Capitol Fax.com - Your Illinois News Radar » Question of the day
SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax      Advertise Here      Mobile Version     Exclusive Subscriber Content     Updated Posts    Contact
CapitolFax.com
To subscribe to Capitol Fax, click here.
Question of the day

Friday, May 18, 2018

* From the governor’s recent amendatory veto statement on HB1468

One recommendation of the School Safety Working Group that was well-received by the Legislative Public Safety Working Group and that requires legislation is amending the County School Facilities Sales Tax statute to expand the authorized uses of sales tax revenue approved by local referendum. The tax is currently restricted to improvements in physical facilities, such as locks and security doors. I ask that it be amended to include the hiring of school resource officers or mental health workers based on local determination of local need.

The governor mentioned this provision today when asked about the latest school shooting. So, he’s cleverly given himself some political cover on this topic during the ongoing gun debates.

* From the original statute that the governor wants to amend, with emphasis added by me

In any county, a tax shall be imposed upon all persons engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property, other than personal property titled or registered with an agency of this State’s government, at retail in the county on the gross receipts from the sales made in the course of business to provide revenue to be used exclusively for school facility purposes if a proposition for the tax has been submitted to the electors of that county and approved by a majority of those voting on the question as provided in subsection (c). The tax under this Section shall be imposed only in one-quarter percent increments and may not exceed 1%.

* The Question: Should local school infrastructure sales tax money be used to hire school resource officers and/or mental health workers? Take the poll and then explain your answer in comments, please.


polls & surveys

- Posted by Rich Miller        

21 Comments
  1. - 47th Ward - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 2:42 pm:

    We used to call proposeals like this “unfunded mandates.” Although, in fairness, this isn’t really a mandate, it simply grants permission.

    OTOH, since he keeps blocking all of the gun control bills put forward by the General Assembly, it’s clear he doesn’t believe the state should help protect children in schools from gun violence. I guess he sees that as a local issue.


  2. - Perrid - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 2:47 pm:

    I don’t see any downside to this. as 47th Ward mentions this just gives options to local districts, which I don’t see any problem with. I wish and hope most districts choose to invest in more outreach to stop kids from deciding to commit murder rather than hiring officers to shoot them when they do decide to murder, but more resources to do either of those things is not a bad thing.


  3. - Juice - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 2:51 pm:

    More flexibility is good. But I suspect that most districts that have the tax use the revenues to cover debt service, so my guess that most will not take advantage of this provision. (And it could weaken some of the bonds that would be issued since the revenues can now be used for multiple purposes instead of just capital.)


  4. - Jocko - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 2:59 pm:

    Voted “No” to the school safety lockbox amendment…given how the transportation one worked out.


  5. - Amalia - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:07 pm:

    we need more mental health help for school children. including because apparently parents don’t lock up their guns and when their kid goes to school every day in a dark trench coat in the Texas heat it does not ring a bell that something might be wrong with him (it’s virtually always him, another issue). protect everyone because parents are far too often not responsible for their kid’s mental health and it may endanger others.


  6. - Try-4-Truth - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:09 pm:

    I voted “no”. Here’s why. 1.) This is something the state should be investing in to begin with. Local governments are stretched too thin (especially smaller ones) to be able to add more taxes to fund non-educational line items. 2.) Sales taxes disproportionally affect lower income families. 3.) Here, in Rockford, if Winnebago County passed this, our sales taxes will be over 10%. Way too high.


  7. - Leigh John-Ella - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:09 pm:

    If Rauner persists in dumping more school pension costs on local taxpayers, should schools also be able to access this fund to help pay those increased pension costs?


  8. - Roman - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:23 pm:

    BTW, the tax cannot be imposed in cook county and it has to be approved by referendum by the voters in each county.


  9. - RNUG - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:24 pm:

    Actually not a bad idea. Gives the school districts options.


  10. - Roman - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:24 pm:

    Here’s a link:
    http://www.revenue.state.il.us/localgovernment/Overview/HowDisbursed/PTAX-1002-8-C.pdf


  11. - Try-4-Truth - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:28 pm:

    === - Roman - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:23 pm:

    BTW, the tax cannot be imposed in cook county and it has to be approved by referendum by the voters in each county.===

    Right, and that’s another reason this is a bad idea. It will create yet another way that schools are funded inadequately.


  12. - Undiscovered country - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:36 pm:

    juice raises an interesting point. CAN the funds be diverted to non-infrastructure purposes if the funds are promised for issued bonds? I’m guessing Chapman and Cutler are doing some research as we speak.


  13. - VanillaMan - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:42 pm:

    Absolutely.
    Empowers schools to individualize each school’s needs.


  14. - My Button is Broke... - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:46 pm:

    I voted no, unless the school districts go back to the voters. In the counties that approved this tax, the schools sold the tax increase for infrastructure improvements not for salaries. So for counties with the tax already in place, go back to the voters for approval. In counties that haven’t already approved the tax, sure, just change the referendum language. It might even help schools get the tax passed.


  15. - Anon - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:47 pm:

    I don’t think Illinois needs more regressive taxes.

    I voted no.

    If the state wants more resource officers and more mental health professionals, they should raise the income tax in order to pay for it.

    The last thing a school district needs in a poor southern Illinois county is an inadequate tax to fund a service.


  16. - JS Mill - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:55 pm:

    The CSFST law was written very narrowly for a reason. They did not want this money used for anything other than facilities and it should stay that way.

    Unlike Iowa where the tax was approved statewide, this is county by county meaning many districts would not have access to this money. This funding should come from the state or through a separate levy source that could require a local referendum.

    BTW- when Rauner was running for governor he was critical of the County Facility Sales Tax at a small event I was present for, so kinda funny he now wants to use this money.


  17. - Bogey Golfer - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 3:57 pm:

    Infrastructure improvements are infrequent, but needed, such as roof repairs, HVAC replacement, accessibility improvements and parking lots. Resource officers and mental health workers should be part of the school/district employee listing.


  18. - SSL - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 4:01 pm:

    Voted yes. It should be funded anyway, but the urgency in dealing with mental health issues for teenagers means we can’t wait. If this mechanism prevents one school attack it’s worth it.


  19. - DarkDante - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 4:10 pm:

    Voted “Yes.” More flexibility in budgeting is, in general, a good thing.


  20. - truthbetold - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 4:15 pm:

    While i think SRO and Mental health workers are important and necessary, the tax legislation was written this way for a reason. Rauner should push for relaxation of the tax cap legislation to allow for district by district additional levies for purposes such as this. It would be surprising to see a referendum defeated if it was intended for this expenditure, especially after events in Fla and TX.


  21. - DuPage - Friday, May 18, 18 @ 4:26 pm:

    Yes for security doors, alarms, security cameras, all doors secured as emergency exits only except one entrance, where a police officer could be stationed. As for the salary of the police officer, NO. That should be at least partly paid by the police dept. or county sheriff. Part could be paid by the state, with a matching school amount paid out of the funds used for operations. Construction money should not be used for salaries.


Sorry, comments for this post are now closed.


* Downstate newspapers appear to be picking the lesser of two evils
* Caption contest!
* Plaintiffs holding press conference today
* Maybe have a long chat with the governor about this?
* Pritzker campaign touts party-building money
* Learn from this, please
* SUBSCRIBERS ONLY - Today's edition of Capitol Fax (use all CAPS in password)
* *** LIVE COVERAGE ***
* Yesterday's stories

Support CapitolFax.com
Visit our advertisers...

...............

...............

...............

...............

...............
<


Loading


Main Menu
Home
Illinois
YouTube
Pundit rankings
Obama
Subscriber Content
Durbin
Burris
Blagojevich Trial
Advertising
Updated Posts
Polls

Archives
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004

Blog*Spot Archives
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005

Syndication

RSS Feed 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress




Hosted by MCS SUBSCRIBE to Capitol Fax Advertise Here Mobile Version Contact Rich Miller