Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Pritzker hit on taxes
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Pritzker hit on taxes

Friday, Mar 23, 2018

* From the RGA

A new editorial from the Chicago Tribune is calling out J.B. Pritzker’s tax plan for Illinois, pointing out that Pritzker seems to only want one thing – tax hikes and more spending the state can’t afford.

It has been reported that Pritzker has refused to pay his own fair share in taxes – he’s been caught claiming that his Gold Coast mansion is “uninhabitable” to get huge property tax breaks and has reportedly set up offshore shell companies in the Bahamas with the likely aim of dodging federal taxes.

But on the trail, Pritzker’s promised to raise taxes even higher, and it’s leading the Chicago Tribune to ask, “Does Pritzker get it?”

    “What we’ve heard and read so far is that Pritzker wants to tax and spend the state to greatness…raising taxes is no cure-all. It’s a move that will drive away even more employers, jobs and residents.”

J.B. Pritzker’s plan for Illinois is a blatant exercise in hypocrisy – he supposedly won’t pay his own fair share in taxes, but will hike taxes on everyone else.

* From the editorial

“It’s not right that government can destroy your credit and confiscate your car because you can’t afford a few parking tickets,” he said on election night. Hmm, so Gov. Pritzker would pay your parking tickets, too? We’re not sure, but that sounds expensive.

That’s so disingenuous. The idea is to stop criminalizing poverty, not make the state pay parking tickets. They certainly know that.

* Anyway, back to the premise. Voters don’t do nuance. And Rauner’s main message is easy to understand and was summed up well in the RGA release: Pritzker avoids taxes while hypocritically wanting you to pay more.

Pritzker counters that he doesn’t want regular folks to pay more, he wants the well-off to pay more via a graduated tax. But he hasn’t specified what his rates would be at what income levels. And one of the only graduated tax bills out there is this one that the Illinois Policy Institute is relentlessly attacking

House Bill 3522, filed by state Rep. Robert Martwick, D-Chicago, would tax incomes between $0 and $7,500 at 4 percent. For income between $7,500 and $15,000, the rate would be 5.84 percent. For income between $15,000 and $225,000, the rate would be 6.27 percent. And for income over $225,000, the rate would be 7.65 percent.

Sign the petition

Stop the progressive income tax
Sign the petition today to tell your lawmaker to oppose the progressive income tax.

Pritzker was asked earlier today if he supports Martwick’s bill. He said he didn’t and claimed the Illinois Policy Institute was just trying to get Rauner reelected.

I’m not sure what the heck Rep. Martwick was thinking (I asked him if he had any second thoughts this morning, but haven’t heard back), unless the plan is to kill the bill to show Democrats are against those goofy rates.

* From the Rauner campaign…

Now that the general election is here, we need to focus on the issues that unite us, like cutting taxes, so that we can continue building a better future for Illinois.

Meanwhile, JB Pritzker is focusing on figuring out a way to raise taxes on middle-class families. We can’t let that happen!

Donate $10 to our Unity Fund today to show the Democrats that we are ready to take on JB Pritzker in November.

Let’s keep fighting!

Team Rauner

He’s got a “Unity Fund”?

- Posted by Rich Miller        

32 Comments
  1. - siriusly - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:04 am:

    Tribune editorials . . . matter because why?


  2. - jeffinginChicago - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:09 am:

    Has anyone talked to Rahm about the parking tickets? This issue exists because of City ordinances not State laws. According to Propublica 7% of Chicago’s revenues come from tickets and fines. This has a huge impact on poor people.

    Is it an issue for the Governor or the Mayor?


  3. - Anon221 - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:10 am:

    To the Rauner “Unity Fund”… if Pritzker can self-fund, why can’t you??? It would be more to the genuine and keeping to character if Rauner posted instead- “Give us $10 or the interns starve- No pizza parties (or Uno cards).”


  4. - Rutro - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:18 am:

    J.B. should legally do everything he can to bring his wealth (most trusts are probably outside his control) back to the US/Illinois banks/investments, then he should write a check to the assessor for the mansion fiasco and say, your turn Bruce, next issue. He is running for governor and leads by example.


  5. - Metal - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:19 am:

    I hope Pritzker summons some inner Bernie inasmuch as he starts talking numbers. He needs to point out just how bad the deficit and debt are, and that we have 2 options: cut expenditures (the vast majority of which are either non-discretionary or are essential public services) or increase revenue.

    Since those public services (healthcare, education, public safety, infrastructure) are most needed by the poor/working/middle classes, we’re really talking about taking things away from the neediest among us or asking the wealthy to contribute their fair share. Pritzker needs to establish this narrative now and repeat it like a drum beat so voters understand the real choice we have to make as a state.


  6. - XDNR - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:22 am:

    Rauner has a Unity Fund. Isn’t that special. You get a blame Madigan decoder ring when you join.


  7. - Oswego Willy - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:22 am:

    Unity Fund?

    I thought that was ILGo.

    Right? Exactly right.


  8. - City Zen - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:25 am:

    The Human Fund was already taken.


  9. - supplied_demand - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:30 am:

    Is there an estimate on how much revenue House Bill 3522 would raise?


  10. - Grandson of Man - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:34 am:

    Martwick’s bill is not good. The tax rates should be higher on higher incomes and lower on lower ones.

    Pritzker needs to point out the difference between his philosophy and Rauner’s. He can challenge Rauner and say it’s time for wealthy people to pay more. Rauner is against the wealthy paying higher taxes. Rauner’s “toilet-ripping” in a sense is his refusal to pay a higher state income tax.


  11. - DuPage Saint - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:34 am:

    If you contribute to Rauner’s unity fund he should send you a miniature Madigan clock
    With all the money JB is spending on election he should just put toilets back in mansion and say he changed mind about renovations for now and pay proper amount and back taxes and be done with it


  12. - Dan24 - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:35 am:

    Is there any other choice? We are doomed with only these two choices.


  13. - A guy - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:39 am:

    Rich folk sure do hate taxes and paying them. It’s a principle they must pick up at Kellogg and Booth or wherever. If they learn nothing else; they learn that.


  14. - Anonymous - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:45 am:

    State is heading down. The more taxes increase under Pritzker, the more the exodus of tax payers and business will be.


  15. - Anyone - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:49 am:

    House is on sale. Heading to Michigan. 4.25% flat income tax, 6% sales tax


  16. - The Iceman Cometh - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 11:50 am:

    ===I’m not sure what the heck Rep. Martwick was thinking===

    FWIW, the rates are the same as Wisconsin’s, and the brackets are similar.

    https://www.tax-brackets.org/wisconsintaxtable

    Trolling the IPI and their admiration of Scott Walker?


  17. - Anonymous - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:01 pm:

    Martwick’s bill is bad politics in an election year, but that is what we can expect with a progressive income tax. If the goal is net new revenues, you cannot expect a middle class tax cut to be made up for by only increasing taxes on $1MM incomes.


  18. - City Zen - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:12 pm:

    Does Martwick’s plan include separate brackets for single vs married? Most states do this.


  19. - JS Mill - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:16 pm:

    =“What we’ve heard and read so far is that Pritzker wants to tax and spend the state to greatness…raising taxes is no cure-all. It’s a move that will drive away even more employers, jobs and residents.”=

    I would like to see evidence of these statements.

    =House is on sale. Heading to Michigan. 4.25% flat income tax, 6% sales tax=

    Enjoy. And by enjoy I mean enjoy lower wages and higher expenses. You want the road in front of your house repaired? You will pay for it. Personally. Michigan has the most dirt roads this side of the Mississippi as well. Everything is pay to play there.

    You won’t be missed.


  20. - Truthteller - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:18 pm:

    High income families and corporations just got a huge federal income tax break which they neither needed or deserved.
    Asking them to share that windfall with the state to provide essential education, health, and public safety services is entirely in order.
    Naysayers should tell us where they would cut a few billon from the budget and why it’s right to have a tax structure like the one we have now where lower and middle income families spend a higher proportion of their incomes in state and local taxes than do wealthy families


  21. - Streamwood Retiree - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:22 pm:

    Rauner wants to cut taxes for prosperity. Like Kansas?


  22. - Streamwood Retiree - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:31 pm:

    When I lived in Virginia, the nominal rate was three times that of Illinois, but I actually paid less tax because one simply copied the US taxable income over to the (one page) Virginia return, applied the rate, then added 50% for the County/City. my property tax was $300. The neighbors thought it was too high and thought I was lying when I said I paid $1,000 in Lake County. (Obviously a long time ago.)


  23. - Ron - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:37 pm:

    Illinois is tied for the fifth highest state and local tax burden in the nation right now. JB wants to increase the tax burden on a dwindling population. I’m sure thisthis will turn out well.


  24. - Ron - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:39 pm:

    Other than a protected political and public sector, we get very little for that tax burden.


  25. - Anonymous - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:41 pm:

    Kansas was never near the top in tax burdens though.


  26. - Ron - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:44 pm:

    Facts matter, other than to tax and spenders apparently.


  27. - titan - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:55 pm:

    Wouldn’t the graduated income tax rate require a constitutional amendment?

    SECTION 2. NON-PROPERTY TAXES - CLASSIFICATION,
    EXEMPTIONS, DEDUCTIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CREDITS

    In any law classifying the subjects or objects of non-property taxes or fees, the classes shall be reasonable and the subjects and objects within each class shall be taxed uniformly. Exemptions, deductions, credits, refunds and other allowances shall be reasonable.
    (Source: Illinois Constitution.)


  28. - Silicon Prairie - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 12:55 pm:

    JB needs to show us a plan on his new taxes. Keep in mind JB also supports repealing the state constitution amendment on Rent Control and that is a bad idea. It has been proven in NY and SF to significantly reduce the quantity of rental units.His plan is going to have to deal with some sort of property tax relief if he raises income taxes on 75% of the state


  29. - Anonymous - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 1:03 pm:

    Let JB. tell the people of Illinois how he plans on dealing with huge deficit and his plans for increasing spending. Let the voter judge.


  30. - Ron - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 1:10 pm:

    Silicon, don’t hold your breath.


  31. - A Jack - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 1:32 pm:

    0% to poverty line
    3% to middle income line
    5% to upper middle income line
    7% above upper middle income line

    With a stipulation that rates will drop when pensions are 80% funded.


  32. - The Dude Abides - Friday, Mar 23, 18 @ 2:00 pm:

    For everyone who thinks we can manage with our current income tax rates my question to you is what do you propose we do to pay off the debts that have been run up by our current administration? Specify where the cuts, if any, need to come from.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - HDem news
* Question of the day
* Pritzker in Peoria for two big announcements
* Get your (flu) shots, people
* State's eviction moratorium will expire on October 3
* Rep. Welter files pro-virus transmission bill
* *** UPDATED x1 *** Pritzker issued EO late Friday in response to school quarantine lawsuits
* Today's must-read: Six Rules That Will Define Our Second Pandemic Winter
* Open thread
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller