot project.==

    Purity of essence. Peace on earth.

  2. - Anonymous - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 10:53 am:

    I mean, if they want to waste their time and money on a slam dunk loser of a case, I suppose that’s their right

  3. - Lonely Man - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 10:55 am:

    JB Pritzker opposed the bill. Is he going to fund the litigation for CTU also?

  4. - Curl of the Burl - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 10:57 am:

    Lonely - good question. I bet the odds on that are even.

  5. - Oswego Willy - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 10:58 am:

    This is a mistake.

    Any Dem candidate for Governor that doesn’t realize how it could put the Dem Nominee in jeopardy with “a Chicago Union” trying to hurt downstate schools isn’t understanding what Rauner wants to peddle, and how this plays into, up to now, a failing narrative of putting regions against each other… while in the same breath touting this school funding bill.

    Walk away from this.

    No good to be found here.

  6. - SAP - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 10:58 am:

    I have criticized the Governor for not accepting 90% of a loaf and declaring victory, but this just quantum levels crazier.

  7. - SAP - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:00 am:

    Not to speak for Pritzker, but I believe his position was that the tax credit was bad policy, not that it was unconstitutional.

  8. - PJ - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:00 am:

    They have no chance. This is crafted specifically to skirt that constitutional limit.

  9. - West Side the Best Side - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:01 am:

    Sometimes it seems like the CTU and the Governor just deserve one another.

  10. - wordslinger - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:04 am:

    Who’s the judge that’s going to sign an order blowing up $7B in funding for every school in the state over a $75M tax credit?

    Judge Crater?

  11. - @MisterJayEm - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:04 am:

    “I have criticized the Governor for not accepting 90% of a loaf and declaring victory, but this just quantum levels crazier.”

    I presume leadership will file this suit as a sop to the union’s hard-cores with no expectation (or intention) of winning.

    “Sorry, Che. You can’t say we didn’t try…”

    – MrJM

  12. - Anon221 - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:05 am:

    CTU needs to realize they need to let this battle go and focus on the “war” instead. It is a pilot program with a sunset. There is a Dem candidate for Governor that has stated he will work to end it. There will be an “ammo dump” of donors and schools and “distributors” of the dollars that can be used for future campaigns. Trying to win a court case on principle (and I do support the principle) is not the way to go. Please CTU, let it go and just breathe.

  13. - H-W - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:05 am:

    == If the union successfully challenged the tax credits, the entire school funding measure would be “invalid” under a provision lawmakers inserted into the legislation. ==

    What sort of provision was inserted? Did is state if any part is deemed invalid then the whole is invalid? I have seen that sort of language used to force lawmakers to vote, but not to prevent lawsuits. Just curious.

  14. - the Cardinal - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:13 am:

    The CTU should focus efforts in the class room and dump all the false outrage. Your folks are well taken care of…go get the results that Kids deserve and parents expect in the classroom.

  15. - 360 Degree TurnAround - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:14 am:

    I want to say the piece on Andy Manar by Bernie was fantastic. He is the one that deserves much of the credit, along with Will Davis. They worked their tails off.

  16. - Really ctu - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:15 am:

    Besides Mike Madigan you are the second biggest problem in the state of il.get rid of CUT

  17. - Mary Sunshine - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:19 am:

    The tax credit doesn’t even start until next year, by the time it gets up and running we could be only a few months away from having a new governor. We could end up spending much less than 75 million before the program is repealed if that’s the case Everyone complaining about the bill should put their energy and resources into working against Bruce Rauner and his ilk.

  18. - 360 Degree TurnAround - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:23 am:

    Legal question: Why can’t CTU sue to block the scholarship program? I understand that the new law will not be severable. Can a court rule for the “common good” that education funding can continue, while the scholarships cannot?

  19. - igotgotgotgotnotime - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:25 am:

    Shouldn’t the conservatives be the ones challenging a $75M bailout? They’re an inconsistent bunch.

  20. - Joe M - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:37 am:

    Where will the money for this $75 million tax credit come from? Was it budgeted for in the recent budget that passed? Or will it put the state budget $75 million more in the hole?

  21. - Obamas Puppy - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:42 am:

    You can keep saying it is a “pilot program” and maybe that makes some feel better about this voucher scheme but it is not temporary. When this is implemented who is going to eliminate this for kids who are already in a private school? Yanking a kid out of any grade after growing up with those kids is traumatic and will never happen. Also everyone knows increasing this amount of tax break for the rich will be the next ransom that must be paid for the Guv to sign any sort of budget.

  22. - DuPage Bard - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:46 am:

    This will be good for CTU and teacher’s unions.
    This won’t be a Chicago bailout once the teachers sue it’ll be teachers unions blocking a bill they agreed with 90%. Special interests are ruining our state says the Governor. CTU may just prove that to be true.

    Teachers against Kids

  23. - My thoughts - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:47 am:

    What I do not understand is why for example Loyola University of Chicago, a private Roman Catholic university, should be able to receive MAP grants while a private college preparatory high school should not receive vouchers. Article X Section 3 of the Illinois constitution states no public funding shall be made available to “college, university, or other literary or scientific institution, controlled by any church or sectarian denomination”.

  24. - RNUG - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:47 am:

    CTU needs to walk away from this one for now.

    Concentrate on electing a Governor and more Legislators. Then you can repeal that provision if you still want to.

  25. - Sue - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:52 am:

    And they wonder why States with less union participation have more economic growth, jobs and prosperity

  26. - 360 Degree TurnAround - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:53 am:

    I’m not sure the repeal will come so easily with Madigan as speaker.

  27. - 360 Degree TurnAround - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:54 am:

    Sue, more jobs and prosperity? Are you sure?

  28. - Molly Maguire - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 11:57 am:

    CTU gonna CTU

  29. - Ghost - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 12:17 pm:

    Judge Crater …. sounds like a character in clue

    Judge Crater, in the court house with the candlestick er gavel….

  30. - Ghost - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 12:18 pm:

    actually insuppose that hame would be more aptly called Clueless

  31. - winners and losers - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 12:18 pm:

    Obamas Puppy is correct. NO State that has started neo-vouchers has repealed them.

    Reminds me of gambling in Illinois: first Riverboats that sailed a few times a day, then fixed locations that are much larger and could be entered at any time, and now slots all over Illinois in every little town and village.

    As I stated earlier, Vouchers (tax credits) for private schools are an extremely important and emotional issue for those who support public schools, public education, and local public schools as the heart of a community.

    Witness the Federal battle over Betsy DeVos as U.S. Secretary of Education (confirmed only with the V.P. breaking a time in the U.S. Senate) all over Vouchers and Charter schools.

    As the Fred Klonsky blog states today:

    Betsy DeVos is the law in Illinois

  32. - A guy - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 12:24 pm:

    What’s truly amazing is that this ridiculous notion is being contemplated “out loud”.

    Even if it comes to nothing, as it likely will; the CTU is on the record for this idiotic boner.

    They can’t help themselves. All about the kids, except the 100% of it that isn’t. Dorks.

  33. - igotgotgotgotnotime - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 12:39 pm:

    I’m guessing MAP grants pass muster because they’re given to Illinois residents, to be used where the resident sees fit, not to institutions.

  34. - Wondering - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 12:50 pm:

    I wouldn’t be too quick to bet against CTU on this. Appellate courts have been reversed. Reasonable educational expenses is not a scholarship.

  35. - Chicago_Downstater - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 12:55 pm:

    Ideologues annoy me. I’m more ideologically in-line with the CTU than I am with Rauner, but frankly I’d be happy to stick them both in a boat & shove them off into Lake Michigan.

    I’ve tried being patient with all the folks saying “but but but it’s emotional.” But no more.

    You have emotions? Ok, fine. Have your emotions. Go eat some cake with Tina Fey. I don’t care. But don’t take away money from the very kids you claim to care about.

    Basically pluck out thine own eye if it offend thee, but keep your fingers out of the rest of our eye sockets. *rant over*

  36. - winners and losers - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 1:10 pm:

    A politician ignores passion and emotion on an issue at their own risk.

    But the bill clearly violates the INTENT of the Illinois Constitution -
    “Neither the General Assembly nor any county, city, town, township, school district, or other public corporation, shall ever make any appropriation or pay from any public fund
    whatever, anything in aid of any church or sectarian purpose, or to help support or sustain any school, academy, seminary, college, university, or other literary or scientific
    institution, controlled by any church or sectarian
    denomination whatever; nor shall any grant or donation of land, money, or other personal property ever be made by the State, or any such public corporation, to any church, or for any sectarian purpose.”

  37. - Carhartt Representative - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 1:17 pm:

    CTU finds vouchers to be a threat to continued education funding for CPS. They also believe that this scholarship language was an end around. Better to fight it now, then in ten years when the question isn’t if, but how much.

  38. - Demoralized - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 1:50 pm:

    Those of you saying this is unconstitutional are making an incredible stretch. You get tax deductions now for education expenses. You get tax deductions now for charitable contributions, including to churches. How is this any different? It’s not.

    Ever heard of the textbook loan program? Religious school could participate.

    There is no constitutional issue here

  39. - My thoughts - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 1:58 pm:

    igotgotgotgotnotime - much like the tax credit for the voucher is given to the donor to use where they see fit?

  40. - walker - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 2:10 pm:

    “”"little good to be found here”"”

    Unfortunately, that describe a lot of the political actions of CTU leadership.

  41. - Chicago_Downstater - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 2:10 pm:

    @winners and losers

    “A politician ignores passion and emotion on an issue at their own risk.”

    Last I checked the CTU weren’t politicians, but I digress, because I think there is a larger issue with your statement.

    Obviously a politician is at-risk if they ignore their constituents’ emotions and passions. However, politicians are also at-risk if they allow a small segment of their constituents to run roughshod with their emotions and passions over the basic needs of their other constituents.

    Let’s say the CTU had got their way & killed the education bill. Do you think Chicago parents were going to care more about tax credits or the fact that schools now aren’t funded?

    Now let’s say that the CTU wins their lawsuit. Again are parents going to care about defeating those bad old tax credits or that they now have nowhere to take lil Johnny because schools are closed?

    Rich has rightfully pointed out to me before that I tend to underestimate the public support the CTU currently enjoys. I agree. But one day the CTU will reach too far. And I think if they go through with this ideological purity test of a lawsuit and win and shutdown schools for a measly tax credit while continuing to lobby for ever increasing benefits at the cost of the families they are supposed to serve, then that might just do it.

    And it certainly won’t help them when they go to try to unseat Rahm. Because we all know that’s what this is all about, right?

  42. - winners and losers - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 2:21 pm:

    It was a false argument that it was SB 1947 or nothing, school funding or no funding.

    It is now a false argument that if SB 1947 is found to violate the intent of the Constitution that schools will not be funded.

    The Courts are very likely to significant time to correct the situation.

    Any lawsuit will be very difficult to win, but a 75% CREDIT on every dollar of tax is very different from a tax deduction.

  43. - Ron - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 2:21 pm:

    Good I hope CTU wastes lots of money on this. Less to spend at election time.

  44. - My Thoughts - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 2:38 pm:

    winners and losers - Previously, an Illinois Appellate Court in 2001 upheld a state income tax credit of up to $500 for parents for paying “qualified educational expenses” that exceed $250 for the education of children in K-12 private schools.

  45. - Chicago_Downstater - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 2:40 pm:

    @winner and losers

    What was the alternative for SB 1947? There weren’t enough votes for an override unless I’m missing something.

    And you say that the judge could just magically wave his gavel and take the tax credits out even with the trigger language in the bill? If that’s the case, then what you are suggesting is an obvious example of legislating from the bench. If you really care about the constitution as your posts seem to indicate, then I’d think you’d be just as concerned about the separation of co-equal branches. But honestly it just seems like a rather risky assumption that a judge would just magically lift away the tax credits.

    Just because this issue is emotional and gets certain folks passionate doesn’t mean it’s worth the harm pursuing it could cause. Basically, I’d happily encourage the CTU to tilt at windmills here if there wasn’t a chance they’d mistakenly canter off and hit the school.

  46. - winners and losers - Thursday, Aug 31, 17 @ 2:51 pm:

    On the small chance part of SB 1947 would be ruled unconstitutional (and therefore, the bill as a whole could not take effect per a specific part of the bill with that exact intent), the Illinois Supreme Court will almost certainly allow months before cutting off school funding.

    That is hardly legislating from the bench.

    In fact the Court could review two parts of the bill:
    (1) tax credits for private schools
    (2) the inseverability clause as an attempt to restrict Court review

    Alternatives to SB 1947?
    (1) A new bill on funding
    (2) Current law, which would require an
    appropriation bill

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* AG Raoul orders 'Super/Mayor' Tiffany Henyard's charity to stop soliciting donations as Tribune reports FBI targeting Henyard (Updated x2)
* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Pritzker on 'Fix Tier 2'
* Caption contest!
* House passes Pritzker-backed bill cracking down on step therapy, prior authorization, junk insurance with bipartisan support
* Question of the day
* Certified results: 19.07 percent statewide primary turnout
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Update to today’s edition
* It’s just a bill
* Pritzker says new leadership needed at CTA
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today’s edition
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...







Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller