Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » NCSL fires at proposed elimination of SALT deduction
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
NCSL fires at proposed elimination of SALT deduction

Wednesday, Sep 27, 2017

* Press release…

The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) issued the following statement in response to the release of the tax reform framework developed by the Trump administration, the House Committee on Ways and Means, and the Senate Committee on Finance:

As a central tenet of tax reform is to provide tax relief for the middle class, NCSL is dismayed that the released framework will eliminate a deduction that is vital to middle class taxpayers, the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction. The SALT deduction has existed in the federal tax code since its inception, which coincidentally was also when the federal tax code was at its simplest, because federal tax writers were cognizant to not tax an individual’s income twice. Eliminating this deduction will lead to higher tax burdens for tens of millions of middle class taxpayers of every political affiliation, an outcome contrary to the stated goal of providing meaningful relief to taxpayers. The elimination of the SALT deduction also impedes the ability of states to invest in infrastructure, fund education, and provide the vital public services that Americans expect from their state and local governments.

Ensuring that the incomes of American workers are not taxed twice hardly counts as a special interest tax break or loophole that needs to be closed. NCSL strongly supports preservation of the SALT deduction and opposes any attempt to harm middle class taxpayers and their communities.

Protect state taxpayers. Protect local decision making. Protect SALT.

I don’t think I’ve ever seen NCSL take a hardcore public stance like that before.

“Blue” states tend to have higher state and local taxes, including property taxes, which is one reason why this is being floated in a Republican Congress. But there are a whole of of Republican members in high-tax suburban and rural districts that will be exposed to some serious constituent anger over this topic.

* From GOP Congressman Rodney Davis…

“Today House Republicans united around middle-class Americans who are being crushed by our outdated tax code,” said Davis. “Illinois residents know all too well the impact high taxes are having on their families’ ability to save and get ahead and our state’s ability to compete for good-paying jobs. Our plan uses Illinois as an example of what not to do. We want to cut tax rates for individuals, simplify but maintain important middle-class deductions, and make it so American businesses can compete globally. There’s still much more work to be done, but this is our shot at changing the lives of each working American for the better and I hope we get bipartisan support to get it done.”

But under this bill, those high state and local taxes won’t be deductible.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Honeybear - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 3:17 pm:

    Wow…this idea seems like a political death wish

  2. - Precinct Captain - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 3:19 pm:

    Rodney will gladly follow Trump, Ryan, and McConnell off the cliff.

  3. - JB13 - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 3:20 pm:

    What’s the big deal here? Illinois *is* a low-tax state, is it not? And it’s just a few more dollars in taxes. Illinoisans love their taxes, after all. Right?

  4. - Dan Vock - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 3:35 pm:

    The big state and local groups have been worried about this for a while. Even if it doesn’t affect many states, they tend to look out for each other on issues like this. (They have also gone to bat for states like Texas, which have no income tax, in order to allow Texans to deduct the amount of sales taxes they pay instead of income taxes.) Here’s a study that a bunch of them came together to produce earlier this year that outlines the potential consequences for state and local governments.

  5. - don the legend - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 3:41 pm:

    Major tax overhauls are hard enough in an environment of civility and respect like the last one in 1986. Today with Trump and the polarization in Congress, it will be a miracle.

  6. - Undiscovered country - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 3:42 pm:

    One of the loudest arguments against the estate tax i.e. the “death” tax, is that it taxes the same income twice, once when earned and once when transferred. Isn’t there the same argument here? May be an interesting rhetorical role reversal.

  7. - Northsider - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 3:42 pm:

    Why do I suspect that the more we learn about the details of this plan, the more we’ll see how it favors corporations and the rich over everyone and everything else?

    Oh, right. Its a Republican tax plan.

  8. - Iron Lady - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 3:49 pm:

    Rodney is clueless. He wants to be liked by the big kids regardless of what is best for his constituents.

  9. - Blue Bayou - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 3:57 pm:

    Rodney and his party lie again about what their policy proposals do.

    It never ends.

  10. - Confused - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 4:03 pm:

    Can we get past the concept that only blue states will be hit with this? Look at the highest income tax brackets in places like Wisconsin, Iowa, Missouri, South Carolina, Arkansas, Louisiana and Georgia. These are hardly “blue” states.

  11. - ughh.. - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 4:10 pm:

    but the standard deduction is increased very significantly, so the salt deduction should really only impact the weathliest, which is something the dems want..

  12. - hisgirlfriday - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 4:18 pm:

    Here’s hoping the GOP tax plan, having beem crafted in secret with no public hearings or bipartisan input, meets the same fate as their healthcare reform bills.

  13. - PJ - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 4:38 pm:

    ===but the standard deduction is increased very significantly===

    Nope. In the fine print, the standard deduction is only going to increase by about 12% for most people. At least in this draft.

    So it’s not likely to offset the SALT deduction.

  14. - anon2 - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 8:15 pm:

    About half of Americans don’t owe federal income taxes. Consequently, they probably don’t get much benefit out of the SALT deduction. The biggest beneficiaries pay the most income and property taxes, which means they sure aren’t poor.

  15. - Andy S. - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 8:19 pm:

    The increase in the standard deduction is pure subterfuge, because the plan eliminates personal exemptions. Childless couples who do not itemize may benefit slightly, but if that couple has just one child, their combined standard deduction and personal exemptions will be lower.

  16. - Scared senior - Wednesday, Sep 27, 17 @ 8:48 pm:

    If there is no higher deductible for seniors like there is now I will pay more. My senior deductible and personal exemption are slightly over $12000 now and bottom tax rate will go up. So much for helping lower and middle class persons.

  17. - pundemonium - Thursday, Sep 28, 17 @ 12:54 am:

    –fine print– show me the fine print?

    The tax brackets are: 0%, 12%, 25%, and 35% but I haven’t seen the income levels yet, has anyone else?

  18. - Frustrated - Thursday, Sep 28, 17 @ 11:46 am:

    All the talk about the loss of SALT being compensated by doubling the standard deduction does not consider that for singles, the new standard deduction will only increase $6000. Losing the personal exemption - takes away $4000 of that - so single homeowners (middle class) are toast.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...








Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller