Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Pritzker campaign wants questions answered about former Rauner chief counsel
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pritzker campaign wants questions answered about former Rauner chief counsel

Wednesday, Sep 13, 2017 - Posted by Rich Miller

* Pritzker campaign…

5 Questions for Bruce Rauner About Dennis Murashko

While A Scandal Brews, Rauner Remains Silent

Chicago, IL – Last week, reports surfaced about why former Rauner General Counsel Dennis Murashko was summarily dismissed from the administration and escorted from his office. The firing may have been associated with a memo Murashko wrote that questioned “whether the administration was properly keeping politics out of the office.” Another story also alleged that Rauner filled his administration with Illinois Policy Institute staff in exchange for $30 million in campaign donations from Dan Proft’s and Dick Uihlein’s networks.

Others have claimed that Murashko himself abused the powers of his office by handing out, “plum duties to someone with whom he had a personal relationship.” While allegations continue to swirl, Rauner has dodged questions on the controversy saying only, “I will not comment on rumors.”

Here are five questions Bruce Rauner should answer on the abrupt firing of one of his closest advisers:

    * Why was Dennis Murashko dismissed?
    * Bruce Rauner told reporters there would be no further departures from his administration before announcing Murashko’s departure later that day. What changed?
    * When did Bruce Rauner learn about the allegations that Dennis Murashko abused the powers of his office, and what did he do to fix the problem?
    * Did Dennis Murashko’s memo on the need for proper boundaries between Rauner’s political and government operations have anything to do with the $30 million promised to him by Dan Proft and Dick Uihlein?
    * What has Bruce Rauner done to address the ethics issues raised in Dennis Murashko’s memo?


  1. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 9:58 am:

    If the Murashko memo exists, I’m surprised someone hasn’t shared it publicly yet.

  2. - Sugar Corn - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 9:59 am:

    Could the memo be posted here? Would like to see what Murashko alleged in full if possible.

    Wonder when Senator Barickman will start demanding Audit Commission hearings on this subject, the outsourced $100 million Canadian health insurance portal, or the Barney’s Warehouse lease. Not holding my breath.

  3. - Macbeth - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 9:59 am:

    And: Did Murashko write the memo in order to retro-actively protect himself?

  4. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:00 am:

    The Pritzker Crew put down a marker.

    They have the correct questions that need to be ask.

    The story needs a bit more meat on the bone and seasoning in the soup to get the heat turned up, but it is important to put this marker down.

    Now, if more spills out in the press or other places, the Pritzker Crew can “double down” on this marker.

    This is what competent canpaigns do.

  5. - Veil of Ignorance - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:01 am:

    Pritzker team’s response to Trib Blago piece is to open a new front vs Rauner and draw media attention to that story. These two campaigns are going to take negative campaigning to a whole new level…

  6. - Ghost - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:04 am:

    To quote Gov Stevenson
    “We can chart our future clearly and wisely only when we know the path which has led to the present.”

    Rauner tells us the path that led to this termination

  7. - DuPage Bard - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:15 am:

    The Pritzker crew keeps hitting Rauner but eventually they’re going to have to win the primary. Beating up Rauner is great for the Dem party overall but when do they start making their move to separate from the other candidates?
    Still haven’t seen any polling that shows Pritzker up.

  8. - Ghost - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:16 am:

    have you ever noticed then when we can see Rauner live, or in public, there are no posts at that same time from OW?…… hmmm

  9. - Blue dog dem - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:19 am:

    To Team Kennedy. Stay focused on Illinois issues. This is the sort of rabbit dung that turns voters off. Stay above it all.

  10. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:20 am:

    ===…when we can see Rauner live, or in public, there are no posts at that same time… ===

    I don’t think I’m Governor Rauner.

    If I get a 2nd confirmation that I’m not the governor I’ll pass that on.

  11. - Ghost - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:24 am:

    OW dont forget to refuse to respond to rumours :>

  12. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:29 am:

    As always, any and all questions should be directed to - Norseman - unless otherwise indicated.

    To the Post,

    The biggest piece of the puzzle is the confirmed, actual, memo.

    The memo, its contents, it’s timing, and if there are any email chains attached to the correspondence, that would be a great deal to configure, especially with the 5 questions Pritzker’s Crew is asking.

  13. - Henry Francis - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:33 am:

    Good questions. I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for the Guv to answer them.

    If you look at all the turnover in the legal staff, and you look at the people that are coming in, where they are coming from and the limited experience they have, it is not hard to come to the conclusion that the Guv ain’t looking for seasoned, well reasoned legal guidance, he’s interested in getting “legal cover” (no matter how thin, or weak the basis may be).

    You can also look back on the many untenable legal positions his administraton has tried take (eg fair share withholding) and how many times they have lost when challenged in court. That also seems to support the conclusion that the Guv doesn’t look for his lawyers to tell him what the law is, the Guv tells his lawyers what he wants the laws to be, and they need to go out and make it happen.

  14. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:34 am:

    With Sheldon, Director of DCFS, leaving with ethical problems this starts to build a pattern of corruption.

    Worth starting some inquiries in the GA.

  15. - blue dog dem - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:39 am:

    Team Pritzker. Here is some advice. Demand a Special Prosecutor. Demand to see Rauners’ birth certificate. Demand to see the deleted emails. This will prove to the Illinois voters you understand the states problems.

  16. - Ghost - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:59 am:

    So if the GC says we are breaking the law, and is fired, does that mean firing comey, er the GC, could be grounds for criminal complaint against the gov for obstruction?

  17. - Anon0091 - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 11:13 am:

    Blue Dog Dem,

    I’m confused. You think it is irrelevant whether the governor traded $30 million in exchange for officials actions despite a memo from his general counsel? Seems like if proven that’s the kind of quid pro quo for which other governors have gone to jail. No?

    I mean I get that since the Pritzker campaign didn’t release and promote health care, economic development and early childhood education plans, that you have a point. Oh wait, they did release those plans. So nope, don’t get your point at all.

  18. - Ghost Whispering - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 11:16 am:

    In light of Blago, what would it take for the federales to open an investigation into Rauner? Are they tired of taking down IL guvs, or do they still get golden stars for taking down corrupt Big Dogs?

  19. - Norseman - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 11:17 am:

    Sorry, I’m late posting. I was meeting with some operatives who know how to work Facebook really, really well. Willy, I think we have a great social media plan. ;)

  20. - Arsenal - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 11:22 am:

    ==If you look at all the turnover in the legal staff, and you look at the people that are coming in, where they are coming from and the limited experience they have, it is not hard to come to the conclusion that the Guv ain’t looking for seasoned, well reasoned legal guidance, he’s interested in getting “legal cover” (no matter how thin, or weak the basis may be).==

    Perhaps, but remember that these really are high-stress jobs. Some of the recent turnover has been a *bit* quicker than normal, but people really can/do burn out.

    That being said, between this and Sheldon, some ethical issues seem to be piling up (and there’s lower level stuff, too, like monkey business with agency salaries and weird hires and stuff). That’s not a trifling concern for Rauner. He got a lot of votes from disgust at cronyism.

  21. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 11:24 am:

    - Norseman -

    “I love it”

    To the “investigating” and such, wondering aloud, things like investigations have two very important components.

    They take time.

    They aren’t discussed if they are going on.

    If the Feds want to pursue, they will, if they don’t, they won’t, and we might not know either way for a long while if they will.

    The questions asked, way outside the legal scope, the politics to them there is more than enough to ask, the actual authenticated memo would move the story too(?)

  22. - walker - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 11:28 am:

    I don’t expect much here. It’s common practice of in house counsel to remind staff of the legal boundaries between political and government activities. As far as improper interpersonal relations? Maybe something remains to be seen.

    JB establishes his eligibility for the ultimate prize by punching up. Cannot recall that being a losing strategy for a primary. Rauner did the same with Quinn, and let outsiders with big miner undermine his Republican opponents.

  23. - blue dog dem - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 1:15 pm:

    Anon. The politics of the time bore me. Sorry. I am so tired of the Repubs and Dems playing gotcha. I want substance. I want details.

    Now if JB only gets into details on how he plans on paying for these thingS I will be impressed. The dream of a progressive income tax will only be that. So he, and everyone else needs to quit making empty campaign promises.

    But I also understand this is how folks get elected. Just like Rauner. But I am sick and tired of it. We, the state of Illinois, are running out of time.

  24. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 1:36 pm:

    I’d tell JB to pound sand.

  25. - A guy - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 1:38 pm:

    And here are 5 questions about 5 toilets in 5 bathrooms…

  26. - Oswego Willy - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 1:43 pm:

    ===And here are 5 questions about 5 toilets in 5 bathrooms…===

    Maybe question 6 could be…

    “Why all those homeowner exemptions Rauner had?”

    Rauner knows his way around property taxes, lol

  27. - anon - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 2:36 pm:

    Here’s what I’d love to know… What does Murachako’s memo, assuming it actually exists, say about Goldberg, Mahoney, Trover, and other former staff members’ dealings with the political side? Is the memo strictly about conduct going forward or does it shed light on past activities?

  28. - Last Bull Moose - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 3:59 pm:

    I doubt the memo ever becomes public. It is a lawyer advising his client.

    Rauner could release it, but then it would help Rauner.

  29. - wordslinger - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 4:05 pm:

    –And here are 5 questions about 5 toilets in 5 bathrooms…–

    That’s going to sting, very badly, no doubt.

    It’s the perfect material for a negative spot.

    JB should have thrown a bookkeeper under the bus about that over the summer when no on would care.

    Now, he’ll probably have to spend millions pointing out Rauner’s rich-dude problems to compensate.

  30. - Anon0091 - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 4:33 pm:

    Thanks Blue, but you still didn’t answer the question. Would it be irrelevant and a waste of your time if Rauner engaged in quid pro quo for campaign cash against the advice of counsel? It’s a legit question, especially around here.

  31. - blue dog dem - Wednesday, Sep 13, 17 @ 10:35 pm:

    0991. Again sorry. I for one thought Blago got a raw deal. Barely a politician alive who hasn’t been bought off.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Isabel’s afternoon roundup
* Uber Partners With Cities To Expand Urban Transportation
* Yes on operations and capital spending, No on revenues to pay for it
* Giannoulias on House floor while bill goes down
* Some budget react
* Governor rebuffs Rep. Crespo’s worries of future fiscal cliff
* Coverage roundup: House sends $53.1 billion FY25 budget to the governor
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Welch: 'No one's ever said the House is boring'
* House passes budget 65-45 - BIMP passes 62-46 - Grocery tax elimination sails 86-20 - Revenue omnibus put on postponed consideration - Motion to reconsider passes - But big problem and Dems will have to suspend the rules - Concurrence motion finally passes as GOP gives up
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...











Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller