Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Janus files first brief in US Supreme Court case against AFSCME
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Janus files first brief in US Supreme Court case against AFSCME

Wednesday, Nov 29, 2017

* Press release…

Today, attorneys for Illinois public servant Mark Janus filed the first merits brief in the Supreme Court case, Janus v. AFSCME. The brief asks the High Court to recognize that the First Amendment protects public workers from being required to make payments to union officials as a condition of working for their own government.

Plaintiff Mark Janus is an Illinois child support specialist who filed the challenge with free legal aid from the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and the Liberty Justice Center. Janus is currently required to pay union fees to AFSCME union officials even though he opposes many of the positions union officials advocate using his money and feels he would be better off without the union’s so-called representation.

In the 1977 Abood v. Detroit Board of Education case, a divided High Court ruled that public employees could not be required to subsidize many political and ideological union activities; however the court left in place forced fees used to subsidize union monopoly bargaining with the government. In a series of cases in the last five years, the Supreme Court has begun to question the theory underpinning Abood.

In the National Right to Work Foundation-won Knox v. SEIU (2012) and Harris v. Quinn (2014) cases, the Supreme Court made clear that mandatory union payments invoke the highest level of First Amendment protection. In Janus, Mark Janus asks the Supreme Court to apply this heightened scrutiny to all mandatory union payments required of government employees.

If the High Court rules in Janus’ favor, over 5 million public school teachers, firefighters, police officers, and other government employees who currently are forced to pay money to union officials just to keep their jobs would be free to decide individually whether or not to make voluntary union payments. Oral arguments in the case are now expected to occur in late February.

“Forced union fees remain the largest regime of compelled speech in the nation,” said Mark Mix, President of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. “Forty years ago in Abood, the Supreme Court erroneously left forced fees in place citing the artificial distinction between union officials’ ideological activities and union bargaining with the government that inherently seeks to alter public policy.”

“Now that the Janus case is being briefed for argument at the High Court, we are hopeful that in the coming months the Supreme Court will correct this anomaly in First Amendment jurisprudence by striking down all mandatory union payments for public workers,” continued Mix. “Americans shouldn’t forfeit their First Amendment protections just to work for their own government.”

“Government workers like Mark Janus shouldn’t have to pay for union politics just to keep their jobs,” said Jacob Huebert, director of litigation at the Liberty Justice Center. “The First Amendment gives everyone the right to choose which political groups they will and won’t support with their money.”

The brief is here.

- Posted by Rich Miller        

52 Comments
  1. - JazzyJeff - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 2:58 pm:

    It’s not like the union was sprung on these people. They knew what they were getting into when they applied.


  2. - Whatever - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:00 pm:

    From the very first paragraph of the “statement of the case,” the brief makes it clear that Janus’ complaint is based on his claim that he does not want the union to represent him, that is, to speak for him. His legal complaint is not about having to pay for something he receives, it is that he doesn’t want to receive it. If he is successful on this argument, the court will have to hold that the law cannot compel the union to bargain for him or represent him in any way, so he won’t have to pay for anything. But then when the next collective bargaining agreement says that union members have to be paid at least as much as nonunion members doing the same job, and nonunion members have to be laid off first, etc., we’ll see how many state employees opt out of the union.


  3. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:00 pm:

    Unless you’re being forced to take a job I don’t see how anybody’s First Amendment rights are being violated.

    And I really wish someone would ask him if he has the intestinal fortitude to give back all of the benefits he has received as a result of the union contracts he has worked under. If he wants to cut ties then he should cut ties and disavow himself of everything he has gained as a result of the union.


  4. - Frank Grimes - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:05 pm:

    I know the odds are against this because of Gorsuch, but it would be hilarious if this backfired and the Court came up with something that got rid of freeriding.


  5. - thunderspirit - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:06 pm:

    The argument NRTWLDF presents is, unsurprisingly, aimed at undermining unions entirely, not merely public sector unions.

    Phrases like “mandatory union payments” and “forced union fees” being “compelled speech” is designed to open the door to uniion busting nationwide.


  6. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:06 pm:

    Taft-Hartley forces unions to represent all workers in the group. Abood vs. Detriot Board of Education was the Supreme Court’s way of making sure that unions didn’t get ripped off.


  7. - Rabid - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:10 pm:

    your coworkers voted to certify the union, blame them or vote to decertify


  8. - CrispyCritter - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:10 pm:

    Put a check box on the job application, want to be in the union? Yes or No


  9. - Aimtomisbehave - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:12 pm:

    If Janus doesn’t want the union to represent him, then he should work to de-certify the union. Convert a majority of his co-workers over to his side and vote to leave the union.


  10. - bothanspy - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:16 pm:

    JazzyJeff -
    “It’s not like the union was sprung on these people. They knew what they were getting into when they applied.”

    I think that is the point he is making. From the post, “The brief asks the High Court to recognize that the First Amendment protects public workers from being required to make payments to union officials as a condition of working for their own government.”


  11. - Honeybear - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:23 pm:

    Here’s something fun though in the unintended consequences department.
    If compelling an employee to pay an agency fee or fairshare is a violation of free speech as Janus argues. Because one cannot be compelled to pay for speech one does not agree with,
    Then it follows that conversely paying for Union membership is also a political free speech act, like contributions to political campaigns cannot be restrained as affirmed by citizens United.
    Would that not make the actions of a Union like striking, work slow down/stoppage, direct action also a political act and thus cannot be inhibited
    As an expression
    Of free speech?

    Look I’m not a lawyer. I just read this argument in article. Any legal minds want to speculate. I’d appreciate it


  12. - RNUG - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:24 pm:

    Disclaimer: I did not go and read the brief yet.

    I know the courts have been splitting hairs on this issue for years, but the argument here is ignoring one fact.

    The actual political lobbying is done by a supposedly separate organization which is funded by voluntary contributions, not actual union deductions. If Janus’ argument is purely about union dues going to political advocacy, I think it fails on that particular split hair.

    If the argument is that there is an insufficient “Chinese Wall” between the union itself and the union PAC, it might have merit. That argument was used successfully by some Dept. of Revenue state employees back in the 1970’s and more or less resulted in the current “fair share” practice.

    It’s going to be an interesting case to follow …


  13. - Union proud - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:30 pm:

    There are private agency child support worker vacancies out there. Janus can go for one of those. They pay 14 bucks an hour, have less benefits, and no job protections but they aren’t in some pesky union. His profession has non-union equivalents. He just wants to free ride off a good union contract.


  14. - Frank Grimes - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:33 pm:

    Maybe the Court will strike the part of Taft-Hartley that forces the union to represent everyone in the group.


  15. - Raccoon Mario - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:42 pm:

    I don’t agree with my taxes funding wars I don’t support so I should get to opt out of paying taxes.


  16. - Chicago 20 - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 3:59 pm:

    - “Government workers like Mark Janus shouldn’t have to pay for union politics just to keep their jobs,” said Jacob Huebert, director of litigation at the Liberty Justice Center.

    This is a completely false and intentionally misleading statement. Fair share fees are for the costs of representation an employee. Fair share fees cannot be used in any political manner.


  17. - cdog - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:12 pm:

    Why do unions engage in partisan political speech?

    Seems a little out of their wheelhouse.

    And, why do they just support one party?

    It seems that unions have created their own little mess here.

    (btw, the history of worker rights regarding safety, fair wage, etc has been a worthy exercise. But, the current situation, where unions seem to only support liberal politics, is ridiculous.)


  18. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:13 pm:

    Since I got in the Union, I have NOT been forced to be a campaign worker against my will by corrupt political appointees.


  19. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:16 pm:

    The roof leaks in my condo. The condo association voted to repair the roof and have a special assessment, of 1000 dollars. I voted against the roof repair. Now I feel like the condominium is violating my first amendment rights. So I don’t have to pay for the roof repair.


  20. - Ron - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:22 pm:

    “He just wants to free ride off a good union contract. ”

    Terrible for private tax payers though. You know, the vast majority of citizens.


  21. - Robert the 1st - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:23 pm:

    It doesn’t matter if the unions have separate funds/PACs for political activity. The argument is that nearly all work done by government unions is political. Wages, benefits, even work rules affect public budgets, hence it’s political. That’s why this is only about forced dues within public/government unions.


  22. - cdog - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:30 pm:

    The AFSCME Council 31 website does not explain to all the state workers that fund them which PACS are supported by their dues.

    This link shows how partisan this spending has been.
    https://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/12/21/11969/donor-profile-afscme


  23. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:31 pm:

    Ron:

    There’s taxpayers. Period. This attempt to place people into some distinct taxpayer “group” based on their employer is absolute nonsense.


  24. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:32 pm:

    ==where unions seem to only support liberal politics==

    Like that broad brush do you? You aren’t very good at research if you think that.


  25. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:34 pm:

    ==forced dues==

    Nobody is forced to pay dues. Did I miss where we’re required to take a specific job?


  26. - Chicago 20 - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:37 pm:

    - “It doesn’t matter if the unions have separate funds/PACs for political activity.“

    It does matter.

    It’s the law.


  27. - Ron - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:38 pm:

    As a private workforce taxpayer, all I get is higher taxes due to unionized public employees.


  28. - Robert the 1st - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:38 pm:

    It doesn’t matter in this case because that has nothing to do with the argument. Just like it doesn’t matter in this case if unions tend to support one political party over another. Those aren’t the activities in debate here.


  29. - Demoralized - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:41 pm:

    ==As a private workforce taxpayer, all I get is higher taxes==

    Yeah, because tax rates are doled out between public and private sector workers. Enough with this baloney


  30. - Chicago 20 - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:43 pm:

    - cdog
    “The AFSCME Council 31 website does not explain to all the state workers that fund them which PACS are supported by their dues.”

    The reason you can’t find that information is because it doesn’t exist.

    No union PACS are supported by union dues.


  31. - Nick Name - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 4:57 pm:

    “Janus is currently required to pay union fees to AFSCME union officials even though he opposes many of the positions union officials advocate using his money”

    As RNUG and others have pointed out, not a dime of union dues — or fair share fees — goes toward political lobbying and activities. This is by federal law. The Janus case is based on a major misrepresentation of facts.

    RNUG: ==The actual political lobbying is done by a supposedly separate organization which is funded by voluntary contributions, not actual union deductions. If Janus’ argument is purely about union dues going to political advocacy, I think it fails on that particular split hair.==

    Correct. Union members have to file paperwork authorizing a deduction from their pay, over and above their dues (or fair share fees) to support political activity. Unless Janus filed this paperwork, he is not paying anything toward lobbying or other activity he does not agree with.

    Gawd I hope the AFSCME lawyers are up to the task of pointing out this one very simple fact. Upon this, the whole Janus case crumbles.


  32. - Anonymous - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 5:00 pm:

    AfSCME members voluntarily make payments into our People PAC. All voluntary and unrelated to what our dues pay for. Our dues pay for conferences, legal fees, contract negotiation costs and contract maintenance expense.


  33. - Ron - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 5:05 pm:

    Private sector taxpayers get shafted by paying way too much tax for so little public service. Of course public employees are the beneficiary of the higher taxes.


  34. - Chicago 20 - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 5:16 pm:

    - Ron

    “Private sector employees get shafted….”

    Complete unsubstantiated nonsense.


  35. - RNUG - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 5:25 pm:

    Started reading the brief. Bit of irony there. One of the law firms is the one Jim Thompson is associated with.

    If you don’t get then irony, Big Jim is the former Governor most responsible for unions in Illinois State government. And now that law firm is helping to try to destroy unions.


  36. - RNUG - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 5:46 pm:

    Interesting how they drag in Abood, Harris, Citizen’s United, even Rutan … although they are often citing the minority opinion in those decisions, re-arguing the cases.

    They also re-argue the whole AFSCME contract impasse, which reminds us this case started as just another Rauner union attack … until it became obvious that Rauner had no legal standing to bring the case, since he wasn’t employed in a covered union position.


  37. - City Zen - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 6:58 pm:

    ==Big Jim is the former Governor most responsible for unions in Illinois State government.==

    Don’t forget the lobbyists with deep pockets. Per the EIU’s paper PUBLIC SECTOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IN ILLINOIS:

    The primary author of the legislation introduced in 1983 was the Illinois AFL-CIO. As the Illinois Federation of Teachers and the Illinois Education Association represented the vast majority of members in the public education sector, they had a
    major voice in the drafting of legislation as well.


  38. - AC - Wednesday, Nov 29, 17 @ 7:36 pm:

    Da Big Bad Wolf - many condo and homeowners associations contribute to CAI, a lobbying organization, and they fund their contributions through homeowner dues. Condo and HOA members can’t opt out of these contributions, they don’t even have a “fair share” option to only pay non political costs. No billionaires are funding challenges against condo/homeowners associations under the guise of “free speech”. I wonder why? CAI has been tremendously successful as a lobbying organization, most new detached homes are in HOAs. I’m sure unions wish most new jobs were union jobs.


  39. - Da Big Bad Wolf - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 6:40 am:

    AC because LRTWLDF and Liberty Justice Center don’t care about first amendment rights. They care about sabotaging unions. If I, as a condo owner, were to call Libery Justice Center today and ask them to spend enough money so I could take my roof assessment conflict to the Supreme Court what do you think they would say?


  40. - Demoralized - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 7:51 am:

    ==Of course public employees are the beneficiary of the higher taxes.==

    Yep. They don’t pay any of those higher taxes. /s/

    Your arguments are utter hogwash.


  41. - Demoralized - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 7:53 am:

    ==for so little public service==

    And that’s just a ludicrous argument. You let your hate for public employees cloud any reasonable thoughts.


  42. - Responsa - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 8:11 am:

    Many open minded people (and by that I merely mean ones of us who are not directly and personally involved in the issues of this particular case) do see aspects of merit in both sides of the main arguments. If this were an obvious “slam dunk” for either side and not a complex legal and Constitutional matter it would likely not have reached the Supreme Court. I’ll leave it at that.


  43. - City Zen - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 8:26 am:

    ==Yep. They don’t pay any of those higher taxes.==

    Yes, but they also receive a direct monetary benefit from a tax hike. If we raised taxes and that money went to buy software my company develops, I’d be paying higher taxes too, but my compensation (raise) and employment status (less chance of layoff due to budget cut) would directly benefit.

    ====for so little public service==


  44. - City Zen - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 8:28 am:

    ==for so little public service==

    I hate this argument. Please stop insulting the work ethic of government workers.


  45. - cdog - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 8:45 am:

    It’s easy to find the unions financial filing on a .gov, that shows they spend significant dollars on political activities.


  46. - cdog - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 8:50 am:

    I have tried to post a longer explanation but have been moderated.

    The undeniable fact is Councel 31 spends nearly $2m of its revenue on political activities, and I am unable to find a transparent itemization of what has been supported with those funds.


  47. - cdog - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 8:58 am:

    The report is called a LM2 and its on the dol.gov, file number 511-506.

    It’s on Schedule 16, Political Activities and Lobbying, $1.8m.


  48. - City Zen - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 9:27 am:

    @cdog - You’re on the right track. “SCHEDULE 17 - CONTRIBUTIONS, GIFTS & GRANTS” will give you a window into political leanings. For example, there you’ll see financial support for frequent capitolfax content/comment provider “Illinois Working Together.

    Among other things, scroll further to see $123,000 spent on a convention in Las Vegas.


  49. - cdog - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 9:47 am:

    I sure wish normal posts, filled with objective facts, made it on the blog, consistently. I have a response to cz not showing.


  50. - cdog - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 9:49 am:

    I will try again. That schedule you cite, has lots of detail. The previous schedule I cited does not, just one big check, to themselves.


  51. - RNUG - Thursday, Nov 30, 17 @ 12:50 pm:

    -cdog-

    One of mine went off somewhere also.


  52. - Radio Flyer - Friday, Dec 1, 17 @ 8:01 am:

    cdog, so what? This is voluntary money, not dues. Citizens have that right, you know? Did you think they would donate to someone who would govern against their interests?


TrackBack URI

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Reader comments closed for the weekend
* Rauner issues executive order barring legislators from representing clients at PTAB
* Kennedy: Limit top progressive income tax rate to less than 6 percent
* Question of the day
* Next week's House session cancelled
* *** UPDATED x2 - Pritzker "Did Chris Kennedy Just Endorse Bruce Rauner?" - Kennedy campaign tries to explain *** Kennedy says Rauner "should be applauded" for "trying to do what he thinks is best for the state of Illinois"
* Sen. Donne Trotter retires
* Illinois payrolls were up just 0.5 percent last year
* Vitriol continues in Durkin's primary race
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Judge clears courtroom in Rauner lawsuit hearing
* You can't "fully inform" voters without money
* State agrees to a $400 million consent decree
* Rate Prizker's new online ad
* Rauner gets another property tax press pop
* Emanuel pokes Rauner over Amazon comments
* Rauner's new Pritzker ad cost just $11,900
* Kennedy unveils health care plan
* Gov. Rauner gets his own blog
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


* New session will bring new efforts at Illinois .....
* Republican Primary Challenger Jeanne Ives Stops.....
* Democratic Candidate for Attorney General Nancy.....
* Democratic Attorney General Candidate Kwame Rao.....
* The Sunday Spin: Politics with Rick Pearson Ful.....
* WBBM’s At Issue: Bob Fioretti, Candidate for Co.....
* Ives discusses marijuana, DACA as she looks to .....
* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax a.....


* Sangamon County Jail increases inmate mental health services
* Truck driver charged in fatal accident in West Virginia
* U of I's capital plan will focus on facilities
* Bald eagle takes flight at Litchfield lake after rehab
* Bill would give rural Illinois schools high-speed internet
* Northern Illinois utility says customers can get assistance
* EXCHANGE: Basketball bookends Vietnam veteran's story
* EXCHANGE: Brown's Chicken murders changed business forever
* Thousands protest Trump at Illinois women's marches
* $1.9M in Mellon Foundation grants aid UIC humanities studies

* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax appeals
* Outdoor sports participants hoping for larger cut in farm bill
* U of I trustees approve 4th-straight tuition freeze
* Rauner to air extended ad of Pritzker, Blagojevich on wiretap
* Mendoza to keynote Women's March Saturday in Springfield
* Chicago mayor vows to step up Amazon second headquarters bid
* Under the Dome Podcast: More Blago-Pritzker talk, Rauner confirms Duke is racist
* U of I withdrew 35 job offers after background checks
* Frerichs: Can't get tax break for using college savings plan on private K-12 tuition
* Illinois governor to air extended ad of rival, Blagojevich on wiretap

* How important is job flexibility? Our survey wants to know.
* Like our roundup? Share it around.
* What you need to know about the L.A. Times 'frat-boy executive' scandal
* Law firms' 2018 resolution: Less paper
* Could this company become Chicago's own Salesforce?


* Judge facing trial doesn’t want jurors to hear ‘Englewood,’ ‘South Side’
* Amazon to debut cashier-less store in downtown Seattle
* Patriots will return to Super Bowl after rallying to beat Jaguars
* Anti-Trump protesters rally downtown
* 2 ‘Dreamers’ in Chicago wait for word on program’s future — and their own
* At comedy festival touched by harassment, panel of women looks for solutions
* Fred Hoiberg, Bulls players aren’t about to apologize for ruining tank job
* Senate moderates to pitch leaders on plan to end shutdown
* UIC student goes on ‘Shark Tank’ to pitch his idea for a better weight clip
* What Matt Nagy’s coordinator search tells us about the Bears head coach’s style


* Moderate senators race to strike a deal to end government shutdown
* Moran: Waukegan joins the list of communities swinging and missing at Amazon's HQ2
* Patriots storm back to knock off Jaguars 24-20, advance to 8th Super Bowl in 17 seasons
* One year after Trump inauguration, protesters march in Loop
* Billionaire couple from Toronto were murdered by multiple people, private investigators believe
* Actions will speak louder than words for Blackhawks
* A year of Trump's 'America First' agenda has radically changed the U.S. role in the world
* Larry Nassar case shows courage of victims, shamefulness of enablers
* Shut down this shutdown habit
* J.J. Watt, Greg Olsen and Benjamin Watson finalists for NFL's Walter Payton Man of the Year award


» Chicago Schools Chief: Cost A Driver In Special Ed Overhaul
» One Year Later, Women’s March Demands More Than Attendance
» State Week: Education Funding, Pritzker-Blagojevich, Rauner-Duke
» Sheriff Offers To Help Review Police Shootings In Suburban Cook County
» A Prescription For Fruits And Veggies: One Solution To Food Insecurity in Illinois
» A Call For Transparency
» 2 Illinois Governor Candidates Spend $26M In Last 3 Months
» State Board of Education: Double School Funding Now
» Lawmakers Demand Fast Internet For Rural Schools
» 2 Dreamers Discuss Helping Other Immigrants Amid Uncertainty


* Rauner goes after Madigan's other job
* Madeleine Doubek: May we better value journalism and the journalists
* Our View: Springfield needs more than a cautious plan for Y block
* Statehouse Insider: Rauner goes after Madigan's other job
* UIS Perspectives: Public affairs internships lead to success
* Petty, Davidsmeyer both decry anti-Petty calls
* Ed Rogers: High stakes for Trump at the World Economic Forum
* Scott Reeder: Formula for political success is to listen to voters
* Rauner order bars lawmakers from property-tax appeals
* Outdoor sports participants hoping for larger cut in farm bill


* 5 juveniles struck by car in St. Louis; 1 in critical condition
* UI Women's Tennis vs Florida State
* Tazewell, Woodford marriages, divorces: Jan. 21, 2018
* Random Acts of Kindness: Stranger rescues dog in rush hour
* Missing 10-year-old from Missouri found safe
* Followup file: Overlook senior housing taking shape in Moline
* Car flipped on its roof in Decatur accident
* Dense fog advisory remains for northern counties
* Calendar: See Macon County government meetings for Jan. 22-26
* Big story: At Joe's, 50 years of haircuts and life lessons


* The Latest: Fight breaks out in Eagles parking lot
* Brady leads Patriots back to Super Bowl, top Jaguars 24-20
* Depay scores winner as Lyon beats league leader PSG 2-1
* Mount Prospect adds free textile recycling to refuse collection
* Bids to start at $1.2 million for Lake in the Hills shopping center

* Our view: End patronage at Algonquin Towns...
* Letters to the editor: Election commission...
* Teacher raised in Yorkville running agains...
* Subcommittee on Financial Institutions and...
* Lawmakers back renaming Warrenville post o...
* This RSS feed URL is deprecated
* Congressman Randy Hultgren Disagrees with ...
* Bipartisan Illinois criticism follows Trum...
* Shutdown Stalemate As Immigration Negotiat...
* Time Magazine's Powerful New Cover Feature...

* This RSS feed URL is deprecated...
* Tom Cotton flip-flops, confirms Trump's pr......
* Open ine: Tom Cotton flip flops, confirms ......
* BND readers sound off on child porn priest......

* This RSS feed URL is deprecated...
* Senator who lost her legs in Iraq calls Tr......
* Senator who lost her legs in Iraq calls Tr......
* Duckworth calls on Congress to reclaim war......

* Patti Blagojevich slams Rauner's campaign ad using Blagojevich FBI wiretap, and other Chicago news
* Women's March: The Sequel, or this time we have a destination
* Sketchbook.
* From Bev Johns: The ISBE and legislators turned a blind eye to CPS special education mess.
* Hearing aids print money and executives steal it.
* Sketchbook.
* Observing Epiphany With A Plunge In The Lake
* Michael Pfeiffer, Former Crew Server, Missing
* Don't Get Conned By The Armani Jacket Scam
* Sketchbook.


* Illinois Awarded Funds to Offer Advanced Training on Detecting Impaired Driving
* Illinois EPA Announces Upcoming Household Hazardous Waste Collection Events
* IEMA Highlights Emergency Preparedness for People with Access and Functional Needs in May - Ready Illinois website offers preparedness tips for people, caregivers
* First Lady Launches Illinois Family Connects
* Governor and Lt. Governor Unveil 2016 Journal of Local Government Shared Service Best Practices

  
* New Nokia flagship leaks with five camera lenses and Snapdragon 845
* Android 8.0 Oreo will roll out to Sprint HTC U11 on Monday
* Apple's New iPhone X Video Focuses on Selfies Taken With Portrait Lighting
* Samsung Galaxy S9 internal change, Razer Project Linda dates & more – Pocketnow Daily
* Women’s March embraces collaborative social app Crunchet
* Portrait Camera App 'Focos' Gains Real Lens Optical Effects and Improved Shooting Mode
* Shell wants to turn smartwatches into smartphones on a wing (or two)

* Advocating for retired non-numbers
* Getting ready for Soxfest 2018
* White Sox seeking new flagship radio home
* Engel working to steady barrel in Year 2
* WLS parent company looking to end White Sox radio deal
* Inbox: Who replaces Rodon in the rotation?
* 2018 South Side Sox Hall of Fame Ballot


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller