Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » Report: Amazon subsidy could add up to $2 billion
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Report: Amazon subsidy could add up to $2 billion

Friday, Oct 20, 2017

* Paris Schutz at WTTW

Chicago, Cook County and Illinois government are willing to shell out an incentive package worth around $2 billion in order to lure Amazon, according to two sources close to the bid process. That breaks down to around $1.6 billion in tax breaks and $400 million in infrastructure and capital spending around the project, the sources said. It is not known how the money is divided up between city, state and county, and over what period of time the incentives would be paid.

The main tax incentive the state has to offer is the EDGE tax credit, which was re-authorized into law this year by Gov. Bruce Rauner after it had expired. It works as a credit against payroll taxes for companies that create new jobs in the state. The credit has been controversial in the past, but several analysts say it would make sense in this instance, as Amazon is pledging to create 50,000 new jobs with an average salary of $100,000 and invest $5 billion in new office space. […]

Others point to the fact that the choice is between having Amazon and giving them tax breaks vs. not having the company at all. “It’s not as if you’re pledging current revenue to them,” Msall said. “That revenue doesn’t exist yet. You’re just pledging future revenue if they get here.”

* Related…

* Some of Amazon’s Suitors Have Been Burned Before: Good Jobs First says that in trying to lure and retain employers, many cities and states give away more than they get back. The group’s analysis of 386 deals worth at least $50 million since 1976 found that the average cost per job created was $658,427 — far more than cities and states could expect to get back from income taxes, sales taxes, property taxes or other revenue.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

  1. - Ed Higher - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 9:58 am:

    “We lose money on every deal, but we make it up in volume…”

  2. - Amalia - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 9:59 am:

    I just can’t get my hopes up about this one. Chicago is an amazing place, with great universities, a transportation system that is much better than residents give it credit, a workforce ready to meet the workplace challenge, and an environment of cultural richness. But maybe they will move to Austin, apparently a top choice. so I can’t get emotionally invested. I’m still not over the Olympics loss. who knew that another city could be better at bribes.

  3. - The Captain - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 10:03 am:

    NJ reportedly offered up to $7 billion, so if Illinois wins it won’t be because we bought it.

  4. - HangingOn - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 10:03 am:

    Offer them the Thompson Center. 2 birds, one stone :p

  5. - Homer J. Quinn - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 10:08 am:

    the workforce they’re trying to attract doesn’t want to live in Chicago. they’re not going to choose a location that would actively deter new talent. it’s going to be Denver.

  6. - TopHatMonocle - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 10:11 am:

    Not even one third of what New Jersey offered. Guess we can stop all the hand-wringing over this, Amazon isn’t coming.

  7. - Blue dog dem - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 10:11 am:

    Sales tax a must on internet sales.

  8. - Retired Educator - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 10:12 am:

    Nothing ventured, nothing gained. I know that if we don’t get the facility we don’t get the jobs. Maintaining the status quo isn’t an option. If we want the state to prosper we need this type of business to come to Illinois.

  9. - Robert the 1st - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 10:17 am:

    Chicago is at capacity. Which is a good thing. I don’t think the city has a chance at this HQ2. Not to mention the other issues.

  10. - PJ - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 10:26 am:

    ===Not even one third of what New Jersey offered.===

    Good. The race to see who can give the most enormous tax break to a multibillion dollar corporation is not one I want to win.

    Basic free market economics that conservatives claim to adore would tell you that massive government subsidies are not a stable or efficient path for growth.

    Politicians want to tout the job numbers. They don’t want to calculate the potential damage that a Foxconn-like deal could actually cause in the long run. I’d love to have them choose Chicago, but not because we subsidized them to the tune of the yearly GDP of a small country.

  11. - Anonymous - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 10:34 am:

    Listening to NPR on the way home last night, and the term corporate citizen popped up concerning Amazon. They a city like Detroit might be a place they should look at to aid in revitalization instead of whichever city could roll out the biggest “cactus”.

  12. - My button is broke... - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:15 am:

    With those job and salary numbers, it would take 8 years for the State to recoup the $2 billion figure just on the income taxes of those workers (sales and property taxes and other taxes would be gravy). So for $2 billion, that’s a steal. I’m surprised the number isn’t higher.

  13. - Last Bull Moose - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:15 am:

    Amazon would be economically and culturally transformative. Chicago could absorb the additional people, though there would be many complaints about gentrification. Chicago is still down about 1 million people from its peak population.

    $2 billion would be money well spent.

  14. - m - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:19 am:

    There are a lot of articles and analysis trying to guess what city wins. Has anyone seen one where Chicago is even a top 5? It’s an honest question., just curious how they would describe it.
    Here’s one of the better ones I found-

  15. - Responsa - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:29 am:

    ==the term corporate citizen popped up (NPR) concerning Amazon. They a city like Detroit might be a place they should look at to aid in revitalization==

    Yeah that’s pretty silly. Its not Amazon’s responsibility to pick a city to come into to “revitalize”. HQ employee types clamoring to move to Detroit? Not so much.
    Most people I know won’t even go to Detroit to attend baseball games or basketball tourneys anymore.

  16. - Rich Miller - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:30 am:

    ===HQ employee types clamoring to move to Detroit? Not so much.===

    It’s a hipster mecca these days.

    ===Most people I know won’t even go to Detroit to attend baseball games===

    Says more about you than you might think.

  17. - Loop Lady - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:34 am:

    Detroit is already on its way back…

    I fail to see a long term upside snagging Amazon…

    Besides, they are responsible for the demise of shop local…

  18. - Anonymous - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:45 am:

    Inside information is leaking and Chicago is not on the list. Austin Tx and Atlanta GA are rumored to be #1 and 2 followed by some other non-Illinois cities.

  19. - City Zen - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:48 am:

    Why don’t we build Amazon a stadium? It’d be cheaper.

  20. - Been There - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:48 am:

    If their projected number of 50,000 jobs actually came through we would have to be offering them almost $33 billion if we used the $658,000 average. The $2 billion deal is only $40,000 per job. If we get it that would be a steal.

  21. - Been There - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:51 am:

    ===It’s not as if you’re pledging current revenue to them,” Msall said. “That revenue doesn’t exist yet. You’re just pledging future revenue if they get here.”====
    This is the least understood part of most incentives. And a lot of the press seem to be the least educated on how these incentives actually work.

  22. - Epic - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:52 am:

    New Jersey’s 7 billion give away means nothing, the largest city in NJ is not even half a million people so it does not even meet the requirements. They are just trying to desperately bribe there way in. It might get some overspill if New York or Philly area get it.

  23. - @MisterJayEm - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:55 am:

    “Amazon would be economically and culturally transformative.”

    Yes, but that cuts both ways, e.g. and

    – MrJM

  24. - Curl of the Burl - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 11:56 am:

    Quicken relocated to Detroit - in part to help jump start Detroit’s economy and standing. Their plan is working.

  25. - Anon221 - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 12:21 pm:

    Detroit has some pretty impressive PR just released. Watch the video.

  26. - City Zen - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 12:29 pm:

    ==Quicken relocated to Detroit…==

    …from a suburb 20 miles away.

  27. - Cassandra - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 12:58 pm:

    It sounds like a bad deal (for taxpayers) to me but I suppose it’s all in the assumptions you make and the way the data are presented. I’m sure Amazon and our local politicians will present an excellent case for these gigantic tax breaks.

    I am, however, intrigued. What are these 50,000 employees making an average of 100k going to be doing? I thought today’s tech behemoths were heavily into automation and small human workforces.

  28. - wordslinger - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 3:00 pm:

    ===HQ employee types clamoring to move to Detroit? Not so much.===

    There is a little mom-and-pop outfit called General Motors.

    ===Most people I know won’t even go to Detroit to attend baseball games===

    Oh please. Tigers drew 2.3M in a down year. It’s a great ballpark and perfectly safe.

    –New Jersey’s 7 billion give away means nothing, the largest city in NJ is not even half a million people so it does not even meet the requirements.–

    There’s a pretty big city just across the Hudson, another just across the Delaware.

    I get the impression that some are working themselves into a state that this Amazon “competition” is “Chicago’s to lose.” Is there any reason to believe that?

  29. - Whatever - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 3:40 pm:

    Cassandra — the whole notion that there are going to be 50,000 jobs or that they will pay $100,000 each on average is hype, at best. This is for a second headquarters, and not a move or replacement of the old headquarters. Amazon’s pitch makes it sound like it will grow to the size of its current headquarters, or 50,000, and promises “high paying” jobs, without getting specific. Amazon’s most recent 10-K says it had 341,000 employees as of 12/31/16. What on earth are they going to do with 100,000 headquarters employees? Also, for 2016, Amazon reported operating expenses (other than costs of sales) of about $43.5 billion, which works out to less than $126,000 per employee if 100% of those costs were for employee compensation, which is obviously not the case. So states can dream on about the $100,000 average salary.

  30. - Ginhouse Tommy - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 4:03 pm:

    While the Chicago area has a lot to offer the financial situation in the state is a downer. The traffic is a killer too. The NYT did an article where the picked the city for Amazon and they figured out Denver was the best choice. Chicago and St. Louis was out on the first go round. I get the hometown pride thing but realistically Chicago has on outside shot.

  31. - Lefthand Louie - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 4:35 pm:

    Whichever state wins the Amazon HQ2 bidding war is going to pay a king’s ransom. And it will be worth it.

    This is a generational opportunity, and would be a big big win for Chicago and Illinois. I know there is a reluctance to overpay, but Amazon is a transformative entity unlike most others. Every retailer today fears Amazon.

    If it happens it would re-energize the city, and pay dividends to the state. Despite all the positives Chicago and Illinois have to offer, the inability of leaders across our state to demonstrate they can work together consistently is a big hurdle to overcome. All leaders, even OW’s beloved Mike Madigan are to blame. As is Rauner and Rahm.

  32. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Oct 20, 17 @ 4:39 pm:

    === All leaders, even OW’s beloved Mike Madigan are to blame.===

    Making it about me isn’t making an argument.

    I know, it felt good to type, lol

    I’m a Republican and right now Raunerism destroyed the ILGOP, Bruce and Diana Rauner own it now.

    To this idea who owns the loss?

    Looks like Rahm and Bruce want the win… so are you saying Madigan wins if Bruce and Rahm get Amazon too?

    You think on that, lol

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* I've just never seen anything like this
* Pritzker then and now
* Oppo dump!
* Another former Pritzker campaign worker comes forward as the spin cranks up
* HB40 backstory: A preemptive strike and throwing Norwood under the bus
* Pritzker sets national campaign finance record
* New Cook County IG report raises more questions than it may answer
* Keep your fingers crossed
* *** UPDATED x1 - ILGOP responds *** Bombshell discrimination lawsuit called "offensive" and "baseless" by Pritzker campaign
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Supplement to today's Capitol Fax
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Erika Harold reports $1.5 million contribution from Ken Griffin, $100K from Jennifer Pritzker
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...







Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller