Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Pritzker fumbles Madigan question
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pritzker fumbles Madigan question

Tuesday, Oct 10, 2017

* Parts of the Democratic gubernatorial forum over the weekend were tough to watch. We’re going to discuss other aspects, but let’s start with this one…


* Sun-Times

The question that seemed to draw the most heated response launched a back and forth between Biss and Pritzker. Ahern asked about candidates’ relationships with Michael Madigan, speaker of the Illinois House of Representatives. […]

Biss said Madigan is too powerful.

Pritzker said Madigan has just become a GOP “talking point.”

When asked if Madigan supports him, Pritzker added that he is an independent who won’t be influenced, and called Biss out for voting for the speaker. Biss then responded that Pritzker should be more honest about the speaker’s support.

* ILGOP…

Democrat Audience Laughs At Pritzker’s Claim of ‘Independence’ from Madigan
As Pritzker tries to distance himself from Madigan, the Democrat audience responds with laughter and groans

“On Sunday, the Democrats running for governor were abundantly clear: Mike Madigan is for J.B. Pritzker. It makes sense, since Pritzker and Madigan both share a history of corrupt deal-making and gaming the system for their own personal gain. Pritzker’s attempts to distance himself from Madigan were literally laughable - so laughable that an audience of Democrats and progressives wren’t buying the malarkey he was peddling.” - Illinois Republican Party Spokesman Aaron DeGroot

On Sunday, the Democratic candidates for governor held a forum at the Chicago Teacher’s Union headquarters, and though they may disagree on exactly how high they will raise taxes, they all came together on one topic: Mike Madigan’s support for J.B. Pritzker.

When asked about his relationship with Mike Madigan, Pritzker repeatedly dodged the question, fumbling over his inability to change the subject. His discomfort was so plain that after being challenged on the issue by moderator Mary Ann Ahern, Pritzker’s non-answers were met with laughter from the crowd of Democrat activists. […]

The Democrats may not always agree on how big government should be, but they all came together on one topic: J.B. Pritzker is Mike Madigan’s candidate for governor.

* The video

Biss definitely took it to the guy. But here’s Pritzker’s retort…

I do need to respond to that. Senator Biss, you ran Mike Madigan’s PAC last year. You ran his Super PAC, millions of dollars. C’mon, there is no halo here, we all are Democrats, we don’t get to choose who the Speaker is. He is the Speaker of the House, There’s nothing that any of us can do about it except to support leadership term limits which I do.

* Chris Kennedy’s response…

Mary Ann Ahern: Mr. Kennedy, what’s your relationship like with Speaker Madigan?

Kennedy: I think we should give [Madigan] a choice. I think he should have the choice between being a property tax appeals lawyer or a state Representative. I don’t think we have to accept the current situation. I don’t think it has to be like this in Illinois. He’s a property tax appeals lawyer, he’s appealing the property taxes to Joe Berrios. One is head of the state Democratic Party, one is head of the Cook County Democratic Party. The scale of this thing is incredible. The Sears Tower sells for a billion, two hundred million dollars. It gets a billion dollar mortgage on it. They’re recorded at Cook County. They’re reported in the Tribune and Crain’s. The assessor says “oh no,” he has alternative facts, it’s only worth $579 million. We need to prevent our elected officials from having outside jobs that are adverse to the interests of the body they were elected to serve.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

65 Comments
  1. - Grand Avenue - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:18 am:

    Pritzker = Madigan + Blagojevich + Berrios will be the Republican message if Pritker wins the primary.

    Rauner has no record to run on & Pritzker lets him run an attack campaign


  2. - 360 Degree TurnAround - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:21 am:

    One is the Executive Branch. One is the legislative branch, and half of it. Separation of powers.


  3. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:23 am:

    Um, shouldn’t Democrats run against Rauner and Trump?

    I think the other guys cornered the “Because Madigan” market long ago. Not a lot of growth potential there for Democrats.


  4. - Ghost - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:24 am:

    Kennedy is running on his name as a connected Democrat, and he is upset about connected democrats?


  5. - PJ - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:25 am:

    ===Um, shouldn’t Democrats run against Rauner and Trump?===

    Yeah, but he’s become such an issue that they all need an answer to this question. Pivoting to Rauner won’t save them. Mike’s popularity is just as low or lower.


  6. - Sharon - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:25 am:

    Biss’ holier than thou BS was stale a long time ago, now it’s starting to become laughable.


  7. - Teddy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:26 am:

    He didn’t so much fumble it as he just has no good defense. It’s true that he’s Madigan’s pick, so he can’t deny it, and he can’t say anything bad about Madigan.

    I really don’t get the attack on Biss about the SuperPac. It was a joint Democratic effort to discredit Trump, not a personal campaign for Biss, so why wouldn’t he take the money? It certainly doesn’t mean he’s beholden to Madigan because of it. And Pritzker donated to that SuperPac too, which I wish Biss had mentioned.

    Pritzker’s performance in the forum was kind of painful. It just showed that he’s not really gubernatorial material and is only there because of his money.


  8. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:27 am:

    I can’t believe Pritzker can’t park this. Seriously.

    “Speaker Madigan, like President Cullerton, and Leaders Durkin and Brady encompass the legislative branch leadership. Bruce Rauner fails because he either can’t work with Speaker Madigan or President Cullerton, and can’t be trusted by his OWN leaders, like the resigned former Leader Radogno, who was chased off because Bruce Rauner can’t work with any side not labeled “Rauner’s” side.

    It’s imperative that the next governor of Illinois work with President Cullerton, Leaders Durkin and Brady, and even Speaker Madigan. That’s how governing works. I won’t be the failing governor that can’t work for a better Illinois. That’s Bruce Rauner, and he needs to go.


  9. - Stan - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:28 am:

    Kennedy answered it best.


  10. - Teddy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:29 am:

    Oswego Willy, but that wasn’t actually the question, was it? If I remember correctly, it was “Do you have the support of Speaker Madigan?” Pritzker can’t deny that he does.


  11. - Grand Avenue - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:30 am:

    I remember a story about Pritzker losing weight - it looks like the campaign diet has put a stop to that.


  12. - MG85 - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:31 am:

    I guess I am naive, but how does the metaphor of a “fumble” apply here?

    In my mind, a fumble applies to someone who either a) does not have a concerted answer b) was in the process of giving a good answer but does so in an indigestible manner.

    His answer seems pretty clear to me, Madigan is a whipping boy that his opponents are using against the Democratic Party. Instead of giving in, he’s going to focus on issues he can impact. Pritzker has already said he will work with whoever he can (to contrast himself with Rauner who has worked with no one) to get what’s best for Illinois.

    So, where’s the fumble?


  13. - Teddy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:31 am:

    ==Kennedy answered it best.==

    The problem with Kennedy’s idea to bar property tax lawyers from holding office is that it’s almost certainly unconstitutional. That he continues to make it the centerpiece of his campaign when it’s completely undoable is yet another reason Kennedy needs to go.


  14. - OneMan - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:31 am:

    “That is a question that would be better asked of the speaker”

    See that wasn’t so hard.


  15. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:32 am:

    ===”Do you have the support of Speaker Madigan?”===

    Yep. That’s the question. The sidestep here is to the governing and working together, showing that working together gets things done, with the support of the legislative leaders.

    I guess the other candidates on the Democratic side don’t want to get anything done? Hmm. That’s an odd way to run.


  16. - Teddy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:34 am:

    ==I guess the other candidates on the Democratic side don’t want to get anything done? Hmm. That’s an odd way to run.==

    I didn’t hear that. They all said they would work with Madigan. They just pressed home the point that Pritzker is Madigan’s choice, so he represents much of what voters despise about Illinois politics.


  17. - Ahoy! - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:34 am:

    He is the Speaker of the House, There’s nothing that any of us can do about it.

    So Pritzker thinks Madigan is omnipotent?


  18. - Responsa - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:37 am:

    Ultimately, the gubernatorial nominee from the Dem side is going to need to attract at least some Independent and Republican voters who cast ballots for Gov Rauner last election if he is to be unseated for a second term. It is obvious that some of the Dem candidates get this –and others do not– by the public stances they are taking and certain defenses they are or are not raising.


  19. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:39 am:

    ===They just pressed home the point that Pritzker is Madigan’s choice, so he represents much of what voters despise about Illinois politics.===

    … and making it about getting things done is better than going after Biss for voting for MJM or Kennedy who still thinks he’s running for Cook County Assessor.

    “Answering the question” and keeping it about the governing is the best chance.

    Pritzker is swamping the others in TV and Ads, not unlike Rauner did to the GOP field in 2014. Why look petty?


  20. - MG85 - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:39 am:

    ==The sidestep here is to the governing and working together==

    I much prefer the metaphor Oswego uses, although a sidestep still seems too negative. Sidesteps aren’t always purposely misleading, it’s sometimes a meaningful and nice way of saying “your question isn’t important.”

    I don’t think Pritzker cares if Madigan supports him or not, but his brand is working together not tearing things apart. He wants to be seen as the guy who gets things done. Hard to be that when you’re joining the choir that sings the leader of 1/2 of a coequal branch of government must go or is (insert slander here).


  21. - wordslinger - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:41 am:

    “I am seeking and welcome the support of any and all Democrats, as are all candidates in this forum.

    “And I’ll be reaching out to Independents and Republicans to defeat Raunerism and Trumpism, which should be the primary goal of all the candidates in this forum.”


  22. - Teddy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:42 am:

    ==He wants to be seen as the guy who gets things done.==

    I believe Madigan’s popularity is below Rauner’s. I don’t think Illinois voters want “things to get done” if it means more of the same Madigan/machine politics.


  23. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:44 am:

    I’ve seen him give much much better answers to this question. This was not one of them.


  24. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:46 am:

    ===I believe Madigan’s popularity is below Rauner’s. I don’t think Illinois voters want “things to get done” if it means more of the same Madigan/machine politics.===

    Oh - Teddy -, lol

    “I believe Madigan’s popularity is below Rauner’s.”

    … in the margin of error is probably splitting the middle.

    ===I don’t think Illinois voters want “things to get done” if it means more of the same Madigan/machine politics===

    If you don’t want to beat Rauner, who has so much more power than Rauner, then maybe you’re not looking at this about beating Rauner, or trying to seem thoughtful in your comment here, but with a splash of Kass staining your point of purity.


  25. - Lester Holt’s Mustache - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:47 am:

    The reason the Speaker is supporting Pritzker is because of money, not because of any special policy positions JB holds. If Kennedy or Biss were billionaires willing and capable of not only self-funding but also donating money for down ticket races, they would be Madigan’s pick for governor.

    Frankly, if Biss and Kennedy want to get rid of Madigan so badly, shouldn’t they drop out and support JB? Seriously. Why do Dems follow Madigan’s lead? It isn’t his sparkling personality. It’s because as state party chairman, he controls the money (and in turn, many Dem endorsements). If anyone could break the speakers grip on Illinois D politics, wouldn’t it be an incredibly wealthy democratic governor who could replace Madigan as the financial gatekeeper of party campaign funds? Not that I think Pritzker wants to do so, but out of this bunch he would be the only one with a chance.


  26. - TopHatMonocle - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:49 am:

    I love how when Pritzker mentioned someone up here voted for Madigan to be Speaker, Kennedy immediately grabbed Biss by the shoulder as if to say “go get him buddy”.

    As Pritzker himself stated, the Republicans are going to say they’re all Madigan stooges. He needs a much sharper answer because dancing around it so much throws up a red flag for people. Just keep it simple and say that the Speaker looked at all the candidates and thought I was the most qualified, but his support won’t influence my decisions as Governor. Or something. Just don’t dance around for multiple minutes reciting a laundry list of irrelevant stuff.


  27. - Teddy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:50 am:

    OW, it’s not my politics of purity. I will vote for whoever the Democratic nominee is. It’s acknowledging the reality of the politics today, which is that Madigan is deeply unpopular and that fact will be used, mercilessly, by Rauner. If they successfully tie Pritzker to Madigan, it’s going to be a serious disadvantage.


  28. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:54 am:

    ===I will vote for whoever the Democratic nominee is.===

    … then you may support someone who is being supported by Madigan, like JB Pritzker?

    Then you’re arguing to argue.

    “Pritzker is with Madigan and Madugan is with Pritzker, but if JB wins, I’ll vote for him”

    The target IS Rauner.

    You staying in the end you’ll support the nominee… what the point?


  29. - Teddy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:57 am:

    OW, this isn’t about me or my vote, which is what I was trying to make clear. I’m saying that in figuring out which nominee is most likely to beat Rauner (which I think is the point of most discussions of the primary), we should acknowledge that Pritzker is most tightly tied to Madigan, who will be an albatross in the general.


  30. - A guy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:58 am:

    The lack of readiness for this question at this point in the campaign is astounding. It really is. He didn’t just fumble it, he booted it too. As these things become more televised and easier to see, JB is going to highlight more and more how inept he is at this.

    Kennedy actually had an answer. Was it great? It was good enough after hearing JB. Crazy.


  31. - JoeMaddon - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 10:58 am:

    *8If Kennedy or Biss were billionaires willing and capable of not only self-funding but also donating money for down ticket races, they would be Madigan’s pick for governor.**

    Well, to be fair, Kennedy was MJM’s first pick, until MJM determined that Kennedy wasn’t sufficiently wealthy enough.


  32. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:02 am:

    ===I’m saying that in figuring out which nominee is most likely to beat Rauner (which I think is the point of most discussions of the primary), we should acknowledge that Pritzker is most tightly tied to Madigan, who will be an albatross in the general===

    … all the while you have no problem, if it’s JB who wins?

    So you’re the only “enlightened one”?

    So Dems won’t rally, as you seem to think, as you will do, to defeat Rauner?

    Rauner is running with a 63% disapproval, and “Pat Quinn fails” as a template and Bret Baier framing Rauner’s incompetency, what exactly are you saying?

    “I’m a Dem. Rauner has been awful. I’ll vote for Bruce anyway”?

    The goal is it get more Dems and Labor voters to vote against Rauner. Deciding a civil war in the Dem party is best is counter-intuitive.

    I’m just glad you’re evolved, not unlike the voters you think are as evolved(?)


  33. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:05 am:

    The teacher’s union was clearly not on Pritzker’s side.

    Kennedy hit the nail on the head about our ridiculous property tax system in Cook County. Pritzker can’t make that case because he of his own property tax fiasco


  34. - Beers of Champaign - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:07 am:

    Pritzker is flailing in his own Blago-Madigan wasteland. Kennedy really does have him cornered. Imagine a debate where Rauner and ILGOP couldn’t score any points by using cheap corruption buzz words. Using the primary to reform the party may be uncomfortable for some establishment types, but it’s invigorating, inspiring to us voters.


  35. - Teddy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:10 am:

    OW, $1.5 million people voted for Jill Stein in 2016 out of bitterness towards the Dem establishment. Saying that I will not be one of those people doesn’t mean those people don’t exist. We’ve learned the price of disillusionment with the establishment, and it’s not pretty.


  36. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:14 am:

    ===Saying that I will not be one of those people doesn’t mean those people don’t exist. We’ve learned the price of disillusionment with the establishment, and it’s not pretty.===

    If you can’t convince a Dem that Rauner is destroying the state and a Dem will be better than Rauner… you will never get them to vote against Rauner.

    Even you, who will vote for the Dem nominee see Rauner as unacceptable. Dems that won’t see that aren’t going to see beating Rauner as important, no matter the nominee.

    Inflaming a civil war to impede the end goal is helping Rauner.


  37. - MG85 - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:19 am:

    ==OW, $1.5 million people voted for Jill Stein in 2016 out of bitterness towards the Dem establishment==

    Dollar sign aside, your takeaway from the presidential election is misguided. HRC, who is the epitome of establishment, won IL by a 17 point margin. The only thing the Dem nominee wants to do in the general election is replicate that feat.

    Tying Rauner to Trump is worse for him than it is to his favor by tying the Dem nominee to Madigan.

    Also, Jill Stein isn’t running for Governor.


  38. - WizzardOfOzzie - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:20 am:

    If his own party laughs at Pritzker’s claims of independence from Madigan, what are actual independents going to think?

    This is a major issue, and Dem electeds who endorse JB are ignoring it at their own peril.

    Also, JB does not look comfortable on the stump.


  39. - Uncle Buck - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:23 am:

    What did we learn here. Maybe that JB isn’t as slick as all those ads he is running. Like the one about his poor family history.

    Maybe that democrats aren’t goung to fall all over themselves for JB. The laughter was painful and should send a message.

    We learned that JB bears a certain resemblance to an east coast governor and should probably eat healthier given his family’s heart history.

    We learned that being a billionaire doesn’t always mean you can think on your feet. Rauner is ten times worse, but as we get to see more reporters grill JB about topics like Blago phone conversations and toilets, we may see more fumbling.

    The connection to Madigan is real, and it isn’t popular with the voters. This thing isn’t over yet.


  40. - Whatever - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:24 am:

    “Darting questions”???? Who wrote this nonsense?


  41. - Responsa - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:24 am:

    ==He didn’t just fumble it, he booted it ==

    Kind of like Schwarber in the game yesterday.


  42. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:25 am:

    Rauner is running with a 63% disapproval, and “Pat Quinn fails” as a template and Bret Baier framing Rauner’s incompetency, what exactly are you saying?

    OW you are citing one poll of 600 people by the Democratic Governor’s association.

    Consider the source, what did you expect them to find? How does permanently rising income taxes by 32% and not reforming Illinois government or our business environment poll?

    There was significant blowback as most of those “perfect 10″ you admire so much are not running for reelection.

    Why do you think the Democrats are immune to that same blowback and why would the majority of Democrats vote for the Speaker’s hand picked candidate who won’t challenge him?


  43. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:28 am:

    ===Like the one about his poor family history.===

    This says volumes more about you as a person than your comment tries to say about JB Pritzker the candidate and the person. How terribly pathetic it must be, not to have sympathy or empathy to a story that includes losing a parent, and the other battling the disease of dependency.

    Oh, and before you put a price on losing a parent to death or dependency, talk to others what they’d pay to have parents back that faced similar challenges.

    Be better.


  44. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:36 am:

    At your sanctimonious best OW.

    Not a hint of irony that you are the one calling out commenters for staying out side the boundaries of good manners


  45. - A guy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:38 am:

    ==Kind of like Schwarber in the game yesterday.==

    Actually, by comparison, Schwarber showed the finesse of a ballerina.


  46. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:43 am:

    ===Not a hint of irony that you are the one calling out commenters for staying out side the boundaries of good manners===

    Slip and Sue has had years now to explain all that money she got from her lawsuit and how much was paid to the law firm and why other monies weren’t returned to “make her point”

    Or the RaunerS explaining the clouting of their child, or Diana’s real role in decisions, with emails…

    … but let’s talk about being “sanctimonious”…

    Like giving McCarter a wide berth on votes that have a family connection, or letting Kennedy and Joy be the ones to tell their family stories as theirs and not me deciding what it should be…

    No, I know what I write, exactly as I write it.

    To deny JB hunanity others also deservedly get is the issue, and it’s unfair as emotions and pain have no dollar signs.


  47. - lake county democrat - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:51 am:

    @wordslinger

    You wish, but no. Because legions of regular Democrats are damaged immensely by Speaker Madigan and his ilky allies like Joe Barrios. Given some of the things Madigan has done to Democrats in primaries, I don’t think he has any right to be invoking some sort of Democrat counterpart to Reagan’s first commandment.


  48. - lake county democrat - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 11:56 am:

    If Pritzker can get away with “the governor needs to be able to work with the legislative leadership” then Republicans shouldn’t have to answer questions about Donald Trump. After all, they have to work with the President too, so why get into all this nasty business of asking if they endorsed Trump for President, think he should resign, if his ties to foreign business make his presidency unconstitutional, etc.?

    Transparent dodge not worthy of the highest office of the state.


  49. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 12:04 pm:

    During the presidential election, I did not like either candidate. Next year’s Gov election will be the same if Pritzker is nominated. Being endorsed by Madigan is clearly a point that voters in Illinois, even outside of the Republican Party, find unattractive.


  50. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 12:07 pm:

    ===…you are citing one poll of 600 people by the Democratic Governor’s association===

    If you think Rauner is doing better than the poll having him at 63% disapproval, please cite it.

    ===Consider the source, what did you expect them to find?===

    Are you questioning the poll? The pollster? The results? Hmm. That’s not really questioning that Rauner IS polling awful, is it? No. No it’s not.

    ===what did you expect them to find? How does permanently rising income taxes by 32% and not reforming Illinois government or our business environment poll?===

    I guess Bret Baier is right to question Rauner. Not much will change if Rauner wins a second term? Exactly right? lol

    ===Why do you think the Democrats are immune to that same blowback and why would the majority of Democrats vote for the Speaker’s hand picked candidate who won’t challenge him?===

    Because… They won’t be Bruce Rauner, LOL

    “I’m a Dem. Rauner is worst than Quinn. I’m voting for Rauner”

    That’s not the best campaign strategy.

    ===There was significant blowback as most of those “perfect 10″ you admire so much are not running for reelection.===

    I guess then HB40 and Rauner’s signature will also mean blowback by actual Republican voters turning their back on Bruce Rauner?

    Wasn’t it you that said to the effect even Dem Governors wouldn’t sign HB40… lemme see if I can find this those… lol

    The “perfect 10″, you can’t be angry with them and support the governor for signing HB40, and then say it’s a fiscal issue. Can’t be done.


  51. - JB13 - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 12:21 pm:

    Mike Madigan is only a “GOP talking point?” So, prove it: Buck him.

    I’ll bring the popcorn.


  52. - Quiet Sage - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 12:28 pm:

    The huge advantage Kennedy would have over Pritzker in the general is that an anti-Madigan attack would not work on him. He’s a Kennedy.


  53. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 12:29 pm:

    Yes I am questioning this poll as well as every other poll. Pollster’s track records are not very good these days.

    The bigger point is that it is an irrelevant poll, from a partisan source because there is no nominee from the Democratic side yet.

    Voters have spoken and they are upset with Springfield. You think it is a foregone conclusion that voters want more insiders.

    You have your blinders on if you think the majority of voters in Illinois want Speaker Madigan to have more power.

    The nomination of a handpicked, billionaire candidate for Governor who has no political experience other than questionable ties to an imprisoned former Governor is insider politics at it’s worst.


  54. - Anonymous - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 12:49 pm:

    JB’s Bubble thought re: Wordslinger comment @10:31.
    “Thanks a lot dude. Where were you last Sunday??”


  55. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 1:25 pm:

    ===Yes I am questioning this poll as well as every other poll. Pollster’s track records are not very good these days.===

    Then Mike Madigan can’t be all that bad, since you question “every other” poll out there. Thanks.

    ===The bigger point===

    … that Rauner’s disapproval is at 63%? That’s really high.

    ===Voters have spoken and they are upset with Springfield. You think it is a foregone conclusion that voters want more insiders.===

    You’re right, as a failed incumbent governor, Bruce Rauner needs to be sent home. As a failed governor, Illinois deserves better than Bruce Rauner.

    ===You have your blinders on if you think the majority of voters in Illinois want Speaker Madigan to have more power.===

    I looked this up. The Speaker of the Illinois House is weaker than the Office of the Governor by every measure, including that a governor him/herself is one-third of the governing of Illinois, and the Speaker presides over 1/2 of one-third of that governing.

    I guess you and the Governor Ka k a constitutional understanding of Illinois gonernment. Still, as Pat Quinn failed, so has Bruce Rauner.

    ===… billionaire candidate for Governor who has no political experience other than questionable ties to an imprisoned former Governor is insider politics at it’s worst===

    The nominee will be minted with the nomination by voters, casting ballots, unless you, like Trump, don’t believe in the integrity of Illinois’ elections, but let’s look at what you have here…

    “billionaire candidate”

    Rauner has put in, since 2013 nearly $130+ million to own a party and take over the governor’s office and two caucuses. I’m sure you find that appalling too.

    “Governor who has no political experience other than”

    Thus was Rauner, in 2013, he then became this governor you “worry” about, so the only way this works is you admitting Rauner has proven the “governor” type IS a failure. Thanks.

    “..,questionable ties to an imprisoned former Governor is insider politics at it’s worst”

    “Because Blago”?

    I thought it was “Because Madigan”?

    Pick a lane, Madigan moved to impeached Blago, did you forget that too?


  56. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 2:07 pm:

    Pick a lane?

    Why exactly would Illinois voters want self described Madigan stooge JB Pritzker to be their Governor?

    When he can’t address the substance of the question about having the support of Speaker Madigan, he just sloughs it off as a Republican talking point.

    He is the only one on the stage not criticizing Speaker Madigan at a Democratic event. And you mock “because Madigan”.


  57. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 2:24 pm:

    ===Why exactly would Illinois voters want self described Madigan stooge JB Pritzker to be their Governor===

    “Bruce Rauner failed.”

    “What would be different in a Rauner second term?”

    Lots of reasons to vote against Bruce Rauner. Ask conservatives, lol

    ===When he can’t address the substance of the question about having the support of Speaker Madigan, he just sloughs it off as a Republican talking point.===

    It is a Raunerite talking point, yes.

    Never substance from the Raunerite state party but 19 “Madigan” references.

    Whomever wins the nomination, they will be tainted as “Madigan’s stooge”. It’s all Raunerites got.

    ===He is the only one on the stage not criticizing Speaker Madigan at a Democratic event. And you mock “because Madigan”.===

    Campaigns choose many different strategies. Maybe we might see Proft’s phony newspapers telling candidates to run against Rauner. So?

    Pritzker’s poor answer then is just that, because he and every Dem that wins will magically be “Madigan’s Stooge”. The fact that the others seemingly are obsessed and short-sided, that’s campaigns in a nutshell


  58. - EVanstonian - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 2:35 pm:

    The best sidestep here, by any candidate, is “You aren’t asking if I have the support of a person, you’re asking if I am a machine Democrat. I’m not. I believe Democrats will vote for me because of my values and beliefs, and I believe we’ll get a lot of Republicans to cross-over in the general because they’re tired of seeing someone they can’t trust in the Governor’s mansion. What has been lacking in Illinois politics, maybe even on both sides, is integrity. I have integrity and I won’t back down from hard truths.”

    You’ll get hammered by people saying “maybe on both sides” but in a primary I don’t think you should be going full Drury and tearing up your own party. Call me old fashioned. Don’t use the Speaker’s name - address the reason they’re asking the question, and that’ll be the winner.


  59. - Anon0091 - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 2:58 pm:

    “Well, to be fair, Kennedy was MJM’s first pick, until MJM determined that Kennedy wasn’t sufficiently wealthy enough.”

    No, Madigan supported Kennedy until he realized Kennedy was a disastrously bad candidate. Can’t raise money. Can’t articulate a message. Can’t run a campaign. Can’t show up properly dressed. And he has the gravitas of one of my kids.

    Seriously, I saw Kennedy twice on Sunday and all I could do is shake my head at how awful he was. Biss was solid, but Kennedy was a train wreck. That’s one key reason why the Speaker, labor, county chairs and a whole lot of other folks turned away from Kennedy despite his universal name recognition. If Kennedy had Pritzker’s money, there would be no consolidation around Kennedy. He’s that bad.


  60. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 3:04 pm:

    ===No, Madigan supported Kennedy until he realized Kennedy was a disastrously bad candidate. Can’t raise money. Can’t articulate a message. Can’t run a campaign. Can’t show up properly dressed. And he has the gravitas of one of my kids===

    Was Bruce Rauner present when you and the Speaker talked so frankly, pointedly, and directly?

    “No, Madigan supported Kennedy until he realized Kennedy was a disastrously bad candidate.”

    Did the Speaker say “This is it, now I’m out” and when was this realization?

    “Can’t raise money. Can’t articulate a message. Can’t run a campaign.”

    It’s really the burn rate that’s so awful. The raising is embarrassing, but the burn rate is where the damage is.

    “Can’t show up properly dressed.”

    See Rauner, Bruce, governor.

    So Madigan has a dress code? Who knew?

    “And he has the gravitas of one of my kids”

    I’m sure your child will be pleased to hear 1) they are an example, 2) it’s not the good example.

    Take a breath, you like Pritzker.


  61. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 3:32 pm:

    That is all the ”Raunerites” have is opposition to The Speaker?

    Have you been paying attention to the backlash against, tax and spend progressive Democrats in Cook County who just raised income taxes permantly by 32% on top of record sales, property, soda and water taxes?

    Your commentary about voters tolerance for tax increases without reform is way off base


  62. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 3:59 pm:

    ===Have you been paying attention to the backlash against, tax and spend progressive Democrats in Cook County who just raised income taxes permantly by 32% on top of record sales, property, soda and water taxes?===

    What Denocrat raised income tax AND also voted for the soda tax?

    I’d like to meet that Democrat that voted for both.

    Oh, and Rauner personally failed to stop both, LOL

    “Vote for me, I fail at stopping things, and my second term won’t be much different.”

    That Rauner. No successes, no budgets, higher debt, raised income tax, destroyed social services, lied to a Catholic Cardinal, signed a bill for taxpayer paid abortions…

    … all that’s left is “Because Madigan”

    The state party tells me so.


  63. - I'mDone - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 5:18 pm:

    1. Anyone who bucks Madigan in the Democratic Party does so at his own peril because he has labor buffaloed into thinking he cares about them (remember the pension bill anyone? He’ll sell you out again if given a chance).

    2. “The problem with Kennedy’s idea to bar property tax lawyers from holding office is that it’s almost certainly unconstitutional. That he continues to make it the centerpiece of his campaign when it’s completely undoable is yet another reason Kennedy needs to go.”

    my response - just because it’s undoable doesn’t mean it won’t resonate with voters. (Exhibit A: Rauner and Trump). FACTS DON’T MATTER ANYMORE.

    3. Kennedy was the only one with a clear succinct answer. I’m by no means a Kennedy supporter, but if he does a little more of that as we move along, he remains a top tier contender.


  64. - Lucky Pierre - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 7:06 pm:

    Maybe you missed it OW but all the candidates on the stage at that Democratic forum except JB Pritzker agree with the “Because Madigan” line. These are Democrats not “Raunerites”.

    I guess you and JB are alike in that regard except he is a liberal billionaire from Chicago and you are a “Republican” from Oswego.

    Voters are angry and voting for the hand picked candidate of the establishment that advocates for the failed status quo and no reform of our government or business environment in Illinois is not likely to happen.

    Why do you think Rauner won in the first place? Now you think voters will go back to one party rule in Springfield because they loved it so much for the previous 12 years?


  65. - Oswego Willy - Tuesday, Oct 10, 17 @ 7:26 pm:

    ===Maybe you missed it… but all the candidates on the stage at that Democratic forum except JB Pritzker agree with the “Because Madigan” line. These are Democrats not “Raunerites”.===

    They may feel that Madigan isn’t supporting them, so go after who Madigan is allegedly supporting.

    Instead of focusing on Rauner who has personally destroyed social services and higher education Dems are choosing to go after each other, when petitions are still on the street. Campaigns choose their own ways.

    Rauner will have HB40, a bill you said even Democratic governors wouldn’t sign, and we’ll see how Proft will tear into the most socially liberal governor in the county masquerading as a Republican, but governing as Diana Rauner requires.

    ===I guess you and JB are alike in that regard except he is a liberal billionaire from Chicago and you are a “Republican” from Oswego===

    Not really. As a Republican seeing how Raunerism turned its back on Raunerites and Republicans in the GA, if anything, my Republican credentials have been vindicated by Rauner and fit example signing HB40, something you said Denicratic Governors wouldn’t do because it’s too liberal.

    Bruce Rauner is more liberal then Democrats. Whew.

    I’ll let Pritzker speak for himself, LOL

    ===Why do you think Rauner won in the first place?===

    … same reason he might lose in the second place, “Bruce Rauner failed Illinois”

    ===Now you think voters will go back to one party rule in Springfield because they loved it so much for the previous 12 years?===

    First Rauner cripples Catholic Charities, then Rauner lied to Cardinal Cupich about HB40.

    That type of Governor isn’t good for Illinois.

    Do you want me to start pulling your comments on HB40?

    That will be fun.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Konkol out at Chicago Reader after "tumultuous ten days"
* Madigan asks Bustos, Mendoza and Ammons to "develop a plan for elevating the status of women in the party"
* Saturday quick hits: Mendoza wants Quincy veterans moved; Biss and Raoul report big bucks; Reader cover fallout intensifies
* Reader comments closed for the holiday weekend and some late news updates
* Question of the day
* Kennedy wows Daily Herald
* The perils of sticking too closely to talking points
* Fitch warns another Illinois stalemate could trigger rating downgrade
* More ads than you can shake a stick at: Rauner, Ruiz, Rotering, Quigley, Proft and Clark
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Latest Quincy Legionnaires’ case was Rauner's State of the State guest
* Ives release new ad, endorsed by Susan B. Anthony List, slams Trib endorsement of Rauner
* *** UPDATED x1 - Drury responds *** Appellate court rules unanimously that Drury should appear on AG ballot
* Rep. Feigenholtz files bills "to give strength to more victims"
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Kennedy again dismisses workers' comp as an issue
* Pritzker goes after Biss' "middle-class governor" claim, also airs ad featuring Stratton
* Will Gov. Rauner's cost-shift help wealthier schools and hurt poor districts?
* Biss airs new "middle-class governor" ad
* "Men and women who once were quasi-normal human beings become alien life forms"
* Lipinski wants IRS probe of Illinois Policy Institute leaders
* Surprise! Tribune endorses Bruce Rauner
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** UPDATED x2 - Brown: "We are not involved" *** Alaina Hampton sends cease and desist letter; Kevin Quinn arrested for violating protection order
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* House Speaker Madigan calls for end to harassme.....
* New Illinois Sports Betting Bill Includes MLB, .....
* Madigan says he's taking steps to end harassmen.....
* APNewsBreak: 2016 report put Quincy plumbing fi.....
* Madigan says he's taking steps to end harassmen.....
* Madigan says he's taking steps to end harassmen.....
* Andy Shaw: Basic responsibilities in a democracy..
* Madigan says he's taking steps to end harassmen.....


* Mourners: Slain Chicago officer was 'one of the good guys'
* Cause of fire that killed 6 in Illinois can't be determined
* It's championship day for Illinois high school wrestling
* Sikh driver's complaint referred to state prosecutors
* Madigan says he's taking steps to end harassment, abuse
* Madigan says he's taking steps to end harassment, abuse
* University of Illinois selects projects for $11M investment
* EXCHANGE: Animal rescue means personal sacrifices
* EXCHANGE: Red hats boost awareness of heart disease
* Tollway executive director leaving for stadium authority

* Opponents: Rauner insurance changes would hurt state workers, retired teachers
* Can middle-class candidate Daniel Biss defeat millionaires in Illinois?
* Speaker Madigan: 'I take responsibility' for not doing enough on sexual harassment issue
* Former Lanphier player among the latest Legionnaires' cases in Quincy
* Former Lanphier player among the latest Legionnaire's cases in Quincy
* 2016 report put Quincy veterans' home plumbing fix at $8M
* Appellate court rules Drury can stay on March primary ballot
* Former Lanphier star among the latest Legionnaire's cases in Quincy
* Ousted Madigan ally accused of violating protective order in different case
* Another new case of Legionnaires' disease reported in Quincy

* Half-hour to Cleveland by hyperloop?
* How did MetLife lose track of thousands of pension clients?
* This Chicago law firm has the rights stuff
* U of C to host Clinton Foundation event
* SEC kills Chinese-linked takeover of Chicago Stock Exchange


* WATCH: Jazz rookie Donovan Mitchell wins slam dunk contest
* Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane lead the way as Blackhawks snap 8-game skid
* LeBron James says he ‘will definitely not shut up and dribble’
* NBA All-Star game preview: Teams picked by LeBron, Steph prepare to collide
* Suns’ Devin Booker walks off with NBA 3-point title with record final round
* Statement from Sun-Times Media CEO on change in Chicago Reader leadership
* Man charged with hate crimes in racist tirade, threats at Calumet City bus stop
* U.S. men’s hockey team doesn’t have a miracle, medal in it
* Corey Crawford still no closer to returning for Blackhawks
* 16-year-old girl reported missing from Skokie


* Officials: Man found in burning car in Mount Prospect was fatally shot
* Woman, 23, accused of removing evidence in homicide case
* Bulls rookie Lauri Markkanen caps All-Star weekend with runner-up skills finish
* Biden, in public and private, tiptoes toward a 2020 presidential run
* Carnival passengers say cruise devolved into violent mess due to family intent on trouble
* Nikolas Cruz: 'We had this monster living under our roof and we didn’t know.'
* Pope revives lapsed sex abuse commission after controversial defense of Chilean bishop
* Northwestern blows 27-point lead to fall to No. 2 Michigan State 65-60
* 'No more BS': Pain turns political in Parkland after school shootings
* Bail denied for man accused of threatening black mother, son, 12


» Mourners: Slain Chicago Officer Was 'One Of The Good Guys'
» Madigan Says He's Taking Steps To End Harassment, Abuse
» 2016 Report Put Quincy Plumbing Fix At $8M
» State Week: Governor Rauner Presents His Budget
» Rauner Budget Doesn’t Use 'Pixie Dust,' But It’s Fanciful Nonetheless
» Dem Candidates Dissatisfied With Madigan's Response To Sexual Harrassment Claims
» 10 Years After NIU, Shooting Survivor Reflects On Florida Tragedy
» Prosecutor: Slain Police Commander Was Shot 6 Times
» Cubs First Baseman Rizzo Travels To Florida To Offer Support
» Women Rising: The Push For Gender Parity In State Government


* Statehouse Insider: Don't spend that tax cut all at once
* Andy Shaw: Basic responsibilities in a democracy
* Lincoln Land Community College: Come see us at Campus Visit Day tomorrow
* Opponents: Rauner insurance changes would hurt state workers, retired teachers
* Can middle-class candidate Daniel Biss defeat millionaires in Illinois?
* Speaker Madigan: 'I take responsibility' for not doing enough on sexual harassment issue
* Bernard Schoenburg: 3 years later, Rauner tells similar incomplete story
* Former Lanphier player among the latest Legionnaires' cases in Quincy
* Heidi Stevens: I knew slain Chicago cop, and he was as wonderful as people are saying
* Ed Rogers: The so-called GOP-FBI split is a Democratic fantasy


* Police: Use caution on icy roads in Central Illinois
* Mercer County child dead after being in frozen pond
* Stolen property recovered during search in Herrin
* Cube champions: Rubik's Cube gains popularity with local kids
* Polar Plungers brave cold temperatures for a good cause
* Red Dress Run: Hundreds gather for charity run
* Author and exhibit explore life of Laura Ingalls Wilder
* Construction worker dies in cave-in
* 2018 State Wrestling Finals
* HS Boys Swim: 2018 Sectionals


* (No heading)
* Novak helps Grayslake Central snap streak
* Blackhawks rout Caps 7-1 to end 8-game losing streak
* Hearts of Gold honors Arlington Heights' unsung heroes
* Medical examiner: Man found dead in burning car was shot multiple times

* Democrat Schneider, Republican Hultgren si...
* ELECTIONS 14TH CONGRESSIONAL DIST. Victor ...
* This RSS feed URL is deprecated
* Duckworth taps downstate principal as Stat...
* House passes bill boosting funding to Illi...
* Before the State of the Union, a chance to...
* What to Expect When Congress Talks Blockch...
* Oklahoma senator will serve as co-chair of...
* A New Congressional Caucus Backs Planetary...
* Assault weapons used to be illegal. What h...

* This RSS feed URL is deprecated...
* Letter: Democrats will be irrelevant if th......

* This RSS feed URL is deprecated...

* Lupe Fiasco’s ‘Harold’s’ builds on Chicago hip-hop’s historical connection to the fried-chicken chain [UPDATED]
* Statement from Sun-Times Media CEO on change in Chicago Reader leadership
* ABL reviews #BlackPanther
* What A Difference A Year Makes
* Rauner adopts Madigan plan for pension cost shift to local school boards.
* Sketchbook.
* Chicago FOP announces judicial endorsements for the upcoming primary
* February 22 reception for Ketki "Kay" Steffen
* @formyblock: Shoveling for Seniors #twill
* Pre-Presidents Day Fundraiser tomorrow for Judge Toya T. Harvey


* Illinois Awarded Funds to Offer Advanced Training on Detecting Impaired Driving
* Illinois EPA Announces Upcoming Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events
* IEMA Highlights Emergency Preparedness for People with Access and Functional Needs in May - Ready Illinois website offers preparedness tips for people, caregivers
* First Lady Launches Illinois Family Connects
* Governor and Lt. Governor Unveil 2016 Journal of Local Government Shared Service Best Practices

  
* No breaks for Huawei or HTC | #PNWeekly 292
* How ad-free subscriptions could solve Facebook
* Best cases for the OnePlus 5T
* Buy a phone on Project Fi, get $80 of service credit
* LG G7 won’t be G7, but is codenamed “Judy”
* Fourth new color for Essential Phone only on Amazon
* Error -6722 stopping you from setting up your HomePod? Here’s what to do

* Projections? We don’t need no stinkin’ projections
* Abreu embraces mentor role with countrymen
* Meet the Players: Matthew Smith
* Meet the Players: Rob Hill
* Pipeline Podcast: Robert on fast track?
* Pipeline Podcast: Luis Robert expectations
* Giolito confident after success at season's end


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller