Capitol - Your Illinois News Radar » The politics behind Rauner’s veto and the future of gun bills
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      About     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact Rich Miller
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
The politics behind Rauner’s veto and the future of gun bills

Monday, Mar 19, 2018 - Posted by Rich Miller

* My weekly syndicated newspaper column

Governor Bruce Rauner’s veto of a gun-dealer licensing bill last week took a lot of folks by surprise. It probably shouldn’t have.

We’ll get to the politics in a second, but as with HB40, the governor was acting on his beliefs. Rauner is a strong abortion-rights supporter, so he signed HB40 last year to provide public funding for abortions and protect women’s right to choose if Roe v. Wade is reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Governor Rauner also says he’s an NRA member. And he’s been railing against government regulations of business his entire adult life. This licensing bill checked both of those ideological boxes.

Okay, on to the politics.

After the disastrous two-plus-year state-budget impasse, HB40 gave him an opening with suburban women last year – and you can’t win statewide without that demographic.

Last week’s licensing-bill veto allowed him to throw some red meat at his GOP base a few days before the primary.

Getting on the front page of every newspaper in the state and leading the local TV news coverage and inserting himself into conservative talk radio shows would tend to help the governor with Republican primary voters.

And the more the Democrats scream about that veto, the more Rauner’s base is shored up at an important moment. That may sound cynical, and it most definitely is, but it’s difficult to deny. He upset a lot of conservatives by signing HB40. He needed to make it up to them.

Then, the Friday before the election, the Democratic Governors Association dropped almost half a million dollars on two TV ads designed to both help Rauner’s GOP primary opponent Representative Jeanne Ives court conservative, pro-Trump, pro-gun Republican primary voters and hurt the governor with that same Republican base.

As Rauner knows from his own personal experience, primaries often tighten up at the end. His polling had him leading by double digits four years ago at this time. Back then, he pulled down all his negative ads and switched to a fully positive campaign, only to barely squeak by on primary night. He wouldn’t want to make the same mistake twice.

Rauner probably suspected the DGA was about to do something, so his gun-bill veto earlier in the week was perfectly (accidentally, but still perfectly) timed.

It sure seems as I write this that the governor believed the race was tightening by looking at his behavior last week.

He vetoed that bill to regulate gun sellers, then held a hastily arranged press conference at the now-infamous Quincy veterans’ home to announce some “options” for the future, pulled down his negative TV ad attacking JB Pritzker, reportedly added $350,000 to his already huge $1.5 million buy for the final week, launched a new and more powerful negative ad against Representative Ives that ludicrously tried to connect her to Speaker Madigan, and quickly put together a new TV spot defending himself against the DGA’s onslaught.

With Republican turnout appearing to tank compared to four years ago (which might give the far-right base an advantage), along with the possibility that at least some Cook County Republicans might be taking Democratic ballots to vote against Cook County Assessor Joe Berrios (a possibility that Rauner himself encouraged with his constant attacks on the Madigan-Berrios combine), and the fact that the governor cannot campaign effectively on a record of accomplishments (his positive advertising just says what he will do in the future, although he does take full credit for proposing a $1 billion tax cut that has no chance of passage), plus the intense national political weirdness, it all adds up to a situation where the governor could not afford to take any chances at all.

But wait. What about the gun-bill veto’s impact on the fall campaign? After all, those crucial suburban women are not known for being pro-gun. Just the opposite.

Well, you gotta win the primary before you can get to the general. Plus, the governor is likely betting that the Democrats will send him more gun-related bills and he can sign some or even all of them once the primary is behind him, so he can balance things out for the fall.

The bottom line is: I don’t think this is the end for gun-control legislation this spring. In fact, it could wind up as just the beginning once we get to April. But that will rely on the Democratic leadership wanting to pass laws, not just bills. And I’m not sure yet which path they’ll take.


  1. - wordslinger - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 9:35 am:

    As someone here pointed out at the time of the veto, that “comprehensive” word Rauner kept throwing around signals the likelihood of plenty of gun legislation from Rauner after the primary.

    By now, I hope no one will be surprised if Rauner burns them for his own self-interest.

  2. - RNUG - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 10:12 am:

    == With Republican turnout appearing to tank compared to four years ago ==

    Usually, we vote early. Right now, we’re planning on sitting this primary out. Nobody on the GOP ballot we care passionately about, so we’ll let our absence speak for itself.

  3. - Roman - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 10:28 am:

    It’s interesting that only one of the three gun bills that passed the Senate last week is on the governor’s desk. (The other two were amended so they have to go back to the House for concurrence.)

    That gives Madigan a chance to limit a post-primary “win” for Rauner on gun control that appeals to suburban moderates. Maybe the speaker goes to work on a “comprehensive” package of gun bills that is designed to fail?

  4. - m - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 10:38 am:

    “that will rely on the Democratic leadership wanting to pass laws”

    I can’t imagine they will want to send him any big or controversial bills that don’t put him in a bad spot.

    If he’s willing to sign gun control, they won’t send it, unless there’s a libertarian or independent candidate that can make hay out of the issue and kill his base. Whether there is a good alternative to Rauner for conservatives on the ballot may determine as much as anything. Then they can make him pick between the base and suburban women.

    Otherwise it will be a showcase for how creative they can get with poison pills.

  5. - Thomas Paine - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 10:45 am:

    @RNUG -

    I like to go in an undervote specific incumbents, even when they are running unopposed.

    That, too, sends a message.

  6. - Last Bull Moose - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 10:48 am:

    Politics swamps substance again. My wife and I will be taking a Democratic ballot to support Pat Quinn. If he weren’t running running, we would take a Republican ballot to vote against Rauner.

  7. - Blue dog dem - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 10:58 am:

    Why is this governor obsessed with gaining support from suburban women? I heard it from a reliable.source a week or two ago that those votes are controlled by their significant male other.

  8. - don the legend - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 11:53 am:

    BDD. Very nice.

  9. - Anonymous - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 12:04 pm:

    Democrats would be foolish to send those bills back to Gov. Rauner.

    It’s a clear contrast that the Democratic Candidate cough - JB Pritzker - cough could use to distinguish himself from Rauner. He won’t sign it, I will kind of language.

    Then again, Democratic legislators haven’t shown me much political intelligence since Rauner took office. Maybe they will this time.

  10. - ILAnonymous - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 2:33 pm:

    To say that Rauner is going to make it up to suburban women by possibly signing 1 or all of the other gun bills that may be sent his way is a little idealistic. The most onerous gun bills have not made it to his desk yet. They will prove to be more controversial than the dealer licensing bill or anything other than a 72 hour waiting period. If the gun mag bill or even an outright AWB gets to his desk, watch out after the primaries. Signing any of those will most decidedly turn his base against him, and I am not sure he can make that up with those he tried to court with HB40.

    Senate Dems took the bump stock bill and amended it with a municipal roll-back of State preemption for assault weapons. If it survives a House concurrence and gets to his desk, while some may think it is a trap for Rauner, I have not doubt he will spin that against Dems and could actually be successful.

    Since we are talking the politics of it, that’s the way I see it.

  11. - Arthur Andersen - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 3:41 pm:

    I agree with Thomas Paine and have done the same for years.

  12. - Mama - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 6:38 pm:

    - RNUG - Monday, Mar 19, 18 @ 10:12 am: =

    RUNG, Do you really want to take a chance on more budget crisis over the next 4 years?

    I can’t stomach listening to Rauner whine & lie for another 4 years so I’m voting for Ives.

    Do you really think Ives is no better than Rauner?

    Go vote.

Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.

* Abbott says he will resume migrant busing to Chicago ahead of DNC
* Open thread
* Isabel’s morning briefing
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* Live coverage
* Selected press releases (Live updates)
* Yesterday's stories

Visit our advertisers...






Main Menu
Pundit rankings
Subscriber Content
Blagojevich Trial
Updated Posts

July 2024
June 2024
May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005


RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0

Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller